tazzygirl
Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
So then I would first ask you (or whomever professes knowledge of all incidents involved) of the 27 "ban" incidents, what percentage of those shootings had an "assault weapon" and/or a high capacity pistol, and of the 15 "non" ban incidents, what percentage of THOSE shootings had the same? I never said anything about the bans or what happened before or after. quote:
I believe we also need to know the motivation of the choice of weapon(s) in each (e.g. what was readily available, what was most effective, etc). Some were, Im sure, what was available... however as more info comes out, we may discover the Bushmaster may have been the best in mom's arsenal. However, with others the guns were purchased. It could have been that they were purchased with finance in mind. Couple that with the biggest majority, if not all, had at least one semi in thei possession... Definitely not a group into the nostalgia of shooting. They chose with the primary goal of maximum damage. quote:
That would at least shape some credibility into the statement. Nevertheless, the other factors proposed cannot simply be ignored. It would be important to determine which had experience, age, disposition, physical fitness, and skill of each shooter as well as his/their planning and what if any lucky variables intervened and disrupted these plans. physical fitness..; from photos, they all looked fit. Experience... since most, if not all, came from either military backgrounds or familes with guns, I can safely say that all had some experience with guns. Some professional level.... many just basic. Age.... most, especially lately, below 25. The rest... no idea... would say most were considered loners that didnt quite fit in.
_____________________________
Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt. RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11 Duchess of Dissent 1 Dont judge me because I sin differently than you. If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
|