willbeurdaddy
Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy I didnt comment on whether she did or didnt. She said she was ACCUSED of playing the race card, and the post she objected to did nothing of the sort. She absolutely "played the race card", and in her typical form, is trying to weasel. That's all her and those of her ilk have to offer to attempt to deflect from the failures of the idiot in the Oval Office. The other poster already stated neither the excessive (i) Debt, or (ii) Spending has ANYTHING to do with the "race", but here she comes... trying to MAKE it about "race" by tossing in her pathetic "for some it has everything to do with race" garbage. Thus, her lie about merely responding to an "erroneous statement" is just that... a LIE, as "race" has nothing to do with Debt or Spending. Period. There was no "erroneous statement" to correct... just her playing-the-race-card. Pathetic. Have some coffee or coke or whatever you use to clarify your mind. I didnt say she did, I didnt say she didnt. I dont give a fuck if she did or didnt, she has never shown any signs of actually being racist, so if someone wants to spin her comment that way, fine...but thats what it is, spin. My comment was restricted to this statement: "And in it, you played the card you play so well in many places, which is derail the argument towards a specific reference rather than address the debate itself. It's because you can't debate the argument and have to find ground where you feel comfortable." She claimed erroneously that that statement accused her of playing the race card. It doesnt in any way shape or form. It very accurately described her pentient to deflect, and in this thread, to deny she was wrong when she most obviously was.
_____________________________
Hear the lark and harken to the barking of the dogfox, gone to ground.
|