RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Truthness -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 11:52:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Of which the definition means... against abortion. Allowing abortion even in the case of maternal life is contrary to the definition. Therefore, hypocrisy.



Wrong. Accepting that allowing an abortion to save a mother's life does not negate the fact that person still has a huge issue with abortion.

And if that person is honest about his viewpoints, then he's not creating a pretense; therefore there is no basis to claim hypocrisy.




yummee -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 12:12:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Of which the definition means... against abortion. Allowing abortion even in the case of maternal life is contrary to the definition. Therefore, hypocrisy.


That is simply not true. Most pro-lifers make allowances for when the mother's life is in danger, even those who are against abortion in the case of rape or incest. It is viewed as a form of self defense. There are always extremists, but the majority of pro-lifers allow some exceptions. You can use the word the way you think it should be used, but that is not the common usage and it is not the way others here are using the word.

Many people believe a fetus is a life. Just because people believe that life is generally worth preserving does not mean they believe that all life is worth preserving at all cost. For many people, quality of life is equally important, for themselves as well as their loved ones (including unborn fetuses). For instance, I have a living will for myself. There are certain conditions I would just prefer not to live with and have discussed with my loved ones and have in writing. Likewise, I can't imagine a child wanting to live under those same circumstances, so would likely abort for various quality of life (of the child) issues. I would consider it cruel to bring a child into the world who would be vegetative, in chronic pain, or severely deformed or brain damaged. I would not want to live like that, so would make the same determination for any child of mine. It is not black and white for most. The loudest ones may be the most extreme, but there are many many shades of grey.





tazzygirl -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 12:15:28 PM)

quote:

That is simply not true. Most pro-lifers make allowances for when the mother's life is in danger, even those who are against abortion in the case of rape or incest.


Dear, we are working with definitions.... I listed those definitions.

No one said they dont make allowances. What I am saying is that to make allowances means you are not, by definition "prolife".




yummee -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 12:40:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

That is simply not true. Most pro-lifers make allowances for when the mother's life is in danger, even those who are against abortion in the case of rape or incest.


Dear, we are working with definitions.... I listed those definitions.

No one said they dont make allowances. What I am saying is that to make allowances means you are not, by definition "prolife".


Ugh, I had forgotten what talking to you is like. Why so condescending and patronizing? I've said nothing offensive, attacking or personal. I am not your dear, I am not stupid, and my beliefs and opinions are not somehow "less than" yours if they differ. People who are against killing are rarely complete passifists. Self defense is commonly accepted and does not make someone a hypocrite.

Why are you intentionally completely ignoring all of the shades of grey? There is a huge gap between complete unfettered access to abortion up until the moment the child is delivered and every single abortion for any reason being completely illegal and deemed murder. Most people fall somewhere in between on this issue. Are they all hypocrites? If they are neither pro-life or pro-choice, which word have you been using to refer to them. Even the fundie Southern Baptists protect the mother's life over that of an unborn fetus, although some individual families will choose to risk it and try to deliver. Are you saying that Southern Baptists are not pro-life as that term has been commonly understood and used?




Truthness -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 12:49:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


No one said they dont make allowances. What I am saying is that to make allowances means you are not, by definition "prolife".



And I've already demonstrated that this is flat out wrong.




xssve -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 12:58:08 PM)

She is correct, the rape/incest exception excludes you as a prolifer, for all practical political purposes.

Prolife has come to mean all pregnancies carried to term, no exception, including criminal penalties for spontaneous abortion or miscarriage.

Eventually, this will include criminalizing any non-reproductive sexual activity or anything that interferes with the reproductive process (as it typically has in the past) , a woman doesn't' have a right to not reproduce, by force or otherwise.

Essentially, it's compulsory, mandated reproduction for women, no exceptions, no appeal.




xssve -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 12:59:55 PM)

It reduces all women back to the status of property, private or public, by virtue of possessing a uterus.




Truthness -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 1:06:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

Prolife has come to mean all pregnancies carried to term, no exception, including criminal penalties for spontaneous abortion or miscarriage.



Not everyone agrees with that definition. A Gallup poll for instance showed 50% polled identified as "Pro-life" while only 23% of them believed abortion should be illegal in all circumstances.





tazzygirl -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 1:10:03 PM)

quote:

Not everyone agrees with that definition. A Gallup poll for instance showed 50% polled identified as "Pro-life" while only 23% of them believed abortion should be illegal in all circumstances.


They "self identified" as "prolife", when they clearly are not. Tell me, you would have them call themselves prochoice? They are not. Yet, they have no other definition. So, how else would you have them identify as.

By definition, they are not prolife, they are not prochoice. But, of course, everyone has to have a label.




tazzygirl -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 1:11:19 PM)

Ya know, ignore works wonders. Yeah, I remember what it is like talking to you too..

Careful of the attacks, dear. Attack the posts, not the posters. [;)]




xssve -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 1:14:39 PM)

Well by not agreeing with that definition, you are axiomatically either moderate, liberal, or gay, which amounts to about the same thing.

And that because they've even redefined "gay": quite simply, if you penetrate a woman with your penis in any way that does not potentially result in a baby being carried to term, you're gay, and a liberal by extension.

Without even doing that, by endorsing the rape/incest exception, you're a liberal, and by definition cannot be "pro-life" which means no exceptions, ever.




Truthness -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 1:28:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


They "self identified" as "prolife", when they clearly are not.


I disagree, and have explained why.

But once again from another angle:

I'm very much against having to work late. I value my free time too much.

Twice last week circumstances necessitated having to work late to get critical projects done. I did what had to be done, and bitched about it on the way home...but by your twisted logic I'm "clearly not pro-going-home-from-work-on-time."

And that's just absurd.




SoftBonds -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 1:30:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

It's not just about what is funded by taxpayers now. It is more about what some groups are trying to get the taxpayers to pay for.


to pay for? Im sorry, what groups are trying to get abortions paid for on the taxpayers dime? I dont recall anyone asking for free abortions.


I think what he is saying is that if the federal government pays an organization to provide services the federal government finds useful (e.g. cancer screening) and that organization would have provided those services anyway cause they care about women, and that organization also provides abortions, that since cutting funding to that organization would give them less money to take care of women, it would reduce the funding for abortions...
Sure, it might also mean women die of cancer, but who cares about women when there are unborn to protect???




kalikshama -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 1:40:55 PM)

quote:

That is simply not true. Most pro-lifers make allowances for when the mother's life is in danger, even those who are against abortion in the case of rape or incest. It is viewed as a form of self defense. There are always extremists, but the majority of pro-lifers allow some exceptions.


The Personhood Bill making the round of state legislatures says abortion is never ok under any circumstances. They do try to soften it a bit when the mother's life is at stake, but still say intentional abortion is never ok.

http://www.personhoodusa.com/press-release/personhood-usa-responds-“life-mother”-question-presidential-pledge

...Dr. Patrick Johnston of the Association of Pro-life Physicians explains: “When the life of the mother is truly threatened by her pregnancy, if both lives cannot simultaneously be saved, then saving the mother’s life must be the primary aim. If through our careful treatment of the mother’s illness, the preborn patient inadvertently dies or is injured, this is tragic and, if unintentional, is not unethical and is consistent with the pro-life ethic. But the intentional killing of an unborn baby by abortion is never necessary.

There are no exceptions in Personhood USA’s presidential pledge because there are no situations where it becomes necessary to dismember a baby,” added Jennifer Mason, spokesperson for Personhood USA.

------------

5 Republican Presidential candidates took the Personhood Pledge.

http://www.personhoodusa.com/blog/personhood-republican-presidential-candidate-pledge

PERSONHOOD REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE PLEDGE

I __________________ proclaim that every human being is created in the image and likeness of God, and is endowed by our Creator with the unalienable right to life.

I stand with President Ronald Reagan in supporting “the unalienable personhood of every American, from the moment of conception until natural death,” and with the Republican Party platform in affirming that I “support a human life amendment to the Constitution, and endorse legislation to make clear that the 14th Amendment protections apply to unborn children.”

I believe that in order to properly protect the right to life of the vulnerable among us, every human being at every stage of development must be recognized as a person possessing the right to life in federal and state laws without exception and without compromise. I recognize that in cases where a mother’s life is at risk, every effort should be made to save the baby’s life as well; leaving the death of an innocent child as an unintended tragedy rather than an intentional killing.

I oppose assisted suicide, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research, and procedures that intentionally destroy developing human beings.

I pledge to the American people that I will defend all innocent human life. Abortion and the intentional killing of an innocent human being are always wrong and should be prohibited.

If elected President, I will work to advance state and federal laws and amendments that recognize the unalienable right to life of all human beings as persons at every stage of development, and to the best of my knowledge, I will only appoint federal judges and relevant officials who will uphold and enforce state and federal laws recognizing that all human beings at every stage of development are persons with the unalienable right to life.





SoftBonds -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 1:51:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

quote:

ORIGINAL: pghays04

It's not just about what is funded by taxpayers now. It is more about what some groups are trying to get the taxpayers to pay for.


Stop with this red herring.

Can someone help me with stats on how much anti-choice legislation was introduced in state legislatures since 2010? IIRC, it's upwards of 1,100 bills.

This article is from June 2011.

The Avalanche of Anti-American Tea Party Legislation Since 2010

o Anti-abortion Laws

Republican legislators have introduced a wide array of laws designed to either outlaw abortion outright or to discourage it by making ridiculous and sometimes humiliating requirements of women who might consider having a pregnancy terminated.
Rep. George Lavender, R-Texarkana, has proposed a bill (House Bill 2988) that would prevent any abortion except in cases of rape, incest or the life of the mother.
In Georgia, a bill (SB 209) sponsored by Sen. Barry Loudermilk, R-Cassville, would close all abortion clinics in the state and require abortions to be performed in hospitals
South Dakota wants to require “spiritual” counseling (House Bill 1217) at religious centers before allowing an abortion to take place. The bill was signed into law in March 2011 and challenged in court by Planned Parenthood and the ACLU in May.
The Texas State House of Representatives has passed the Sonogram Bill (HB 15), a measure requiring women to get a sonogram before ending a pregnancy, forcing even victims of rape to have a sonogram at least 24 hours before the procedure. Gov. Rick Perry has signed the bill into law, which takes effect September 1, 2011. There are exceptions in cases of rape and incest.
Georgia State Representative Bobby Franklin has introduced a bill that would not only make abortion illegal but would make miscarriages illegal.
Indiana (House Bill 1210) wants to force doctors to lie to women about abortion causing breast cancer despite medical evidence to the contrary in order to discourage women from having abortions
Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) introduced a bill in the U.S. House of Representatives, the “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act,” (HR 3) that would limit the rape exemption for abortion to “forcible rape” which would have defined many rapes, for example, statutory rape of a minor, as non-forcible and therefore not covered by federal assistance. Mother Jones has reported another aspect of this legislation, that the IRS would be turned into abortion-cops: “Were this to become law, people could end up in an audit, the subject of which could be abortion, rape, and incest,” says Christopher Bergin, the head of Tax Analysts, a nonpartisan, not-for-profit tax policy group. “If you pass the law like this, the IRS would be required to enforce it.”
Representative Joe Pitts (R-PA) introduced a bill (HR 358) would allow states to deny insurance coverage for birth control meaning hospitals could deny abortion procedures and transport to a facility that would provide a woman with an abortion even if failure to provide an abortion would mean the death of the woman
· Louisiana State Rep. John LaBruzzo, R-Metairie wants to sentence both women and doctors who commit this crime the ban to 15 years hard labor. The law would make no exceptions for cases of danger to the health of the mother, incest or rape.
The U.S. House of Representatives passed (by a 234-182 vote) an amendment sponsored by Virginia Foxx (R-NC) prohibiting teaching hospitals from receiving federal funding if they teach doctors how to perform abortions. Unfortunately, as a result of this legislation new physicians will not receive the training needed to save women’s lives. As Correntewire.com puts it, “234 members of the House voted to ban the teaching of medical procedures that are vital in saving the lives of women who have miscarried, or have complications that endanger their health, or who aren’t even pregnant.”
In Ohio, Janet Porter’s “Heartbeat Bill” criminalizing abortion and which was backed by Newt Gingrich and Michele Bachmann, passed the Ohio State House on June 28, 2011. “It prohibits abortions after only about six weeks, a time when many women do not yet even know they are pregnant,” said Armond Budish, leader of the Democratic caucus in the House.
Also in Ohio, The state budget, approved June 28, 2011 by the Senate, bars state hospitals from performing abortions.
Mother Jones reports that “Every abortion provider in the state of Kansas has been denied a license to continue operating as of July 1 [2011].” This is the result, according to Mother Jones, of passage in April of a law “directing the Kansas Department of Health and Environment to author new facility standards for abortion clinics, which the staunchly anti-abortion GOP governor, Sam Brownback, signed into law on May 16.”
On July 1, 2011 a budget impasse shut down the government of the state of Minnesota. The Republican majorities in the house and senate refuse to negotiate in good faith, insisting that a list of social issues be included in the budget, including abortion restrictions.
In Arizona, the House of Representatives passed House Bill 2443 sponsored by Republican Rep. Steve Montenegro, on February 21, 2011. The bill, if passed into law, would criminalize abortions being performed because of the race or sex of the fetus. Montenegro claims that “there are targeted communities that the abortion industry targets.” If made law, HB 2443 would require that “women seeking abortions in Arizona will have to sign a statement declaring that race or sex was not the reason they sought the procedure.”

o Arguing that it is “morally wrong to take the tax dollars of millions of pro-life Americans and use them to fund organizations that provide and promote abortions,” Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind, introduced a bill (HR 217) in the U.S. House of Representatives to strip Planned Parenthood of federal funding, despite the many other services Planned Parenthood provides to both men and women, including contraception and STD testing

o Legalizing the Murder of Abortion Doctors
South Dakota flirted with a law to make the murder of an abortion doctor legal as self-defense
When South Dakota was forced to drop the idea of murdering abortion doctors, Nebraska and Iowa picked up the idea

o “Personhood Laws” and Fetal Rights

Seven states are now considering laws that would give fertilized eggs the rights of “personhood” – in other words, fertilized eggs would have the same rights as you or me – a blatant ploy to attack women’s reproductive rights.
In Iowa a pregnant woman was arrested for falling down a flight of stairs. Yes, for falling down a flight of stairs. You see, following a fight on the phone with her husband, Christine Taylor fell down a flight of. Like any responsible pregnant woman would, she went to the hospital to check on the fetus – and was arrested thanks to one of the many state laws that grant fetuses rights separate from the mother. Iowa has a “feticide” law that pertains to the second trimester and beyond, and since Taylor confessed that she had contemplated abortion but had chosen to have the baby, the nurse and doctor at the hospital decided to phone the police and accuse her of trying to terminate her pregnancy illegally. She was fortunate not to be charged with a crime – for falling down the stairs.
Nebraska banned abortions after 20 weeks on the unscientific grounds that fetuses feel pain at that gestational age. Shortly thereafter, Danielle Deaver discovered at 22 weeks she had a pregnancy that could not result in a living baby. Yet Nebraska law denied her an abortion. Nebraska is not alone, and Deaver will not be alone. Legislators in 12 other states — Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, New Mexico and Oregon — are considering similar laws. But banning abortion could not save Deaver’s fetus: With undeveloped lungs, the baby likely would never survive outside the womb, and because all the amniotic fluid had drained, the tiny growing fetus slowly would be crushed by the uterus walls. On Dec. 8, Deaver delivered 1-pound, 10-ounce Elizabeth, who, as doctors had predicted, lived for only 15 minutes outside the womb.
Idaho is the latest state, inspired by Nebraska’s example, to put such a law on the books. Senate Bill 1165 bans abortion after 20 weeks but leaves no loophole even for cases of rape. Their justification? The bill’s House sponsor, state Rep. Brent Crane, R-Nampa, told legislators that the “hand of the Almighty” was at work. “His ways are higher than our ways,” Crane said. “He has the ability to take difficult, tragic, horrific circumstances and then turn them into wonderful examples. And Rep. Shannon McMillan, R-Silverton says, “Is not the child of that rape or incest also a victim?” asked “It didn’t ask to be here. It was here under violent circumstances perhaps, but that was through no fault of its own.”[...]
On February 11, 2011, the North Dakota House of Representatives passed House Bill 1450; a bill which seeking to define a fertilized egg as a human being. As Planned Parenthood reports, “HB 1450 is backed by a national activist group, Personhood USA, working to make North Dakota the epicenter of a heated national debate.”
The Oklahoma House of Representatives voted 94 to 2 to a ban on abortion’s later than 20 weeks of gestation similar to Nebraska’s in what it called the “Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.” Bill 1888 will go on to the state Senate.
A personhood bill in Louisiana sponsored by Republican State Rep. John LaBruzzo that would have banned all abortions in the state was defeated when a House vote sent it to the House Appropriations Committee, which shelved the measure. This is not the end, however, as this fall a referendum on a personhood amendment.

The War on Special Supplemental Nutritional Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC)

o Having ensured that children will be born through their anti-abortion legislation, House Republicans have now ensured those children will be deprived of proper nutrition once they come into the world, ensuring that 300,000 millionaires will have more money in their pockets at the expense of nearly 500,000 women and children. Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee approved the appropriations bill which reduces WIC funding from $6.73 billion this year to $5.90 billion in 2012. The bill will also cut $38 million from the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSIP), as well as $63 million from the Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAB). If the Republicans had been truly interested in slashing the federal budget they could have saved more money by ending tax cuts for the rich or slashing subsidies to the oil companies. Instead they starve the infants and elderly. Why do I say that? WIC could be fully funded at the cost of just one week of Bush’s tax cuts for millionaires. According to the Center for American Progress, “one day’s worth of millionaire tax cuts would feed needy families for a year.”

Read more: http://www.politicususa.com/the-avalanche-of-anti-american-tea-party-legislation-since-2010/



I'ma gonna propose a new law here in cali that women who have miscarriages get 15 years of hard labor, on their backs, giving me pleasure-and then birthing and caring for the babies!
Anyone wanna co-sponsor? I'll let you help!

Actually, I think motherhood is at least 18 years of hard labor...

At the end of the day, all this shit doesn't reduce the abortion rate (which is so much higher in Mexico where abortions are illegal than in England where they are legal it isn't even funny), it just makes women suffer. Rich women go on a "vacation," to Europe, and come back mysteriously not pregnant. Poor women have to find someone with a coat hanger, or otherwise have an unsafe abortion. Falling down stairs is one way, punch in the stomach is another.
Sure, you can put a woman in prison for that, but it won't stop the activity.
I mean, come on people, think. Do you really think some woman is callously thinking "gee, it'd be kinda inconvenient to have a kid, guess I'll go to the clinic and fix that?" Here in the real world, women find out they are pregnant, and have all sorts of emotions. When they can't afford the child, or they are unwed and expect conservatives to make their lives hell for it, or they see their future destroyed, they turn to abortion. An extremely painful and personal choice. At that point, they have made a decision that they realize they will think about for the rest of their lives.
No law is going to change that, all you can do is punish the mother.
Oh, and how about putting a woman in prison for having an abortion, cause she's got two kids and can't afford a third, who does that help? How does putting a woman in prison for an abortion help the state budget? If you just close all the clinics, and she doesn't find a way to get an abortion, now you have a kid who will know they were not wanted, raised by a woman who believes she has ruined her life by having a child, and who self-admits she can't do the job. How do you suppose that child will turn out?
Amusingly, we have an answer, about half of the drop in crime in the last 20 years was the result of Roe-v-Wade. Turns out that women getting abortions meant a lot less kids who were unwanted and not taken care of, which led to less crime...




kalikshama -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 1:55:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

quote:

ORIGINAL: pghays04

It's not just about what is funded by taxpayers now. It is more about what some groups are trying to get the taxpayers to pay for.


Stop with this red herring.

Can someone help me with stats on how much anti-choice legislation was introduced in state legislatures since 2010? IIRC, it's upwards of 1,100 bills.


http://www.mintpress.net/war-on-women-both-sides-take-off-the-gloves/

...after the 2010 election that saw Republicans gain control of state Legislatures across the country, more than 1,100 anti-choice laws were introduced in 2011, a new record. Eighty three measures have been passed into law. And so far in 2012, another 430 have been introduced.




tazzygirl -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 2:00:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Truthness


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


They "self identified" as "prolife", when they clearly are not.


I disagree, and have explained why.

But once again from another angle:

I'm very much against having to work late. I value my free time too much.

Twice last week circumstances necessitated having to work late to get critical projects done. I did what had to be done, and bitched about it on the way home...but by your twisted logic I'm "clearly not pro-going-home-from-work-on-time."

And that's just absurd.



Nor is there a "pro-staying-at-work-late" group either. Do try and keep within the scope of the topic.

They were given two choices.. prolife and prochoice. If you are asked if you are white or other, how would you answer? I would have to be "other". If asked if I am prochoice or prolife, I would have to say prochoice, even though I do agree with restrictions, but only because there isnt another option.

Surveys are designed by pollsters to give those paying them the results the payer desires. Results are based on telephone interviews with 1,015 national adults out of 280 million?

When your choices are limited to two, you really dont have any choice. Its like asking an Independent.. are you Democrat or Republican?




tazzygirl -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 2:03:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SoftBonds


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

It's not just about what is funded by taxpayers now. It is more about what some groups are trying to get the taxpayers to pay for.


to pay for? Im sorry, what groups are trying to get abortions paid for on the taxpayers dime? I dont recall anyone asking for free abortions.


I think what he is saying is that if the federal government pays an organization to provide services the federal government finds useful (e.g. cancer screening) and that organization would have provided those services anyway cause they care about women, and that organization also provides abortions, that since cutting funding to that organization would give them less money to take care of women, it would reduce the funding for abortions...
Sure, it might also mean women die of cancer, but who cares about women when there are unborn to protect???


I agree with you, but, you notice, he hasnt returned to answer the question.




yummee -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 2:04:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Ya know, ignore works wonders. Yeah, I remember what it is like talking to you too..

Careful of the attacks, dear. Attack the posts, not the posters. [;)]



Please show where anyone attacked you.





tazzygirl -> RE: Go Fuck Yourself, Mississippi. Why do you hate women? (4/8/2012 2:06:11 PM)

quote:

Why so condescending and patronizing?


Name calling is considered an attack. You have no evidence I was either.




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875