RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Truthness -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 3:17:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

In Favor means they are in agreement....



Yep. And as demonstrated above, being in agreement doesn't disallow one to have exceptions.

Since the definition given of pro-life doesn't mention exceptions as either being allowed or disallowed, anyone in favor of a ban on abortions qualifies under that definition; with exceptions or without.




xssve -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 3:18:31 PM)

You're kidding yourself.




tazzygirl -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 3:23:02 PM)

quote:

Yep. And as demonstrated above, being in agreement doesn't disallow one to have exceptions.


Pro-life favors banning legal abortions.

Thats it.

No except in this case.. or except in that case... its clearly defined.. even in the legal dictionaries.

Its just how it is.

You want to include exceptions so you can feel better about something, which is why most people want to include something, so they dont feel like they are being utter assholes.

I actually have more respect for the 23% who state they are pro-life because they get it and they arent afraid to admit it.

I dont agree with them, I dont have too. But I do respect them.

I myself am in the murky middle. Most of us are. I call myself pro-choice, but I have limitations I believe in, which means I am not pro-choice because I want to limit those choices. If I were truly pro-choice, then a woman could get an abortion at any time for any reason up to the day of delivery. I cannot agree with that. But, as for so many others in this debate, there are only the extreme terms to use. There isnt one for the saner beliefs of this issue.




SoftBonds -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 3:37:40 PM)

Who cares what percent of the population is pro-life/pro-choice, I just found the solution anyway!
according to the 5th amendment, the government can't take a woman's property away without due compensation. If it denies her an abortion, it has taken her womb away from her.
That means taxpayer dollars to pay her for the property seized from her.
So pro-life folks, are you willing to pay higher taxes to pay women for their bodies? Or should abortion be her choice? You can't take her body and not give her due compensation!
BTW, you think welfare was expensive...




Moonhead -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 3:40:36 PM)

It they pay compensation for the uterus, would that mean that they can seize it, I wonder?




xssve -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 3:53:52 PM)

No, it would have to be a lease arrangement.

I'm pretty sure they would want to claim ownership of the child though, 'cause that's just how their minds work.




Truthness -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 3:56:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

No except in this case.. or except in that case... its clearly defined.. even in the legal dictionaries.



And if we're going to look at "ban" from a legal perspective...look up, say, "smoking bans" in Kansas...and you'll see it's been banned in public places...

...with a few exceptions.

quote:

You want to include exceptions so you can feel better about something, which is why most people want to include something, so they dont feel like they are being utter assholes.


That is so not the case, and to assume that about me and an entire group with that brush is just bigotry IMO.

I originally was from a "No exceptions" pro-life stance. It was through debate with a very well reasoned pro-choice individual that I came to be willing to change my stance to some degree. This individual made some compelling arguments from the perspective of a geneticist that had me rethinking being pro-life altogether, but I just can't get past that bump of believing that it's a human life being killed, if at a young stage.

quote:

But, as for so many others in this debate, there are only the extreme terms to use. There isnt one for the saner beliefs of this issue.


On that I do agree. As I said before, I wasn't the one that coined the phrase "pro-life", and if it'd been up to me, I would have coined something different.

I'm convinced that those that coined the phrases "pro-life" and "pro-choice" did so out of trying to come up with a "pro" term to make their side look better and demonize the other side. As in "We're PRO-LIFE, while the others kill babies!" while the others are going "We're PRO-CHOICE, the others want to take your freedoms away!" They are terms meant to highlight the positive of your stance and belittle the other on it's negative.

Even now though, people try and come up with terms for the other side to try and belittle an opposing viewpoint...such as "anti-choice", or the ridiculous "anti-family-planning!" while the pro-life people come up with bumper stickers claiming "The most dangerous place to be is in the womb!" Those aren't changing anyone's minds either.

So by now, noone is falling for it anyways, and the terms "pro-life" and "pro-choice" have just become convenient to use.

My real annoyance was through calling a group of people hypocrites for using an old term that's commonly used when you disagree with how they are using it. Okay, so you disagree that some of us use "Pro-life" while understanding the need for some exceptions; myself and others still try and be straightfoward about what our belief is on the subject, and stick to it...so "hypocrisy" doesn't apply, and trying to attach that term to the discussion just drags out a long, pointless tangent.




Truthness -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 4:00:00 PM)

Switching this response to other thread.




tazzygirl -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 4:20:53 PM)

quote:

And if we're going to look at "ban" from a legal perspective...look up, say, "smoking bans" in Kansas...and you'll see it's been banned in public places...

...with a few exceptions.


With those exceptions being clearly defined.

quote:

That is so not the case, and to assume that about me and an entire group with that brush is just bigotry IMO.


LOL.. I am far from a bigot over any medical issue. But the fact remains that it is true.

quote:

I originally was from a "No exceptions" pro-life stance. It was through debate with a very well reasoned pro-choice individual that I came to be willing to change my stance to some degree. This individual made some compelling arguments from the perspective of a geneticist that had me rethinking being pro-life altogether, but I just can't get past that bump of believing that it's a human life being killed, if at a young stage.


And my bump is the age of viability. Until that point, the fetus cannot survive outside the uterus. To date, the youngest is 21.6 weeks. And was only because the mother lied about the due date. Not only did the mother put her own life in danger to have her daughter, the child itself is extremely small and has health issues.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1021034/The-tiniest-survivor-How-miracle-baby-born-weeks-legal-abortion-limit-clung-life-odds.html

quote:

Even now though, people try and come up with terms for the other side to try and belittle an opposing viewpoint...such as "anti-choice", or the ridiculous "anti-family-planning!" while the pro-life people come up with bumper stickers claiming "The most dangerous place to be is in the womb!" Those aren't changing anyone's minds either.


I am pro-patient. How is that? lol At the age of viability, that fetus, to me, now becomes another patient. 24 weeks is considered that age. Before 20 weeks, most OBGYN's wont attempt to stop preterm labor, with very good reasons.

Its a confusing issue even for those in the medical field. If the woman in the link above had died as a result of her own actions, the hospital would have found itself in deep trouble. Its highly doubtful the family would ever have admitted to the measures they were doing.

quote:

My real annoyance was through calling a group of people hypocrites for using an old term that's commonly used when you disagree with how they are using it. Okay, so you disagree that some of us use "Pro-life" while understanding the need for some exceptions; myself and others still try and be straightfoward about what our belief is on the subject, and stick to it...so "hypocrisy" doesn't apply, and trying to attach that term to the discussion just drags out a long, pointless tangent.


I call myself a hypocrite on this issue as well. There simply isnt a way not to be with limited definitions. I had the decison to make myself, and I decided to have my son. Abortion, as a personal choice, is not something I would ever consider. That doesnt mean I would think any less of someone who does. I have taken care of many women who have. Its not as easy a decision as some may believe.




farglebargle -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 4:31:54 PM)

Let's just stop feeding the "Pro-Life" trolls. If they're pro-life, what do they eat? Meat and Vegetables are out, because they need to be killed to eat them, and if you eat a fruit, you're killing an embryo.

They're no "Pro-Life". They're Anti-Family-Planning. And if you REALLY want to break it down, they're Anti Woman's Freedom.




Truthness -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 4:42:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

With those exceptions being clearly defined.


As should any exceptions allowing abortions should also be clearly defined.

quote:

And my bump is the age of viability. Until that point, the fetus cannot survive outside the uterus. To date, the youngest is 21.6 weeks. And was only because the mother lied about the due date. Not only did the mother put her own life in danger to have her daughter, the child itself is extremely small and has health issues.


That is something that I'd thought long and hard about as well. One suggestion made was that if a woman doesn't want to carry the fetus; induce labor and if it can survive, good for it. I can understand the rationale behind the age of viability. That leads to another bump I can't quite get over though...even past the age of viabilty, the individual can't survive on it's own for many years...so the same logic used to permit killing it at 20 weeks could be stretched (and yes, I understand it's a stretch) to permit killing it long after. It's just enough of a bump that while I was almost there, I can't quite bring myself to agree with using age of viability.

I guess the best way to explain my reluctance to consider myself anything but pro-life is that for the mother; it's nine months of inconvenience (if a very significant one); for the human being growing inside her though, it's a lifetime being lost. Ideally IMO, technology should be advanced enough to prevent the issue altogether (through birth control primarily, etc...which I'm very much FOR as a method of family planning)...but I'm just too soft hearted to be able to bring myself to seeing human beings killed off before they've had a chance to live. And yes I know that a partly based emotional reasoning isn't the strongest argument; but it's an honest one.

quote:

I call myself a hypocrite on this issue as well. There simply isnt a way not to be with limited definitions.


There's no reason to call yourself a hypocrite that I can tell. I believe that word should be reserved for those who preach one thing while believing and doing something else. You seem to believe each woman should have the right to make the choice in the matter, and acted in accordance with that belief, so while I cannot bring myself to have the same viewpoint; there's no reason to claim hypocrisy there.




yummee -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 5:18:51 PM)

Extremists on both sides are moving the goalposts further and further. The pro-life movement has been around since the mid to late 60's. Many pro-life organizations allowed exceptions then and still coined the term "pro life." the SBC, for instance, definitely pro-life

"Resolution On Abortion, adopted at the SBC convention, June 1971:
WHEREAS, Christians in the American society today are faced with difficult decisions about abortion; and
WHEREAS, Some advocate that there be no abortion legislation, thus making the decision a purely private matter between a woman and her doctor; and
WHEREAS, Others advocate no legal abortion, or would permit abortion only if the life of the mother is threatened;
Therefore, be it RESOLVED, that this Convention express the belief that society has a responsibility to affirm through the laws of the state a high view of the sanctity of human life, including fetal life, in order to protect those who cannot protect themselves; and
Be it further RESOLVED, That we call upon Southern Baptists to work for legislation that will allow the possibility of abortion under such conditions as rape, incest, clear evidence of severe fetal deformity, and carefully ascertained evidence of the likelihood of damage to the emotional, mental, and physical health of the mother"

Since then, they have tightened the noose until, about 10 years later, the single remaining exception was if the fetus was a threat to the physical life of the mother.

http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/baptist/sbcabres.html

Roman Catholics have been back and forth

"Many religions, including many denominations within Christianity, have adopted the general principle that abortion is a form of murder if it is performed at or after the time that a soul enters the body of an embryo or fetus. Down through the ages, beliefs varied about when this "animation" happened.

Various church authorities and popes placed the time at:

At a specific time into pregnancy (40 days, 80 days, 116 days), or
Quickening (when the woman first feels the fetus move), or
At conception.
The latter is the current church teaching.

The Catholic Church has consistently taught that abortion -- at any stage of development -- is evil. However, its stance has changed down through the years on whether a given abortion is murder. " (http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_hist_c.htm)

Apparently, there have been periods of time that the RC Church has not even made an exception for the mother's life

"Pope Pius IX (1869) dropped the distinction between the "fetus animatus" and "fetus inanimatus." The soul was believed to have entered the pre-embryo at conception.
Leo XIII (1878-1903):
He Issued a decree in 1884 that prohibited craniotomies. This is an unusual form of abortion used under crisis situations late in pregnancy. It is occasionally needed to save the life of the pregnant woman.
He issued a second degree in 1886 that prohibited all procedures that directly killed the fetus, even if done to save the woman's life."

Now, they are back to the exception to spare the mother's life.

Even Pat Robertson allows for self defense and only condemns his definition of murder. (Apparently, state sanctioned executions are not murder, self defense is not murder, and China's forced abortions are not worth interfering with).

The definition of pro choice that I am most familiar with is more like this one:

"A comprehensive pro-choice position affirms that all of the following must remain legal:
Celibacy and abstinence ;
Contraception use ;
Emergency contraception use ;
Abortion, for the first two trimesters of pregnancy ; and
Childbirth." (http://civilliberty.about.com/od/abortion/tp/Pro-Life-vs-Pro-Choice.htm)

This discussion is the first time I have ever heard that Pro-choice means "for any reason whatsoever" and pro-life means "for no reason whatsoever."




SoftBonds -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 5:29:06 PM)

Yummie, thanks for mentioning China's one child policy. Without that policy, China estimates their current population would have increased by an additional 300 million people. AKA the entire population of the US.
Seems like a lot of abortions to me, but I guess preventing them in Mississippi is more important...
Does that mean that the value of a child depends on the physical location at conception? Is that why the pro-life folks are working more here in the US, and not in China???

Edit: Wait, I understand now, the abortion counts against the nation that allows it in god's ledger of sins. If US women either fly to Europe or have illegal abortions, then it doesn't count as a US sin, and if European nations sin by allowing US women to have abortions there, it doesn't matter to the godliness of the US! Am I right pro-life folks???




tazzygirl -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 5:31:02 PM)

quote:

As should any exceptions allowing abortions should also be clearly defined.


Yet they are not, which is why we are having this fierce debate in this country.

quote:

That leads to another bump I can't quite get over though...even past the age of viabilty, the individual can't survive on it's own for many years...so the same logic used to permit killing it at 20 weeks could be stretched (and yes, I understand it's a stretch) to permit killing it long after. It's just enough of a bump that while I was almost there, I can't quite bring myself to agree with using age of viability.


And yet I disagree. The medical rationale behind not preventing preterm labor is because of the multiple complications the outcome would face, not to mention the complications associated with the medications given. The risks outweigh the outcome by a huge margin.

Now, we agree we are speaking about viability here.. that age... betwen 22 weeks and 24 weeks.

[image]http://www.guttmacher.org/graphics/factsheets/2011/01/10/IB-induced-abortion-c2.gif[/image]

The majority of all abortions occur before 22 weeks. only 1.5% occur after 21 weeks. Over half occur before 9 weeks. And that was the stats for 2006. With the introduction of the morning after biil, which prevents pregnancy, it doesnt induce an abortion, those numbers will start to drop.

quote:

There's no reason to call yourself a hypocrite that I can tell. I believe that word should be reserved for those who preach one thing while believing and doing something else. You seem to believe each woman should have the right to make the choice in the matter, and acted in accordance with that belief, so while I cannot bring myself to have the same viewpoint; there's no reason to claim hypocrisy there.


And yet, saying I am pro choice, then saying.. but not after the age of viability.. is denying women that choice. My decisions are almost purely medical. My beliefs for myself do not extend to others.

quote:

I guess the best way to explain my reluctance to consider myself anything but pro-life is that for the mother; it's nine months of inconvenience (if a very significant one); for the human being growing inside her though, it's a lifetime being lost. Ideally IMO, technology should be advanced enough to prevent the issue altogether (through birth control primarily, etc...which I'm very much FOR as a method of family planning)...but I'm just too soft hearted to be able to bring myself to seeing human beings killed off before they've had a chance to live. And yes I know that a partly based emotional reasoning isn't the strongest argument; but it's an honest one.


Remember the RU486? That caused a miscarriage. Plan B prevents pregnancy.
Sperm can live within the body for 5 days. Women with high pb cannot take the pill. Certain medications have an adverse interaction with the pill, like seizure medications. White females have the lowest precentage of high blood pressure issues. By the time a black woman is mid to late 30'sm she has a 25% chance of having high bp, which means the availability of contraceptive choices drops dramatically. From 25 - 34, that same woman's chances of having high mp is 10%.

[image]http://www.severehypertension.net/images/uploads/figure1.3.gif[/image]

There is so much information people do not know. So much they do not wish to be educated about because it doesnt fit into what they want to believe.

I wish it were as simple as telling a woman.... you are responsible if you get pregnant.. but that simply isnt true. The pill is only 94% accurate, and, other than a tubal, nothing else comes close.

And dont even get me started on tubals.... again, a woman's choice that is heavily controlled by the government.




yummee -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 5:38:49 PM)

From what I can tell about Pat Robertson's position (and he does not state it outright, but its the feel i get from him so may be totally off the mark), only children created in God's image are not to be murdered. Therefore, aborting Chinese babies is something we don't need to interfere with. <puke>

For the record, I'm one of those in the grey areas. I am not an advocate of repealing current laws. I am also not an advocate of allowing unfettered access to abortions of late term fetuses for non-medical reasons.




SoftBonds -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 5:46:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: yummee

From what I can tell about Pat Robertson's position (and he does not state it outright, but its the feel i get from him so may be totally off the mark), only children created in God's image are not to be murdered. Therefore, aborting Chinese babies is something we don't need to interfere with. <puke>

For the record, I'm one of those in the grey areas. I am not an advocate of repealing current laws. I am also not an advocate of allowing unfettered access to abortions of late term fetuses for non-medical reasons.



Personally I thought me and one of the conservative folks on here made a good compromise (not that I think it would ever be adopted, too many folks on both sides make money on the fight, so don't want it to end). Abortions allowed but only till 12 weeks, exceptions to that for the health of the mother and for rape/incest, and for any woman who is prevented from getting an abortion by 12 weeks because of state action or protesters (e.g. Mississippi).
The only remaining bone of contention was if a birth defect was detected... A pretty small area for further argument I think...




Truthness -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 5:49:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
I wish it were as simple as telling a woman.... you are responsible if you get pregnant.. but that simply isnt true. The pill is only 94% accurate, and, other than a tubal, nothing else comes close.

And dont even get me started on tubals.... again, a woman's choice that is heavily controlled by the government.


Running short on time to reply to everything, but had to mention...

...that's why I'm hoping RISUG works out with the promise that it's showing so far. It's a birth control solution for men that's cheap (The fluid costs less than the syringe used to inject it), lasts for 10+ years, is reversible, and is 100% effective.




farglebargle -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 5:56:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: yummee

Extremists on both sides


There are no "Pro-Family-Planning" extremists. Every woman has a right to unfettered access to complete family planning services, including abortion, on demand. Everything else if private between her and her doctor. Period. End of story.

That position is supported by both Science, and Privacy Rights and Private Property Rights.

Compare this to the crazy belief that the State owns someone's uterus, and the contents of that uterus, because of some crazy religious belief that -- and yes, the nuts really believe this -- that "Life Begins At Some Arbitrary Point..." as if Life isn't a continuum. ( That's because their real argument "There's a soul in there, and it's special!" sounds retarded when we're talking about a half-inch long embryo without a recognizable brain... )

The civil rights of women aren't an "extremist" position, unless you're stuck back in the 18th Century with the rest of the people who haven't yet gotten over freeing the slaves and shit.




yummee -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 6:02:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SoftBonds

Personally I thought me and one of the conservative folks on here made a good compromise (not that I think it would ever be adopted, too many folks on both sides make money on the fight, so don't want it to end). Abortions allowed but only till 12 weeks, exceptions to that for the health of the mother and for rape/incest, and for any woman who is prevented from getting an abortion by 12 weeks because of state action or protesters (e.g. Mississippi).
The only remaining bone of contention was if a birth defect was detected... A pretty small area for further argument I think...



I'm all for that being completely up to the woman carrying. I know, for me personally, there are medical conditions I would not want to live with. Perhaps others would prefer to live in those same situations. There is no right or wrong there as far as I can tell, just personal choice. Since a fetus has no ability to choose, I believe that choice is best left in the hands of the mother or potential mother, and certainly not in the hands of faceless people who don't really give a shit about the individuals affected.





farglebargle -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 6:03:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: yummee
I am also not an advocate of allowing unfettered access to abortions of late term fetuses for non-medical reasons.


So, you think a woman should be chained down to a table in order to get an abortion?

After all, I expect everyone here to be aware of what the word "Fetters" means, and why "UNFETTERED ACCESS" isn't an unreasonable demand, when what those who oppose it are advocating leg chains...




Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125