quote:

Wouldn't it be much more simple when signing up or modifying your profile to have something that says "Status" and simply select an option to say "Single, looking" or the like?  To me how it would work like is if you were in a relationship and not looking, you'd no longer be apart of that list of those looking, you avoid a lot of people that simply look at your picture and want to bang you naturally, and that is that.

quote:


rhetorical question: are narcissists always so intent on focusing attention on themselves?

quote:

ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker

quote:


rhetorical question: are narcissists always so intent on focusing attention on themselves?

If that is the case, wouldn't your pen-pal Niney be more at fault seeing as he has posted more times than anybody else in this topic so far waiting for someone to acknowledge him or reply to his constant flirtations?

If the topic turns about me, I cannot help that people find me fascinating/interesting to talk to. 

quote:

One problem with your rationale. I'm not a narcissist. I'm a cunt.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko

Right, and not to beat a dead horse on an already tedious topic, but...if you did a search for submissives, you would get only submissives, but - those submissives should have also filled out on their profile that they are looking for dominant men, or friends only, or otherwise. Then, between both the searcher and the ....um....searchee(?)....the results should mesh. "Friends only" is kind of just another way of saying "Not looking." It's just a matter of what it's called on this site versus another site.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheFireWithinMe

quote:

One problem with your rationale. I'm not a narcissist. I'm a cunt.

Really? Me too, I think you may be my soulmate!

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheFireWithinMe

quote:

One problem with your rationale. I'm not a narcissist. I'm a cunt.

Really? Me too, I think you may be my soulmate!

quote:

ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko

Right, and not to beat a dead horse on an already tedious topic, but...if you did a search for submissives, you would get only submissives, but - those submissives should have also filled out on their profile that they are looking for dominant men, or friends only, or otherwise. Then, between both the searcher and the ....um....searchee(?)....the results should mesh. "Friends only" is kind of just another way of saying "Not looking." It's just a matter of what it's called on this site versus another site.

Let me explain if you were just signing up...

You fill out all your info and whatever, and then are prompted to answer what you're here for.  You then put down something like, "Looking for dominant men" or "Looking for poly household" or even just "Looking for friends."  Then when you sign up, you get matched up with results according to what you prefer.  Do I want submissive females that are also looking and are 20 to 24 years old?  I get only those as results.  Any submissive female that is already with someone else and no longer looking no longer appears on my options or "matches" listing.

To me it just seems to be more logical and less primitive (such as right now where you have to put in your profile or journal that you're not looking/with someone else). 

quote:

There's a lot of us about.

quote:

i can kinda see what NS is saying, but i think since people can select "actively seeking 'dominant men'" and a man can narrow his search with the drop down menu to  "They are seeking -- Dominant men," then that should be sufficient...?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Delilya

Flirting on a social site? Surely you jest.