RE: Stand Your Ground II (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


lovmuffin -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/7/2012 11:24:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
So some of these guys have figured a way around it. It still doesn't make it right that a law abiding citizen should be denied the means of self defense all the while gang bangers are going to be packin regardless of the law.

Who's talking about denying law abiding citizens means of self defense? No really, I apparently missed that part of this thread, where is it?
Your are by advocating abolishing SYG. If one is out somewhere away from home minding their own bees wax, if mugged or car jacked or assaulted or attempted rape ect. one should be allowed to defend against it. There are too many overzealous prosecutors willing to prosecute just to keep their numbers up. SYG protects those who legitimately use their guns in a self defense situation.
quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
In any case there are not so many of these guys that don't already have criminal records.

Oh you've checked? How many are there, what's the number?
Come on now, how many could there possibly be ? It's like advocating gun registration. Gang bangers, bank robbers, serial killers, organized crime types amoung others just are not going to register their guns. Their not likely to get concealed carry permits either. That's just common sense.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
Your problem is that you don't like guns or citizens using them to defend themselves.

Anyone know where I can find an emoticon for liar liar pants on fire?

My father started teaching me to shoot with my grandma's .22 rifle when I was all of 4, I can remember when it took all the strength I had in both hands to pull the trigger of that tiny little rifle. Just in the bedroom I've got 3 guns with me.

Furthermore I'm in favor of legitimate self defense as I mentioned earlier in the thread. What I'm not in favor of is the taking of human life in situations that are easily avoidable. I guess you can call me pro-life that way [sm=dunno.gif]

I'll see if I can find that emoticon for you. My 2 year old nephew could pull the trigger with ease on a Red Rider BB gun after we cocked the lever. If you state as a 4 year old that it took all your strength to pull a trigger then you must have been a seriously deformed weakling or you are totally full of shit. I would bet on the latter.

I'm not in favor of life taking in avoidable situations either but I'm not in favor of citizens being prosecuted for a legitimate self defense situation. I hope we're not arguing over semantics here.


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
Not only that but if the guy who legally has the gun ends up having to use it he won't be covered under SYG if it's a result of criminal activity

The problem with that being how SYG legalizes the gang related gun violence that Floridans are so keen on protecting themselves against. I would rather these gang thugs get arrested for shooting each other before yet another 5 year old gets killed in the cross fire.
Innocents are going to get killed in the crossfire regardless of the laws. I'll let you in on a secret, gang thugs don't obey the laws and SYG doesn't get inocents shot nor does it cause gangs to shoot each other. If SYG has some flaws I'm not apposed to addressing those. It would seem that SYG does have it's abusers and a slick lawyer can take advantage of it. So it would seem to me the fault lies with the slick lawyers and stupid juries, judges and incompetent prosecutors, kind of like in the OJ and Casey Anthony acquittals. What laws could you address to fix that ?
quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
but he will be covered under 10 - 20 - life which I'm sure we can all agree is a good law.

When it comes to violent crime with deadly weapons I'm more of a one maybe two strikes at most man myself.
10 - 20 - life is a first strike law.





BamaD -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/7/2012 11:28:38 AM)

It is also not SYG




BamaD -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/7/2012 11:32:30 AM)

I would have to see the tape.




Nosathro -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/7/2012 11:44:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I would have to see the tape.


It is on the article.




GotSteel -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/7/2012 11:48:03 AM)

I certainly don't think my house should be your castle.




Nosathro -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/7/2012 12:10:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro







Just for clarification.  What you are saying is that even though this law if fawled it should not be corrected in anyway because to do so would force you give up your gun?



I'm not saying the law is flawed but that criminals will just find some way around it anyway or ignore it altogether. It wouldn't necessarily force me to give up my gun but restrict it's use in common self defense situations.



I don't follow, okay lets say a loophole is allowing criminals to get away with owning a firearm.  In this case as the example that someone has arrests, but not convictions...so having arrests only is added to the law restrictions.  How is this going to change your situtation, you have arrests?




BamaD -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/7/2012 12:20:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

I already pointed out that the judge has the power to make suspention of the right to carry as one of the bail conditions.
So the problem is with the judge not the law.

The tape must look fairly bad or you wouldn't have posted it.





Just for clarification.  What you are saying is that even though this law if fawled it should not be corrected in anyway because to do so would force you give up your gun?



I'm not saying the law is flawed but that criminals will just find some way around it anyway or ignore it altogether. It wouldn't necessarily force me to give up my gun but restrict it's use in common self defense situations.



I don't follow, okay lets say a loop is allowing criminals to get away with owning a firearm.  In this case as the example that someone has arrests, but not convictions...so having arrests only is added to the law restrictions.  How is this going to change your situtation, you have arrests?





BamaD -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/7/2012 1:50:57 PM)

He is on trial for it what more do you want?




GotSteel -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/7/2012 1:55:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
Oh you've checked? How many are there, what's the number?
Come on now, how many could there possibly be ? It's like advocating gun registration. Gang bangers, bank robbers, serial killers, organized crime types amoung others just are not going to register their guns. Their not likely to get concealed carry permits either. That's just common sense.


Are you getting this common sense from comic books or bad action movies? Having seen evidence from the Miami-Dade Police Department’s Gang Unit Commander that your preconceptions on this subject are wrong, isn't common sense actually looking some of this stuff up?

Just that particular unit is up against:

quote:

ORIGINAL: http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/05/07/a-night-inside-south-floridas-gang-wars/
There are at least 250 gangs in Miami-Dade County with a minimum of 2,000 gang members.

By comparison, Miami-Dade’s gang unit is comprised of Almaguer, three sergeants, and thirteen officers. That’s 17 against 2,000. Add to that as many as another 10,000 “associate” gang members – hangers on who aren’t formally members of the gang but often participate in their crimes – and you quickly get the sense of how tall a challenge the police are facing.


Since you've seen evidence that these people are organized into crews with members who can carry concealed legally isn't common sense that there could very possibly be many?




BamaD -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/7/2012 2:23:15 PM)

For the momment let us pressume that there are hundreds of gangbangers who can legally own and carry guns because they have not yrt been convicted of a crime. Does that mean Kitara should not be allowed a gun to protect himself? Punish the innocent in the hopes of slowing down the guilty? No change to syg would affect this, talk about off subject.




lovmuffin -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/7/2012 2:34:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
Oh you've checked? How many are there, what's the number?
Come on now, how many could there possibly be ? It's like advocating gun registration. Gang bangers, bank robbers, serial killers, organized crime types amoung others just are not going to register their guns. Their not likely to get concealed carry permits either. That's just common sense.


Are you getting this common sense from comic books or bad action movies? Having seen evidence from the Miami-Dade Police Department’s Gang Unit Commander that your preconceptions on this subject are wrong, isn't common sense actually looking some of this stuff up?

Just that particular unit is up against:

quote:

ORIGINAL: http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/05/07/a-night-inside-south-floridas-gang-wars/
There are at least 250 gangs in Miami-Dade County with a minimum of 2,000 gang members.

By comparison, Miami-Dade’s gang unit is comprised of Almaguer, three sergeants, and thirteen officers. That’s 17 against 2,000. Add to that as many as another 10,000 “associate” gang members – hangers on who aren’t formally members of the gang but often participate in their crimes – and you quickly get the sense of how tall a challenge the police are facing.


Since you've seen evidence that these people are organized into crews with members who can carry concealed legally isn't common sense that there could very possibly be many?




That was just one example and I'm sure there are more but in comparison to the entire total of gang related criminal activity I'm betting it's not a major problem though what ever problem it is could certainly be addressed as BamaD suggested in some of his posts. If ya have a guy with a CCP riding around in a car with a guy packin cocaine, why can't they take his gun and or the *car* (a contradiction with myself though as I have issues with forfeiture laws) ? If he has arrests that have not as yet been adjudicated then why can't the terms of his bail/release include not possessing guns ? Why do we have to scrap the entire SYG ??




GotSteel -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/7/2012 5:39:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
For the momment let us pressume that there are hundreds of gangbangers who can legally own and carry guns because they have not yrt been convicted of a crime. Does that mean Kitara should not be allowed a gun to protect himself? Punish the innocent in the hopes of slowing down the guilty? No change to syg would affect this, talk about off subject.

Where the are you getting this from and have you considered a tin foil hat?

Seriously who's claiming that "Kitara should not be allowed a gun to protect himself"? Where's that position being advocated? That certainly has nothing to do with what lovmuffin and I are talking about and you're correct about one thing what you're talking about is very much off subject.




BamaD -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/7/2012 7:07:27 PM)

I wiil not respond to your juvinile insults. I among others have given you the solution to the problem repeatedly and you keep asking the same question over and over. Apparently you do not accept the reasonable fix which targets the offenders you were worried about insisting instead upon a more sweeping change to the concept which would affect innocent and guilty alike.




GotSteel -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/9/2012 6:52:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
That was just one example and I'm sure there are more but in comparison to the entire total of gang related criminal activity I'm betting it's not a major problem though what ever problem it is could certainly be addressed as BamaD suggested in some of his posts.

Having already bet any amount of money and lost, what data are you using to calculate these bets? Old Van Damme movies?

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
If ya have a guy with a CCP riding around in a car with a guy packin cocaine, why can't they take his gun and or the *car* (a contradiction with myself though as I have issues with forfeiture laws) ? If he has arrests that have not as yet been adjudicated then why can't the terms of his bail/release include not possessing guns ? Why do we have to scrap the entire SYG ??

Have you considered asking google that question? Checking to see if using a separate legal driver and a clean car to avoid such laws does in fact avoid such laws might be a good idea.




lovmuffin -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/9/2012 10:49:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
That was just one example and I'm sure there are more but in comparison to the entire total of gang related criminal activity I'm betting it's not a major problem though what ever problem it is could certainly be addressed as BamaD suggested in some of his posts.

Having already bet any amount of money and lost, what data are you using to calculate these bets? Old Van Damme movies?

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
If ya have a guy with a CCP riding around in a car with a guy packin cocaine, why can't they take his gun and or the *car* (a contradiction with myself though as I have issues with forfeiture laws) ? If he has arrests that have not as yet been adjudicated then why can't the terms of his bail/release include not possessing guns ? Why do we have to scrap the entire SYG ??

Have you considered asking google that question? Checking to see if using a separate legal driver and a clean car to avoid such laws does in fact avoid such laws might be a good idea.



Sounds like a great idea.....why don't you......Gang bangers can shoot each other till their all dead for all I care, I'm not in favor of scraping SYG.




BamaD -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/9/2012 12:34:30 PM)

We are still faced with the fact that your example is a gang enforcement question having nothing to do with either cc permits or syg.
ou also keep repeating the "problem without offering anything remotly resembling a solution other than perhaps that of disarming the honest citizens even though you know that they will find a way around the new laws.




Nosathro -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/9/2012 12:43:54 PM)

More on the Houston incident

http://news.yahoo.com/houston-trial-focusing-stand-ground-law-181804863.html




lovmuffin -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/9/2012 1:42:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

More on the Houston incident

http://news.yahoo.com/houston-trial-focusing-stand-ground-law-181804863.html



I'm not familiar with the Joe Horn case but if the jury doesn't convict this guy then they are brain dead. Rodriguez should have called the police to complain about the noise and no way should have stepped on their property with a gun. Though some one at the party could have shot Rodriguez and been covered on SYG. SYG should not be meant to cover that kind of shit.




BamaD -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/9/2012 2:05:18 PM)

You should know Rodriguez was in the wrong or Nosathro wouldn't have brought it up.




Nosathro -> RE: Stand Your Ground II (6/9/2012 2:50:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You should know Rodriguez was in the wrong or Nosathro wouldn't have brought it up.


I beleve the topic of this discussion is "Stand Your Ground II" I brought the news article for that purpose.




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875