sexyred1
Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sundowner quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP ... Sorry to say this SD, but you're way off base. I've gotten email (back when I was seeking) from guys who it would appear we might be compatible from quick perusals of the profile. But there's no way to state on a profile everything you want in a person. Sense of humor could mean an appreciation of word play. But then you get guys who believe it means the Three Stooges is the epitome of humor. Not for me. ... My beef is with situations where: 1. The profile invites contact (Actively Seeking), 2. The writer has read the profile and is interested, 3. The writer meets any specified criteria (age, location, life goals - whatever), 4. The writer writes a personal note, and 5. The lady does not reply. Over the years I've occasionally messaged people, in every case on the basis above. And hey - I've made friends that way; and I've had a few "thanks but no thanks" replies. "No thanks" seems to me to be so entirely reasonable I can't conceive of writing further either with abuse or with an attempt to change a mind. (Apart from GT of course, who keeps saying no to my "kneel bitch" messages for some reason - unbelievable - so the only possible response is to explain to her that she's fake). But I've also had occasions of no reply to a courteous letter; I find that ill-mannered in the extreme when contact was invited. I think I stand by my hissy fit. And if you're saying above that you simply didn't reply when you received a message from someone who apparently met all your criteria but just in a dull way and you weren't interested then in my book that's ill-mannered. (Sorry DesFIP, I just love the wagging finger opportunities - doesn't mean I don't love you loads). Experience may have taught you that often a "no thanks" may trigger abuse; well I find that distressing and I sympathise. But life is, at times, hard; good manners can help us deal with that. Your bullet points are too generic. As a woman who gets a lot of email and who also does have manners, let me clarify the above: 1. The profile invites contact (Actively Seeking), (yes, actively seeking, but not seeking just anyone) 2. The writer has read the profile and is interested, (the writer may have read the profile, but the myriad inappropriate, rude, obscene or idiotic emails from said writers indicate a lack of comprehension of what they have read) 3. The writer meets any specified criteria (age, location, life goals - whatever), (this is interpretative. when I say I want someone for a relationship, the writer interprets this to be a relationship of what he believes, without asking what I think, example: today a guy wrote me a long diatribe about how he wants me to be a limitless slave, with him and his wife, for public display, etc. etc. and my profile states I am a submissive, not into poly. See what I mean?) 4. The writer writes a personal note, and (see #4) 5. The lady does not reply. (right. this lady hovered, clicked on the email, rolled eyes, thought of telling writer off and thought better of it since he seemed very scary to me). If anyone writes me a reasonable introduction or makes a comment on what I said in my profile or here, or gives me a compliment, anything like that, I always write back. I, like the other women have stopped saying not interested to most since they freak out upon being rejected, even if done politely. It is a fact of life on dating sites, sometimes your manners have to be tabled because the person being replied back to normally has no manners back when getting rejected, however politely.
|