Iamsemisweet
Posts: 3651
Joined: 4/9/2011 From: The Great Northwest, USA Status: offline
|
Or I can just look it up on Westlaw. In any case, only 9 testified. Surely we have not reached a point where we are convicting and executing people, based on witnesses who didn't even testify. quote:
ORIGINAL: Aylee Ya, your reading skills are great. quote:
ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet Wiki? No, I read the appellate decisions, which is how I read "about the trial.". I have access at my office. Why would I look them up on Wiki, instead of looking at the official document?. Maybe you shouldn't get your info from "wiki". Just a suggestion. 9 witnesses testified. Not 34. quote:
ORIGINAL: Aylee quote:
ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet Only 9 witnesses testified. The other 25 are just hearsay (and I haven't even seen anything that said there were 34 witnesses, so please provide your source for that) 7 have recanted, to various degrees. Why not a retrial, then? If we are going to impose the DP(which I have not previously opposed) the process HAS TO BE FAIR. quote:
ORIGINAL: Aylee quote:
ORIGINAL: 34 eyewitnesses. Including 3 airmen. Where was the biased and tainted evidence? You should read about the trial. This is the case: Georgia v. Troy Anthony Davis Judge Moore was the District Court Judge who ruled on the recants. Have you even LOOKED at wiki? If you check at the bottom they often have links you can look at for the actual information sources.
< Message edited by Iamsemisweet -- 9/22/2011 2:43:32 PM >
_____________________________
Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people. The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad. Alice: How do you know I'm mad? The Cat: You must be. Or you wouldn't have come here.
|