RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


lockedaway -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/9/2011 9:12:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

Wow, subrob, resorting to calling him a moron, just because he's calling it as he sees it and you can't think of anything to come back with..... oh yea, that's right, your satisfaction is he's a moron.  That certainly solves a lot of problems!! [:'(]


Sorry Louve, Subrob is calling Owner a moron for good reason.  The banking meltdown was started by Carter, accelerated drastically by Clinton and was warned about by Bush in 17 speeches/press releases.  For Owner59 to ignore historical fact is moronic and unethical.




Owner59 -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/9/2011 9:16:59 AM)

You wouldn`t be so bothered and replying if there wasn`t some truth there.

Are cons not thrilled and have posted here as such about municipal/state/government jobs being eliminated?



Isn`t "shrinking government", a con-mantra ?



Are you cons following the party line that unions,social programs and welfare are the causes of our money problems?



Is it not you cons who are bending over backwards to give trillion dollar tax breaks to millionaires, hoping some will will "trickle" down ?



The middle/working class has been "trickled" on enough!



Enough of this brown nosing the wealthy thinking they are the answer to our money problems.They fucking caused the great recession.



You think Wall Streeters are losing sleep over that?



Just keep voting against your own interests ,maybe someday it`ll work.




lockedaway -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/9/2011 9:32:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

You wouldn`t be so bothered and replying if there wasn`t some truth there.

Are cons not thrilled and have posted here as such about municipal/state/government jobs being eliminated?



Isn`t "shrinking government", a con-mantra ?



Are you cons following the party line that unions,social programs and welfare are the causes of our money problems?



Is it not you cons who are bending over backwards to give trillion dollar tax breaks to millionaires, hoping some will will "trickle" down ?



The middle/working class has been "trickled" on enough!



Enough of this brown nosing the wealthy thinking they are the answer to our money problems.They fucking caused the great recession.



You think Wall Streeters are losing sleep over that?



Just keep voting against your own interests ,maybe someday it`ll work.



1. Yes.  Government is way too fat.  In my "small" city alone there are 60 ENTIRELY  superfluous jobs that could be eliminated.  Had the current mayor not been re-elected, those jobs would have gone buh-bye!  Instead of those superfluous positions being terminated, he went back on his promise and laid off a bunch of cops.  Nice work.

2.  Yes.  It is also a mantra that anyone other than an idiot would also be echoing.  For every government job, it takes 5 private sector jobs to pay for it; salary, pension, benefits, etc.  A large government PRODUCES nothing.  The government's source of income is its over taxed populace.  In order to grow government, you have to grow the private sector FIRST.  We have grown government while the private sector has shrunk.  We have expanded military actions by getting involved in Lybya.  We have made overtures that we would help bail out Greece.  SUICIDE!  This Socialist fool of a president is killing us.

3. Yes.  They are the cause of some of them, that is for sure.  Unions have helped make the employment environment hostile to business.  The reasons that made unions useful can now be handled by legislation.  Every state should be a right to work state.

4.  There are no tax breaks being given to anyone.  The top bracket is 35% which is an enormous amount to take out of someone's dollar.  Think about it....you get a dollar in New Jersey and before you can even touch it, 35 cents is already spoken for and that leaves you with 65 cents.  Then the state takes 9% which is another 9 cents and that leaves you with 56 cents, then you pay your property taxes and all miscellaneous taxes and you are largely left with lint in your pocket. 

The rest of your post is drivel.  Wall St. didn't cause this problem.  The U.S. government did.  It was Clinton that signed the repeal of the Glass Steagall Act.  It was Clinton that mandated through Janet Reno that 50% of Fannie Mae's paper be shit.  Nope...you are wrong.  Wall St. did what Wall St. has always done; they looked at the change in the law and the opportunities those changes gave them.  The created market vehicles that made some people very rich and some people very poor.  If there was ONE Wall St. firm that you wanted to point your finger at, it would be Goldman Sachs but then look at Goldman Sachs.  How many of its former big wigs have become politicos??  I will give you a hint....Corzine was a big deal at Goldman Sachs.




Louve00 -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/9/2011 9:36:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

Wow, subrob, resorting to calling him a moron, just because he's calling it as he sees it and you can't think of anything to come back with..... oh yea, that's right, your satisfaction is he's a moron.  That certainly solves a lot of problems!! [:'(]


Sorry Louve, Subrob is calling Owner a moron for good reason.  The banking meltdown was started by Carter, accelerated drastically by Clinton and was warned about by Bush in 17 speeches/press releases.  For Owner59 to ignore historical fact is moronic and unethical.



Yep, yep...I've heard it all before.  Only you go way back to Carter starting this mess.  As if no republicans have sat in office during that whole time....as if republicans didn't have control of Congress...as if republicans are just a name only, that can get nothing done because of the big bad democrats.  Give me a break. 

As I just read on a youtube clip from another thread.  I can understand why 1% (the top richest 1%) vote republican.  It's in their best interest.  I have no idea why the other 49% (who are in the very same boat with me) want to kill the middle class.  I mean c'mon.  What have they done for us lately?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPRqSq_qfZM

(just a little heads up for you, I am not responding to you with hate and don't respond back with hate, or I'll realize you're choice is not to be civil)






lockedaway -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/9/2011 9:44:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

Wow, subrob, resorting to calling him a moron, just because he's calling it as he sees it and you can't think of anything to come back with..... oh yea, that's right, your satisfaction is he's a moron.  That certainly solves a lot of problems!! [:'(]


Sorry Louve, Subrob is calling Owner a moron for good reason.  The banking meltdown was started by Carter, accelerated drastically by Clinton and was warned about by Bush in 17 speeches/press releases.  For Owner59 to ignore historical fact is moronic and unethical.



Yep, yep...I've heard it all before.  Only you go way back to Carter starting this mess.  As if no republicans have sat in office during that whole time....as if republicans didn't have control of Congress...as if republicans are just a name only, that can get nothing done because of the big bad democrats.  Give me a break. 

As I just read on a youtube clip from another thread.  I can understand why 1% (the top richest 1%) vote republican.  It's in their best interest.  I have no idea why the other 49% (who are in the very same boat with me) want to kill the middle class.  I mean c'mon.  What have they done for us lately?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPRqSq_qfZM

(just a little heads up for you, I am not responding to you with hate and don't respond back with hate, or I'll realize you're choice is not to be civil)





How have Republicans killed the middle class?  When O'scumbag wanted the Bush tax cuts to expire there was going to be a corresponding increase in all brackets.  The Republicans SAVED you money.  Unless you are in the 47% that pays no federal income tax.  O'scumbag wants to end the mortgage interest deduction for homeowners.  I guess you don't have a home or you would have known that.  If you do have a home, look at your mortgage payment and look what the interest is.  Then multiply that figure times 12 and imagine losing that deduction.  It "may" cause you to lose your home.  Democrats want an estate tax that kicks in at $200,000.00.  I guess you don't have parents they don't  have any money or real property to bequeath to you.  If they left you a home valued at $400,000.00, you would have to SELL that home just to pay the taxes.  What about the Republicans??????????????????  Where do they want to keep the estate tax?  At two million.  That's right...2 million dollars of an estate would be tax exempt. 

I don't know WHAT you are talking about.  The party that is castrating the middle class is the democratic party, also known as the American Socialist Party.

As far as Republicans being in office after Carter?  Sure...there were.  And Fannie Mae's percentage of backed paper that was shit was 33% give or take through Reagan and H.W. Bush.  Clinton put it on the fast track and it broke the bank.  Google "number of times Bush warned of banking crisis" and see what you get.

Oh...and here is a postscript for you.  O'scumbag wants to increase payroll taxes from 8% to 13%.  How is that going to help the small businessman of the middle class?  How is that going to help the people that he fires so he can save some money?  I would like answers to those questions if you are willing.




Owner59 -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/9/2011 10:20:44 AM)

Towns and cities and states choose their own budgets yearly,usually by vote.Or by their representative,who is also voted on .Your town and state make their own rules and tax code.No one else.

They (or in your town,you) choose to do what they want and make the budgets they want make,by voting.It`s called democracy,capiche?

It`s none of your business what other municipalities do with their money.Towns cities and states are free to do what they want.That`s what freedom is.

The only place you get to choose or have a say is your own town (and state, when that election comes).But everyone in your town gets to vote and the budget that gets voted on by your neighbors is the same budget that you have to live with too.Tough cookies if you don`t like it.

Just don`t blame the "government"[8|] for what your neighbors chose.Yeah I know,democracy sucks"why can`t I live on a mountain top?"[8|]

People from Oshkosh don`t have a say what goes on in your town,you don`t have a say what goes on in Oshkosh.If you don`t like how your town or state taxes,move to one you think you can do better.

If you want or think you can do better,earn a better living and pay less overall in taxes/fees/tolls someplace other than your present town/state,by all means move there.

You can`t tho.You can`t find a better deal b/c there isn`t one "somewhere else".The reason the north east NYC metro area is where people flock is b/c the money and jobs are here.There aren`t as many and as well paying jobs in Oshkosh.As beautiful and bucolic as Oshkosh is,it`s not cheaper overall to live there.It`s about the same give or take.

You can`t make as much money in Oshkosh so the lower property taxes there are taking the same percentage of your income.Cars and gas and food aren`t much cheaper in Oshkosh either.So that awsome lower property tax savings you got from moving there means didlie.

I hear the state of Alaska gives every one a yearly check from gas/oil sales ,and that taxes are lower.Win win,just bring plenty of bug spray for the bird sized mosquitos and a good down parka for the rest of the year.lol Good luck.[:D]

And if you think you can find a better deal anywhere else in the world,you`re wrong.

No where in the 1st world do citizens keep more of what they earn or have more liberty.Try and tell us where there`s a better deal, than in America.


You don`t tho, get to opt out of paying if you live here and enjoy what your community has to offer.No one gets to opt out,anywhere,except maybe some places in the 3rd world.

But by all means, have at that too.

Added:Don`t know how it happened but this is in reply to locked,not Louve00








Louve00 -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/9/2011 10:22:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway



How have Republicans killed the middle class?  When O'scumbag wanted the Bush tax cuts to expire there was going to be a corresponding increase in all brackets.  The Republicans SAVED you money.  Unless you are in the 47% that pays no federal income tax.  O'scumbag wants to end the mortgage interest deduction for homeowners.  I guess you don't have a home or you would have known that.  If you do have a home, look at your mortgage payment and look what the interest is.  Then multiply that figure times 12 and imagine losing that deduction.  It "may" cause you to lose your home.  Democrats want an estate tax that kicks in at $200,000.00.  I guess you don't have parents they don't  have any money or real property to bequeath to you.  If they left you a home valued at $400,000.00, you would have to SELL that home just to pay the taxes.  What about the Republicans??????????????????  Where do they want to keep the estate tax?  At two million.  That's right...2 million dollars of an estate would be tax exempt. 

I don't know WHAT you are talking about.  The party that is castrating the middle class is the democratic party, also known as the American Socialist Party.

As far as Republicans being in office after Carter?  Sure...there were.  And Fannie Mae's percentage of backed paper that was shit was 33% give or take through Reagan and H.W. Bush.  Clinton put it on the fast track and it broke the bank.  Google "number of times Bush warned of banking crisis" and see what you get.

Oh...and here is a postscript for you.  O'scumbag wants to increase payroll taxes from 8% to 13%.  How is that going to help the small businessman of the middle class?  How is that going to help the people that he fires so he can save some money?  I would like answers to those questions if you are willing.



Republicans haven't squashed the middle class yet.  But by republicans putting out pieces saying the hard workers of America have to shoulder more of this burden, while they fight for the rich keeping their tax breaks just boggles my mind.  Republicans like to cry "taking from the rich to give to the poor", but think not a whole lot of "taking from the poor to give to the rich".

As far as raising taxes on the rich, the way I look at it is, that's a myth.  The rich aren't being taxed more. Not at all.  The tax breaks they were given are expiring.  There's a difference between taxing and letting the break they gave them end.  Especially when our country could use the money.  If it meant me having to pay a bit more on my taxes, so be it.  I have a sneaking suspicion it wouldn't have affected my bank account as much as it would have the rich.  To throw it back and say democrats are doing it, just because they want to spread it all out a bit more fairly.  I can handle my share of fair.  Most can.  Those that can't...well, they're poor.  Therefore, subhuman and who could care less about that, right? (in other words fuck humanity and mankind, but thats only my opinions and I am not trying to put words in your mouth, if you happen to think its not really a bad thing to help a person down on their luck, then kudos to you!  If you don't think its right to cut some slack to people who need the slack, then why are we giving so much slack to people who don't need it?)

So Carter succeeded in his agenda, Clinton did too.  And now, so is Obama.  But Reagan, and the both Bushes were unable to "right the wrong" eh?  (Bush can warn all he wants, but what did he do about it?  Obama warned this mess we're in now would not take a year, a term or 2 terms to fix, but some seem to like to twist and turn that around to "he promised to fix this mess and create jobs, so halfway into his first term, and I've actually heard it as early as 6 months into his term, they wonder why it's not fixed yet) [8|]

And an increase from 8-13%.  Well ya know, when I was in sales and working for myself, I had to pay a self employment tax.  There were some years, albeit bad years, that that tax was much, much higher than the 8-13% you're talking about.  I survived.  My feelings on that is, if you can't afford to run a business responsibly, if keeping you afloat is the nations responsibility, whether they do business with you or not) then close your business and become an employer.  I'll find my own job, or start my own business...and will survive without weeping it's someone else's fault.

I have gone thru your response, sentence by sentence.  If I've left anything out, it was not my intention to not answer you. 




lockedaway -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/9/2011 10:31:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Towns and cities and states choose their own budgets yearly,usually by vote.Or by their representative,who is also voted on .Your town and state make their own rules and tax code.No one else.

They (or in your town,you) choose to do what they want and make the budgets they want make,by voting.It`s called democracy,capiche?

It`s none of your business what other municipalities do with their money.Towns cities and states are free to do what they want.That`s what freedom is.

The only place you get to choose or have a say is your own town (and state, when that election comes).People from Oshkosh don`t have a say what goes on in your town,you don`t have a say what goes on in Oshkosh.If you don`t like how your town or state taxes,move to one you think you can do better.

If you want or think you can do better,earn a better living and pay less overall in taxes/fees/tolls someplace other than your present town/state,by all means move there.

You can`t tho.You can`t find a better deal b/c there isn`t one "somewhere else".The reason the north east NYC metro area is where people flock is b/c the money and jobs are here.There aren`t as many and as well paying jobs in Oshkosh.As beautiful and bucolic as Oshkosh is,it`s not cheaper overall to live there.It`s about the same give or take.

You can`t make as much money in Oshkosh so the lower property taxes there are taking the same percentage of your income.Cars and gas and food aren`t much cheaper in Oshkosh either.So that awsome lower property tax savings you got from moving there means didlie.

I hear the state of Alaska gives every one a yearly check from gas/oil sales ,and that taxes are lower.Win win,just bring plenty of bug spray for the bird sized mosquito's and a good down parka for the rest of the year.lol Good luck.[:D]

And if you think you can find a better deal anywhere else in the world,you`re wrong.

No where in the 1st world do citizens keep more of what they earn or have more liberty.Try and tell us where there`s a better deal, than in America.


You don`t tho, get to opt out of paying if you live here and enjoy what your community has to offer.No one gets to opt out,anywhere,except maybe some places in the 3rd world.

But by all means, have at that too.







That was probably one of the most prescient posts I have ever read from you.  Here is your problem.  People make money in the No. East and then they flee to Pa, NoCar, SoCar, Texas and Florida.  There is a MASS EXODUS out of the No. East.  And who is replacing those serious wage earners???  Nobody.  NOOOOOOBODY.  So if I liquidate e everything and leave with 2 million in my pocket, the state gets some of it as I am leaving but the $20,000 to $30,000 they were getting every year is gone forever. 

Now...what does that mean, Owner???  It means that we have to make this area more completitive or it is going to go into the toilet. :)




lockedaway -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/9/2011 10:45:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway



How have Republicans killed the middle class?  When O'scumbag wanted the Bush tax cuts to expire there was going to be a corresponding increase in all brackets.  The Republicans SAVED you money.  Unless you are in the 47% that pays no federal income tax.  O'scumbag wants to end the mortgage interest deduction for homeowners.  I guess you don't have a home or you would have known that.  If you do have a home, look at your mortgage payment and look what the interest is.  Then multiply that figure times 12 and imagine losing that deduction.  It "may" cause you to lose your home.  Democrats want an estate tax that kicks in at $200,000.00.  I guess you don't have parents they don't  have any money or real property to bequeath to you.  If they left you a home valued at $400,000.00, you would have to SELL that home just to pay the taxes.  What about the Republicans??????????????????  Where do they want to keep the estate tax?  At two million.  That's right...2 million dollars of an estate would be tax exempt. 

I don't know WHAT you are talking about.  The party that is castrating the middle class is the democratic party, also known as the American Socialist Party.

As far as Republicans being in office after Carter?  Sure...there were.  And Fannie Mae's percentage of backed paper that was shit was 33% give or take through Reagan and H.W. Bush.  Clinton put it on the fast track and it broke the bank.  Google "number of times Bush warned of banking crisis" and see what you get.

Oh...and here is a postscript for you.  O'scumbag wants to increase payroll taxes from 8% to 13%.  How is that going to help the small businessman of the middle class?  How is that going to help the people that he fires so he can save some money?  I would like answers to those questions if you are willing.



Republicans haven't squashed the middle class yet.  But by republicans putting out pieces saying the hard workers of America have to shoulder more of this burden, while they fight for the rich keeping their tax breaks just boggles my mind.  Republicans like to cry "taking from the rich to give to the poor", but think not a whole lot of "taking from the poor to give to the rich".

As far as raising taxes on the rich, the way I look at it is, that's a myth.  The rich aren't being taxed more. Not at all.  The tax breaks they were given are expiring.  There's a difference between taxing and letting the break they gave them end.  Especially when our country could use the money.  If it meant me having to pay a bit more on my taxes, so be it.  I have a sneaking suspicion it wouldn't have affected my bank account as much as it would have the rich.  To throw it back and say democrats are doing it, just because they want to spread it all out a bit more fairly.  I can handle my share of fair.  Most can.  Those that can't...well, they're poor.  Therefore, subhuman and who could care less about that, right? (in other words fuck humanity and mankind, but thats only my opinions and I am not trying to put words in your mouth, if you happen to think its not really a bad thing to help a person down on their luck, then kudos to you!  If you don't think its right to cut some slack to people who need the slack, then why are we giving so much slack to people who don't need it?)

So Carter succeeded in his agenda, Clinton did too.  And now, so is Obama.  But Reagan, and the both Bushes were unable to "right the wrong" eh?  (Bush can warn all he wants, but what did he do about it?  Obama warned this mess we're in now would not take a year, a term or 2 terms to fix, but some seem to like to twist and turn that around to "he promised to fix this mess and create jobs, so halfway into his first term, and I've actually heard it as early as 6 months into his term, they wonder why it's not fixed yet) [8|]

And an increase from 8-13%.  Well ya know, when I was in sales and working for myself, I had to pay a self employment tax.  There were some years, albeit bad years, that that tax was much, much higher than the 8-13% you're talking about.  I survived.  My feelings on that is, if you can't afford to run a business responsibly, if keeping you afloat is the nations responsibility, whether they do business with you or not) then close your business and become an employer.  I'll find my own job, or start my own business...and will survive without weeping it's someone else's fault.

I have gone thru your response, sentence by sentence.  If I've left anything out, it was not my intention to not answer you. 



And here is my response:

1.  When Reagan re-did the tax code, the top bracket was 28%.  OK?  H.W. took it up to 35% and Clinton up to 39.5%.  Please don't tell me how great a president Clinton was, he gutted the military, he had the benefit of a dot com BOOM and it burst and his presidency ended in recession.  Let me ask you this and I really would like an answer.  Do you think it is fair for the federal government to take 39.5% of your income and allow a state like New Jersey to take another 9% all the while as you are paying .52 cents per gallon of gasoline in taxes?  Property taxes?  FCC line charges?  Taxes on your cable?  Tolls on your road?  Do you "really" think is is fair for people to lose 55% of their income and some people even more?  Doesn't that render this government a tyranny?  What happened your right to pursue happiness?  You are a slave!!!!!!!

2.  What burden are Republicans putting the working man?  Oh...do you mean a responsibility to pay 3% towards their health care?  Really???  I pay 100% of my health care.  I pay 100% of my retirement.  I work as hard, if not harder, than anyone.  I carry my own freight and I cost YOU nothing.  Isn't it about time that everyone pay more to support themselves?

3. You want to pay more in your taxes?  Go ahead.  It is voluntary.  Pay all you like.

4.  What could Bush do to stop the mortgage meltdown.  He came out and said that the repeal of Glass Steagall was a mistake and those protections had to be re-instituted.  They were not (that would have required a bill) and they have not been under O'scumbag.

5.  Two terms to fix?  The fix is easy....a corporate flat tax, massive government lay offs, a flat income tax and a one year suspension of the capital gains tax.  If those things were done, this country would explode in financial activity.  The Dow would shoot up over 15,000.  His first term has been an abject failure.

6.  Your last paragraph does not make sense.  Please re-read it.  You still have to pay a self employment tax and the payroll tax if you hire someone.  You also have to pay mandatory worker's compensation insurance.  You ask whether it is the nation's obligation for small business to succeed.  The answer is yes.  By not taxing small businesses to death many would have a much greater chance at success.

7.  You did not give me your thoughts on the estate tax.  Do you support democrats confiscating private property with a estate tax at $200,000.?




Owner59 -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/9/2011 10:48:36 AM)

So if someone is broke and can`t afford the operation that`ll save their life,...they`er toast?


One of the fastest growing segments of poor people are the elderly.


Kinda cold hearted, telling them to season their dog food well and stop bothering you,don`t you think?




Lucylastic -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/9/2011 10:51:20 AM)

hes getting his tampax in a twist because he is part of the problem Owner.. al he can do is be angry at anyone who dare disagree withhim.. simple, he is part of the problem, and doesnt want a solution because that would hurt him...
real simple. thinks hes smart but hate is crippling him...it shows
sad really




lockedaway -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/9/2011 10:52:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

So if someone is broke and can`t afford the opperation that`ll save their life,...they`er toast?


The fastest growing segment of poor people are the elderly.


Kinda cold hearted, telling them to season thier dog food well and stop bothering you,don`t you think?



What are you TALKING about?  See?  You have back slid.  The elderly have medicare.  Right?  Medicare ALREADY engages in health care rationing.  That is why so many seniors buy supplemental plans.

Anyone who walks into an emergency room gets the care they require.  The problem is that they may leave with a high bill.  And shouldn't that be the case?  Don't people have to pay for their services?  When I had no money, what little money I had went to rent, auto insurance and then health insurance in that order.  Food came next.  The people that walk out mired with hospital bills can file for Chapter 7 relief.  




lockedaway -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/9/2011 10:55:37 AM)

I already told you, I don't take Section 8 anymore.  The flotsam and jetsam come to my door and I turn them away with a serious amount of glee. :)




Owner59 -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/9/2011 11:00:24 AM)

The ones 65 and older do.

That doesn`t feed or house those horrible welfare cheats, tho,does it?

And didn`t ya know,poverty doesn`t care if you`re medicare eligible.



As obnoxious as you are, I know you`re not completely ignorant.






lockedaway -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/9/2011 11:03:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

The ones 65 and older do.

That doesn`t feed or house those horrible welfare cheats, tho,does it?

And didn`t ya know,poverty doesn`t care if you`re medicare eligible.



As obnoxious as you are, I know you`re not completely ignorant.





Fuck Owner....do you not read my posts???????????????????????  I have said REPEATEDLY that welfare had to be replaced by WORKFARE.  People out of work and receiving a check isn't such a bitter pill to swallow if they are doing SOMETHING for the money.  Do you not agree????




lockedaway -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/9/2011 11:14:02 AM)

C'mon Owner...we are close to an accord.  This is what this board was MADE for.  We are on the cusp of a mutual understanding.  Don't back out now.  The conversation can advance from here!!!!!!




Lucylastic -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/9/2011 11:14:45 AM)

Whats to stop any business taking on welfare workers as part of workfare, and getting rid of their other staff, to get "slave" labour at a tenth of the cost for the same hours and no bennies.
the same as theyve been doing already with any incentive to hire youth, disabled, or workfare recipents.
Of course workfare seems reasonable to you, its a huge slave pool




lockedaway -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/9/2011 11:21:14 AM)

Owner!!!  C'mon...this is where you and I, potentially, come to a meeting of the minds.  This is where we may jointly formulate a solution.  Don't go deep cover and prove all of the hypocrisy of your liberal mind set.  Walk with me for a moment!  This is where it gets GOOD!




Owner59 -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/9/2011 11:21:55 AM)

Bold ,enlarged print......I`m flattered.....[:)]




lockedaway -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/9/2011 11:22:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

You mean about whether you`re being humiliated or about posting feverishly to anonymous forum members?

I think I responded to your post appropriately.There wasn`t much there other than you don`t give a fuck about Lucy.

What the fuck ever, buddy.Knock yourself out.

The only thing humiliating you is the text you`re typing out to countless anonymous people reading it.

You are one hell of a train-wreck tho.....err I mean, show.

Stick around.



I asked you a question.  Answer it.  This is called intellectual discourse.  PARTICIPATE!  Do you think that people who collect welfare should have to work for the money they receive.  It is soooo simple.  Give me a yes or a no.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875