tazzygirl -> RE: How much can a Master actually change a slave? (11/29/2011 6:04:19 AM)
|
quote:
You can go research it for yourself, have fun. 95% of adults have bowel movements between three and 21 times per week. The entire range -- even just three bowel movements a week -- is normal. What you cited it not "average" Don't ignore the urge to go. Peristalsis of the bowel -- the movements that trigger a bowel movement -- come and go. If you ignore this urge, you may lose the opportunity. The longer stool stays in the bowel, the harder it gets as more water is reabsorbed, and the more difficult it is to expel. The urge to defecate also increases after mealtime, so take advantage of your body's signals. Increasing water intake doesnt fix the problem once its started. It does assist to prevent the problem from beginning. People often go to Drs complaining of passing "ribbons" of stool, which means its passing around a blockage. Any blockage, no matter how many web sites you hit, is always a problem. People who pass these ribbons also believe they are not constipated. It can literally look like ribbons, or come out as diarrhea, making the person believe they are not constipated when they really are. Now, I will ask you the same question you asked to LL. Are you a physician? Are you medically trained to know the differences? Can you show me one source, a medical source, that enforces your insistance that forced constipation will do no harm? I looked, I cannot find a single one. And as others will tell you, I am very good when it comes to research. The clinical definition of constipation is having any two of the following symptoms for at least 12 weeks—not always consecutive—in the previous 12 months: straining during bowel movements lumpy or hard stool sensation of incomplete evacuation sensation of anorectal blockage/obstruction fewer than three bowel movements per week This is why I call it forced constipation. While this may be a kink you both enjoy consensually, telling others this is not harmful would be a worrying comment coming from anyone with medical training. Someone reading this thread, with no medical training, sees you spouting off about your medical training and insisting this is a good thing.. and problems begin for the slave that person is controlling. They would have no knowledge of how this could affect, or be affected, by medications or desease processes. That person would be stupid to take your work as fact. And, honestly, as a medically trained person, you are stupid for presenting it as such. quote:
I choose standards so I have a means of evaluating things in relation to them. If you don't set a standard somewhere, you don't know where you really are. You might think you do, but until you measure yourself against a standard, you don't really know. Standards in this case are your standards, and subject to the evaluation of anyone when you post them to a message board. Standards often change within a community. By saying your standards are the "standards" with which to measure against, how do you know your standards are the correct ones? They may be for you, based upon your own standards, but what if your standards are faulty? quote:
I wish you would refrain from stating your OPINION that not allowing a slave to defecate for 3 or 4 days is harmful, as if it were fact. Much of what you have posted is opinion... your opinion, supported by nit picking through multiple articles of fact. When presented as a whole, its hard to refute. when its cherry picked, it no longer is entitled to be called... fact... it then becomes YOUR fact... which can easily be someone elses fiction. I look forward to seeing your medical credentials.
|
|
|
|