TheHeretic
Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007 From: California, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: erieangel The cops and prosecution and judges decided Davis should pay despite the lack of any evidence. They had shitloads of eyewitnesses, didn't they? Yeah. These things often follow a pattern in the media. Claims of doubt by witnesses, or appeals to emotion because the guy who went on the shotgun kill spree wrote a children's book while in prison. Afterwards, we'll hear a little about the victim, and the facts of the crime that were in evidence, and that will be the end of it. As I understand the facts of this case, some shitty human being in a fast food parking lot was abusing a homeless guy for kicks, and when the security guard came over to stop it, the punk put a cap in his ass, for no good reason, whatsoever, but seemed to think it was all pretty funny. Nine eyewitnesses said that piece-of-shit punk was Troy Davis. I have no idea what the eyewitnesses in the case have been through in the decades since the cold-blooded murder, but at the time, they took the oath, and told it to a jury that believed them. It's been all the way to the Supreme Court. The AP quotes him as saying, "I did not have a gun." That makes me wonder if he has ever said who did. I don't like cases like this. I'd rather have direct physical evidence, if not a full confession. The idea is that the right person pays the price of the crime. In something like this might be, where a gangbanger would rather die than rat out his buddy, I guess I'm ok with getting the right gang.
_____________________________
If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced. That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.
|