Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/4/2012 1:21:03 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
Okay, Thor. My bad.

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to LadyHibiscus)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/4/2012 2:14:25 PM   
Fetters4U


Posts: 393
Joined: 5/25/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hardcybermaster
As usual its the yanks who are pro gun and the brits who are anti gun. Guess it's just about how and where you were brought up.

Actually, I think it is more folks who live in the USA and know how seriously fucked up some people here are, and folks that live in the good old UK and are, in some cases, ignorant. I would prefer it if you did not try to speak for the entire British people, and not for me in particular. Frankly, I find your insinuations embarrassing.

I am British born and raised but now I live in the USA. I totally agree with what this women did. I am glad she blew him away rather than scare him away (so he could try again later). She definitely improved the gene pool. It's a shame she could not get them both.

For the record, if the attacker was my son, I would still totally approve. In fact, if I had been passing by and saw what was going on, I would have done it myself, son or no son. Unfortunately, it is typical of people who raise such monsters to whine afterward. Forgiving the unforgivable is what helps create such creatures in the first place.

Oh. And in response to an earlier post of yours: I would try not to fatally shoot someone who killed my dog. I would much rather wound them and watch them die slowly. If you are far enough gone to deliberately kill a family pet for no reason, then, IMHO,  it's time for Darwin to be invoked.



_____________________________

Male-Dom-Straight

A dame that knows the ropes isn't likely to get tied up. -- Mae West
I like restraint, if it doesn't go too far. -- Mae West

To err is human; to edit, divine...

(in reply to hardcybermaster)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/4/2012 3:35:41 PM   
hardcybermaster


Posts: 904
Joined: 10/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fetters4U

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardcybermaster
As usual its the yanks who are pro gun and the brits who are anti gun. Guess it's just about how and where you were brought up.

Actually, I think it is more folks who live in the USA and know how seriously fucked up some people here are, and folks that live in the good old UK and are, in some cases, ignorant. I would prefer it if you did not try to speak for the entire British people, and not for me in particular. Frankly, I find your insinuations embarrassing.

I am British born and raised but now I live in the USA. I totally agree with what this women did. I am glad she blew him away rather than scare him away (so he could try again later). She definitely improved the gene pool. It's a shame she could not get them both.

For the record, if the attacker was my son, I would still totally approve. In fact, if I had been passing by and saw what was going on, I would have done it myself, son or no son. Unfortunately, it is typical of people who raise such monsters to whine afterward. Forgiving the unforgivable is what helps create such creatures in the first place.

Oh. And in response to an earlier post of yours: I would try not to fatally shoot someone who killed my dog. I would much rather wound them and watch them die slowly. If you are far enough gone to deliberately kill a family pet for no reason, then, IMHO,  it's time for Darwin to be invoked.



So it's a slow painful death for anyone who kills a dog and you are perfectly happy with the idea of your own son being shot dead.
I am so glad you are now in the US and nowhere near me
At what point did I claim to speak for the entire British people, at what point did I claim to speak for a nut job like you? It was a generalisation, are you going to argue that more yanks are anti gun, or that more Brits are pro gun?

_____________________________

insert something clever or profound that someone else thought of

vanilla burger flipper


(in reply to Fetters4U)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/4/2012 7:51:26 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
Not to plant a turd in the punchbowl of approval for the right of self defense, and the sanctity of our castles, but does anyone else get the impression there is more to this story? Was she specifically targeted as more than a victim of opportunity?

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to hardcybermaster)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/4/2012 9:38:34 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Duskypearls

A girl after my own heart!

http://www.kfor.com/news/kfor-blanchard-woman-shoots-and-kills-intruder-20120101,0,2752550.story


You go girl!




According to police,there is evidence that the attack was premeditated.

She had two of her dogs recently killed which points to someone targeting them.

The reason?

Anyone`s guess at this point.



< Message edited by Owner59 -- 1/4/2012 9:45:01 PM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Duskypearls)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/4/2012 9:41:37 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Not to plant a turd in the punchbowl of approval for the right of self defense, and the sanctity of our castles, but does anyone else get the impression there is more to this story? Was she specifically targeted as more than a victim of opportunity?

I don't think it was strictly a victim of opportunity as another article I read indicated that he had introduced himself as a neighbor at her husbands funeral and in the process creeped her out.

Seriously, hitting on a woman at her husband's funeral. What's not to creep you out?

I think he was a perve that decided this young mother needed "company".

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/4/2012 10:00:55 PM   
FrostedFlake


Posts: 3084
Joined: 3/4/2009
From: Centralia, Washington
Status: offline
quote:

Cyberdude

this time I am not fucking with anyone, I am anti gun, and I usually pipe up when there is a "shoot the fuckers!" thread.
As usual its the yanks who are pro gun and the brits who are anti gun. Guess it's just about how and where you were brought up. I am personally very happy to live in a country with hardly any guns and hence much fewer dead people regardless of whether they are good or bad eggs
quote:

ORIGINAL: FrostedFlake

Hardycybermaster is just here to annoy cliques and question cliches. Feel free to ignore him.

Don't think so? Perv his profile. That is exactly what it says.

http://www.collarme.com/hardcybermaster

And as for trying to win him over with reason or charm, forget about it. He is not arguing with you. He is fucking with you.


You are serious this time. Not playing. You REALLY MEAN IT ! And your answer the problem faced by the lady in the story this thread is about is to tuck her baby under her arm just like a football and make a break for it out the back door.

I am going to take a moment to ask all of the mothers out there in CM land to please feel free to say what they think of this idea, before I go on.

It may have escaped you, but in the first place, the men were going from door to door. In this sense, there is no "back door". So, you plan is not only very stupid if the objective is to protect the child, it is also as stupid if the objective is to protect the woman. The third problem with your plan is that fleeing ones home is by definition fleeing the safest place one can be.

Here is my plan, which I hope you will critique for me :

Don't invade someones home wielding a 12" knife, because you could be shot.

I see nothing wrong with that plan. The least problem with it is ; that you do not have to be a good guy, for it to be your plan.


_____________________________

Frosted Flake
simul justus et peccator
Einen Liebhaber, und halten Sie die Schraube

"... evil (and hilarious) !!" Hlen5

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/4/2012 10:02:30 PM   
Fetters4U


Posts: 393
Joined: 5/25/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hardcybermaster
So it's a slow painful death for anyone who kills a dog and you are perfectly happy with the idea of your own son being shot dead.
I am so glad you are now in the US and nowhere near me
At what point did I claim to speak for the entire British people, at what point did I claim to speak for a nut job like you? It was a generalisation, are you going to argue that more yanks are anti gun, or that more Brits are pro gun?

Your ability to read plainly-written English is astounding. It must be those British genes.

Yes. I would be happy if the person that murdered my dog died a nasty, slow, painful death. I bet I am not the only British person that feels that way.  Britain is, after all, well known for being a nation of animal lovers.

Yes, I would much rather have my child dead, than have them harm an innocent. Once they start along this path, their life is over anyway . Sooner or later they will be caught, and face the death penalty or life-without-parole. Since they cannot be saved, you may as well kill them quickly, to keep the body count as low as possible.

Yes, I too am glad that you are nowhere near me. On this we agree.

I have no idea whether or not Britain or the US is pro or anti gun: I am not the one making claims. I do not see this as a gun control issue though. It is a right to defend yourself issue. Had the young lady used an axe, a baseball bat, a kitchen knife or an overripe banana to kill the intruder, she would still have done the right thing.

Generally, people making generalizations include a word like "generally" or "usually" or a phrase like,"as a rule,". I will accept your word, that you meant to make a generalization, but were inept.

Most of all, I am glad you called me a nut job. First, it means that you think I am nothing like you. Second, people only start name calling when they know their attempts at logic have failed. My work here is done.



< Message edited by Fetters4U -- 1/4/2012 10:10:21 PM >


_____________________________

Male-Dom-Straight

A dame that knows the ropes isn't likely to get tied up. -- Mae West
I like restraint, if it doesn't go too far. -- Mae West

To err is human; to edit, divine...

(in reply to hardcybermaster)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/4/2012 11:01:26 PM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: Duskypearls

A girl after my own heart!

http://www.kfor.com/news/kfor-blanchard-woman-shoots-and-kills-intruder-20120101,0,2752550.story


You go girl!




According to police,there is evidence that the attack was premeditated.

She had two of her dogs recently killed which points to someone targeting them.

The reason?

Anyone`s guess at this point.




The fact that this 18 year-old widow is demonstrating her technique for tv cameras makes me wonder about her decision making skills. Does she have no other support people? Where is her family?

I'm sure the audio recording of the 911 dispatcher will be gone over very carefully. 911 would have stayed with her on the phone thru it all. How far out in the boonies did she live that cops couldn't have gotten there within 20 minutes?

I wish she hadn't had to shoot, but who can agrue with it when 2 people had been trying to enter a locked home for 20 minutes??

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/5/2012 9:20:17 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
In response to page 5 (Hibiscus, tj444, Rule, hlen5):

Regarding the legality of rooms without windows in Norway, it's obviously more complicated than that once you have a look at the actual building code. Yet, the long and short of it is that no room with a reasonable expectation of being able to get to it in time- along with anyone else in the house- would meet that code. Indeed, the entire point is to have access from the outside, as well as keeping power consumption low due to sunlight during the day. No, alternate means which accomplish the same goals are not acceptable, unless you get a dispensation, which is virtually impossible if the point is related to security (that's the police's job, as far as Norwegians are concerned, which is part of why we're usually killed when someone wants to kill us, then police arrive to investigate and file the case in a drawer somewhere).

I've seen plenty of firearms in real life, most of them in recent years.

The list includes handguns, shotguns, rifles and assault rifles, more than one of these categories from the wrong side of the barrel, but the only time I got shot, it can't have been too bad, though my memory of the event is kind of fuzzy. For the most part, criminals around where I live don't pack anything more than a knife, though some carry handguns. When they're out to do harm, on the other hand, expect anything from a shiv to a carbine, with shotguns and handguns being most common. Still, we don't see much firearms use in crime involving regular citizens.

If you have the money for it, you can outfit yourself like Frank Castle in about 15-30 minutes.

Regarding the measures I suggested as tools for improving home safety, some of them are demonstrably effective against armed attackers. With a robber or casual attacker, they are likely to be sufficient, assuming you don't waste the time those measures buy you, and anyone with half a brain that is smacked with mace and a flashbang on entering a house will leave if at all possible. Most here do not need to consider veritable soldiers breaking down their door to kill everyone inside the house. Those that do, I would prefer to address in a PM, not in public. Suffice to say that a shotgun doesn't address such a situation.

As for bringing a knife to a firefight, there are several issues: skill, range and legality.

Firearms bring range to the table. In a house, the range benefit is substantially less, although not negligible. The risk associated with defending a home is weighed against the risk faced by the household and the legality of the means used to do so, as well as the training that some means of defense require. In the current political climate up here, it's not wise to indicate that you don't leave it to the police, regardless of whether or not you actually do so.

For the most part, when I've been on the business end of a firearm, it's been without sufficient warning to draw.

It's also usually been possible to neutralize the threat.

Remember that unless you're reasonably confident that your attacker isn't going to shoot you, the best bet is to deal with the gun and the person wielding it, not necessarily in that order. That, of course, is under the assumption that the range is fairly short. At a distance, you run, dodge and try to keep something in the space between you and the attacker. Don't even think about pulling a gun yourself if the other person has theirs out. The exceptions to that rule know who they are.

Disregarding for the moment that the lethality of firearms is exaggerated in the popular imagination, at least as regards handguns, it is still necessary for an attacker to hit you. At close range, this is substantially harder if you take initiative, as humans are slower to react than to act. Properly made firearms have the property that they deliver the bullet along a trajectory described by the barrel. Ideally, the gun should be pointing at the attacker's head or torso. Failing that, it will improve the situation quite a lot to have it pointing somewhere else than yourself, or to have something suitable in the intervening space to reduce the potential damages. Should it be impossible to prevent being hit, a less vital area is the preferred location. Contact shots are most depressing, but the silver lining is that contact will usually permit a small rotation of the relevant bodily axis to deflect the barrel. Being hit is a deceptively dull sensation that is best filed under "not important" for the duration, as should the pain from grabbing the slide firmly to prevent the chambering of a second round. Removing the gun will be helpful, and any fingers broken in the process are a bonus. Striking with the grip to the thin part of the temporal bone, while not necessarily immediately incapacitating, will sever a major vessel in the head. The muzzle is better applied to the eye, being quite hot after firing. Don't attempt to fire an unfamiliar weapon after taking it away, unless you can get some distance to work with. Different rules apply to shotguns, but the principles are the same.

In all cases, the encounter is at an end when one of you is on the ground and the other unjams the weapon to fire two shots into the upper torso and one to the head. If that someone is yourself, expect a hard drop unless used to it. Engage the safety, eject the magazine and work the slide once before that happens. Emptying the remainder of the clip is neither therapeutic, nor constructive, nor likely to look good when police finally arrive.

If the gun has been thrown away (not necessarily a bad idea), a knife will substitute. Entry is made above the left clavicle at a down and inward angle to sever the aorta, as it can be easy to misalign a knife or miss the heart when affected by the adrenalin. The throat should wait until the aorta is dealt with, as there have been cases where people have failed to reach the relevant vessels. Attempting entry through the foramen magnum is pointless unless it's the only readily identifiable landmark and the blade has some length to it. Heavier knives can enter through the temporal bone or any of the sutures. Again, expecting a drop afterwards is a good idea, and police may not be entirely understanding as to why it was useful to ensure that the threat was actually over before dropping, so don't hold on to the blade until the drop occurs.

Obviously, if hit during the process, it's a good idea to get someone on the phone with an ambulance, as the numbness is going to pass, at which point it is not un(wo)manly to curl up and make an awful amount of noise, and also not unusual to be in no position to do anything constructive for a long while. Sudoku will not help pass the time until the ambulance arrives, nor lessen the frustration at discovering that they're not carrying any morphine. The upshot is that you will be far more successful at convincing friends and acquaintances to attend a firearms first aid class when you're eventually done with the surgeries and antibiotics and rehabilitation. Assuming you make it, that is. You're unlikely to regret trying if you don't, though, so it's almost like a win-win scenario, except for the winning.

Seriously, though, a gun is one of several components of defense, one of many, and relying on being able to draw it and bring it to bear fast enough is a recipe for disaster, as much as not having one in the first place. A false sense of safety is very dangerous. When things go down, it tends to be at close range and high speed, and if you didn't see it coming soon enough to get the hell out of dodge, you're not going to see it coming soon enough to make your own gun do anything other than let the other person know it's time to put bullets in you or die. Even for attackers not initially prepared to kill you, that will likely end badly. In the home, if you're away from the point of ingress, you may have more warning, but there's other problems to offset that advantage.

Guns are offensive weapons, not defensive ones, and their main role in either capacity is adding range.

Incidentally, prefragmented breaching rounds make decent shells for indoors use.

Of course, if you're serious, consider a flamethrower instead.

3M also happens to sell fire retardant wallpaper...

Health,
al-Aswad.



_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to LadyHibiscus)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/5/2012 10:56:42 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
A good less than lethal for those who don`t want a firearm.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qa304Plk1So

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbdHkW_TJJ4

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/6/2012 2:11:04 AM   
FrostedFlake


Posts: 3084
Joined: 3/4/2009
From: Centralia, Washington
Status: offline
Hat tip to Aswad.

_____________________________

Frosted Flake
simul justus et peccator
Einen Liebhaber, und halten Sie die Schraube

"... evil (and hilarious) !!" Hlen5

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/7/2012 10:41:40 AM   
Duskypearls


Posts: 3561
Joined: 8/21/2011
Status: offline
And since we're on the subject, perhaps a little levity will help.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IbPE8l1Qqg&feature=player_embedded#!

(in reply to FrostedFlake)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/7/2012 11:09:35 PM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline
A little update - At :47 seconds

"He kept knocking"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/45910084#45910084

(in reply to Duskypearls)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder - 1/7/2012 11:39:42 PM   
slaverachel2Him


Posts: 147
Joined: 11/19/2011
Status: offline
Good for her!! My sentiments exactly. Been there, almost had to do that. He got lucky and the cops arrived first.

_____________________________

Master Richard's slave rachel

(in reply to hlen5)
Profile   Post #: 115
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Blanchard woman shoots and kills intruder Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.093