RE: All things gun control go here (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


jlf1961 -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/23/2012 7:13:50 PM)

I can tell you one way the money would become available...

If congress would stop spending money on a missile defense system that does not work.




jlf1961 -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/23/2012 8:13:46 PM)

quote:

Between 1999 and 2010, firearms cut short the lives of 1,705 children in the United States under the age of 10, including 21 in Maryland and 49 in Virginia, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The deaths of young children from gunshots are dwarfed by fatalities from other causes during that time: 8,499 drownings and nearly 16,000 in traffic accidents. source


Interesting reading, too bad it does not prove the point of the anti-gun proponents.

quote:

Among the young victims killed nationwide by guns since 1999, nearly 60 percent were white and 61 percent male. About 1,280 of the deaths were homicides and 380 were unintentional, according to the CDC data. The causes of 45 deaths were undetermined, and two were suicide. Less than one percent of all homicides among school-age children happen on school grounds or on the way to or from school, according to the CDC’s School Associated Violent Death Study.

“The vast majority of students will never experience lethal violence at school,” the study found.


In fact, it proves what most of us have been saying, this is a rare occasion, not the norm




Powergamz1 -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/23/2012 8:28:59 PM)

In the real world, the costs of putting enough police would be close to what has been projected elsewhere (Note that this 5 billion estimate leaves out all the private schools http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121219152705.htm ), and doubling the number of police in America overnight is simply not going to happen outside of a comic book, or a politician's posturing.

And it is also an overly naive notion that this plan would be in any way at all effective in stopping the next suicider who wants to shock the world by killing kids.


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

So you would be talking about more like half a million annual dollars in cost to a school of any size (and that would only be if greedy administrators and politicians didn't get a whiff of this big pot of money just waiting to be raided).


I think you are far exaggerating the costs...lets just say all additional benefit and insurance costs outside of salary for a $50,000 employee would generously equal an additional $20,000. This would include certifications and training.

In our town local police often fill in as security at various business and colleges around town to obtain SS benefits and could easily substitute for sick days and vacations.

As for the number needed per school the size of the student population would determine the guards needed. The larger the school to more financially enabled they are through local taxes and state aid.

This is very doable and affordable in my view it just takes organization and perhaps a federal mandate for public schools to provide.

Butch





Powergamz1 -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/23/2012 8:30:24 PM)

Or a war on drugs that doesn't work, a war on terror that doesn't work, etc.
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I can tell you one way the money would become available...

If congress would stop spending money on a missile defense system that does not work.





jlf1961 -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/23/2012 8:35:49 PM)

The only way a war on drugs would even approach being successful is for it to be treated as any other war. Considering the corruption in the countries where the drugs are coming from, and the fact the US is paying Afghan warlords who make their money growing opium, it is a losing battle.




jlf1961 -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/23/2012 9:20:53 PM)

well, considering the rampant and rabid anti gun stance in the media, there seems to have been a run on assault rifles.

However, a few weapons seem to have been un affected by the media stance. A Barrett 50 cal sniper rifle starts at $12500 depending on the model, and the NFA market is just as brisk as ever. I found a virgin M2 full parts kit (complete weapon, just not assembled) for $28000, M16's for around 10K, and M60's start at 14,5




kdsub -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/23/2012 9:22:02 PM)

I have listed the real costs my friend... look at it by individual districts and schools... I can not explain it to you any better ...I am using facts not wild estimates with no bases in fact.

There is a national average for police pay...look it up

There is a national average cost per student....look it up

It could be done if mandated with little financial impact on school districts and taxes....Well worth the outlay I would say.

Yes it will take some time and provisions made with local police departments for backup...no problem... I am telling you from knowledge police are looking for side jobs so they can accumulate hours for social security benefits.

My district has added security with no additional tax increase... we are nothing special and if we can do it others can too.

Butch




Powergamz1 -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/23/2012 9:51:21 PM)

Even if we accept the imaginary numbers you asserted, and reject the factual ones I linked to, there is still the other salient point.

Which is that even if we could wave a magic wand and have all of these police appear out of nowhere at a low cost, it would be impossible for them to stop the next suicidal killer. Police work is too reactive in such cases.

How many trained officers does it take to prevent there being any killings inside a massively controlled environment like a prison? And exactly how effective are a few officers going to be in a open environment like a school?

It is a nice dream, but that's all it is... a dream.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I have listed the real costs my friend... look at it by individual districts and schools... I can not explain it to you any better ...I am using facts not wild estimates with no bases in fact.

There is a national average for police pay...look it up

There is a national average cost per student....look it up

It could be done if mandated with little financial impact on school districts and taxes....Well worth the outlay I would say.

Yes it will take some time and provisions made with local police departments for backup...no problem... I am telling you from knowledge police are looking for side jobs so they can accumulate hours for social security benefits

Butch





Hillwilliam -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/23/2012 9:55:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Here's about the only way I justify SRO's (School Resource Officers)
Our town has about 14,000 people. During the day, there are about 12-15 officers on shift which is about 1/1000 people.
The HS has about 1000 students and staff.
Kinda makes sense to put a cop where about 1000 people are concentrated.

or you could eliminate a couple of assistant superentendents who don't improve education anyway


NO SHIT!!!!!!




kdsub -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/23/2012 10:01:30 PM)

quote:

Even if we accept the imaginary numbers you asserted, and reject the factual ones I linked to, there is still the other salient point.

Which is that even if we could wave a magic wand and have all of these police appear out of nowhere at a low cost, it would be impossible for them to stop the next suicidal killer. Police work is too reactive in such cases.


You linked nothing to address the costs I have.

As for your second point...how would you know.. they would be an on scene deterrent. You would have no idea how many tragedies they would stop just by there presence...unless you are a future teller extraordinaire.

Butch




tazzygirl -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/23/2012 10:21:06 PM)

quote:

As for your second point...how would you know.. they would be an on scene deterrent. You would have no idea how many tragedies they would stop just by there presence...unless you are a future teller extraordinaire.


Columbine had officers on duty at the school.




BamaD -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/24/2012 12:08:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

As for your second point...how would you know.. they would be an on scene deterrent. You would have no idea how many tragedies they would stop just by there presence...unless you are a future teller extraordinaire.


Columbine had officers on duty at the school.

but they were inexplicably unarmed keep in mind that in virtually every case when faced with armed ressistance the shooter either surrenders of committs suicide




Powergamz1 -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/24/2012 12:18:49 AM)

The lone LEO on duty at Columbine was not unarmed. And when someone sets out to commit suicide, it is hardly surprising that they end up killing themselves.

Again, these TV show plot lines make for nice entertainment, but lousy public policy, and even worse risk mangement.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

As for your second point...how would you know.. they would be an on scene deterrent. You would have no idea how many tragedies they would stop just by there presence...unless you are a future teller extraordinaire.


Columbine had officers on duty at the school.

but they were inexplicably unarmed keep in mind that in virtually every case when faced with armed ressistance the shooter either surrenders of committs suicide





JeffBC -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/24/2012 12:45:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1
Again, these TV show plot lines make for nice entertainment, but lousy public policy, and even worse risk mangement.

Yes! Yes! Yes!

I think your characterization of "TV show plot lines" about sums up everything I've heard so far. I have yet to hear anything that sounds like formalized risk management... or even a coherent attempt at specifically addressing some problem. So far, I can characterize what I've heard into two groups:

A) Stuff that is in the "Think of the Children" category of knee-jerk reaction.
B) Stuff that sounds plausible but has nothing to do with the recent shooting (a lot of jlf1961's posts)

I'm up for pursuing the stuff in category B but I'd like to do it in a slow and reasoned way rather than as a knee-jerk reaction to an event that it doesn't bear on.




subspaceseven -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/24/2012 2:49:42 AM)

The proof of putting guns in schools will not stop that is simple to show. Explain the Ft Hood killings, inside a Army base where weapons and people trained to kill other people are all over, did not stop the person from killing 12 and wounding 29. Say is was the gun free zone...however all security on all military camps. bases is done by armed personal


Saying the only answer to gun violence is more guns would be like saying the only way to lower drunk driving deaths is to make more alcohol available to people of all ages. which did not work inthe 70's when they lowered the drinking age

My problem with this whole thing is that both extremes are the only ones people are listening to, there is many many ways to reduce gun violence, just as there are ways which have worked to lower smoking, lower drunk driving deaths and they are working.

But when your argument is we will not even listen to the possibility of reducing any type of access to guns and the only answer is more guns for everyone, that is not reasonable, the gun owner is not the only person who has rights protected.

Look at Free Speech.....there are limits to it for the protection of everybody. You can't scream fire in a crowed place as a joke without being arrested, you can't place threats against others without the police getting involved...

As George Washington stated

"Individuals entering into society, must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest. The magnitude of the sacrifice must depend as well on situation and circumstance, as on the object to be obtained."





PeonForHer -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/24/2012 2:51:41 AM)

FR

Hell's bells, I think I've seen everything, now. Armed guards, or even police, in elementary schools . . . .

What sort of society do people want? What sort of society will they put up with?




meatcleaver -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/24/2012 2:53:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subspaceseven

The proof of putting guns in schools will not stop that is simple to show. Explain the Ft Hood killings, inside a Army base where weapons and people trained to kill other people are all over, did not stop the person from killing 12 and wounding 29. Say is was the gun free zone...however all security on all military camps. bases is done by armed personal


Saying the only answer to gun violence is more guns would be like saying the only way to lower drunk driving deaths is to make more alcohol available to people of all ages. which did not work inthe 70's when they lowered the drinking age

My problem with this whole thing is that both extremes are the only ones people are listening to, there is many many ways to reduce gun violence, just as there are ways which have worked to lower smoking, lower drunk driving deaths and they are working.

But when your argument is we will not even listen to the possibility of reducing any type of access to guns and the only answer is more guns for everyone, that is not reasonable, the gun owner is not the only person who has rights protected.

Look at Free Speech.....there are limits to it for the protection of everybody. You can't scream fire in a crowed place as a joke without being arrested, you can't place threats against others without the police getting involved...

As George Washington stated

"Individuals entering into society, must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest. The magnitude of the sacrifice must depend as well on situation and circumstance, as on the object to be obtained."




Don't you think it is a little inconsiderate coming on this thread and being sensible?




PeonForHer -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/24/2012 2:56:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subspaceseven

"Individuals entering into society, must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest. The magnitude of the sacrifice must depend as well on situation and circumstance, as on the object to be obtained."



Most of the gun-convos I've ever seen have centred on what are called 'positive freedoms' - freedoms to do X or Y. This omits (deliberately or otherwise) 'negative freedoms' - freedom *from* X or Y. Me, a few days ago, at around midnight, I walked home through an unlit park in a town centre carrying roughly two hundred pounds of shopping. I had no fear of anyone pulling a gun on me. Such a fear is rare in the UK, natch.




Nosathro -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/24/2012 5:34:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

Between 1999 and 2010, firearms cut short the lives of 1,705 children in the United States under the age of 10, including 21 in Maryland and 49 in Virginia, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The deaths of young children from gunshots are dwarfed by fatalities from other causes during that time: 8,499 drownings and nearly 16,000 in traffic accidents. source


Interesting reading, too bad it does not prove the point of the anti-gun proponents.

quote:

Among the young victims killed nationwide by guns since 1999, nearly 60 percent were white and 61 percent male. About 1,280 of the deaths were homicides and 380 were unintentional, according to the CDC data. The causes of 45 deaths were undetermined, and two were suicide. Less than one percent of all homicides among school-age children happen on school grounds or on the way to or from school, according to the CDC’s School Associated Violent Death Study.

“The vast majority of students will never experience lethal violence at school,” the study found.


In fact, it proves what most of us have been saying, this is a rare occasion, not the norm


I think it does, 1,705 children would be alive to day. However as you continue to show you care little about human life.....




Nosathro -> RE: All things gun control go here (12/24/2012 5:36:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

well, considering the rampant and rabid anti gun stance in the media, there seems to have been a run on assault rifles.

However, a few weapons seem to have been un affected by the media stance. A Barrett 50 cal sniper rifle starts at $12500 depending on the model, and the NFA market is just as brisk as ever. I found a virgin M2 full parts kit (complete weapon, just not assembled) for $28000, M16's for around 10K, and M60's start at 14,5


I consider the rampant and rabid NRA.....[&:]




Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375