Banned fetishes

Banned fetishes (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

SimplyMichael -> Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 6:51:48 AM)
There are a number of fetishes banned by tbe TOS here. Shouldnt Fin Domme be added to the list?

theRose4U -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 7:13:03 AM)
I don't think it would stop them trolling here for clients. New code would just be "into roses or very charitable" but it wouldn't stop them. Besides much like porn there is a lucritive market or there wouldn't be so many doing it!

RemoteUser -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 7:28:52 AM)
I don't see a need to ban FinDommes. They have their own thing, some people don't like it but that's typical enough. We wouldn't ban Goreans for being different, although I recall when they first hit the scene online that was the knee-jerk reaction of some sites and users. If a FinDomme posts something thought provoking I want to read it. [;)] And if it's about providing services, well, we do have a thread for that; their professional posts could be placed there. And yes if they troll, treat em like trolls - but give them the opportunity to fit in before segregating them.

LadyPact -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 7:34:52 AM)
http://www.collarchat.com/m_4224292/tm.htm I've got a detailed answer on this thread that was on page 2 of the General Board.

theRose4U -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 7:37:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RemoteUser And yes if they troll, treat em like trolls - but give them the opportunity to fit in before segregating them. But can I still beat the trolls with my sitck?!? Nothing better than a game of whack a troll...damn that's mole isn't it?[;)] As for goreans "in the old days"...I think that's where the original weel twue dom jokes came from. I don't have enough fingers & toes to count the number of times was told "a female should drop to their knees in the proper position when I enter a (chat) room!!" Umm yeah let me get right on that[:'(]

mnottertail -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 7:38:17 AM)
Looks to me that the entire idea of the fetishes that are banned here are the ones that are NON CONSENTUAL. If it is consentual it is in. Do I about got that right? Well, you fuckin' Sie A I do.

SimplyMichael -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 8:04:21 AM)
Animals dont consent to us slitting their throats or dlicing their skin off and wearing it...

RemoteUser -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 8:16:13 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael Animals dont consent to us slitting their throats or dlicing their skin off and wearing it... They also don't have the verbal capacity or mental acumen to challenge us in the food chain. If the cows develop sentience, we'll probably change our burger-eating ways. I'd like to see them type a message on the forums though, that would be a neat trick.

mnottertail -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 8:21:03 AM)
Can we talk about that here, Mike? I thought it was a nono, which would reinforce my point, but if not, point team Mike.

LadyPact -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 8:44:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael Animals dont consent to us slitting their throats or dlicing their skin off and wearing it... Does this mean that you are willing to tell the cattle rancher that your opinion of his farm should usurp his ownership of it? In a sense, that's what your original has in similarity. You are very well aware that the site is owned by an independent party and the decisions of what can and can not be here is not decided by popular vote. What you think should and should not be allowed is really inconsequential. Very much the same way that you have no voice in the authority that is held in other people's dynamics. I used to have a sig line that said, "My dynamic is not a democracy and you don't get a vote". I pretty much see the site the same way. ETA - Oh, and for the record, last Saturday at the munch, I had the greatest, greasy, not good for Me hamburger, with mushrooms and blue cheese that I had in the longest time. I didn't feel a damn bit bad for the cow.

RemoteUser -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 9:02:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact ETA - Oh, and for the record, last Saturday at the munch, I had the greatest, greasy, not good for Me hamburger, with mushrooms and blue cheese that I had in the longest time. I didn't feel a damn bit bad for the cow. Great, now you're on the radar of the Sentient Herd. [:D] I vote that we ban blue cheese. Then I vote that we ban voting. (I'm also lobbying to have grease made calorie free. I'll let you know how that goes.)

Ninebelowzero -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 9:08:26 AM)
Fin Dommes fill a role for some people. It isn't illegal therefore it stays IMO. What about banning whiney judgemental eejits?

Aswad -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 9:19:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Looks to me that the entire idea of the fetishes that are banned here are the ones that are NON CONSENTUAL. If it is consentual it is in. Do I about got that right? Not as far as I can tell. IWYW, — Aswad.

Aswad -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 9:20:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RemoteUser If the cows develop sentience, we'll probably change our burger-eating ways. Very doubtful, at least in the first few decades. IWYW, — Aswad.

RemoteUser -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 9:25:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aswad quote: ORIGINAL: RemoteUser If the cows develop sentience, we'll probably change our burger-eating ways. Very doubtful, at least in the first few decades. IWYW, — Aswad. This will make the sentient cows cry. Moo hoo hoo.

LizDeluxe -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 9:31:22 AM)
Bitching about Fin Dommes should definitely be added to the list.

JeffBC -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 9:33:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Looks to me that the entire idea of the fetishes that are banned here are the ones that are NON CONSENTUAL. Without even looking I'm going to guess that the ones which are banned are the ones which are illegal in the united states and so would get the site shut down (or whatever jurisdiction CM falls under).

TheLilSquaw -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 9:33:47 AM)
OP, you may not like fin dommes or pros for that matter. However, as a proswitch that practices financial domination I can tell you there are those that use my services. There are many people who crave to be controlled by a financial domme just as there are people who crave to be tied up and have their asses beaten black and blue. It may not be your kink but no one is forcing you to participate in it. Are there those that take the subs money then poof? Yes, but here is a news flash there are abusive "doms" period. Should outsiders judge EVERY dom/me by the bad apples? Do the abusers represent you? I don't think so. I am far to well there are those "lifestylers" that look down their nose at me because I am not only a lifestyle switch but a pro but eh, frankly that is no skin of my ass. I am not here to please the masses or some whining self absorbed person on the net who thinks his way is the only way people can participate in this lifestyle. As far as cattle not being able to consent to be eaten, some would say they do by default. The whole food chain thing. A squirrel doesn't consent to the be lunch for a fox but eh it can still happen. Salmon doesn't consent to be lunch for a bear but again it happens.

JeffBC -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 9:37:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael There are a number of fetishes banned by tbe TOS here. Shouldnt Fin Domme be added to the list? I think we've been over this a zillion times. I see no reason why a Fin Domme shouldn't be on this site. I can see reasons why it'd be nice if there was the "fin domme" check box so that searches would be simpler. But I have grave misgivings over whether the Fin Domme's would use such a thing because it'd eat into business. The serious Fin Dommes would though since it would aid them finding appropriate partners. Overall I'm in the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" camp. Us male doms have to deal with the fake subs/slaves also.

Aswad -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/27/2012 9:41:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JeffBC Without even looking I'm going to guess that the ones which are banned are the ones which are illegal in the united states and so would get the site shut down (or whatever jurisdiction CM falls under). Correct. It's strictly a legal matter. IWYW, — Aswad.

Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875