Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

The Distress Of The Privileged


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> The Distress Of The Privileged Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/16/2013 1:13:52 PM   
Fightdirecto


Posts: 1101
Joined: 8/3/2004
Status: offline
A rather long article. To read it in it's entirety, click The Distress Of The Privileged

quote:

In a memorable scene from the 1998 film Pleasantville (in which two 1998 teen-agers are transported into the black-and-white world of a 1950s TV show), the father of the TV-perfect Parker family returns from work and says the magic words “Honey, I’m home!”, expecting them to conjure up a smiling wife, adorable children, and dinner on the table.

This time, though, it doesn’t work. No wife, no kids, no food. Confused, he repeats the invocation, as if he must have said it wrong. After searching the house, he wanders out into the rain and plaintively questions this strangely malfunctioning Universe: “Where’s my dinner?”

As the culture evolves, people who benefitted from the old ways invariably see themselves as victims of change. The world used to fit them like a glove, but it no longer does. Increasingly, they find themselves in unfamiliar situations that feel unfair or even unsafe. Their concerns used to take center stage, but now they must compete with the formerly invisible concerns of others.

If you are one of the newly-visible others, this all sounds whiny compared to the problems you face every day. It’s tempting to blast through such privileged resistance with anger and insult.

Tempting, but also, I think, a mistake. The privileged are still privileged enough to foment a counter-revolution, if their frustrated sense of entitlement hardens.

So I think it’s worthwhile to spend a minute or two looking at the world from George Parker’s point of view: HE’S A GOOD 1950S TV FATHER. HE NEVER SET OUT TO BE THE BAD GUY. HE NEVER MEANT TO STIFLE HIS WIFE’S HUMANITY OR ENFORCE A DULL CONFORMITY ON HIS KIDS. NOBODY EVER ASKED HIM WHETHER THE WORLD SHOULD BE BLACK-AND-WHITE; IT JUST WAS.

GEORGE NEVER DEMANDED A PRIVILEGED ROLE, HE JUST UNCRITICALLY ACCEPTED THE ROLE SOCIETY ASSIGNED HIM AND PLAYED IT TO THE BEST OF HIS ABILITY. AND NOW SUDDENLY THAT SOCIETY ISN’T WORKING FOR THE PEOPLE HE LOVES, AND THEY’RE BLAMING HIM.

IT SEEMS SO UNFAIR. HE DOESN’T WANT ANYBODY TO BE UNHAPPY. HE JUST WANTS DINNER.


But even as we accept the reality of George’s privileged-white-male distress, we need to hold on to the understanding that the less privileged citizens of Pleasantville are distressed in an entirely different way.

George deserves compassion, but his until-recently-ideal housewife Betty Parker (and the other characters assigned subservient roles) deserves justice. George and Betty’s claims are not equivalent, and if we treat them the same way, we do Betty an injustice.

GEORGE SEES HIMSELF AS THE VICTIM OF BIGOTRY. HE ISN’T AWARE OF HATING ANYBODY. HE JUST WANTS TO PRESERVE THE WORLD HE GREW UP IN, AND CAN’T BE BOTHERED TO PICTURE HOW OTHERS SUFFER IN THAT WORLD.

HE JUST WANTS DINNER....

SUPREMACY ITSELF ISN’T HATE. YOU MAY EVEN HAVE AFFECTION FOR THE PERSON YOU FEEL SUPERIOR TO. BUT SUPREMACY CONTAINS THE SEEDS OF HATE.

SUPREMACY TURNS TO HATE WHEN THE FEELING OF INNATE SUPERIORITY IS OPENLY CHALLENGED... SUPREMACY IS WHY SOME EVANGELICAL FUNDAMENTALIST CHRISTIANS HAVE MORE OUTRAGE AT THEIR OWN INCONVENIENCE THAN AT THE LEGITIMATE OPPRESSION OF OTHERS.


All his life, George has tried to be a good guy by the lights of his society. But society has changed and he hasn’t, so he isn’t seen as a good guy any more. He feels terrible about that, but what can he do?

One possibility: Maybe he could learn to be a good guy by the lights of this new society. It would be hard. He’d have to give up some of his privileges. He’d have to examine his habits to see which ones embody assumptions of supremacy. He’d have to learn how to see the world through the eyes of others, rather than just assume that they will play their designated social roles. Early on, he would probably make a lot of mistakes and his former inferiors would correct him. It would be embarrassing.

But there is an alternative: counter-revolution. George could decide that his habits, his expectations, and the society they fit are RIGHT, and this new society is WRONG. If he joined with the other fathers (and right-thinking mothers) of Pleasantville, maybe they could force everyone else back into their traditional roles.

Which choice he makes will depend largely on the other characters. If they aren’t firm in their convictions, the counter-revolution may seem easy. (“There, there, honey. I know you’re upset. But be reasonable.”) But if their resentment is implacable, becoming a good guy in the new world may seem impossible.

Only the middle path - firmness together with understanding - has a chance to tame George and bring him back into society on new terms.


ONCE YOU GRASP THE CONCEPT OF “PRIVILEGED DISTRESS”, YOU’LL SEE IT EVERYWHERE: THE RICH FEEL “PUNISHED” BY TAXES; WHITES BELIEVE THEY ARE THE REAL VICTIMS OF RACISM; EMPLOYERS’ RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IS THREATENED WHEN THEY CAN’T DENY CONTRACEPTION TO THEIR EMPLOYEES, EVANGELICAL FUNDAMENTALIST CHRISTIANS FEEL THEY ARE BEING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST WHEN THEIR CHILD’S SCIENCE TEACHER TALKS ABOUT DARWIN’S THEORY OF EVOLUTION IN BIOLOGY CLASS; ENGLISH-SPEAKERS RESENT BILINGUALISM - IT GOES ON AND ON.

AND WHAT IS THE TEA PARTY MOVEMENT OTHER THAN A COUNTER-REVOLUTION? IT COMES CLOAKED IN RELIGION AND FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY, BUT SCRATCH THE SURFACE AND YOU’LL FIND PRIVILEGED DISTRESS: CHANGE HAS TAKEN SOMETHING FROM US AND WE WANT IT BACK.


Confronting this distress is tricky, because neither acceptance nor rejection is quite right. The distress is usually very real, so rejecting it outright just marks you as closed-minded and unsympathetic. It never works to ask others for empathy without offering it back to them.

At the same time, my sunburn can’t be allowed to compete on equal terms with your heart attack. To me, it may seem fair to flip a coin for the first available ambulance, but it really isn’t. Don’t try to tell me my burn doesn’t hurt, but don’t consent to the coin-flip.

Acknowledging the distress while continuing to point out the difference in scale is as good an approach as I’ve seen. ULTIMATELY, THE PRIVILEGED NEED TO BE WON OVER. THEIR SENSE OF JUSTICE NEEDS TO BE ENGAGED RATHER THAN BEATEN DOWN. THE ONES WHO STILL WANT TO BE GOOD PEOPLE NEED TO BE OFFERED HOPE THAT SUCH AN OUTCOME IS POSSIBLE IN THIS NEW WORLD.


< Message edited by Fightdirecto -- 1/16/2013 1:21:47 PM >


_____________________________

"I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.””
- Ellie Wiesel
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/16/2013 3:09:01 PM   
naughtynick81


Posts: 890
Joined: 3/23/2007
Status: offline
I find it laughable how people keep saying white men are privileged when there is NOT ONE, yes, NOT ONE aspect of political correctness that considers men as a a gender and whites as a race.

(in reply to Fightdirecto)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/16/2013 3:11:17 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
Well, clearly the master race from the other side of the orion nebula did not do what I suggested they do to prove that the human race is not intelligent enough to be a threat to galactic peace.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/16/2013 9:36:27 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
Will you quit your whining? You aren't getting reparations, and that's that.
quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81

I find it laughable how people keep saying white men are privileged when there is NOT ONE, yes, NOT ONE aspect of political correctness that considers men as a a gender and whites as a race.



_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 5:22:53 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81

I find it laughable how people keep saying white men are privileged when there is NOT ONE, yes, NOT ONE aspect of political correctness that considers men as a a gender and whites as a race.

Okay, I'll give this a shot.
How many "aspects" of political correctness can you cite?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 6:52:53 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
FR

A certain alliterative user is pretty good proof of the fact of distress of the privileged.

Those of us lucky enough to have been born white and male in a first world nation have lived much of our lives in a bubble of privilege that it is far too easy to come to take for granted and to become excessively butt hurt when that bubble bursts.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 7:05:09 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
I've certainly noticed a lot of arsiness* from those poor oppressed white males in this very forum, true enough.

*(Limey for "butthurt")

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 7:14:11 AM   
MistressJinxBBW


Posts: 47
Joined: 1/8/2013
Status: offline
ouch...

_____________________________

Mistress Jinx
financial dominatrix
mistressjinxdominatrix.socialparody.com

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 7:46:33 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81
I find it laughable how people keep saying white men are privileged when there is NOT ONE, yes, NOT ONE aspect of political correctness that considers men as a a gender and whites as a race.


The goal of political correctness is to explain to the dominant gender (male) and dominant race (white) in our country that minorities and women are people too.

Do you understand that?

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 7:47:49 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
My money is on.... he doesnt.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 7:49:03 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

FR

A certain alliterative user is pretty good proof of the fact of distress of the privileged.

Those of us lucky enough to have been born white and male in a first world nation have lived much of our lives in a bubble of privilege that it is far too easy to come to take for granted and to become excessively butt hurt when that bubble bursts.

The Humpty Dumpty of white paternalistic privilege, to change the metaphor, fell from the wall in the 60s and 70s with civil rights marches in the southland, women's liberation, school integration, the anti-war movement, long haired boys, drugs, and rock n roll!

The Republican conservatives have been trying ever since to put Humpty Dumpty back together again. It is called a Culture War.

That's why they grip tightly their bibles and guns.

< Message edited by vincentML -- 1/17/2013 7:50:50 AM >

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 11:29:15 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
That's also why they're losing the culture war: defaulting to the early '50s doesn't leave you with a lot of firepower to bring to bear on people who've at least pretended to assimilate the social and cultural changes since then.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 12:00:19 PM   
Fightdirecto


Posts: 1101
Joined: 8/3/2004
Status: offline
I started to learn about my White privileges the day I was allowed to drink from the "Whites Only" water fountain in Washington, D. C. in 1961 and my Black friends couldn't. Our school choir had come down from Philadelphia to do a concert - and the non-White kids couldn't stay in the same hotel with the White kids and couldn't eat at the same restaurant.

If I had grown up in the South, I probably would have accepted it as being the way things were many to be. Just like the fictional character in the film thought that was how things were meant to be.

Things really haven't changed all that much. White high school students are tracked to college prep courses, most non-Whites are still tracked into auto shop, metal shop and clerical courses.

_____________________________

"I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.””
- Ellie Wiesel

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 1:15:16 PM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fightdirecto

Confronting this distress is tricky, because neither acceptance nor rejection is quite right. The distress is usually very real, so rejecting it outright just marks you as closed-minded and unsympathetic. It never works to ask others for empathy without offering it back to them.

At the same time, my sunburn can’t be allowed to compete on equal terms with your heart attack. To me, it may seem fair to flip a coin for the first available ambulance, but it really isn’t. Don’t try to tell me my burn doesn’t hurt, but don’t consent to the coin-flip.

Acknowledging the distress while continuing to point out the difference in scale is as good an approach as I’ve seen. ULTIMATELY, THE PRIVILEGED NEED TO BE WON OVER. THEIR SENSE OF JUSTICE NEEDS TO BE ENGAGED RATHER THAN BEATEN DOWN. THE ONES WHO STILL WANT TO BE GOOD PEOPLE NEED TO BE OFFERED HOPE THAT SUCH AN OUTCOME IS POSSIBLE IN THIS NEW WORLD.




This was an interesting article. Thanks for the link.

I think the concept of Privileged Distress is actually quite compelling and does give some insight into how to educate people. I think when those of us in support of change reject privileged distress it definitely makes things worse.

I will have to give further thought to how, for particular issues, does one address the privileged distress. For example, if we are talking about taxes, what does one do to acknowledge the distress while still not giving the ambulance over to the sunburn?

I found your story about your school choir trip so unsettling. It is still hard for me to fully grasp that this is, relatively speaking, recent history i.e., plenty of people around to still remember these types of things. I wonder if the civil rights movement has more inspiration for us (in terms of learning how to appeal to people's sense of justice).

_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to Fightdirecto)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 1:20:35 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
You'd certainly hope so, but sadly a lot of people seem to view the civil rights movement purely as the moment when things started to go terribly wrong and the start of the slide into the current dreadful socialist dystopia where a kenyan can get elected President and Acorn are encouraging subhuman vermin to vote.
I don't think sympathy for attitudes like that is very likely to help anybody even in the short term, frankly.
(I was surprised by Fd's story as well. You normally think of that stuff happening to blues and soul muscians, not sodding school choirs...)

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 2:27:16 PM   
naughtynick81


Posts: 890
Joined: 3/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

The goal of political correctness is to explain to the dominant gender (male) and dominant race (white) in our country that minorities and women are people too.


So you are trying to say that white males are stupid and most of them don't know how to treat women and minorities as people?

Where are all these white males who don't treat women and minorities as people?

Why is it okay to generalise white males but if we generalised other groups, it's a hate crime?


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 2:36:50 PM   
naughtynick81


Posts: 890
Joined: 3/23/2007
Status: offline
It's funny how plenty from the loony left think it's a sign of racism when 60 % of white people voted for a white person while it's "just entitlement" when 93% of blacks voted for a black in the election.

Gotta larf

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 2:40:09 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
I have a solution, if it is so distressful for the privileged to have wealth and all the stuff that comes with it, they can pool their resources into two bank accounts, one for me and one for tazzy, and split their homes between the two of us.

Then we can rent or sell the houses we dont want to use to our fellow collarme members at a rent of $50 dollars a month or sell for .01% of a penny on the dollar.

As far as their jobs go, they can hold a drawing with all the names of the collarme users and draw one name for each job. the member who's name is drawn gets the job, and the salary.

That way collarme members could find out for themselves how distressful it is to be wealthy and privileged.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/17/2013 3:15:28 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81
So you are trying to say that white males are stupid and most of them don't know how to treat women and minorities as people?

Nope.

quote:

Where are all these white males who don't treat women and minorities as people?

I'm talking to one of them, it seems.

quote:

Why is it okay to generalise white males but if we generalised other groups, it's a hate crime?

News to me that it's okay to generalise any group however white and male they are, and that generalities about anybody are automatically a hate crime. Care to show your working out for a change?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: The Distress Of The Privileged - 1/18/2013 4:53:43 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fightdirecto

A rather long article. To read it in it's entirety, click The Distress Of The Privileged


I remember the movie Pleasantville. The scene cited in this article was followed by a scene in the bowling alley:

quote:

Bob: [in the bowling alley] What happened? Are you alright? What is it?
George: Rain.
Bob: Real rain?
[George nods]
Bob: Oh my God.... Are you alright?
George: I came home like I always do. And I came in the front door. And I took off my coat. And I put down my briefcase and I said "Honey. I'm home."
[The men all nod in recognition.]
George: ...Only no one was there. So I went into the kitchen and I yelled it again. "Honey--I'm home." But there was no one there either. No wife. No lights. No dinner.
[The men all gasp]
George: So I went to the oven you know--because I thought maybe she had made me one of those "TV dinners..." But she hadn't. She was gone. And I looked and looked and looked -- but she was gone.
Bob: It's gonna be fine George. You're with 'us' now.
Gus: What do we do Bob?
Bob: Well--we'll be safe for now--thank goodness we're in a bowling alley--but if George here doesn't get his dinner, any one of us could be next. It could be you Gus, or you Burt, or even you Ralph.... That's real rain out there, gentlemen. This isn't some little "virus" that's going to "clear up on its own." There's something happening to our town and I think we can all see where it comes from. My friends, this isn't about George's dinner or Burt's shirt. It's a question of values. It's a question of whether we're gonna hold onto the values that have made this place great. So the time has come to make a decision. Are we in this alone, or are we in it together?


I always thought that "Thank goodness we're in a bowling alley" line was hilarious. It was a rather strange movie with some unexpected turns.

I'm not sure if the movie addresses "privilege" per se as much as insularity. They didn't know about privilege because they didn't know about anything outside of their town. A lot of people in these small towns may not see themselves as privileged, because they have nothing else in their immediate vicinity to compare it to. They might live rather insular lives, only seeing the outside world through their TV screen (or internet blog).

In this allegory, the bowling alley becomes a sanctuary for privilege?

Pleasantville did not actually depict the rich or powerful - or those who would be truly privileged in our society. George Parker and his friends were not wealthy or aristocratic, but were born into a system they had no real power or desire to change.

In the real world, things are changing all the time, and people find ways of adapting and adjusting. But some people never do. Some people might be more flexible when they're younger, but become more set in their ways as they get older. I think this might be the case with every generation, as new generations displace the old and create change in the process. This is a normal process which isn't anything new or earth-shattering.

It's also true that we in America (and perhaps other western countries) have been somewhat insulated to the problems of the rest of the world. Sure, we might read about it or see it in the news, but it might as well be happening on Mars, since we've always been somewhat detached from events around the world. Even those who have compassion and care for the oppressed and downtrodden would still be somewhat shielded from the pain and misery that they go through.

In the current political climate and the factionalism taking place, I sometimes wonder if it isn't a case of "privileged vs. privileged."

In the case of the Tea Party, they mostly strike me as former Reaganites who are trying to recapture the spark that led to the Reagan Revolution of the 1980s. They're using the same tactics and strategies which worked back then, but don't seem to be doing very well currently. This may be another indication that a new generation has ascended and sees things differently than we did 30 years ago.

But it's an interesting article and perspective. I'm not sure that it tells us much beyond that. I think that it's not as much clinging to the past of privilege, but there's also some legitimate worry about what may be coming next. That's also where we're left hanging at the end of Pleasantville since we don't really know where it's all headed. But that's life, I guess. But sometimes, it's nice to have a plan ahead of time. That may be what has people worried these days, since the politicians don't really seem to know what to do. It's like we're on a ship headed for an iceberg, yet all we can hear the ship's officers do is argue with each other over who stole the strawberries.





(in reply to Fightdirecto)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> The Distress Of The Privileged Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109