RE: About last night, for what it's worth.

RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Lucylastic -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 5:40:05 PM)
On September 13, Obama Again Referred To The Attack As An "Act Of Terror." At a campaign event in Golden, Colorado on September 13, Obama again described the Benghazi attack as an "act of terror": OBAMA: So what I want all of you to know is that we are going to bring those who killed our fellow Americans to justice. (Applause.) I want people around the world to hear me: To all those who would do us harm, no act of terror will go unpunished. It will not dim the light of the values that we proudly present to the rest of the world. No act of violence shakes the resolve of the United States of America. (Applause.) [White House, 9/13/12] At A Second Event On September 13, Obama Said Of Benghazi: "No Act Of Terror Will Dim The Light" Of American Values. Later on September 13, at an event in Las Vegas, Nevada, Obama again called the attack an "act of terror": OBAMA: As for the ones we lost last night: I want to assure you, we will bring their killers to justice. And we want to send a message all around the world -- anybody who would do us harm: No act of terror will dim the light of the values that we proudly shine on the rest of the world, and no act of violence will shake the resolve of the United States of America." [White House, 9/13/12]

servantforuse -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 5:41:32 PM)
I never said that Obama has his China investments under his control. I said he has them, and he does..

Lucylastic -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 5:50:35 PM)
they are part of his pension plan..he has no control over those

ElizabethAnne -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 5:54:05 PM)
For days they pussyfooted around about it; they blamed it on an obscure video - it did take a long time for it to be called out and out a terrorist attack. AND he did apologize. http://news.yahoo.com/us-spends-70k-ads-denouncing-anti-islam-film-183222317.html

servantforuse -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 5:57:01 PM)
It was a coverup, and the Obama administration lied about what really happened and it took 14 days to tell the truth.

TheHeretic -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 5:58:47 PM)
Well that's lovely, Lucy. If that was the case, have the talking points emails included a reason for why they then turned around and lied to the citizenry of my country and world about it, since they knew all along that it had nothing to do with the stupid movie?

Lucylastic -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 6:02:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ElizabethAnne This from USA today from 9/12 - I don't see the word terror in his initial response. Mention is made by Hilary about the video. YOU said......I dont see the word terror, not terrorist .... The same as right wingers everywhere, Its been proven to you that he said it four times at four different speeches, but NOW you change goalposts to being an act of terrorism. Id give you links to the fact that the video did have an impact on many people and protests, but I doubt you will acknowledge the facts. WHy do you think Romney never said SQUAT about Benghazi last night??? It wasnt because he was right.

RacerJim -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 6:05:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: xBullx However Obama didn't want to call this a terrorist attack, and that is obvious. Obvious to who? The President called it an 'act of terror' the very next day, in as near as I can find his first public remarks on it. Obvious to anyone who actually reads the transcript of his first public remarks about it in the Rose Garden the very next day. He did not, repeat DID NOT, call it an "act of terror".

Lucylastic -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 6:08:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic Well that's lovely, Lucy. If that was the case, have the talking points emails included a reason for why they then turned around and lied to the citizenry of my country and world about it, since they knew all along that it had nothing to do with the stupid movie? I don't read the talking points emails Rich, much to your surprise Im sure. I can find out factual information on my own without electioneering bullshit LMAO they were dealing with the death of four americans, they were dealing with Egypt, they were dealing with confusion, they were dealing with utter political bullshit from Romney before ANY Of the facts were out, they had investigations going on and a lot of different intel. bad and otherwise. and PLEASE don't lecture ANYONE on falling for " lies", considering YOU jumped on the bandwagon about Stevens being sodomized, not once but three times if I'm not mistaken Are you denying that the president DID say acts of terror?? and that Romney was RIGHT at the debate??? AGAIN, many protests in that part of the world WERE to do with the video... got anything to state otherwise???

Lucylastic -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 6:12:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RacerJim Obvious to anyone who actually reads the transcript of his first public remarks about it in the Rose Garden the very next day. He did not, repeat DID NOT, call it an "act of terror". http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=3Nu6VZ9DeVc#! take a look at 4.19 the transcript says As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe. No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done. OOps, it seems he did

DomKen -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 6:14:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RacerJim quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: xBullx However Obama didn't want to call this a terrorist attack, and that is obvious. Obvious to who? The President called it an 'act of terror' the very next day, in as near as I can find his first public remarks on it. Obvious to anyone who actually reads the transcript of his first public remarks about it in the Rose Garden the very next day. He did not, repeat DID NOT, call it an "act of terror". Can you not read? http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/09/12/remarks-president-deaths-us-embassy-staff-libya

FMRFGOPGAL -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 6:15:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: xBullx quote: ORIGINAL: FMRFGOPGAL quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 I bet you don`t know how many factorys Mitt owns in China...... Mitt`ll be tough on China alright.....surrrre...[8\|] Got bad news about that bridge you bought in Brooklyn.... Pah-leeezzz......keep your cool-aid to yourselves.... I guess all the neocons got so caught up in the game of battleship (registered trademark), that they actually missed what Romney said he would do "economic development" is code for outsourcing more American Jobs, if you come from the Bain Capital/Bain Consulting School Of Goverment. Owner, why didn't Romney sing Lennon's "Imagine". What a tragedy of reasonimg that first post was. Well, since you weren’t talking to me, I won’t our time responding to all your hyperbole. Good

TheHeretic -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 6:19:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic PLEASE don't lecture ANYONE on falling for " lies", considering YOU jumped on the bandwagon about Stevens being sodomized, not once but three times if I'm not mistaken Lucy, I'm going to offer you the opportunity to correct that, because it's even bigger bullshit than my President trying to claim last night that he never sought a SOFA with Iraq. You are very badly mistaken. I'm not sure who you have me confused with, but your assertion is false. Sodomized? I never even heard that story, much less repeated it.

FMRFGOPGAL -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 6:23:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic LOL seeing him collapse into agreeing with Obamas actions made him look like a lying puppet being jerked around from the neo conservative to the most centrist arena, I wouldnt trust him as far as I could throw him With all his "myths" dribbling out last night, the Presidents response was low key any lower and people would be calling him a wuss. If the man cannot sack up after doing nothing BUT attack the Prez since 2008 and whine he was being "attacked" he shouldnt have lied so many times. I want to know who coached him on than Monalisa kissy-face look he pointed at Obama all night. I half expected him to say "I'm from Massachusetts. You know what that could mean if we dumped these bitches". Seriously, whomever coached him on his expressions, was looking at it from the wrong camera angle during practice.

servantforuse -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 6:24:47 PM)
Newly released e-mails from the State Dept will show that Obama knew immediatly that the embassy attack had nothing to do with a you tube video. They knew because alquaida took responsibility for that attack. A minor detail to the liar in chief.

Lucylastic -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 6:32:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic PLEASE don't lecture ANYONE on falling for " lies", considering YOU jumped on the bandwagon about Stevens being sodomized, not once but three times if I'm not mistaken Lucy, I'm going to offer you the opportunity to correct that, because it's even bigger bullshit than my President trying to claim last night that he never sought a SOFA with Iraq. You are very badly mistaken. I'm not sure who you have me confused with, but your assertion is false. Sodomized? I never even heard that story, much less repeated it. Rich, I humbly apologise. Seriously and without question. I was wrong and maligned you badly. My apologies

TheHeretic -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 6:37:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Rich, I humbly apologise. Seriously and without question. I was wrong and maligned you badly. My apologies Accepted, Lucy, but where the fuck did that even come from? Sodomized??? Who the hell came up with such a charge?

Lucylastic -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 6:41:44 PM)
Arturas which makes me feel even worse for thinking it was you... I actually feel really bad right now

Owner59 -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 6:47:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse It was a coverup, and the Obama administration lied about what really happened and it took 14 days to tell the truth. You still haven`t told us what the lie was yet. Or what was covered up or how. Don`t you think you cons have an obligation to share this with us? Everyone was getting info that the film was related to the attack including every media outlet. Doesn`t matter either way because it`s irrelevant....either way.

Owner59 -> RE: About last night, for what it's worth. (10/23/2012 6:55:13 PM)
The day after...in the Rose Garden,the President called it a terrorist act.......in English even. Romeny, standing their looking clueless because he followed the faux-news lunatic narrative,instead of following the news like the rest of us.....reminds me of this lie charge by our cons .........that comes from the same lunatic narrative.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875