MikeSojourner -> RE: How much can a Master actually change a slave? (11/20/2011 6:48:05 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: OsideGirl quote:
ORIGINAL: MikeSojourner Personally, I think one of the jobs of the master is to improve the slave, Personally, I've always found that view offensive. I'm not some broken little girl that can't get my crap together and needs direction just to function. Just because you've labeled yourself as a dominant doesn't mean that you're in a position or even qualified to improve me. A relationship is a two way street. We support each other in our desires to improve ourselves, but neither one of think we're so special and sparkly that we can decide and impose "improvement" on the other. I did not mean to imply that slaves are "broken", unable to function or improve themselves without a dominant. And, indeed, if there are real issues that need to be addressed, I'm not qualified to help with them - that's what professional therapists are for. I will disagree on the "imposing improvement" - In some relationships, that is exactly what is allowed. The submissive has given the dominant permission to steer them in whatever direction the dominant decides. Not my style, and apparently not yours, but doesn't mean it isn't a valid choice. My personal style is more along the lines of helping a submissive grow in the direction she chooses. Just like I expect a submissive to help me achieve the goals I've set for myself. Yes, a two-way street, but not the same type of help and support in both directions. I tend to provide direction, motivation, and support. My submissives tend to provide information, knowledge, time, and effort. Could the submissives have achieved what they did without my help - most likely. But, focusing on helping each other achieve/change/do something became part of our dynamic.
|
|
|
|