lockedaway -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/10/2011 8:37:07 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: erieangel quote:
ORIGINAL: lockedaway quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote:
ORIGINAL: lockedaway quote:
ORIGINAL: Louve00 Wow, subrob, resorting to calling him a moron, just because he's calling it as he sees it and you can't think of anything to come back with..... oh yea, that's right, your satisfaction is he's a moron. That certainly solves a lot of problems!! [:'(] Sorry Louve, Subrob is calling Owner a moron for good reason. The banking meltdown was started by Carter, accelerated drastically by Clinton and was warned about by Bush in 17 speeches/press releases. For Owner59 to ignore historical fact is moronic and unethical. Talk about grasping at straws ? I sure would like to read some specifics about just what Carter and Clinton did. I am not holding my breath though. Mr.Rodgers, I asked you a very simple question. Should people who receive welfare, which is taxpayer funded, have to do something to earn it. Yes or No? Just answer the question and the public discourse can continue. lockedaway, I'll answer that question. In certain circumstances, YES. Right now, however, there are not enough jobs. Without the social safety net--which includes welfare as it is--people will be on the streets, starving, and dying of all kinds of diseases. It sounds like that is what you are advocating. Welfare-to-work programs are great--when there is work to be had. Right now there are no jobs. NONE. Even public sector jobs are being cut. So what type of work would you have welfare recipients do to earn their benefits? Not to mention the disabled who go on welfare while awaiting determination from social security. When I became disabled, i was a divorced mother of two children ages 7 and 4. I was on welfare for nearly 3 years before I finally got approval for SSI-not disability because I hadn't worked enough consecutive quarters to earn disability, so I had to go SSI which is basically a federal welfare program for the disabled who don't qualify for disability. Under your theory that people should have to do something to earn their welfare checks my children would have most likely been placed in foster care because I would not have been able to hold down a job. I was barely to care for myself and the kids. Good post! I have never assailed disability. In hundreds (literally hundreds of posts) I have said that it is our collective responsibility to protect the impaired, the disabled, our veterans and the elderly. An able bodied person receiving welfare and doing nothing in return for society should be cattle-prodded out of their house in the morning and given a pointy stick and a shoulder bag or a mop or a broom or garden shears WHATEVER and put to work. If a company says "yeah...we could use him 4 hours per day in the mail room" (or whatever) the recipient should have to comply. EVERYONE WORKING makes for a much better country. Yes...there is catastrophic unemployment and it is going to get worse. I hope everyone understands that. There is NO REASON for the situation to improve. But allowing people to lay fallow and receive funds is wrong and deleterious to society as a whole.
|
|
|
|