descrite
Posts: 459
Joined: 5/14/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
You're not intentionally criticising a parent for a) wanting her child to be educated in the mainstream Sure I am. I would also criticize a parent who wanted me to only teach my kid Winnie The Pooh because her kid had a learning disability. Or who didn't want me to teach my kid to swim because hers couldn't. If we customize our civilization to meet the needs of lowest common denomiator, we're going to have a very low society. quote:
b) having an issue with same child being bullied? Of course not. But I can't stand parents that throw their kid in a pool and cry when it drowns. Physician, heal thyself. quote:
Most of his biggest challenges are social interaction with others Right. Those are his problems. But you want to make rules/laws that change the environment for everyone else, to accommodate his problems. @Miss: I am very sorry for what happened to you-- such a thing should never happen to any child. But that was rape. At the hands of an adult. We already have laws for that. Changing the words I am allowed to use won't somehow protect children from pedophiles. In fact, by censoring information, it might make it harder to warn kids about pedos, or detect them once an attack has occurred. quote:
Yes, of course he belongs in society and with his peers Right. His peers. The 10 year-olds with Asperger's. quote:
Do you really expect society to kneel to the lowest common denominator? Nope. See above. quote:
Conceptual posturing and philosophizing is siimply throwing bullshit around when one only has opinions, and nothing of true substance or experience to add to a concrete issue. Ever taught a kid with Asperger's? I have. I had to explain to him that calling his classmates "niggers" was not going to get them to like him. He had no problem getting an A on every test I put to him, but he failed to understand basic human interaction. This was extremely dangerous for him. Especially at my school. One the classmates he taunted ended up killing another one of my pupils (granted, it had nothing to do with racial slurs or bullying-- it was because the victim snitched on the murderer, over a robbery ring they were running). Hey, you know what's funny? According to many of the posters in this thread, the Asperger's kid would be the bully, in that circumstance. Or...do you give a kid a waiver from "bullying" charges, if he gets a note from his doctor? (Because that's the way it stands right now, according to the law in many states: a medical profile --to include psych diagnoses-- is the Supreme Rule in the classroom...if a shrink says a kid needs to stand up and slap their desk and shriek like a banshee every 12 minutes, then they must be allowed to do so, even at the cost of the education of the other students.) quote:
Heinlein didn't apply his societal views to children and to quote his world view as a model for the issue of children being bullied is ridiculous. Agreed. That wasn't my point. I will repeat: depriving children of words, or teaching them to fear that the government will imprison them for what they might say or otherwise express, has a "chilling effect": it causes kids to second-guess what they say, or how they say it...which may lead to them NOT expressing themselves freely as adults...which leads to a society that is less free, overall, because conversation and communication (including, say, art) is constrained by preliminary self-restraint. No, thanks. I will take a thousand rude bullies, if it means we get to have one Lenny Bruce. I will take a million screaming Nazi, racist, stupid, hateful, KKK scumfucks, if it means we get to have one George Carlin. I'll paraphrase Bruce (via Dustin Hoffman): "Please don't take away my words." It's almost quaint to think he was arrested for saying, "cocksucker" in public, isn't it? Here. In California. Would you like to go back to live in that world? I sure don't.
|