PeonForHer
Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ReMakeYou That's the difference between you and me. You define feminism based on its PR. I define feminism based on the behaviors of actual feminists. No, I define 'feminism' on the basis of the accepted definition within the social sciences, in the way it's taught in schools and colleges. If the people you mention didn't act and behave in accordance with the principals of equality and freedom, then they weren't acting as feminists. Here is one definition that fits. Besides, feminists' 'PR', as you call it, hasn't been up to much - pretty evidently. If I'd based my definition on that, it'd probably be closer to your own. In particular, I don't base my definition on that of the two hundred years of anti-feminist propaganda that was much in evidence at the time of the Suffragettes as it is now. In the USA, particularly, this has been as historically hostile as the propaganda which has been aimed at the term 'socialism'. I don't think Dworkin et al have done unqualified good for the movement, certainly - but if there wasn't a Dworkin around, antifeminists would find another a replacement quickly enough. And then they'd kick off the propaganda machine that always conveys the same message: "This is a feminist; all people who call themselves feminists must, but definition, believe what she believes and will, eventually, act just like her." If you don't think hostile propaganda has anything to do with this process, then consider other political and social movements. Is 'republicanism' to be defined by the way Nixon or McCarthy thought or acted? But if someone says, 'I'm a supporter of republicanism, however I'm not like McCarthy was', by and large he'll be accepted. Why the easy ride for one 'ism' and not the other? Might it not have something to do with the powers-that-be - particularly that in the mass media - choosing where to focus its hate-propaganda? It's got to the stage, now, where the villifying propaganda against feminism has been so energetic, for so long, that for many, feminism actually *means* 'man-hating'. And people are so frightened of the term that they'll use words like 'humanist' to describe themselves instead - even though the main motivation of feminism was only ever to be a humanist cause applied to a particular case.
< Message edited by PeonForHer -- 7/5/2012 9:16:03 AM >
_____________________________
http://www.domme-chronicles.com
|