NuevaVida
Posts: 6707
Joined: 8/5/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Firebirdseeking am genuinely puzzled about some things I have found them throughout my readings here. An example: "I don't have to keep up. If he wants to fuck me, then he fucks me. It's not important whether I particularly feel like sex at the time or not. I'm not expected to feel hot or horny just because he does. I AM expected to accept being fucked when he wants to. I don't do it out of love or a desire to serve, I do it because he's the boss, he wants to fuck and that's how our relationship is run." Yep, this is sometimes the case with us. Not always, but sometimes. And totally cool with me. I wouldn't want it any other way. quote:
Years ago, I read that idiot John Gray's Mars and Venus in the Bedroom. In one of his chapters, he tries to make a point that sometimes men just want to fuck and not be "bothered" with "foreplay". He suggested that on such occasions, that the two people work it out, maybe cut a little deal where she goes and gets herself "ready", and then he just comes in and goes at it with her. (Next day she could get a nice backrub in exchange for getting fucked with no foreplay). Frankly, I felt furious that a man could not be "bothered" to take the time to insure that his female partner was stimulated, mentally, physically and emotionally. It struck a nerve with me, because it not only lacked in regard for the partner, but for me, it was a very poor model of what a man is, including, and especially, a dominant man. I am married to my dominant, and I cannot imagine him ever taking me without regard for how I feel. I actually never bothered to read the book, but I've learned the gist of it from others. But I see it differently than you. If we take the generalization that for the most part men just want to fuck, and for the most part women want foreplay and time spent...and then apply your notion that men are somehow assholes for wanting what they want and not catering to the woman to give her what she wants, then could it not be said that women are somehow assholes for wanting what they want and not catering to the man to give him what he wants? Being that Gray isn't discussing D/s & M/s relationships, I see his proposal as a way of trying to strike a balance so that both parties get what they want - the men get their occasional "fuck without bother" and the women get their occasional "love-making with foreplay." quote:
So I find I am genuinely confused over what John Gray thought was OK, and with some of what is said here, and how it is accepted. How are they different?? I think the women here, myself included, who are sometimes fucked without foreplay or preparation ARE having their feelings taken into account. Some of us need to be taken like that, and if he didn't, we'd feel we were missing out. I need to know that he knows he can undoubtedly walk up to me, push me down and fuck the hell out of me, whether I'm ready for it, whether I want it, whether I'm in the middle of something else, or not. I love that he has that kind of freedom. And then of course yes there's a hotness factor in it for me, but mostly I love knowing he has exactly what he wants. Conversely, he does so much to add to my overall happiness, and to the thriving of our relationship. Of course he regards my feelings. And I regard his, too. So we both are getting what works for us.
_____________________________
Live Simply. Love Generously. Care Deeply. Speak Kindly.
|