Focus50
Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004 From: Newcastle, Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aswad quote:
ORIGINAL: SirNose [ I don't get ] Why you're risking a brick through window for trapping somebody else's cat to get that done when it'd be a lot easier to destroy the creature. See, your clarified statement is troubling. Not because of species chauvinism, but because of cynicism and the implicit underlying fascistoid attitude to life and its value. I'm unaware of any redeeming aspects to this trait, and as far as I know it is a core trait. It appears to be an unambiguous flaw that reinforces the importance of correct attribution when judging merit based on action, as the difference in merit between a person with this flaw and Mengele is exclusively a matter of context. From my angle, where autonomy is a crucial aspect of human will and value, such a person is not complete in a moral sense. You touch on the very core of why Kantian ethics reject socially motivated penal codes, for instance. You don't get why she doesn't just kill for convenience, cat or no. Such a trait is particularly problematic in the scene, because of the context reliance. We are in the business of changing context. That raises some red flags with me, because it seems probable that such a person would be without much of the underlying substance and character which might otherwise make it safe to play. The reason it's safe to be tied up in a room with me isn't because of law or culture or agreement, when you come right down to it. It's because I don't cut the moral corner of reducing creatures to objects of convenience on an instinctive basis, whether human or not. Doing so is a conscious choice for me, not a default my mind reaches for because it lacks something it's supposed to have. As such, that choice is always subject to the relevant safeguards and not contextual. If you stand by what you said, I will sincerely encourage you to refrain from ever scening while the least bit inebriated. Make some allowances that there may be other important things you don't get, and maybe can't get. — Aswad. It fixes the problem, no...? Me, I think stray cats are a problem created by the irresponsible owner, not the cat and not those affected. Not saying I would target a neighbour's pet, myself, (not first step, anyway) but I'm not one to just embrace victimhood and passively wear it, either. And I'm impressed that you'd use a word like "unambiguous" (assuming it's actually a word) in one of your signature pontificating posts engineered solely to be an unnecessarily difficult read to we mere worker bees. Not that the pretext rather than the context isn't an entertaining read. Just not in Sir Humphrey Appleby's league but.... Focus.
_____________________________
Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown> Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)
|