RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


lickenforyou -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/10/2011 3:38:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

I will try to address this point one more time though - If work gets done faster, then (try to stay with me) less man hours are needed to do the job. Less man hours means... THAT SOMEONE ISN'T GETTING PAID!

When someone is being mentored in how to do a job correctly, I can tell you from direct experience that everything takes longer. And if they're not being specifically trained to take over that job, then once they can do it with reasonable skill and efficiency they move on to another learning task. That's how we trained new executive hires in our company. You had to know everything from the ground up before you got to plant your ass in the big chair.

Unpaid interns wouldn't necessarily be expected to learn as much as a new executive hire. But they would learn a lot of transferrable job skills, and be getting actual experience working and interacting in a business atmosphere. I think it sounds like a damn good idea, personally. But you'd probably have to offer the companies some incentive, because training somebody takes time and effort. Interns ain't "free help".

K.




You've come in on a conversation that, on my part, was meant to heap abuse on the foul mouth, abusive, lockedaway. If you want to have a reasonable discussion, fine.

I have interned and I can tell you that much of the time interns are free help. Especially when you have salaried employees training them. I'm sure that when you have executives in training that is a completely different ballgame.

And, you would definitely have to offer incentives to companies. Especially if it's a mentoring program rather than a free labor program. I imagine the incentives would come in the form of tax relief. So, now we're still paying out welfare, but now we're taking in a little less. But, ok, let's say it works out perfectly. You now have more people entering the job market. Except, you don't have the jobs.

Also, who takes care of the kids during this time? I've looked around a bit but I haven't had time to find hard figures, but it appears that the vast majority of welfare recipients are single mothers.





erieangel -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/10/2011 3:39:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

Wow, subrob, resorting to calling him a moron, just because he's calling it as he sees it and you can't think of anything to come back with..... oh yea, that's right, your satisfaction is he's a moron.  That certainly solves a lot of problems!! [:'(]



Sorry Louve, Subrob is calling Owner a moron for good reason.  The banking meltdown was started by Carter, accelerated drastically by Clinton and was warned about by Bush in 17 speeches/press releases.  For Owner59 to ignore historical fact is moronic and unethical.


Talk about grasping at straws ? I sure would like to read some specifics about just what Carter and Clinton did. I am not holding my breath though.



Mr.Rodgers, I asked you a very simple question.  Should people who receive welfare, which is taxpayer funded, have to do something to earn it.  Yes or No?  Just answer the question and the public discourse can continue.




lockedaway, I'll answer that question. In certain circumstances, YES. Right now, however, there are not enough jobs. Without the social safety net--which includes welfare as it is--people will be on the streets, starving, and dying of all kinds of diseases. It sounds like that is what you are advocating.

Welfare-to-work programs are great--when there is work to be had. Right now there are no jobs. NONE. Even public sector jobs are being cut. So what type of work would you have welfare recipients do to earn their benefits?

Not to mention the disabled who go on welfare while awaiting determination from social security. When I became disabled, i was a divorced mother of two children ages 7 and 4. I was on welfare for nearly 3 years before I finally got approval for SSI-not disability because I hadn't worked enough consecutive quarters to earn disability, so I had to go SSI which is basically a federal welfare program for the disabled who don't qualify for disability.

Under your theory that people should have to do something to earn their welfare checks my children would have most likely been placed in foster care because I would not have been able to hold down a job. I was barely to care for myself and the kids.




erieangel -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/10/2011 3:50:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

Now...here is the unfortunate part of all of this.  This is what  you have to take from the microcosm of the discussion I had with Owner; the chasm that exists between conservatives and liberals can NEVER be broached.  That brings us inextricably back to class warfare, left vs. right, those who need to take vs those who work for what they have.  It brings us back to liberals being the ENEMIES of conservatives and vice versa.  No...this isn't my theory.  This is Karl Marx' theory. 

To my fellow conservatives...keep the faith.

To you liberal, commie, no good, lazy low life rat bastards.......and you know who you are......get a life!!  



I'm a liberal. I'm no commie. I also work 40 hours a week but get paid for only 37 1/2 (I tend to work through my lunch periods). Until 3 months ago I also held a weekend job, but it got too much and i ended up in the hospital with a mild heart attack. My house is mortgage-free, is yours?




Kirata -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/10/2011 4:12:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

I have interned and I can tell you that much of the time interns are free help. Especially when you have salaried employees training them. I'm sure that when you have executives in training that is a completely different ballgame.

I'm not seeing what you're claiming here. In my experience, training someone to do a job is training someone to do a job. It doesn't matter whether they were hired for the job or whether you're training them to do it so they can move on.

Granted, there comes a time when they're getting pretty good and your task is mainly oversight. But that still requires time and, I might add, sharp attention. This is when many trainers become lax, turning out somebody whose skills are more half-baked than honed. But once they're handling the job without any further need for support or intervention, you're done. Either they take over, or they move along and you go back to doing the job yourself. There's no "free help" in that picture.

That said, yes, there has to be a job market. But, someone with some training and experience is still better off in whatever market there is than someone who has none. And yes, again, with regard to mothers with pre-school children who have no family available to help -- with no "but" on that one.

K.




erieangel -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/10/2011 4:25:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

I have interned and I can tell you that much of the time interns are free help. Especially when you have salaried employees training them. I'm sure that when you have executives in training that is a completely different ballgame.

I'm not seeing what you're claiming here. In my experience, training someone to do a job is training someone to do a job. It doesn't matter whether they were hired for the job or whether you're training them to do it so they can move on.

Granted, there comes a time when they're getting pretty good and your task is mainly oversight. But that still requires time and, I might add, sharp attention. This is when many trainers become lax, turning out somebody whose skills are more half-baked than honed. But once they're handling the job without any further need for support or intervention, you're done. Either they take over, or they move along and you go back to doing the job yourself. There's no "free help" in that picture.

That said, yes, there has to be a job market. But, someone with some training and experience is still better off in whatever market there is than someone who has none. And yes, again, with regard to mothers with pre-school children who have no family available to help -- with no "but" on that one.

K.



I interned while in college--both in a classroom, as I was an English major with a minor in education as well as at the local International Institute (they handle refugees). It was hard work, with a lot of oversight and a lot of "busy" work designed to free up the teacher or the employees at the Institute for more important things. I really didn't learn much, however.




Louve00 -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/10/2011 6:43:09 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel


quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway


To my fellow conservatives...keep the faith.

To you liberal, commie, no good, lazy low life rat bastards.......and you know who you are......get a life!!  



I'm a liberal. I'm no commie. I also work 40 hours a week but get paid for only 37 1/2 (I tend to work through my lunch periods). Until 3 months ago I also held a weekend job, but it got too much and i ended up in the hospital with a mild heart attack. My house is mortgage-free, is yours?


I caught that too and decided it wasn't worth my time to continue with it.  For one, you'll never get them to even consider another point of view because they have already stereotyped their "enemy", for another, he has no idea what a liberal is, if he can clump all of that into one category.  For an aside, I know more than a few conservatives that can fit the bill he outlined for liberals.  Image that!  [8D]




ArizonaBossMan -> RE: Why are leftists so brain dead? (7/10/2011 6:48:10 AM)

There is very little good that can come from arguing with leftists/liberals/progressives/marxists or whatever term they come up with that they think they can fool the public. It's all the same. Producers vs. moochers. Smaller government versus ever growing government and higher and higher government paychecks. Lower fair flat taxes that anybody can fill out online in 15 minutes vs. a complicated tax code nobody understands, not even the legions of tax lawyers and accountants who have to try to figure them out. Freedom vs. Tyranny.

November 2012. America, your move. Your choice. What do you want to become? Venezuela? Or America?




Lucylastic -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/10/2011 6:53:29 AM)

you cant argue, you come on here you dribble your bullcrap and run and hide.
You wouldnt know how to argue, debate or have a rational conversation.
Because its not liberals that are the problem, thats one you own all by yourself.




lickenforyou -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/10/2011 6:56:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

I have interned and I can tell you that much of the time interns are free help. Especially when you have salaried employees training them. I'm sure that when you have executives in training that is a completely different ballgame.

I'm not seeing what you're claiming here. In my experience, training someone to do a job is training someone to do a job. It doesn't matter whether they were hired for the job or whether you're training them to do it so they can move on.

Granted, there comes a time when they're getting pretty good and your task is mainly oversight. But that still requires time and, I might add, sharp attention. This is when many trainers become lax, turning out somebody whose skills are more half-baked than honed. But once they're handling the job without any further need for support or intervention, you're done. Either they take over, or they move along and you go back to doing the job yourself. There's no "free help" in that picture.

That said, yes, there has to be a job market. But, someone with some training and experience is still better off in whatever market there is than someone who has none. And yes, again, with regard to mothers with pre-school children who have no family available to help -- with no "but" on that one.

K.



That's fine if someone can come up with an effective mentoring or job skills training program. I really don't know what incentives could be offered to make it worth an employers time and energy. But, if it could be done I'm all for it. Just saying it, though, is not enough.

Money would have to be put into studying, developing, and, monitoring the program. There would be abuses by some unscrupulous employers. What if someone get's hurt on the job? Who pays that bill? Some people don't have transportation. And, I don't know how the state would determine who has family that will help. Sounds like a lot more bureaucracy.





.




domiguy -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/10/2011 7:59:58 AM)

Republicans hate America because they are fat.




Moonhead -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/10/2011 8:03:57 AM)

Ann Coulter isn't: the woman makes Kate Moss look like Rosie O'Donnell...




lockedaway -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/10/2011 8:20:00 AM)

I have read all of the crap that has been posted in response to what I have said.  If I have missed a particularly perspicacious post....by all fucking means.....tell me.

Otherwise what I have read is that liberal/loser/socialists want more taxation so there can be greater safety nets without any regard to the people that are already being taxed to death.  They want people like me and many of the other conservatives on this board to be the slaves of the losers that never made it.  Tey don't want time limits.  Their argument is that welfare should run in perpetuity.   They don't want reductions.  They don't want people on welfare to even be inconvenienced to give something back to society in return for getting the money we have to work for every day.  No...tax on!  Republicans say drill baby drill and liberals says tax baby tax!!!  Well...I smile when I say this...you fuckers have some rough days ahead.  And it is ABOUT TIME. 

Rather then be constructive.  Rather than find solutions.  You people make excuses.  OH...did anyone answer my questions how much should a person lose from a dollar? 




lockedaway -> RE: O'dingdong admits welfare = dependency (7/10/2011 8:28:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

I will try to address this point one more time though - If work gets done faster, then (try to stay with me) less man hours are needed to do the job. Less man hours means... THAT SOMEONE ISN'T GETTING PAID!

When someone is being mentored in how to do a job correctly, I can tell you from direct experience that everything takes longer. And if they're not being specifically trained to take over that job, then once they can do it with reasonable skill and efficiency they move on to another learning task. That's how we trained new executive hires in our company. You had to know everything from the ground up before you got to plant your ass in the big chair.

Unpaid interns wouldn't necessarily be expected to learn as much as a new executive hire. But they would learn a lot of transferrable job skills, and be getting actual experience working and interacting in a business atmosphere. I think it sounds like a damn good idea, personally. But you'd probably have to offer the companies some incentive, because training somebody takes time and effort. Interns ain't "free help".

K.




Great post!  You are right.  Companies and small businesses in my scheme would have to opt in for this.  I'm not sure what the incentive for the business would be.  The benefit to society would be great.  It would be great because the welfare recipient (which is freakin' different than the guy on unemployment!) would be exposed to professional people, professional settings, things learned (THOUSANDS OF THINGS LEARNED) every day.  Also...let me be perfectly frank....it is inconvenient.  O'piece-of-skunk-shit ADMITS that welfare is not a job incentive.  Of course not!!!!  If you can sit on your ass and get a check, why would you leave the house?  The inconvenience alone is an incentive to find something more to your liking.  Liberal/dipshit/socialist/losers don't like that idea.  It is really that simple.  They don't want to be inconvenienced, they want their check...PERIOD.




lockedaway -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/10/2011 8:37:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel


quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: lockedaway

quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

Wow, subrob, resorting to calling him a moron, just because he's calling it as he sees it and you can't think of anything to come back with..... oh yea, that's right, your satisfaction is he's a moron.  That certainly solves a lot of problems!! [:'(]



Sorry Louve, Subrob is calling Owner a moron for good reason.  The banking meltdown was started by Carter, accelerated drastically by Clinton and was warned about by Bush in 17 speeches/press releases.  For Owner59 to ignore historical fact is moronic and unethical.


Talk about grasping at straws ? I sure would like to read some specifics about just what Carter and Clinton did. I am not holding my breath though.



Mr.Rodgers, I asked you a very simple question.  Should people who receive welfare, which is taxpayer funded, have to do something to earn it.  Yes or No?  Just answer the question and the public discourse can continue.




lockedaway, I'll answer that question. In certain circumstances, YES. Right now, however, there are not enough jobs. Without the social safety net--which includes welfare as it is--people will be on the streets, starving, and dying of all kinds of diseases. It sounds like that is what you are advocating.

Welfare-to-work programs are great--when there is work to be had. Right now there are no jobs. NONE. Even public sector jobs are being cut. So what type of work would you have welfare recipients do to earn their benefits?

Not to mention the disabled who go on welfare while awaiting determination from social security. When I became disabled, i was a divorced mother of two children ages 7 and 4. I was on welfare for nearly 3 years before I finally got approval for SSI-not disability because I hadn't worked enough consecutive quarters to earn disability, so I had to go SSI which is basically a federal welfare program for the disabled who don't qualify for disability.

Under your theory that people should have to do something to earn their welfare checks my children would have most likely been placed in foster care because I would not have been able to hold down a job. I was barely to care for myself and the kids.



Good post!  I have never assailed disability.  In hundreds (literally hundreds of posts) I have said that it is our collective responsibility to protect the impaired, the disabled, our veterans and the elderly.  An able bodied person receiving welfare and doing nothing in return for society should be cattle-prodded out of their house in the morning and given a pointy stick and a shoulder bag or a mop or a broom or garden shears WHATEVER and put to work.  If a company says "yeah...we could use him 4 hours per day in the mail room" (or whatever) the recipient should have to comply.  EVERYONE WORKING makes for a much better country.  Yes...there is catastrophic unemployment and it is going to get worse.  I hope everyone understands that.  There is NO REASON for the situation to improve.  But allowing people to lay fallow and receive funds is wrong and deleterious to society as a whole.




SternSkipper -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/10/2011 7:37:41 PM)

quote:

Those leftists keep trying to trying to ban gay marriage and think homosexuality is sinful.

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) is the first GOP candidate to sign a controversial pledge to oppose same sex marriage and uphold "family values," circulated by the Iowa conservative group "THE FAMiLY LEADER."
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com

Wait!

Is Michele Bachmann a leftist now?



Yes She Is!




SternSkipper -> RE: Why do lib#$%$ feel the need to pit Americans against each other? (7/10/2011 7:40:16 PM)

quote:

Good grief these lib#$% are amazingly ignorant. It's ok. You guys go on lying and pushing Americans apart. That's all you have. You have a media that will just print whatever you push out. Never any questions.
The solution is near = November 2012.
Thank you!


I smell oil burning... did you throw a rod?





dcnovice -> RE: Why do lib#$%$ feel the need to pit Americans against each other? (7/10/2011 7:43:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ArizonaBossMan

Good grief these lib#$% are amazingly ignorant. It's ok. You guys go on lying and pushing Americans apart. That's all you have. You have a media that will just print whatever you push out. Never any questions.

The solution is near = November 2012.

Thank you!


I saw this on the scroll and thought "ArizonaBozoMan."

Sure enough . . .




SternSkipper -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/10/2011 7:44:16 PM)

quote:

Keep telling that lie, maybe just maybe, someone other than a moron like yourself will believe it.


Want me to go see if I can find you a copy of "arguing coherently  for dummies"?




slvemike4u -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/10/2011 7:46:58 PM)

I'm thinking even that would move too fast for him.




StrongSpirit -> RE: Why do Republicans hate America? (7/10/2011 8:09:49 PM)

quote:

tted simpleton accused me of being bitter. I am not. I enjoy a very nice lifestyle, I have a good business and, thank God, while I have not necessarily been blessed with good fortune, I have been blessed with an absence of bad fortune.


I read your repost. It is quite clear that you have a very strong opinion. But you provide zero support for it, except blatant lies so incredibally stupid, 10 seconds on the internet proves you wrong. You said that the founding fathers rejected socialism. Strange, as Karl Marx was not born until 1818. Karl Marx was basically the founder of Socialism. OK, he did base his work on the some ideas on other people's work - such as Henri de Saint Simon - born 1760 and Robert Owen - born 1771.


This country was born in 1776. The founders were all done by that date. Are you thinking they considered the work of a 16 year old child? Or perhaps Owen's famous treaty at the age of 5 - on how to share the potty?

And you think WE are crazy and stupid?

Someone needs to go back to school -- and this time a school taught by people with actual degrees in History and Politics, not a bunch of lies made up by Partisan Republicans who can't look at a timeline.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875