Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate the other.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate the other. Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 6:03:05 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Just out of curiosity, could that be because your system treats mental illness instead of pretending it doesnt exist?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 301
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 6:22:09 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

all of the shooters mentioned were under 21 an thus it was a violation of federal law for them to own a handgun


We know..... you are late to the party.

All were legally obtained by someone they knew.

quote:

It claims to tell us how many times something of which there is no record happenes there it is nothing but a wag (wild a!! guess)


Its been documented.

obtaining a hadgun for a minor is also a federal offence
keeping me from owning one because it could be stolen and misused is exactly the same as saying I shouldn't have a car because it could be stolen and missused
and I was in this party before you were born

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 302
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 6:27:42 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

The 1994 ban on assault rifles would still have stopped people owning the gun used.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/07/20/557811/expired-assault-weapons-ban-would-have-covered-rifle-used-in-colorado-shooting/?mobile=nc



The original ban did not do anything about the ones already made, in warehouses and in private hands.

It did not do anything about the Ruger Mini14 that can be bought with a collapsible stock, has a high rate of fire and is the same caliber as the bushmaster. The bill exempted 900 specific weapons.

It was in the anti crime bill.

It did not stop crime, most criminals do not use military style weapons, you cant hide the thing under a long coat and they are really obvious to anyone but a blind man that somebody has a fucking gun.

It did not prevent sales of existing semi auto weapons between individuals, in fact no gun control law has.

It did nothing about the various 9mm pistols you can slap a 15 or 20 round mag in and do just as much damage.

It did nothing about the monster pistols, the 357,44, or 50 caliber desert eagles that you could put 15 round mags in.

According to the statement put out by the Senator that introduced the original is not good, it still does not address the problem that makes these weapons so deadly. It will stop the manufacture and sales of new large capacity mags, but does nothing about the existing ones.

In the long run, the original ban didnt do a damn thing it was supposed to do, and form Feinstein's statement, the new one is just as useless, and unless the majority of Republican members of the house are struck down by some party specific pandemic, it will never get past the house.

Yep, today two Republican senators came out today and said something has to be done. Nothing along those lines from republicans in the house.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 303
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 6:37:01 PM   
Tallblkdom


Posts: 14
Joined: 2/14/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

The 1994 ban on assault rifles would still have stopped people owning the gun used.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/07/20/557811/expired-assault-weapons-ban-would-have-covered-rifle-used-in-colorado-shooting/?mobile=nc


That article is nearly a 100% outright lie........a post ban rifle sold within the AWB, actually had the same functions and capability as the pre ban rifle. What the article leaves out is that the AWB defined assault weapons if they had at least 10 points. If the rifle did not have at least 10 of the points it was not classified as an assault weapon. Thus, you remove all the cosmetics(about 60% of the points); pistol grip, collapsible stock, flash hider, bayonet lug, grenade launcher it was not classified as an assault rifle.
Ironically, the rifle displayed in the article would have been legal under the AWB in nearly all states just by selling it with a 10 round magazine and turning down the barrel at the muzzle which prevented flash hider from being attached.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 304
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 6:51:40 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Seems that way... we also dont know what may have been used in the hallways.


Well said....if I recall (and of course, everything written in the first 2 months is going to be speculation at best, even as it's trotted off as fact), the kid did have some form of gun that wasn't one shot stuff.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 305
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 7:37:54 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Just out of curiosity, could that be because your system treats mental illness instead of pretending it doesnt exist?


And in the United States, most mental illness is treated haphazardly with the limits put on it by health insurance companies, and Obamacare doesnt push it hard for much more than behavioral problems like drug addiction.

As for low income people who suffer from mental illness, the feds and states dont give a fuck about them.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 306
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 7:40:29 PM   
tingdatt


Posts: 16
Status: offline
Obama should show that he's committed to gun safety. Make the White House a gun-free zone.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 307
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 8:22:01 PM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tingdatt

Obama should show that he's committed to gun safety. Make the White House a gun-free zone.



YUK YUK YUK

_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to tingdatt)
Profile   Post #: 308
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 9:28:00 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
Please note that a man with a 1866 winchester and a pair of 1851 colt navy revolvers could have done the same damage in the same time

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 309
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 9:56:14 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

all of the shooters mentioned were under 21 an thus it was a violation of federal law for them to own a handgun


We know..... you are late to the party.

All were legally obtained by someone they knew.

quote:

It claims to tell us how many times something of which there is no record happenes there it is nothing but a wag (wild a!! guess)


Its been documented.

obtaining a hadgun for a minor is also a federal offence
keeping me from owning one because it could be stolen and misused is exactly the same as saying I shouldn't have a car because it could be stolen and missused
and I was in this party before you were born



Where did I say you couldnt own one?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 310
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 9:58:57 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Please note that a man with a 1866 winchester and a pair of 1851 colt navy revolvers could have done the same damage in the same time


1866 Winchester rate of fire... 28 per minute.

1851 colt navy revolver... 6 per minute....

Dont think so.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 311
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 10:00:05 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Just out of curiosity, could that be because your system treats mental illness instead of pretending it doesnt exist?


And in the United States, most mental illness is treated haphazardly with the limits put on it by health insurance companies, and Obamacare doesnt push it hard for much more than behavioral problems like drug addiction.

As for low income people who suffer from mental illness, the feds and states dont give a fuck about them.


It does get rid of the monetary caps.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 312
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 10:16:48 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Just out of curiosity, could that be because your system treats mental illness instead of pretending it doesnt exist?


And in the United States, most mental illness is treated haphazardly with the limits put on it by health insurance companies, and Obamacare doesnt push it hard for much more than behavioral problems like drug addiction.

As for low income people who suffer from mental illness, the feds and states dont give a fuck about them.


It does get rid of the monetary caps.


It does? From the websites I have checked, it doesn't, but then there is a bunch of bullshit about behavioral disorders such as drug addiction. and that is the only example.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 313
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 10:51:55 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Americans with mental illness had good reason to celebrate when the Supreme Court upheld President Obama’s Affordable Care Act. The law promises to give them something they have never had before: near-universal health insurance, not just for their medical problems but for psychiatric disorders as well.

Until now, people with mental illness and substance disorders have faced stingy annual and lifetime caps on coverage, higher deductibles or simply no coverage at all.

Now comes the Affordable Care Act combining parity with the individual mandate for health insurance. As Dr. Dilip V. Jeste, president of the American Psychiatric Association, told me, “This law has the potential to change the course of life for psychiatric patients for the better, and in that sense it is both humane and right.”

To get a sense of the magnitude of the potential benefit, consider that about half of Americans will experience a major psychiatric or substance disorder at some point, according to an authoritative 2005 survey. Yet because of the stigma surrounding mental illness, poor access to care and inadequate insurance coverage, only a fraction of those with mental illness receive treatment.

One of the health care act’s pillars is to forbid the exclusion of people with pre-existing illness from medical coverage. By definition, a vast majority of adult Americans with a mental illness have a pre-existing disorder. Half of all serious psychiatric illnesses — including major depression, anxiety disorders and substance abuse — start by 14 years of age, and three-fourths are present by 25, according to the National Comorbidity Survey. These people have specifically been denied medical coverage by most commercial insurance companies — until now.

From an epidemiologic and public health perspective, the provision that young people can remain on their parents’ insurance until they turn 26 is a no-brainer: By this age, the bulk of psychiatric illness has already developed, and there is solid evidence that we can positively change the course of psychiatric illness by early treatment.

Mental disorders are chronic lifelong diseases, characterized by remission and relapse for those who respond to treatment, or persistent symptoms for those who do not. In schizophrenia, for example, relapse is common, even with the best treatment. It makes no sense to tell someone with this condition that his lifetime mental health benefit is just 60 days of inpatient hospitalization.

Psychiatric illness is treatable, but it is rarely curable; it may remit for a while, but it doesn’t go away. That is why the current limits on treatment are as irrational as they are cruel — the discriminatory hallmark of commercial medical insurance.

No more. The Affordable Care Act treats psychiatric illness like any other and removes obstacles to fair and rational treatment.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/10/health/policy/health-care-law-offers-wider-benefits-for-treating-mental-illness.html

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 314
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 10:56:34 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
Thank you, tazzy.

I admit I was wrong.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 315
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 10:59:18 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Not wrong. This law has been so maligned and so many didnt bother to read it. They just listened to the "talking heads" and the media, who also didnt read it at first, went along with the easier ride.

Way back when I said there was more to this law than most people realized. While its not what I wanted, its a hell of a lot better than what we had.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 316
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 11:17:49 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Just out of curiosity, could that be because your system treats mental illness instead of pretending it doesnt exist?

well,.. that may be one component (along with an overabundance of guns).. but imo its more than that, its the US culture & attitude.. the whole take-the-law-into-your-hands thing (& a gun is really handy in those situations.. ), an-eye-for-an-eye, a-life-for-a-life,.. people counting down the minutes for someone on death row to die.. stuff like that.. jmo..

1. America is an unusually violent country.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/07/23/six-facts-about-guns-violence-and-gun-control/

< Message edited by tj444 -- 12/17/2012 11:18:28 PM >


_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 317
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 11:18:34 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Please note that a man with a 1866 winchester and a pair of 1851 colt navy revolvers could have done the same damage in the same time


1866 Winchester rate of fire... 28 per minute.

1851 colt navy revolver... 6 per minute....

Dont think so.

40 x 4=160 i could and I know people lots better than me with guns

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 318
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/17/2012 11:45:25 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
40 x 4 = 160... I dont know what you are talking about.

Mind explaining?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 319
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/18/2012 12:22:22 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

40 x 4 = 160... I dont know what you are talking about.

Mind explaining?

40 rounds in 2 minutes (one revolver in each hand) 4 2 minute periods = 160 rounds
forget the pistols 28 rounds a minute x 8 minutes = 224 rounds almost 10 rounds per victim

< Message edited by BamaD -- 12/18/2012 12:23:44 AM >

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 320
Page:   <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate the other. Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109