RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus

RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

samboct -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/20/2011 6:13:20 PM)
That's why I quoted it. I'll take the bull by the horns. Was that gybe aimed at me? Sam

tazzygirl -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/20/2011 6:22:40 PM)
Solely, no.

samboct -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/20/2011 6:39:07 PM)
All right Tazzy- you've lost another debating/discussion partner. That you would feel the need to so distort my views I must admit, I find rather bewildering. I defy you or anyone to find something I've written that would in some way lead you to think that I would approve, even tacitly, of a father raping a 12 year old girl. That's a distortion so enormous it beggars the imagination. I haven't seen anything from any poster on here that would lead you to such a conclusion. Clearly, we haven't been having a debate, discussion or argument...you have altered what I have written to fit some agenda of your own. Please note- I am not angry, but I am saddened. Good night. Sam

searching4mysir -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/20/2011 6:39:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: angelikaJ quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: forcible rape and non-forcible rape (statutory rape and incest). Since when did non-forcible rape mean statutory rape or incest? It is part of the FBI's definition; they are unclear about what the other circumstances are. http://www.crisisconnectioninc.org/sexualassault/how_legally_define_rape.htm I would presume it would fall under the Class B Felony where they say: quote: 3) the other person is so mentally disabled or deficient that consent to intercourse cannot be given. It is this situation where diminished capacity for consent due to alcohol would fall.

tazzygirl -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/20/2011 7:42:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: samboct All right Tazzy- you've lost another debating/discussion partner. That you would feel the need to so distort my views I must admit, I find rather bewildering. I defy you or anyone to find something I've written that would in some way lead you to think that I would approve, even tacitly, of a father raping a 12 year old girl. That's a distortion so enormous it beggars the imagination. I haven't seen anything from any poster on here that would lead you to such a conclusion. Clearly, we haven't been having a debate, discussion or argument...you have altered what I have written to fit some agenda of your own. Please note- I am not angry, but I am saddened. Good night. Sam I think you need to read what I wrote again... quote: I have no doubt one of the "gentlemen" will be along to inform us that our "rush" to judgement on this old geezer is unwarranted and unfounded. that would in some way lead you to think that I would approve, even tacitly, of a father raping a 12 year old girl. In what way do you come to that conclusion? I said you would be along to determine Lucy and I were wrong in judging this man, especially since Lucy was calling for a much harsher punishment. Surely someone who can see the skewing of rape statistics in this country even with the knowledge that rape is one of the most under reported crimes here, would definitely believe we are over reacting. After all, incest is by non-force, therefore no violence, therefore no rape.

LafayetteLady -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/20/2011 8:37:26 PM)
Actually kali, it was not referring to you at all, but to a few other posters, none of who have posted to this thread.

LafayetteLady -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/20/2011 8:47:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr I don't accept your premise that violence can be present; absent a physical act. I guess I could be wrong but, I am almost positive that a physical act is the only thing that can be violent. Rape is, indeed, a crime of violence, anger, control, and humiliation. Writing words on a paper is not. Like it or not, it's free speech. As much as I detest what some people or groups have to say (The Nazis and the KKK come readily to mind), I have to protect their right to spew their vile message if I want to maintain my right to voice my opinion (which they would find just as distasteful). Like it or not, this list is a form of free (*protected* ) speech; as atrocious as it is, as without humor or shred of human decency as we may find it; it is *speech* . As I stated, very early on in this thread, if someone were to act upon this list, it would become a crime. An action is required for this to be anything but really poor taste (and an indictment on our parenting skills as a society and this particular instiutution of higher learning). Peace and comfort, Michael I also hate that the KKK and the Westboro idiots are free to spew their hate at will. However, when the KKK talks about wanting to keep the races separate, their talk is protected. If they start talking about lynchings, their talk no longer has the protections. This is the same with the college boys. Because they used the term "rape" they lose protection under the law. Does it necessarily make it a crime? Maybe, although everyone here screaming about them "getting what they deserve" would be sad to hear any crime would be a misdemeanor offense.

tazzygirl -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/20/2011 9:36:41 PM)
Thats the part I dont really get. Saying which girl they would love to fuck would have found them a few girls who would have felt complimented. Saying which ones that would rape.... they dont mind stagging it for a long time, apparently.

SailingBum -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/21/2011 10:09:24 AM)
I just read the fist page of replies and seems as tho some ppl are over reacting. Poor taste yes but no worse than the vile howard stearn spews to a national audience "every day" I might add. Come to think of it Hustler magazine spews that much derogatory things about woman on a monthly basis. Their case <Hustlers> went all the way to the supreme court and they won regarding public defamation of character. There is even a movie about it "the ppl vs larry flynt. As a practical matter I dont see what the uproar is about. At the emotional level I understand ppl getting pissed off. My guess is the reason some ppl are upset is they think it might promote rape. To that I say BS. No more than watching shootem up TV promotes murder. We all realize rape and murder are wrong. BadOne

tazzygirl -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/21/2011 10:14:01 AM)
SB, the reason for the "emotional upset" as you put it is that women were named, specifically, as potential victims.

searching4mysir -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/21/2011 10:18:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SailingBum I just read the fist page of replies and seems as tho some ppl are over reacting. Poor taste yes but no worse than the vile howard stearn spews to a national audience "every day" I might add. Come to think of it Hustler magazine spews that much derogatory things about woman on a monthly basis. Their case <Hustlers> went all the way to the supreme court and they won regarding public defamation of character. There is even a movie about it "the ppl vs larry flynt. As a practical matter I dont see what the uproar is about. At the emotional level I understand ppl getting pissed off. My guess is the reason some ppl are upset is they think it might promote rape. To that I say BS. No more than watching shootem up TV promotes murder. We all realize rape and murder are wrong. BadOne What you seem to ignore, SB, is that Jerry Falwell was a public figure and open to parody (part of that situation). Hustler may be nothing but low-class porn, but it doesn't promote violence upon women (at least at that time) and it doesn't name names of innocent, nonpublic women and suggest that they are rapeable. This isn't anywhere NEAR the same thing as "PvLF". This list was not "the press".

EmilyRocks -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/21/2011 10:22:48 AM)
quote: That you would feel the need to so distort my views I must admit, I find rather bewildering. Why would you find it bewildering? That's all she does, that's her entire debating/discussion style.

Lucylastic -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/21/2011 10:24:02 AM)
hahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahah

mnottertail -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/21/2011 10:26:40 AM)
Hey Girls!!!!! FYI. I am on campus!!!!!

tazzygirl -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/21/2011 10:32:03 AM)
Guess we know where she stands on women being called out as potential victims of violence...

SailingBum -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/21/2011 10:34:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: searching4mysir quote: ORIGINAL: SailingBum I just read the fist page of replies and seems as tho some ppl are over reacting. Poor taste yes but no worse than the vile howard stearn spews to a national audience "every day" I might add. Come to think of it Hustler magazine spews that much derogatory things about woman on a monthly basis. Their case <Hustlers> went all the way to the supreme court and they won regarding public defamation of character. There is even a movie about it "the ppl vs larry flynt. As a practical matter I dont see what the uproar is about. At the emotional level I understand ppl getting pissed off. My guess is the reason some ppl are upset is they think it might promote rape. To that I say BS. No more than watching shootem up TV promotes murder. We all realize rape and murder are wrong. BadOne What you seem to ignore, SB, is that Jerry Falwell was a public figure and open to parody (part of that situation). Hustler may be nothing but low-class porn, but it doesn't promote violence upon women (at least at that time) and it doesn't name names of innocent, nonpublic women and suggest that they are rapeable. This isn't anywhere NEAR the same thing as "PvLF". This list was not "the press". Not at all I didnt ignore that... The underlying issue was/is Freedom of speech. Hustler has in the past promoted violence against woman and "Chester The Molester" comes to mind. Which promotes something about which I cannot say as it deals with something we cannot discuss on here. But Im sure the you will be able to figure it out. The supremes to their credit have upheld the right to say what we/you want without recourse. Self admitted law school dropout.. But Im sure if there was a "crime" here The DA would have charged them already. BadOne

tazzygirl -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/21/2011 10:39:57 AM)
SB no one here has called for any criminal charges....

xxblushesxx -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/21/2011 10:43:36 AM)
I believe what SB is trying to say is that these poor guys are guilty of no more than poor judgment, and they really should be left alone now. After all, Hustler does it, Howard Stern does it, why not a school sanctioned organization?

tazzygirl -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/21/2011 10:48:31 AM)
Women dont have to buy a Hustler magazine. Women dont have to listen to Howard Stern. Women do go to that college. The women who pose or read Hustler are doing so willingly. The women who appear on Howard's show do so willingly. The women on campus were not a willing part of this survey. There are many differences.

xxblushesxx -> RE: Name who you would like to rape on campus (12/21/2011 10:51:27 AM)
I'm not disagreeing with you Tazzy. I also don't believe either Hustler or Howard Stern (that bastion of male gentility) has ever done something so stupid and revolting as to make a list of women they'd like to rape and share it with the public. If they had, I'd expect them to lawyer up almost immediately and wait for the fall-out.

Page: << < prev 12 13 [14] 15 16 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875