Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/19/2011 9:26:26 PM   
porcelaine


Posts: 5020
Joined: 7/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: aromanholiday

I am sorry if the smell of that thickening soup offends (smile). But since the words clearly don't apply to you and your experiences, you should probably pay them no heed, no? My hope was not that everyone or even that most people would accept what I wrote as a self-evident truth, but rather that a person facing something like what I have faced will find use in what was said.


You draw some interesting conclusions from a statement that never posited offense. Perhaps the stench has impeded your discernment just a tad? And for future reference, please refrain from tongue and cheek suggestions regarding what 'should' be overlooked. This isn't an intimate discussion, but a public venue where all are welcome to respond according to preference. i needn't accept nor approve of your truth to share an opinion. N'est-ce pas?

Namaste,

~porcelaine


_____________________________

His will; my fate.

(in reply to aromanholiday)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/21/2011 10:09:10 PM   
aromanholiday


Posts: 307
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline
"You draw some interesting conclusions from a statement that never posited offense."

Actually, I think I draw some obvious conclusions from a statement that was a little pompous. Instead of asking me what I meant by any part of my statement, you go instantly into lecture mode. The truth is that you have imagined a contradiction where none actually existed, though I will make one attempt to reexplain and belabor the logic, which, I expect, is already quite obvious to those who do not have personal issues around the content of the statement.

My point was that when a slave has the right attitude, that she is there to serve him, and he is not there to pander to or gently encourage her vanity or even her perception of herself as most reasonable and self-policing, then correction from the master and owner, even quite harsh physical correction, is welcomed with open arms because of the way it provides the slave with the direction she needs to better align herself with his will. When you hold the specific frame of mind suggested by the sentence you quoted, then physical suffering in order to learn a lesson is not something that a slave's ego finds offensive or something that hurts her feelings. Instead, it's viewed as practical, commonsense, in fact, a given. From the beginnings of human thought, people have learned quickest and best from pain. It the prime and most holy of teachers. I personally encourage and desire such learning in myself, as I know I will get to where I want to be much faster with it. Any individual who is willing to risk alienating you, making your resentful, offending you, hurting your feelings, or causing other sorts of bad feelings or confusion because he had the nerve to teach you with pain deserves, in my opinion, nothing less than one's most profuse thanks for administering the push that allows your to progress so much faster than could ever be done if he had to tiptoe around your pride over learning intellectually without "primitive" forms of corporal punishment that are clearly "beneath" you.

I am sorry if the idea of harsh pain or sharp scolding given with no intellectual explanations or respect for one's ability to self-police offends your idea of yourself as a purely intellectual learner, but to me, these actions are signs of a master--or a mistress--who is truly worth serving under, as such an individual has the balls to not spend years kowtowing to a slave's ego but rather uses whatever methods are quickest and most efficient (even if subjectively rough on you at the time) to accomplish his or her goal: leading you into deeper and more intense enslavement. These tried-and-true methods really do work while, quite frequently, the deep respect that some "slaves" demand for themselves doesn't work at all in the long run to increase their ability to serve.

Now, since I have substantiated my words and reexplained them in more basic terms, perhaps you would care to do the same? In particular, would you mind backing up the following brash statement with some clear evidence of your own? "This statement does not coalesce with the comments that followed. As a matter of fact, your remarks almost oppose what you've indicated beforehand."


_____________________________

"Isn't it odd how we misunderstand the hidden unity of kindness and cruelty?"

My profile is not turned off. It is broken and I am too lazy to make a new one.

(in reply to porcelaine)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/21/2011 11:24:58 PM   
NuevaVida


Posts: 6707
Joined: 8/5/2008
Status: offline
I realize your post was to porcelaine, but some things you said caught my eye and I want to comment on them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: aromanholiday

My point was that when a slave has the right attitude, that she is there to serve him, and he is not there to pander to or gently encourage her vanity or even her perception of herself as most reasonable and self-policing, then correction from the master and owner, even quite harsh physical correction, is welcomed with open arms because of the way it provides the slave with the direction she needs to better align herself with his will. When you hold the specific frame of mind suggested by the sentence you quoted, then physical suffering in order to learn a lesson is not something that a slave's ego finds offensive or something that hurts her feelings. Instead, it's viewed as practical, commonsense, in fact, a given. From the beginnings of human thought, people have learned quickest and best from pain. It the prime and most holy of teachers. I personally encourage and desire such learning in myself, as I know I will get to where I want to be much faster with it. Any individual who is willing to risk alienating you, making your resentful, offending you, hurting your feelings, or causing other sorts of bad feelings or confusion because he had the nerve to teach you with pain deserves, in my opinion, nothing less than one's most profuse thanks for administering the push that allows your to progress so much faster than could ever be done if he had to tiptoe around your pride over learning intellectually without "primitive" forms of corporal punishment that are clearly "beneath" you.


I'm wondering who exactly are you speaking of, in these general terms.  Because in my relationship, my attitude is exactly where he wants it to be, and it differs from what you say is the "right attitude" in "a slave."  In many ways, albeit subtle, he serves me, by the way he cares for me.  And in other ways, he does encourage my vanity. He enjoys it.  And he gets to decide what level it rises to, and what he can do with it once it's there.  He's the one who owns it, after all.

As for the other sentence I highlighted, I'd suggest that risking alienation, resentment, hurt feelings and confusion is not every owner's desire.  But I'm unclear if you are addressing this "you" strictly to porcelaine, or again speaking for the masses.  There are many, many dynamics that are not punishment dynamics, after all.  Are you saying those owners are tiptoeing around their slaves' pride?  Are you saying physical pain is the best way to teach a slave, and without it, those owners are not optimally operating? 

For myself personally, far more creative ways than pain are used to get through to me.  Shooting a message through the heart to make a fast and intense point, for me, is far more productive than a cane or whip to make a point.  While he may at times utilize both, the physical pain is merely the underlining of a sentence that has already made its point.

quote:


I am sorry if the idea of harsh pain or sharp scolding given with no intellectual explanations or respect for one's ability to self-police offends your idea of yourself as a purely intellectual learner, but to me, these actions are signs of a master--or a mistress--who is truly worth serving under, as such an individual has the balls to not spend years kowtowing to a slave's ego but rather uses whatever methods are quickest and most efficient (even if subjectively rough on you at the time) to accomplish his or her goal: leading you into deeper and more intense enslavement. These tried-and-true methods really do work while, quite frequently, the deep respect that some "slaves" demand for themselves doesn't work at all in the long run to increase their ability to serve.


Again, perhaps these words are aimed strictly at porcelaine, but it's difficult not to infer from them that you believe any owner who does not conduct his/her teachings in the way you describe is not worth serving.  I wondered if you meant not worth YOU serving, personally, but your use of the word "you" in the sentence above seems to imply you are speaking in generalities.  In which case, I disagree.  Then again, you assume the goal is to lead one into a "deeper and more intense enslavement" but I am doubtful this is the key goal for all owners.

Just some thoughts from an observer here.  What I am reading in your post does not apply in my own enslavement, nor to the enslavement of many others I know personally.  While I understand this may be your own belief as to what works in your world, your words reflect some universal one-true-wayism that I just can't sink my teeth into.


_____________________________

Live Simply. Love Generously. Care Deeply. Speak Kindly.



(in reply to aromanholiday)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/22/2011 1:16:49 AM   
porcelaine


Posts: 5020
Joined: 7/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: aromanholiday

Actually, I think I draw some obvious conclusions from a statement that was a little pompous. Instead of asking me what I meant by any part of my statement, you go instantly into lecture mode. The truth is that you have imagined a contradiction where none actually existed, though I will make one attempt to reexplain and belabor the logic, which, I expect, is already quite obvious to those who do not have personal issues around the content of the statement.


Greetings,

It would appear that you are guilty of the same behavior you accused me of. Which is quite strange for one that is presumably new to the board. Unless of course you're a reincarnated entity perhaps? i don't typically observe such pointed verbiage from newcomers on this site. While you may disagree with the perspective drawn, the passive aggressive antics displayed are rather unflattering in all truth. It's almost comical that you would presume to judge another person's character. Particularly since i'm not inclined to be inflammatory in my manner of speech.

In fact, the more i read your comments the stranger they appear. In particular the continued references to offense. How could a nameless faceless entity that has no bearing on my reality be remotely offensive? The supposition is very odd for an individual i've never encountered in this medium. But allow me to be direct so there's no confusion and we won't find it necessary to have this exchange anymore. No, i will not explain. As you're quite capable of deducing and drawing conclusions all on your lonesome. i'll allow my original comments to remain as is and you're welcome to marinate upon them according to your heart's content.

i'm certain that your brand of slavery and all the nuances it involves works perfectly well for you and yours. And i'm happy to attest the same and have been blessed to aid others in their respective paths. And unlike some, i see little need to partake in a tete a tete that does not enhance my presence or the positive stance i prefer to maintain. It detracts from my beauty and mindset in a manner that is unacceptable.

Namaste,

~porcelaine


_____________________________

His will; my fate.

(in reply to aromanholiday)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/22/2011 3:07:20 PM   
diablarosa


Posts: 63
Joined: 10/3/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: porcelaine

i don't typically observe such pointed verbiage from newcomers on this site.


WTF... what? Newcomers can't be articulate? I guess the only ones that can be have paddles over their names, then? 8-|


"Particularly since i'm not inclined to be inflammatory in my manner of speech."

Not sure if you realize this, but you DO seem a little full of yourself. Maybe people are mistaking that for being inflammatory? My guess.

(in reply to porcelaine)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/25/2011 6:07:15 PM   
aromanholiday


Posts: 307
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline

"It would appear that you are guilty of the same behavior you accused me of."

I demand you prove this bald statement. Once again I insist you back up your brassy declaration with some actual evidence, but before you do, stop being so impossibly vague and tell us all what exactly this behavior of yours is that I am supposed to be guilty of emulating?


"Which is quite strange for one that is presumably new to the board. Unless of course you're a reincarnated entity perhaps?"

I know, we newbies aren't supposed to "research" a place or its occupants prior to or concurrent with posting in it. I mean, that would be expressing intelligent and careful foresight and everybody knows new posters are either total idiots or secret people who are Out To Get You! Only you should be capable of such craftiness, eh Porcelaine?


"No, i will not explain. As you're quite capable of deducing and drawing conclusions all on your lonesome. i'll allow my original comments to remain as is and you're welcome to marinate upon them according to your heart's content."

The old "I can't think of any possible way to back up my brassy unsubstantiated statements so instead I'll just pretend that it is totally beneath my grand superior self to provide clear evidence for the proof of my arguments" ploy only works in the most naive of circles. Surely you are aware of this? But perhaps you are not, or you would not have offered such overwhelming evidence that you are truly speaking out of your ass (or, to put it less crudely, that you are used to simply declaring something is self-evidently so without ever having to substantiate it with careful argument or, heaven forbid, actual experience or evidence).


_____________________________

"Isn't it odd how we misunderstand the hidden unity of kindness and cruelty?"

My profile is not turned off. It is broken and I am too lazy to make a new one.

(in reply to porcelaine)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/25/2011 6:10:00 PM   
aromanholiday


Posts: 307
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: diablarosa


quote:

ORIGINAL: porcelaine

i don't typically observe such pointed verbiage from newcomers on this site.


WTF... what? Newcomers can't be articulate? I guess the only ones that can be have paddles over their names, then? 8-|


"Particularly since i'm not inclined to be inflammatory in my manner of speech."

Not sure if you realize this, but you DO seem a little full of yourself. Maybe people are mistaking that for being inflammatory? My guess.


Thank you for expressing this. Needless to say, I agree with you.

_____________________________

"Isn't it odd how we misunderstand the hidden unity of kindness and cruelty?"

My profile is not turned off. It is broken and I am too lazy to make a new one.

(in reply to diablarosa)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/25/2011 6:23:42 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: diablarosa


quote:

ORIGINAL: porcelaine

i don't typically observe such pointed verbiage from newcomers on this site.


WTF... what? Newcomers can't be articulate? I guess the only ones that can be have paddles over their names, then? 8-|


"Particularly since i'm not inclined to be inflammatory in my manner of speech."

Not sure if you realize this, but you DO seem a little full of yourself. Maybe people are mistaking that for being inflammatory? My guess.

Let me attempt to translate porcelaine-ish to English - she suspects aromanholiday to be a new account of an old poster because what aromanholiday is saying doesn't sound to her like typical noob dialog.

porcelaine does have an interesting way of constructing sentences, which can make her prose difficult to decipher, but her Namaste feels sincere.

(in reply to diablarosa)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/25/2011 7:05:22 PM   
aromanholiday


Posts: 307
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline
"Again, perhaps these words are aimed strictly at porcelaine, but it's difficult not to infer from them that you believe any owner who does not conduct his/her teachings in the way you describe is not worth serving. I wondered if you meant not worth YOU serving, personally, but your use of the word "you" in the sentence above seems to imply you are speaking in generalities."

What I actually think is that any master who does not conduct his or her enslavement of a consensual slave using methods that actually work to increase the enslavement and avoiding practices that undermine the slave's understanding of really being owned, is, in the long run, doing both the "master" and the "slave" a dangerous disservice. The master is fostering a lie: a gentle pleasant lie, but a lie nonetheless. The lie is that what is being experienced is genuine, deep, real enslavement. By fostering this lie, he encourages the submissive dependent upon him and trusting in his truth to lie to herself about the reality of their relationship. Such self-deception can go on for quite some time, even decades, until one day other experiences cause the "slave" to wake up and realize that she's just spent 10, 15, or 20 years living a lie; that she entirely lost sight of her vision and settled for a comfortable, loving, safe, easy second best; that she was never really enslaved at all, she only thought she was. The horror of such a realization after a huge chunk of your adult life is gone, the realization that you spent it living a lie rather than pursuing your ultimate goal and that you are no more closer to that beloved goal (of being truly enslaved) than you were before you started is one of the more painful experiences a person who needs to do something, such as become a slave, can undergo in life, particularly if they are reaching a point where their age has greatly narrowed their possibilities for the realization of their "dream," or, as I think of it, "what they must do before they die."

To take a general message such as the above personally, particularly a message aimed, as I said in the earlier post, to a very narrow (but still unknown and general) audience, says a great deal about the reader and virtually nothing about the writer, other than the latter's desire to communicate an experience that has been very important and devastating in her life to whomsoever can hear it.

Why is it particularly surprising to you that I might think that someone who does not want to enslave somebody as deeply as is humanly possible and someone who doesn't want to be enslaved as deeply as is humanly possible might actually be a dominant and submissive involved in an extreme control relationship who are enamored of the words "master" and "slave," but who are not genuinely master and slave? The few masters and slaves that I have known who were genuinely what they claimed to be were always deeply interested in increasing the intensity of their awareness of one party's enslavement to the other, because they wanted so badly to have as genuine an experience of actual mastery and enslavement as is possible to have. That sort of passion is quite rare but in my experience it is a solid earmark of the reality of any master/slave relationship--or a sign of its potential. I encounter this seldom, but I have encountered it enough to know that despite their rarity, actual master-slave relationships truly exist. They just aren't what I see most bdsm people defining them as.

_____________________________

"Isn't it odd how we misunderstand the hidden unity of kindness and cruelty?"

My profile is not turned off. It is broken and I am too lazy to make a new one.

(in reply to NuevaVida)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/25/2011 7:59:14 PM   
NuevaVida


Posts: 6707
Joined: 8/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: aromanholiday

What I actually think is that any master who does not conduct his or her enslavement of a consensual slave using methods that actually work to increase the enslavement and avoiding practices that undermine the slave's understanding of really being owned, is, in the long run, doing both the "master" and the "slave" a dangerous disservice. The master is fostering a lie: a gentle pleasant lie, but a lie nonetheless. The lie is that what is being experienced is genuine, deep, real enslavement. By fostering this lie, he encourages the submissive dependent upon him and trusting in his truth to lie to herself about the reality of their relationship. Such self-deception can go on for quite some time, even decades, until one day other experiences cause the "slave" to wake up and realize that she's just spent 10, 15, or 20 years living a lie; that she entirely lost sight of her vision and settled for a comfortable, loving, safe, easy second best; that she was never really enslaved at all, she only thought she was. The horror of such a realization after a huge chunk of your adult life is gone, the realization that you spent it living a lie rather than pursuing your ultimate goal and that you are no more closer to that beloved goal (of being truly enslaved) than you were before you started is one of the more painful experiences a person who needs to do something, such as become a slave, can undergo in life, particularly if they are reaching a point where their age has greatly narrowed their possibilities for the realization of their "dream," or, as I think of it, "what they must do before they die."



Having lived a lie in the past, I can attest that it's an awful realization, yet can be successfully used as a springboard into an amazing path ahead, of self awareness and self truth.  It's what one does with it.

However, your posts were centered on using pain as the only suitable method to attain the owner's goal, and I don't see you speaking to that in this response to me.  Would you agree that humans are multidimensional beings, and given one's particular history, emotional make up, and triggers, a "one size fits all" approach would not be appropriate?  Did I misread the above when you spoke of the master's "nerve to teach you with pain?" Because I wasn't inquiring about self truths and living lies; I was inquiring about your assertion that pain is the only road to achieve the end result.  Since you refer to pain as "the prime and most holy of teachers," I'm curious as to how you think this applies to all humans.

quote:



To take a general message such as the above personally, particularly a message aimed, as I said in the earlier post, to a very narrow (but still unknown and general) audience, says a great deal about the reader and virtually nothing about the writer, other than the latter's desire to communicate an experience that has been very important and devastating in her life to whomsoever can hear it.

 

I have no idea at all where you factored in that something was taken personally here.  Did my response indicate I had done that?  I assure you, nothing you say here has been or will be taken personally.  Don't confuse a comparison of your logic to my experience as taking something personally, it's simply a rebuttal of your ideas.  A discussion. On a discussion board. 


quote:


Why is it particularly surprising to you that I might think that someone who does not want to enslave somebody as deeply as is humanly possible and someone who doesn't want to be enslaved as deeply as is humanly possible might actually be a dominant and submissive involved in an extreme control relationship who are enamored of the words "master" and "slave," but who are not genuinely master and slave?


Where was surprise indicated?  Nothing here surprises me.  I was questioning what you wrote, because I don't agree with it.  There is still an unanswered question out there, "Are you saying those owners are tiptoeing around their slaves' pride?  Are you saying physical pain is the best way to teach a slave, and without it, those owners are not optimally operating?" 

quote:


The few masters and slaves that I have known who were genuinely what they claimed to be were always deeply interested in increasing the intensity of their awareness of one party's enslavement to the other, because they wanted so badly to have as genuine an experience of actual mastery and enslavement as is possible to have. That sort of passion is quite rare but in my experience it is a solid earmark of the reality of any master/slave relationship--or a sign of its potential. I encounter this seldom, but I have encountered it enough to know that despite their rarity, actual master-slave relationships truly exist. They just aren't what I see most bdsm people defining them as.


Ah, I see this is where we differ in where we place importance.  I'm not interested in living up to a label.  I'm enjoying the absolute joy that is in my life, with a man who has authority over me.  Our focus is on attaining the most fulfilling life possible, together, whether that means achieving a "real master/slave relationship" or something others might scoff at.  Ironically, when I did discover I was living a lie, it was when I was doing exactly as you have described above.  So we're obviously looking at this from two very different angles.

I don't care if anyone thinks of me as his slave, a wanna be slave, a non-slave, a goofball, a poor mislead little soul, or the greatest  woman on earth since time began.  He rules me, I do as he says, and we're thrilled with the results.  Your "one size fits all" criteria would be a recipe for disaster for me, and actually has been, in my past.

I'm simply disagreeing with you.  Please don't take that personally, either.


_____________________________

Live Simply. Love Generously. Care Deeply. Speak Kindly.



(in reply to aromanholiday)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/25/2011 8:23:38 PM   
NocturnalStalker


Posts: 3858
Joined: 12/4/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: diablarosa


quote:

ORIGINAL: porcelaine

i don't typically observe such pointed verbiage from newcomers on this site.


WTF... what? Newcomers can't be articulate? I guess the only ones that can be have paddles over their names, then? 8-|


"Particularly since i'm not inclined to be inflammatory in my manner of speech."

Not sure if you realize this, but you DO seem a little full of yourself. Maybe people are mistaking that for being inflammatory? My guess.


Oh you're going to have fun reading my posts.


_____________________________

"The road I walk is paved in gold to glorify my platinum soul."

(in reply to diablarosa)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/25/2011 9:21:44 PM   
BitaTruble


Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: aromanholiday

When you hold the specific frame of mind suggested by the sentence you quoted, then physical suffering in order to learn a lesson is not something that a slave's ego finds offensive or something that hurts her feelings.


That could work well for those who actually learn lessons from physical suffering. Not everyone does, slave or not. Some kids actually learn by listening so when the Mom says don't touch the stove, it's hot.. they never touch the stove. They learned by listening.

Then there are those who touch the stove, discovered that it was, indeed, quite hot and never touched the stove again. They learned the lesson as well.

There are also those who saw someone else touch the stove, saw their pain and never touched the stove. They learned by seeing the consequence.

Then you have those who touched the stove, felt it was hot.. then kept touching it. The pain did not teach the lesson.

That's a fail. When all you remember is the punishment and not the reason for it.. that's a fail, too.

The quickest and most efficient way to teach is subjective and would be well-based on how an particular individual learns which may or may not coincide with how someone wants to teach.

MMV


_____________________________

"Oh, so it's just like
Rock, paper, scissors."

He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."


(in reply to aromanholiday)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/25/2011 10:26:40 PM   
aromanholiday


Posts: 307
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NuevaVida

However, your posts were centered on using pain as the only suitable method to attain the owner's goal, and I don't see you speaking to that in this response to me.  Would you agree that humans are multidimensional beings, and given one's particular history, emotional make up, and triggers, a "one size fits all" approach would not be appropriate?  Did I misread the above when you spoke of the master's "nerve to teach you with pain?" Because I wasn't inquiring about self truths and living lies; I was inquiring about your assertion that pain is the only road to achieve the end result.  Since you refer to pain as "the prime and most holy of teachers," I'm curious as to how you think this applies to all humans.

There is still an unanswered question out there, "Are you saying those owners are tiptoeing around their slaves' pride? Are you saying physical pain is the best way to teach a slave, and without it, those owners are not optimally operating?"

I have no idea at all where you factored in that something was taken personally here.  Did my response indicate I had done that?  I assure you, nothing you say here has been or will be taken personally.  Don't confuse a comparison of your logic to my experience as taking something personally, it's simply a rebuttal of your ideas.  A discussion. On a discussion board. 




If this is, as you say, simply a discussion on a discussion board, then why does this feel like an interrogation to me? If this is "just a discussion" on a discussion board then I am certainly free to respond to your post in whatever way I wish. I'm not an Answers Machine that you can kick when it doesn't respond to precisely the exact question you asked. Discussion, NV. NOT interrogation.

I may very well answer the pain question because it is an interesting one to me but the more you demand and push, the more you complain I didn't SPECIFICALLY answer the SPECIFIC question you demanded I answer, the less inclined I am to have anything to do with you.

quote:


I'm simply disagreeing with you. Please don't take that personally, either.


Ah yes, I certainly will not. As long as you don't take my words above personally, too. I'm just stating my honest impressions that your words made on me.


_____________________________

"Isn't it odd how we misunderstand the hidden unity of kindness and cruelty?"

My profile is not turned off. It is broken and I am too lazy to make a new one.

(in reply to NuevaVida)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/25/2011 10:40:42 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: porcelaine
i don't typically observe such pointed verbiage from newcomers on this site.
  You do if they're articulate.  Your ostentatious display of vocabulary is sufficiently impenetrable to make many people wonder what the fuck you're talking about.

Given that the purpose of language is to communicate, you may want to consider the value of tailoring your delivery to the audience.

I came in on the tail end of this thread and backed up to try and discover the terrible comments which must've inspired your outburst, only to discover  a mild personal observation followed by "if it doesn't apply to you, then don't worry about it."

Your defensive reaction is incongruous, especially in one who does her best to portray herself as self-possessed.  In my own blunt fashion, I've simply concluded that some people take longer than others to get over themselves, although I suppose that's a journey we all make in our own good time.  The curse of a decent vocabulary is usually the concomitant arrogance which arises when comparing ourselves to others.  Conquering that and reclaiming a degree of humanity is a worthy goal.

Still, on the positive side, I suppose it's better than watching the usual suspects fling meaningless comments at teen strippers introducing themselves.  The term "fresh meat" assumes new significance in such a place.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to porcelaine)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/25/2011 10:52:45 PM   
NuevaVida


Posts: 6707
Joined: 8/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: aromanholiday


If this is, as you say, simply a discussion on a discussion board, then why does this feel like an interrogation to me? If this is "just a discussion" on a discussion board then I am certainly free to respond to your post in whatever way I wish. I'm not an Answers Machine that you can kick when it doesn't respond to precisely the exact question you asked. Discussion, NV. NOT interrogation.


I can't answer why it feels like an interrogation to you.  It wasn't intended as such. You made general statements which appeared to apply to all  masters and slaves, saying pain was the only way to go to optimally operate.  Disagreeing with this premise and questioning it is not kicking, but how you feel about it is entirely up to you.

quote:


I may very well answer the pain question because it is an interesting one to me but the more you demand and push, the more you complain I didn't SPECIFICALLY answer the SPECIFIC question you demanded I answer, the less inclined I am to have anything to do with you.

I thought it was an important and interesting question.  I don't "demand" you answer it; it's entirely up to you if you do or not.  If asking you clarify and support your comments makes you not want to have anything to do with me, well that's up to you, as well.

quote:



Ah yes, I certainly will not. As long as you don't take my words above personally, too. I'm just stating my honest impressions that your words made on me.


Nothing personal here at all, actually.  I was hoping to understand your stance better. You've made statements that I thought merited questioning.  Questioning those statements has obviously made you uncomfortable, so I'll drop it and move on. 


_____________________________

Live Simply. Love Generously. Care Deeply. Speak Kindly.



(in reply to aromanholiday)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/25/2011 11:05:03 PM   
diablarosa


Posts: 63
Joined: 10/3/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NuevaVida
You've made statements that I thought merited questioning.  Questioning those statements has obviously made you uncomfortable, so I'll drop it and move on. 


Funny. Looks like the other way around from here.

(in reply to NuevaVida)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/25/2011 11:07:15 PM   
diablarosa


Posts: 63
Joined: 10/3/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

quote:

ORIGINAL: porcelaine
i don't typically observe such pointed verbiage from newcomers on this site.
 
You do if they're articulate.  Your ostentatious display of vocabulary is sufficiently impenetrable to make many people wonder what the fuck you're talking about.


Ha. Glad I'm not the only one!

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/25/2011 11:18:16 PM   
NuevaVida


Posts: 6707
Joined: 8/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: diablarosa


quote:

ORIGINAL: NuevaVida
You've made statements that I thought merited questioning.  Questioning those statements has obviously made you uncomfortable, so I'll drop it and move on. 


Funny. Looks like the other way around from here.



That's what's cool about discussion boards - so many points of view and perspectives.  But I'm perfectly comfortable, actually. 

I actually think Bita did a far better job of pointing out differences to the "pain" approach than I did.


< Message edited by NuevaVida -- 4/25/2011 11:25:16 PM >


_____________________________

Live Simply. Love Generously. Care Deeply. Speak Kindly.



(in reply to diablarosa)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/25/2011 11:47:21 PM   
VideoAdminRho


Posts: 2055
Joined: 3/24/2010
Status: offline
Back on topic please, folks.

(in reply to NuevaVida)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? - 4/26/2011 12:18:17 AM   
BitaTruble


Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NuevaVida


I actually think Bita did a far better job of pointing out differences to the "pain" approach than I did. Maybe because she didn't ask any questions, lol.




Thanks dollface.

We are really talking two things different things here. One is the 5 senses. Touch vs ?. I think all of them can be used to teach lessons in their own unique way. Touch rocks, don't get me wrong but so does closing my eyes and just listening to my favorite song. Then there are combinations of senses. Both sight & hearing might be necessary because a particular lesson requires both of those elements to be well-learned.

The other thing is we are not talking about *just* learning a lesson but embracing the will of another. The gist I got was that quick and efficient was the aim and it's my personal experience that quick doesn't much factor into embracing the will of another. It's a process.. it's long term and it takes a great amount of determination and dedication to bend someone to your will so that it is truly and deeply felt and embraced as their own.

Now, if we are talking brain-washing as opposed to embracing.. that's another story. I'm going to nerd out for just a second here and suggest that Star Trek's "Chain of Command" episode would be an excellent source to see an example of the former and Taming of the Shrew a good example of the latter. I'm down for a session of brain-washing on occasion though, so it's all good. :)

~hugs for you and Lord Viktor and my respect to Mister! ~

Celeste

_____________________________

"Oh, so it's just like
Rock, paper, scissors."

He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."


(in reply to NuevaVida)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Personal Service Cluttering Your life? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125