RE: Banned fetishes

RE: Banned fetishes (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

theRose4U -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 6:50:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FrostedFlake The part that is objectionable is the ADVERTISEMENTS (I'm great, you don't even suck, fork over the dough!) that SOME shameless gold diggers feel PERFECTLY JUSTIFIED in pasting where I will trip over it. If someone wants a findom, he can find one VERY EASILY. Everyone else is being abused by those who post such ads. I would like to see such ADVERTISEMENTS (I'm great, you don't even suck, fork over the dough!) BANNED by TOS. Because it is TROLLING. If someone thinks otherwise I pose this : What gives you the right to directly insult me AND almost everyone else? I mean, on FOX you would have to PAY to do that. Why should you get to advertise your business here for free? UNREASONABLE? There is a page for these ADS. This should solve that. http://www.collarchat.com/forumid_40/tt.htm While I agree with the principle of your arguement that fin doms & porn fakes are a waste of male subs time...the work then falls on admins that are volunteers to wade through the sewage daily so you are happy. The additional caveat is the owner receives advertising money based on the number of members. So the deal is for it to stay a free site & keep the admins in a better mood, I personally am fine with fin dommes.

theRose4U -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 6:52:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TNDommeK sighs Gosh, everyone always wants to get rid of us. :( Only the ones un-interested in their whining magical penises![8D]

mnottertail -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 7:04:46 AM)
I don't think I can count the number of times I've laid a fiver in my hand after a really good session and said, "Go out and buy yourself something pretty."

NiceButMeanGirl -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 10:36:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael There are a number of fetishes banned by tbe TOS here. Shouldnt Fin Domme be added to the list? Short answer: NO. Whatever happened to YKINMK? Long answer: Some banned fetishes are illegal and therefore should be banned. Others are very fringe/edgy but not illegal, so I don't know why they aren't on the available list except that CM's fetish list is not, by any means, exhaustive. As for fin-Dommes, there are also those who choose to be fin-slaves, so what's it to you? I'm not either, but I do think they have just as much right to exist as you do. NBMG

Rochsub2009 -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 10:52:25 AM)
Sigh. Another financial Domme thread. Live and let live. That's all I have to say about that.

mnottertail -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 10:54:56 AM)
You're just pissed off cuz nobody will give you enough money to get that blue shit off your face, how much you been selling the directions to my secret walleye hole for anyhow, Roch?

MariaB -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 11:06:10 AM)
If being a financial Domme is a kink then why aren't men doing it too? I don't believe for a second that its a kink. Its business through and through. I don't think there is anything wrong with that sort of business so long as its legit and its not just some thieving criminal using peoples vulnerabilities for their own gain. As for animals being dumb one has to look at comparative behavior in factory farming and roaming animals. Factory farmed animals often suffer from retardation and brain damage.

Rochsub2009 -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 11:12:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MariaB If being a financial Domme is a kink then why aren't men doing it too? Hmmmmmmm, maybe I should create a new niche. I think I'm going to become a financial Dom. Any takers? [;)]

obeyxmilla -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 11:35:29 AM)
There are plenty of male financial dominants. Clip/content producers treat findom as a business. They shoot and record fetish fantasies, upload, and wait for the sales to roll in. This method is favorable because it requires little to no interaction on either end. No worrying about wanky dudes faking and consuming precious time. I don't approach findom this way and I know I'm not alone.

littlewonder -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 12:56:49 PM)
I've come across a few financial male doms. They do exist, they simply are not as many of them. The reason for that is because a woman can get a man for free by just standing still and not doing anything at all. Men are the only ones desperate enough to pay for it. Like I said, no one is forcing them to do so. It's not like someone is hacking into their bank account and stealing all their money. If a domme tells them to give them money all the man has to do is say one simple word.....no. And then walk away. Simple.

MariaB -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 12:57:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: obeyxmilla There are plenty of male financial dominants. Clip/content producers treat findom as a business. They shoot and record fetish fantasies, upload, and wait for the sales to roll in. This method is favorable because it requires little to no interaction on either end. No worrying about wanky dudes faking and consuming precious time. I don't approach findom this way and I know I'm not alone. They are business men and what says they are dominant? I know a few men that do this and they are just part of the porn industry. I'm talking about men online having profiles demanding money from women for 'online domination. Point me to one of those and I will laugh hysterically [:D]

Aswad -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 1:44:31 PM)
Yeah, can't say as I have a problem with findom/mes. The suggestion to add a search criterion thing might be nice to help people meet the ones they're looking for, but there are a billion other things they could do before even thinking about that one (e.g. being able to check more than one country at a time, being able to search for people looking for what you might be to them, etc.). IWYW, — Aswad.

searching4mysir -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 1:46:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MariaB quote: ORIGINAL: obeyxmilla There are plenty of male financial dominants. Clip/content producers treat findom as a business. They shoot and record fetish fantasies, upload, and wait for the sales to roll in. This method is favorable because it requires little to no interaction on either end. No worrying about wanky dudes faking and consuming precious time. I don't approach findom this way and I know I'm not alone. They are business men and what says they are dominant? I know a few men that do this and they are just part of the porn industry. I'm talking about men online having profiles demanding money from women for 'online domination. Point me to one of those and I will laugh hysterically [:D] I've seen them and I do laugh at them. Particularly if they message me, my response is usually "BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA"

obeyxmilla -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 1:49:57 PM)
You said they didn't exist; I said they do. I'm not sure why the gender of the sub is relevant. I'm also not sure whether both parties being genuinely invested in the kink is what qualifies it as kink.

littlewonder -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 1:50:55 PM)
The financial Doms I've come across usually are exactly like the findommes. I also know financial tops. The femsubs pay them to play with them. I have no idea how much business they receive though.

coldslayer -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 2:06:14 PM)
Hi! [;)]

OsideGirl -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 2:15:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MariaB If being a financial Domme is a kink then why aren't men doing it too? I've come across a few male FinDoms. Also, everyone seems to be locked on the "pay me a tribute to talk to me" version of this, but financial domination can also be the Dominant controlling the finances as part of the dynamic.

Kana -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 2:16:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: littlewonder The financial Doms I've come across usually are exactly like the findommes. I also know financial tops. The femsubs pay them to play with them. I have no idea how much business they receive though. Don't tell em what I charge you-it'll skew my rates for ages

Nakhla -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 2:32:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Looks to me that the entire idea of the fetishes that are banned here are the ones that are NON CONSENTUAL. If it is consentual it is in. Do I about got that right? Well, you fuckin' Sie A I do. Nope. Incest between consenting adults can be perfectly consensual, yet also, totally illegal in the USA, Canada, and much of the rest of the world. ( Hence it being a no-go topic here. )

mnottertail -> RE: Banned fetishes (11/28/2012 2:38:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: coldslayer Hi! [;)] Hello!!!!!

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125