RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


FirmhandKY -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/29/2011 7:43:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

"model or not"

That essentially eliminated a model as requirement to explain geology and evolution as a whole.

I don't think nature cares what model we do or don't have, having gotten along so well without it for this long.

*sighs*

Ed, Hannah has beaten me to the punch almost every time.  I think I'll let her attack this one, if she wants too.

I really don't have the patience right now.

However, could I ask you to do with a little less white space in your posts?  They are a pain to clean up.

Firm




HannahLynHeather -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/29/2011 7:45:41 PM)

well ed, i think you're wrong for the simple reason that if revulsion for gay sex acts, or even male-on-male sex acts was "natural" then how the fuck do you explain the millions of people who don't feel that way? and as epytropos pointed out, what about the fucking greeks? homosexuality was not only acceptable, it was expected and institutionalized.

got any explanation as to how a whole people were suddenly going against nature? or how about the many cultures around the world that don't view it as bad or unnatural, are they mutations?

see, what you are doing here is the same fucking thing the gorean fucks do, you are taking your own views and trying to find a "natural" or "biological" basis to prove to yourself that they are right. that's a fucking fools quest.




Edwynn -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/29/2011 7:45:51 PM)




quote:

ORIGINAL: Epytropos

I have serious trouble with that for a number of reasons. The most obvious is that you have societies like the Greeks where a moderate amount of gay sex was expected of men, and was therefore performed with a minimum of vomiting. If nature makes the typical man repulsed by gay sex, how do you account for those sorts of societies? Did they just have a massive genetic difference that abdicated the inborn trait which appeared in others, and if so what happened to it in the intervening period?

Further, how do we see historical cults in which heterosexuals glorify gay sex as an act of communion even if they don't do it themselves? To glorify something you find repulsive as a religious act would be extremely strange, don't you think?

In short, there is entirely too much diversity of thought regarding homosexuality through history to call the aforementioned revulsion a genetic trait.



Sorry, I missed that one.

Apologies here, but I am back and forth to many tasks today.


To your post; yes, and there are also rituals that involve 'homosexual behaviour' as a rite of passage, etc.

But do you think that nurture had the larger part in that process? Or do you think the rituals we speak of are a product of nature?

In nature, male  'homosexual behavior' is not all that unusual among some animals, because the males have to figure out some way to occupy themselves until they figure out how to get a lady. So we can't say that it is "unnatural,"  but the normal preference is undeniable.

As to the fellow that said that the idea disgusted him, and then the OP taking that  ball and running with it ...

(throws hands up)

Drama seeks drama, all I can say.









HannahLynHeather -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/29/2011 7:59:00 PM)

quote:

I don't think it is but on a narrowly focused board like this one, it can seem that way. Out in the general public and in several countries it's not so much a gender thing. There are lots of people who just don't like gays, are repulsed by the notion of gayness and wouldn't mind if those who practice such disappeared from the face of the Earth or got 'cured'. Have you listened to Michelle Bachmann on the subject?
that's an interesting point bita, the attitudes elsewhere in the world. we have to base our opinions on our own observations and experiences, and they are limited to canada. i am aware of bachmann's views, though i haven't heard her speak, but cheri is pretty fucking much ignorant of american politics.

you have traveled in other countries, so your perspective is bound to be broader than ours. but our experiences is that it is primarily a fucking male attitude, that is valid for our corner of canada, well the various corners of it i have lived in as well.

now it could just be that men express it more often than women, that is always a fucking possibility.




LinnaeaBorealis -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/29/2011 9:25:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


In nature, male  'homosexual behavior' is not all that unusual among some animals, because the males have to figure out some way to occupy themselves until they figure out how to get a lady. So we can't say that it is "unnatural,"  but the normal preference is undeniable.





I actually had 2 male dogs whose sexual preference was each other. They weren't neutered & we lived in out in the country where everybody let their dogs run free, so I'm sure there were female dogs available to them both, but they preferred each other. Never did feel the need to figure out how to get a lady.

Homosexual behavior in both males & females is a perfectly natural thing, no matter what you think, Eddie.




Endivius -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 1:40:56 AM)

Brace yourselves. It's about to get real. While I appreciate the discussion that suzie very adequately started, It is only appropriate, that on this very emotional topic, we maintain our objectivity. Thus, rather than berate you, I will educate you. Put your thinking cap on, grab a nice beverage and get comfy.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

Well, aside from the fact that males and females of whatever orientation are different to begin with ...


Obvious, and frankly irrelevent. It's common knowledge that anyone can confirm, and has no bearing on any of the responses given thus far, including your own. (I'm refering to the point in time in wich the post I'm responding to was made, I'll elaborate on the latter posts, later.)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn
Because it suits your purpose to find it thus, as would be taken by such standards of evidence as elicited here.


The responses posted were not intended to suit any one person, whole or in part, including the questions the OP posted. Rather, they were, genuine factual based responses expressed by knowledgable (mostly) people, given thier own personal experiences. Each person has; indeed, unique experiences in thier lives, as well as common experiences, that shape thier beliefs, ideals, and principles. Whether those experiences, ect, al; are related to you, or not, does not discredit thier validity.


On the topic of your post, I will rebuttle using only one of the capital crimes. It is important, that the number of capital offenses commited, is no less one sided on the topic of gender.
However, it is quite varied by demographics on a wide range of variables, including age, race, relgion, sexual orientation, and income. So to narrow our search, I will pick the most heinous of these crimes, rape.

quote:

Original: Edwynn
It is interesting to note that your curiosity does not extend such as to investigate the question of why male-haters are so prevalent among female homosexuals (thankfully not all), while misogyny among male homosexuals is almost non-existent.


The only thing interesting to note here, is your bias, and largely sexist view, pertaining to lesbians being more predominantly "male haters", and gay men being predominantly indifferent. Hope your comfortable sitting down.

To begin:

"There are nevertheless statistical estimates published by some official bodies. The U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1999) estimated that 91% of United States rape victims were female and 9% were male, with 99% of the offenders being male and 1% of the offenders being female.[1] Several studies argue that male-male and female-female prison rape are quite common and may be the least reported form of rape.[2][3][4]"

There is much more to be found on this subject in this arcticle. However, I found most of it to be non-specific, wich is not grounds for factual support of an argument. Moving on.

"About 3% of American men – a total of 2.78 million men – have experienced a rape at some point in their lifetime (Tjaden & Thoennes, 2006).
Males are the least likely to report a sexual assault, though it is estimated that they make up 10% of all victims (RAINN, 2006).
22% of male inmates have been raped at least once during their incarceration; roughly 420,000 prisoners each year (Human Rights Watch, 2001).


Note two very important key statistics listed here: first, 3% of american men have experience rape at some point in thier lifetime. Second that 10% of rape victims are male, that equates: 90% are female, children, or transgender. Don't get excited just yet, we have much much more to explore.

"Nicholas Groth, a clinical psychologist and author of Men Who Rape: The Psychology of the Offender, says all sexual assault is an act of aggression, regardless of the gender or age of the victim or the assailant. Neither sexual desire nor sexual deprivation is the primary motivating force behind sexual assault. It is not about sexual gratification, but rather a sexual aggressor using somebody else as a means of expressing their own power and control. "


Based on this limited study it appears that Sexual assault seems to stem from primarily availability, and has almost no bearing on gender or sexual orientation. Hang on, you aren't out of the woods yet, so far we've only looked at studies pertaining to male assailants. A further exploration of this leads us to:

"In a well-known study of offenders and victims conducted by Nicholas Groth and Ann Burgess, one-half of the offender population described their consenting sexual encounters to be with women only, while 38 percent had consenting sexual encounters with men and women. Additionally, one-half of the victim population was strictly heterosexual. Among the offenders studied, the gender of the victim did not appear to be of specific significance to half of the offenders. Instead, they appeared to be relatively indiscriminate with regard to their choice of a victim -- that is, their victims included both males and females, as well as both adults and children (Groth & Burgess, 1980). The choice of a victim seemed to be more a matter of accessibility than of sexual orientation, gender or age."

This further supports the idea that rape is predominantly about availability. But hang on, this is just one piece of the puzzle. Keep in mind that that vast majority of rape crimes reported in the prison population did not care about the gender of the victim. This reveals that more rapes that occur in prison are predominantly same sex rape, although cross gender rape still occurs. You can further support this by looking at the number of male to female inmates, as well as the number of male to female correctional officers.

"There are 148,200 women in state and federal prisons. In federal women’s correctional facilities, 70% of guards are male. Records show correctional officials have subjected female inmates to rape, other sexual assault, sexual extortion, and groping during body searches. Male correctional officials watch women undressing, in the shower or the toilet. Male correctional officials retaliate, often brutally, against female inmates who complain about sexual assault and harassment."

There were 2,284,900 prison inmates incarcerated in 2009. Of those incarcerated :

"In 2009, the majority (82%) of the total correctional population was male, and 18% was female. Men comprised a smaller portion of the total correctional population in 2009 than in 1990 (86%), while the percentage of women increased within the total correctional population since 1990 (14%)."

"22% of male inmates have been raped at least once during their incarceration; roughly 420,000 prisoners each year (Human Rights Watch, 2001). Requoting for signifigance.

This also supports the hypothesis that that when a male is raped, it is more likely to occur in prison than anywhere else, and by a male offender. Now let's take a look at Female rape victims.

"Young women, low-income women and some minorities are disproportionately victims of domestic violence and rape. Women ages 20-24 are at greatest risk of nonfatal domestic violence8, and women age 24 and under suffer from the highest rates of rape.9 The Justice Department estimates that one in five women will experience rape or attempted rape during their college years, and that less than five percent of these rapes will be reported.10 Income is also a factor: the poorer the household, the higher the rate of domestic violence -- with women in the lowest income category experiencing more than six times the rate of nonfatal intimate partner violence as compared to women in the highest income category.11 When we consider race, we see that African-American women face higher rates of domestic violence than white women, and American-Indian women are victimized at a rate more than double that of women of other races."

Wait for it. Wait for it. Wait for it.

"According to the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs, "domestic violence affecting LGBT individuals continues to be grossly underreported . . . there is a lack of awareness and denial about the existence of this type of violence and its impact, both by LGBT people and non-LGBT people alike."18

Myths regarding gender roles perpetuate the silence surrounding these abusive relationships; for example, the belief that there aren't abusive lesbian relationships because women don't abuse each other. Shelters are often unequipped to handle the needs of lesbians (as a women-only shelter isn't much defense against a female abuser), and transgendered individuals. Statistics regarding domestic violence against LGBT people are unavailable at the national level, but as regional studies demonstrate, domestic violence is as much as a problem within LGBT communities as it is among heterosexual ones.19
"

That's right, same sex violence is just as prevelant regardless of gender. How about that. What you have just learned is that rape, is just as likely to occur among LGBT as it is among heterosexuals. This is important to take note of. Really let this sink in. Requoting what you posted :

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn
"It is interesting to note that your curiosity does not extend such as to investigate the question of why male-haters are so prevalent among female homosexuals (thankfully not all), while misogyny among male homosexuals is almost non-existent."


So far, you've learned that men are raped less than women. Men are more likely to be raped in prison; while women are much much more likely to be raped, and when a rape occurs while in prison, by a man than a woman. So how does this correlate to your post? First, just on the topic of rape alone, not including: domestic violence, kidnap, torture, and murder; you've learned that women are more likely to be a victim of rape, and more likely to be a victim of a male offender. Second, because men are less likely to be the victim of rape to begin with, it is naturally conclusive to deduce that gay men are less likely to be predisposed to a fear of rape from a man or a woman, while women's sexual orientation has no bearing on thier natural fear of being victimized. Finally, a lesbian is just as likely to be a victim of a rape by a woman or man as a gay man is likely to be raped by man. What this should indicate to you, and anyone else who has bothered to read this far, is that rape against women are far more likely to occur from a male offender than they are by a female offender, but that does not equate to the level of violence a male or female offender may commit. Additionally, a male victim is more likely to be a victim of a violent crime by a male than a female. It is naturally conclusive that men commit more violent crimes, and when a gay or lesbian is the victim of a crime, gender is a stronger indication of victimology than sexual orientation, and males are more likely to commit said crimes. This should indicate to you that it is natural for women in general to be more affraid of a violent crime from men than women, more importantly, that it is common knowledge. The fact that you actually posted that being a lesbian had anything to do with a disposition of men at all is sexist, biased, homophobic, and utterly ignorant. Not to mention that you supported the argument with homosexual males mysogynistic views, wich is just as fallic. This was just on the topic of rape, didnt even post any of the other capital crimes, wich are no less one sided regarding victimology. To learn more about the victimology of crimes as they pertain to both genders, as well as sexual orientation:

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn
You gals need to get out more, both in the literal outdoors sense and also in the exploration of  the world other than forums or discussion groups' views within whatever narrowly focused venue you have chosen to confine yourselves in.


That's a very bold conclusion to make, considering your abundant lack of knowledge pertaining to society in general.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn
There are some countries and cultures still where the young and teen boys sleep together in groups, and sometimes tickle, fight, etc, but any actual genital touching  or otherwise potential boy sex implications are strongly frowned upon. It is their natural life.


I've been to the philipines too. Doesn't validate what you have said in any way, or have any bearing on the discussion at hand.



I don't regret my laziness on the references. I do regret that I did not explore this in more detail, especially regarding same sex rape crimes. It's there for those interested in checking.

HeatherLynnHeather: it was most appropriate, although for some reason none of my pics ever upload when i link them in my posts. So single face palm is all i got sadly...


Edit: for clarity and gramatical failures.

Edit: To put this discussion back on course. I realize I did not entirely answer the question posed by Cheri:

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuzeCheri
So why do you think there is such a strong reaction? Why, in your opinion, would anybody find it repulsive?


I did address male on male sex but not the topic of female on female sex. I do not find any homosexual acts to be erotic or repulsive. I have found, I am only aroused by female on female interaction when I participate. Female on female only sexual intercourse does not excite me, unless one of them climaxes, everything leading up to that point, pretty boring. I find I am only aroused by women, I have no clue why this is, and honestly, I don't care. I have fantasized about having sex with multiple women, but never multiple women having sex. I'm probably just wierd.


References :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_gender
http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?dbName=DocumentViewer&DocumentID=32361
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpus09.pdf
http://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/women_prison.pdf
http://www.now.org/issues/violence/stats.html
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm




zephyroftheNorth -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 3:54:54 AM)

quote:

Brace yourselves. It's about to get real. While I appreciate the discussion that suzie very adequately started, It is only appropriate, that on this very emotional topic, we maintain our objectivity. Thus, rather than berate you, I will educate you. Put your thinking cap on, grab a nice beverage and get comfy


Condescending much? This is a matter of opinion there is no right or wrong answer. Some are revolted, some aren't, and some fall somewhere in between. There are no facts except that it is a fact that people feel differently about it.




LaTigresse -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 4:22:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss

This is an interesting question to put up in the midst of the grief of your friend being murdered.


Of all the posts I've read in my time here I have to say this one sucketh the most.

Sunshinemiss, I honestly did not believe you had it in you to display this level of callous cuntishness.

I don't think I have ever felt I misjudged a person's character, via the net, as much as I feel it now.




Edwynn -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 4:40:37 AM)




quote:

ORIGINAL: Endivius

Brace yourselves.


No need to brace ourselves, the adults here have heard all this before. But new delusions always welcome.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Endivius

It's about to get real.



Including self-delusional statements such as that.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Endivius

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

Well, aside from the fact that males and females of whatever orientation are different to begin with ...


Obvious, and frankly irrelevent. It's common knowledge that anyone can confirm, and has no bearing on any of the responses given thus far, including your own.


OK.

Aside from the fact that gender difference is the basis for 95% of  the rest of your post, but has no bearing on it, irrelevant.

OK.

Actually I think you're right. We might should brace ourselves here.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Endivius

On the topic of your post, I will rebuttle using only one of the capital crimes. It is important, that the number of capital offenses commited, is no less one sided on the topic of gender.



You used a noun as a verb, there. Rebuttal (not rebuttle) is a noun, rebut is the verb.

But in any event, the number of capital offenses is no less one sided on the topic of gender, which we have previously been informed is irrelevant.


Look, enough of the nonsense here.

You waste all this bandwidth on reaching into relatively low occurrence social phenomena and try to drag it into everyday social situations.

Maybe you need a raft of official studies and reports to tell you that males commit more crimes of all types than females, or that rapes occur in prisons, and probably you need a peer-reviewed study to tell you that sliced cheese from the deli costs more per ounce than peanut butter ...

But those of us who have been out of the cave a bit longer didn't need the studies to tell us that.


I didn't need any study to tell me that some small percentage of lesbians are phalli-phobes. They told me themselves. "I want them ALL chopped off!", to use the exact phrasing.

So, your studies tell you that there is foundation for all men and women to fear men. Does that logically equate to phalliphobia or even less drastic measures expressing disdain of men in general in your world? How many of your male or female friends have expressed that sentiment, given the grounds for such that you propose?

You are conflating two very different phenomena, aberrant violence vs. everyday social intercourse and peoples' biases. (which biases are involved in about 50,000 other things than race or gender or sexual orientation or politics or ... )

If every woman and every man lived their everyday life and held their world view based on smaller percentage aberrant violent behavior from misrepresentations of the species, this would be a sad world indeed. Fortunately, most of the people I know do not live with such a psycho-albatross. Lesbians and gays included. If I am such a sexist and homophobe, which I'm sure could be verified by one or several of your peer-reviewed studies, then why do I go to the Ace hardware store staffed by ~ 70% lesbians that is farther away than the other Ace hardware or the Home Depot not suchwise staffed?  And why do all the other people who would well qualify for your facile designation of homophobia crowd the store on many days?

I could mention that #4 and #1 on my "top five teachers of all time" are gay, but I'm rocking your world enough as it is, so we'll put that one aside.


Come out of the cave, boy.

You act as though the OP and hannah and myself are walking up to the priest with our sacred crucibles of wine or something in presenting what we say. We are actually in the anteroom drinking from the bottle and then shaking it up and spraying each other in the face with it, truth be known.


Hope there's some left for the Mass.










Endivius -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 6:57:26 AM)

I like how you skipped everything related to what was actually being proven to you in what I said, went off on some rediculous wild tangent about home depot, but had the time to point out a gramatical error.


I'll do it in a shorter manner, since long posts seem to escape your attention span.

This is what you wrote:
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn
"It is interesting to note that your curiosity does not extend such as to investigate the question of why male-haters are so prevalent among female homosexuals (thankfully not all), while misogyny among male homosexuals is almost non-existent."



This is what I proved, in my above post:

quote:

Original: Endivius
This should indicate to you that it is natural for women in general to be more affraid of a violent crime from men than women, more importantly, that it is common knowledge. The fact that you actually posted that being a lesbian had anything to do with a disposition of men at all is sexist, biased, homophobic, and utterly ignorant. Not to mention that you supported the argument with homosexual males mysogynistic views, wich is just as fallic.


What I am trying to educate you on here, is that being a lesbian, has nothing at all, in any way, to do with why a women are "man haters," if they are at all.





Endivius -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 7:01:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

Brace yourselves. It's about to get real. While I appreciate the discussion that suzie very adequately started, It is only appropriate, that on this very emotional topic, we maintain our objectivity. Thus, rather than berate you, I will educate you. Put your thinking cap on, grab a nice beverage and get comfy


Condescending much? This is a matter of opinion there is no right or wrong answer. Some are revolted, some aren't, and some fall somewhere in between. There are no facts except that it is a fact that people feel differently about it.



Can't edit it now. Was trying to convey a totally different message. [:o] I wanted to point out that she had started a very intelligient discussion, but it had gotten torpedo'd by all the other nonsense edwynn and a few others had started preaching.




Edwynn -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 7:17:03 AM)



I read your whole post, suffered through the whole thing, a long drawn out concatenation of incoherency as proof that you missed the point as brought up in the OP and my response to it.

Given your lack of comprehension to that, my response to your torturous side tracked post does not equate to me 'going off on a tangent.'

The OP expressed her opinion that all hetero males are as represented by the one example she gave. I stated that a small percentage of lesbians despise men on general principle. Such subtleties and distinctions obviously escape you, such lack of capacity in that regard provoking an your Alice In Wonderland-meets-sociology-criminal-justice meandering.

But since you've provided such irrefutable evidence in your mind for veracity of the OP's sentiment, you can then explain to us here why you are a homophobe.


- Educate - us on that one.











Endivius -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 7:21:59 AM)

If you want to be a slave to your predjudice so be it.




HannahLynHeather -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 7:31:58 AM)

quote:

I didn't need any study to tell me that some small percentage of lesbians are phalli-phobes. They told me themselves. "I want them ALL chopped off!", to use the exact phrasing.
a couple of points on this bit.

first this bit.
quote:

I didn't need any study to tell me that some small percentage of lesbians are phalli-phobes.
quote:

male-haters are so prevalent among female homosexuals
which is it,; "a small percentage" or "so prevalent"? can't be both, they are fucking contradictory positions, please pick one and stick with it.

now this bit
quote:

They told me themselves.
inadmissible, sorry, i think you established this principle already back in post # 26 with this little exchange
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

quote:


which naturally (to you) leads to the question of "why is this attitude so predominantly a hetero male attitude?"


it doesn't naturally lead to it fuckwit, it simply is an observation she made based on her experiences, experiences and observations that all four of us here can back up.



Oh my ...  a bad experience in life, even several of them, from similar observations ... which provokes some to generalizations ...

My oh my.

I've had bad experiences  with black people, with male homosexuals, with at least two Chinese math teachers, with white heterosexual women, with bank tellers, with white males of any sort ... 

And millions to back that up, even more than the four of you. So there.
so there, fuck you asshole, you can't have it both ways, if our personal experiences don't mean a fucking thing them neither do yours, because i am pretty damned certain that the four of us have interacted with more homophobic men than you have lesbians of any stripe, in fact i fucking well know i have, so again ed, fuck you.

sweet mary's unused cunt! why do the idiots never even pay attention to their previous posts? i mean really, is it really that much to ask, that you know what the fuck you said from one post to the next. consistency fuckhead, consistency.




Edwynn -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 7:32:06 AM)



Projection noted.











Endivius -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 7:41:09 AM)

You really should, as HannaLynnHeather has allready pointed out, attempt to read your posts before responding to others. Especially when you not only contradict yourself, but when you edit your posts, to add to them, further.


While I'm sure you will attempt to logically, and I use the term loosely here in regards to you, provoke a response to the inherently rediculous things you have posted, I have two social hard lines, No pedos, and No Hippocrites.




SuzeCheri -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 7:53:49 AM)

quote:

The OP expressed her opinion that all hetero males are as represented by the one example she gave.
NO I DID NOT!

I said nothing of the sort, not here, not anywhere. I challenge you to show even one place I said anything of the sort.




Endivius -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 7:57:38 AM)


[sm=dontfeedtrolls.gif] Don't worry, we know you didn't. [;)]




Arpig -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 8:03:47 AM)

Relax Cherisse, you'll get used to it dealing with Fast Eddy, he lies all the time, it's his MO. That's why I call him Fast Eddy, because he plays fast and loose with the truth.




Endivius -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (8/30/2011 8:05:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

Relax Cherisse, you'll get used to it dealing with Fast Eddy, he lies all the time, it's his MO. That's why I call him Fast Eddy, because he plays fast and loose with the truth.



That's actually quite apt.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
7.910156E-02