Zonie63
Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011 From: The Old Pueblo Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: descrite quote:
Defining the borders in a manner that can be mechanistically applied may be difficult, but do you find it difficult to see a substantial and clear difference in the natures of the three contrived examples above? Yes. I find it very, very difficult to find a substantial and clear difference. I see a very arbitrary semantic, contextual, and perspective difference-- I see no clear and substantial difference. Let me ask again, because maybe you missed the question: I am purposefully, knowingly, and with full intent, verbally attacking the man specifically to belittle him and make him feel bad. Should I go to jail for this? I suppose it would depend on the circumstances of the event. In the case of the Pope, if you tried to verbally attack him, it probably be from afar, since you wouldn't be able to get near the man without his security stopping you. It might be similar with sports fans who yell and taunt the players. They're in a crowd, with their voices drowned out by thousands. But if someone is just minding his own business, quietly reading a book in a public park, and 5 or 6 guys corner him, verbally attack him, and generally harassing him and preventing him from exercising his rights, then there probably should be something in the law to prohibit that kind of thing. If someone asks to be left alone and tries to walk away, then I think it should be their right to do so without any further harassment. If they keep following and harassing him, then I would say that they would be violating that person's rights. I can see yelling at the Pope or some other public figure who holds power and influence over society. Some might feel they have just cause to have a grudge against the Pope. ---- On the subject of bullying, this thread kind of reminds me of how things were back in my school days. I remember the little cliques and social hierarchies - along with the various tough kids, borderline psychos would beat the crap out of you if you even looked at them the wrong way. For me, elementary school was the worst, since you're stuck in the same room with the same bunch of kids day after day. I was the "new kid," since we moved around a lot when I was younger. It got better in junior high, since we changed classrooms every 45 minutes, and there were also different kids who came from different elementary schools. So, the pool got larger and that irritating bunch from elementary school soon faded into the crowd. I did get into a few fights in junior high and held my own. I wouldn't really call them episodes of bullying, as the fault was probably mutual - even though at the time, I claimed that the other guy started it. We moved to another state 2500 miles away just before I started high school, so I was the new kid again. Fortunately, it seemed that most of the student body was stoned much of the time, so nobody felt like bullying anybody. Those who were actually there to study and learn could do so without much harassment. Sure, there were verbal attacks, but they usually ended there without any actual fight. The penalties for fighting at my high school were more severe than at my other school, so students had to keep their cool or risk suspension or expulsion. I was really glad when I finally graduated and it was all over. Once you're an adult and free to make your own choices, it's much better than to be a kid, stuck in a crappy school with no place to go (and parents who probably don't care).
|