NuevaVida
Posts: 6707
Joined: 8/5/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: aromanholiday What I actually think is that any master who does not conduct his or her enslavement of a consensual slave using methods that actually work to increase the enslavement and avoiding practices that undermine the slave's understanding of really being owned, is, in the long run, doing both the "master" and the "slave" a dangerous disservice. The master is fostering a lie: a gentle pleasant lie, but a lie nonetheless. The lie is that what is being experienced is genuine, deep, real enslavement. By fostering this lie, he encourages the submissive dependent upon him and trusting in his truth to lie to herself about the reality of their relationship. Such self-deception can go on for quite some time, even decades, until one day other experiences cause the "slave" to wake up and realize that she's just spent 10, 15, or 20 years living a lie; that she entirely lost sight of her vision and settled for a comfortable, loving, safe, easy second best; that she was never really enslaved at all, she only thought she was. The horror of such a realization after a huge chunk of your adult life is gone, the realization that you spent it living a lie rather than pursuing your ultimate goal and that you are no more closer to that beloved goal (of being truly enslaved) than you were before you started is one of the more painful experiences a person who needs to do something, such as become a slave, can undergo in life, particularly if they are reaching a point where their age has greatly narrowed their possibilities for the realization of their "dream," or, as I think of it, "what they must do before they die." Having lived a lie in the past, I can attest that it's an awful realization, yet can be successfully used as a springboard into an amazing path ahead, of self awareness and self truth. It's what one does with it. However, your posts were centered on using pain as the only suitable method to attain the owner's goal, and I don't see you speaking to that in this response to me. Would you agree that humans are multidimensional beings, and given one's particular history, emotional make up, and triggers, a "one size fits all" approach would not be appropriate? Did I misread the above when you spoke of the master's "nerve to teach you with pain?" Because I wasn't inquiring about self truths and living lies; I was inquiring about your assertion that pain is the only road to achieve the end result. Since you refer to pain as "the prime and most holy of teachers," I'm curious as to how you think this applies to all humans. quote:
To take a general message such as the above personally, particularly a message aimed, as I said in the earlier post, to a very narrow (but still unknown and general) audience, says a great deal about the reader and virtually nothing about the writer, other than the latter's desire to communicate an experience that has been very important and devastating in her life to whomsoever can hear it. I have no idea at all where you factored in that something was taken personally here. Did my response indicate I had done that? I assure you, nothing you say here has been or will be taken personally. Don't confuse a comparison of your logic to my experience as taking something personally, it's simply a rebuttal of your ideas. A discussion. On a discussion board. quote:
Why is it particularly surprising to you that I might think that someone who does not want to enslave somebody as deeply as is humanly possible and someone who doesn't want to be enslaved as deeply as is humanly possible might actually be a dominant and submissive involved in an extreme control relationship who are enamored of the words "master" and "slave," but who are not genuinely master and slave? Where was surprise indicated? Nothing here surprises me. I was questioning what you wrote, because I don't agree with it. There is still an unanswered question out there, "Are you saying those owners are tiptoeing around their slaves' pride? Are you saying physical pain is the best way to teach a slave, and without it, those owners are not optimally operating?" quote:
The few masters and slaves that I have known who were genuinely what they claimed to be were always deeply interested in increasing the intensity of their awareness of one party's enslavement to the other, because they wanted so badly to have as genuine an experience of actual mastery and enslavement as is possible to have. That sort of passion is quite rare but in my experience it is a solid earmark of the reality of any master/slave relationship--or a sign of its potential. I encounter this seldom, but I have encountered it enough to know that despite their rarity, actual master-slave relationships truly exist. They just aren't what I see most bdsm people defining them as. Ah, I see this is where we differ in where we place importance. I'm not interested in living up to a label. I'm enjoying the absolute joy that is in my life, with a man who has authority over me. Our focus is on attaining the most fulfilling life possible, together, whether that means achieving a "real master/slave relationship" or something others might scoff at. Ironically, when I did discover I was living a lie, it was when I was doing exactly as you have described above. So we're obviously looking at this from two very different angles. I don't care if anyone thinks of me as his slave, a wanna be slave, a non-slave, a goofball, a poor mislead little soul, or the greatest woman on earth since time began. He rules me, I do as he says, and we're thrilled with the results. Your "one size fits all" criteria would be a recipe for disaster for me, and actually has been, in my past. I'm simply disagreeing with you. Please don't take that personally, either.
_____________________________
Live Simply. Love Generously. Care Deeply. Speak Kindly.
|