RE: Time to call "Pro Lifers" what they are. "Pro Coathanger Death" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tazzygirl -> RE: Time to call "Pro Lifers" what they are. "Pro Coathanger Death" (2/2/2012 9:28:05 PM)

quote:

I love how you like to absolve all women of any responsibility in the equation other than the final decision on abortion, it has to be the man's job to decide whether sex occurs in the first place and to provide for any sort of contraception


Show me where I absolved any woman of the responsibility for birth control. You really should read better. Jumping to assumptions.. well... seems hardly worth it.

quote:

Both parties are equally responsible


Yup

quote:

both parties deserve an equal say


Nope

quote:

otherwise it's just sexist and unfair


Can a man have an abortion or give birth? No. The whole issue is sexist and fair doesnt play into the equation at all.

quote:

Now admittedly I fully support the idea that a woman should be allowed to choose wether she has a child or not, but a man should be able to choose if he is to pay child support by the same virtues on the basis of a prebirth opt out that denies him both any right to custody and any responsibility for the general welfare and support of the child, that would be an example of something that would make the equation fair, after all why should either party be forced to do anything they really don't believe is correct?


As I posted... grab a lawyer and get a "no fault" clause worked up. Have the woman sign it, and I will back you 100%. Until that time, it is your responsibility, per the law, regardless of your wishes to the contrary.

quote:

the alternative of course is that women hold all the power of reproduction unless someone haymakers them in the stomache or tosses them down some stairs, which although I don't support I do see the validity of simply because 6 to 12 months in prison for domestic abuse is a hell of alot less problematic than 18 years of child support. I guess what I'm saying is, equality must be established, the alternative is hellish for one or the other party.


So your whole argument is down to bitching about child support payments?

I got news for you. I had mine. 25 years old... and I raised him without a penny from his father. That was MY choice. I didnt ask, he didnt offer. I made the choice not to abort. I also made the choice not to ask for money. I also had a family and a career that allowed me to do so.

Its about choices, and what the law allows. You dont like the law? Then get it changed. Im sure 1000's of dead beat parents would applaud you.

Until that time, maybe if men remembered when they leave that little gift behind they could possibly be leaving their wallets as well, they wouldn't be so hot to get in the sack.

That works both ways as well. While you are complaining about paying support for a child you didnt want, you werent complaining when you were making that child.

Yeah, it sucks to be on that end of a payment plan you didnt expect. For decades women had to deal with that issue on their own while the men pranced off to college and their careers. It sucks that the pendulum swung backwards.

Sex is great, sex is lovely, sex has consequences. You know the consequences before having sex. Buyer's remorse doesnt work in this situation.




Trismagistus -> RE: Time to call "Pro Lifers" what they are. "Pro Coathanger Death" (2/2/2012 9:33:10 PM)

redacted




tazzygirl -> RE: Time to call "Pro Lifers" what they are. "Pro Coathanger Death" (2/2/2012 9:37:27 PM)

I agree, it is over. Time for the Mods to take over.




tweakabelle -> RE: Time to call "Pro Lifers" what they are. "Pro Coathanger Death" (2/2/2012 11:48:44 PM)

The Catholic Church is one of the prime sources of opposition to abortion. It teaches that abortion is contrary to the "Right to Life" inherent it claims, in its version of "Natural Law". Many people wrongly assume from this that the position of the Church is age-old and constant through history.

It comes as surprise to many that the current position is a relatively new position and was defined only in 1869, after a series of twisting and shifting positions. The argument based on the "Right to Life" principle wasn't finalised until after Vatican II in 1974. Up till then abortion was condemned because it was seen as a contraceptive, and as a means of hiding sexual misconduct.

A brief history of these shifts can be found here. This history is well worth reading, it is illuminating.

So the theology that asserts that abortion is wrong is less that 50 years old. To put that another way, it has taken almost 2,000 years for the Church to discover the "Natural Law" that it claims underwrites its opposition to abortion. Awareness of the convoluted history of Catholic teaching on abortion leads one to suspect that the current position is far from infallible and likely to change again in the future.




tazzygirl -> RE: Time to call "Pro Lifers" what they are. "Pro Coathanger Death" (2/3/2012 2:20:31 AM)

tweak, the medical community had a huge hand in the change on the attitude on abortions during that same time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerperal_fever

The first recorded epidemic of puerperal fever occurred at the Hôtel-Dieu de Paris in 1646. Hospitals throughout Europe and America consistently reported death rates between 20% to 25% of all women giving birth, punctuated by intermittent epidemics with up to 100% fatalities of women giving birth in childbirth wards.

Not saying the church didnt have a huge hand in it as well. But, because it was coming from two large and influential fronts, the laws had virtually no opposition.





VideoAdminGamma -> RE: Time to call "Pro Lifers" what they are. "Pro Coathanger Death" (2/3/2012 3:36:23 AM)

Fast Reply

If you have received a warning already, and post another violation you will not like the consequences. I cannot express my disappointment in words at this time.

Refrain from personal attacks.

Thank you for your contribution to the forums,
VideoAdminGamma




farglebargle -> RE: Time to call "Pro Lifers" what they are. "Pro Coathanger Death" (2/3/2012 5:51:18 AM)


quote:



But, she should be in control of his, when they both have a drunken night? It doesn't add up. The laws have to provide equal protection of they're unjust. It's really as simple as that.


Peace and comfort,

Michael


They do. Unless the guy has secured the property rights to any outcome of their intercourse, he HAS NO PROPERTY RIGHTS.

Period. End of story. Caveat Emptor.

If you REALLY CARE what might happen if you get someone pregnant, then you work out the details before hand. Otherwise, you ABANDONED your sperm in her, and what she does is NO CONCERN OF YOURS.

Next time, watch what you do with your property more carefully. It's no-one's fault but yours.




farglebargle -> RE: Time to call "Pro Lifers" what they are. "Pro Coathanger Death" (2/3/2012 5:54:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

The Catholic Church is one of the prime sources of opposition to abortion. It teaches that abortion is contrary to the "Right to Life" inherent it claims, in its version of "Natural Law".


Yeah, they also teach such crackpot and downright insane ideas as "Immaculate Conception" and that babies need to be baptized to be saved because they're tained with sin. And that's even without going to "Jesus is the Messiah". And the "Trininty?" Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman are holier than "The Father, Son and Holy Spirit"....

It's really too bad these crazy religious extremists don't just keep their crazy agendas private, and insist on imposing their Will of Allah on everyone. If they only kept their religion to themselves, we wouldn't have to point out how crazy their extremist religious stance is.





kalikshama -> RE: Time to call "Pro Lifers" what they are. "Pro Coathanger Death" (2/3/2012 5:57:57 AM)

quote:

the alternative of course is that women hold all the power of reproduction unless someone haymakers them in the stomache or tosses them down some stairs, which although I don't support I do see the validity of simply because 6 to 12 months in prison for domestic abuse is a hell of alot less problematic than 18 years of child support.


I find this viewpoint extremely troubling and suggest you address it before the poison eats you up inside.




searching4mysir -> RE: Time to call "Pro Lifers" what they are. "Pro Coathanger Death" (2/3/2012 6:00:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


So the theology that asserts that abortion is wrong is less that 50 years old.



Bullshit. It goes back to the Didache which dates back to the 1st century.


quote:

thou shalt not procure abortion, nor commit infanticide




farglebargle -> RE: Time to call "Pro Lifers" what they are. "Pro Coathanger Death" (2/3/2012 6:03:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

quote:

the alternative of course is that women hold all the power of reproduction unless someone haymakers them in the stomache or tosses them down some stairs, which although I don't support I do see the validity of simply because 6 to 12 months in prison for domestic abuse is a hell of alot less problematic than 18 years of child support.


I find this viewpoint extremely troubling and suggest you address it before the poison eats you up inside.


I think it's pathological. That attitude, "The moment I grace a woman with my sperm they become my breeding stock" is *the* cancer which causes this pus of 'anti-woman's healthcare' which is the stench we all smell from it.

I think the SOLUTION is that we need to educate women to refuse to have any sex with anyone who doesn't acknowledge the sovereignty of their own selves. In a generation or two, this defective gene will breed itself out.

And THAT'S why Sex-Ed is as repellent to these animals as woman's healthcare.




farglebargle -> RE: Time to call "Pro Lifers" what they are. "Pro Coathanger Death" (2/3/2012 6:07:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


So the theology that asserts that abortion is wrong is less that 50 years old.



Bullshit. It goes back to the Didache which dates back to the 1st century.


quote:

thou shalt not procure abortion, nor commit infanticide



THE FIRST CENTURY?

How CHARMING!

Look, Us Jews believe that until the mother feels the baby move, it's not a person. So, all this Christian bullshit is unsustainable in the face of ACTUAL BIBLICAL HISTORY.

So, this is why I'm so contemptuous of everything these crazy Christian extremists spout. They are SO WRONG, that every time they start to pray "In Jesus' Name" they PISS G-d OFF MORE ( There is no "Son", nor "Holy Ghost", and without a "Son" what the fuck is a "Father", and they decide that you've got the One, True, Faith?

Man, those guys sound as crazy as the Mormons, with their whole "Jews sailed to America and buried golden plates of prohpecy outside Rochester, NY...."





VideoAdminGamma -> RE: Time to call "Pro Lifers" what they are. "Pro Coathanger Death" (2/3/2012 6:11:45 AM)

Okay, this topic is closed. It seems I was incorrect on how this could be handled.

Thank you for your contribution to the forums,
VideoAdminGamma




Page: <<   < prev  10 11 12 13 [14]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125