RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Moonhead -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 5:16:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
I am telling you that doublethink leads to madness. It really does man. Zundle being found guilty for "holocaust denial" has nothing what so ever to do with no gassed people.

If the law says you shalt not deny the holocaust it does not matter if there were no war at all, he denied the holocuast then damn it he is guilty.

They dont have religious freedom over there you know, they are told what to believe and its enforced by imprisonment.


[image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/stuff/Judge_Dredd___I_am_the_law_by_XIEZHENSHENG.jpg[/image]


You know that Judge Dredd is an American not a German, right?




jlf1961 -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 5:57:54 AM)

I stand corrected. Thank you for pointing out the nature of the site. Still does not change the fact the document in question was dismissed by a court of law, but you are correct, courts have dismissed evidence contrary to the prosecutions case in the past. I will give you that.

However, interesting point of fact concerning the investigation of war crimes for in Germany and Japan.

No such commission, as stated in the document existed.

Records of International Conferences, Commissions, and Expositions 1825-1972

Unless you are going to claim that the US is just trying to cover their asses.

But I digress.

It was the United Nations War Crimes Commission that was in charge of the investigations that led to the evidence presented in the War Trials.
Archival Finding Aids of UN Predecessor Organizations
UNITED NATIONS ARCHIVES PREDECESSOR ARCHIVES GROUP UNITED NATIONS WAR CRIMES COMMISSION 1943 -1949

The commission started investigations in 1943.

Now I would think that if such a commission as referred to in the Muller Document existed, there would be a record in the US archives, or somewhere other than one piece of paper.

Interesting reading.

Harold Burson

You might want to read the transcripts provided.

Then there is little tidbit.

Strangely enough, the initial Nuremberg had radio coverage, as did the subsequent concentration camp trials, all of which would have disputed the report in the Muller document.

So we have a document referring to a Commission of Inquiry that according to US Archives never existed, contradicting the public record of war crimes trials and the broadcast reports of those trials, which evidence is recorded on 56 feet and 11 inches of microfilm in the US Archives, (link provided previously.)

Clearly the document exists, no denying that, but it refers to a subject that was pretty much closed in 1948 with very public results.

Document states no gassing occurred at the death camps.

Concentration Camp trials confirm that gassing of prisoners Jewish and other races did occur.

One document vs 56ft 11inches of microfilm, not to mention the trial records along with articles of evidence.

You figure it out.




jlf1961 -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 5:59:15 AM)

Austria does not have religious freedom? Be that is new to them.




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 6:13:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ScaryKids
My grandpa graduated with a degree in Chemistry in 1939. He immediately went into the Army after graduation, first as a paratrooper, then aerial/combat photographer, then as a field chemist after he sustained a knee injury. His job was to indentify potentially toxic substances and neutralizing reagents. There was indeed physical, topographical, and chemical evidence, both forensic and existing collected during and after the war, some of it by him personally. He was also granted access to Nazi doctors and other war criminals, pre-Nuremburg, in an attempt to understand methods and procedure for the use of some of the substances that Allied military had been exposed to.

In 1945, he returned home and started working as the head chemist for Ethox Chemicals, LLC, which had a military contract at the time researching and reproducing chemical weapons used during the war in order to develop treatment and preventative methods in future incidents until 1966. (Their military contract, with his name as contact, his security clearances and his military records and some of his submitted documentation are all a matter of public record and should be an easy paper trail to follow if looking in that order. If you run across NASA polymer development research in the same name, then you've got the right guy.)

He retained a good bit of the military documentation of the mass genocide in Europe in his personal files, both what he collected and what the military deemed pertinent to his research. My mother inherited these documents in 2003 and which came to me after she passed in 2008. If you'd like copies, PM me and I'd be glad to send them, or get you started in looking up and applying for official copies since these have been declassified (you can find out how to do this on any genealogy website.)

da records would be of historical value now so maybe you should consider gettin' advice on donating them to a historic institute of repute.


quote:

ORIGINAL: ScaryKids
I was more or less indicating that I was jacking this thread with my long response. Thank you for indicating your inability to accept that some one may contribute something to this discussion, if even in humor.

If you want more out of me, take it to the mailbox as requested the first time.

no point discussing da topic wit mr real on da forum or by pm. thread afta thread makes dat clear.




Moonhead -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 7:13:56 AM)

Part of the problem is that there were concentration camps, death camps and work camps.
Certain antisemites seem to think that claiming all of the camps were of one sort (work camps) allows them to ignore the existence of the other two types.
Not quite sticking their fingers in their ears and shrieking: "Not listening! Not listening!", but not that far removed looking at some of the nonsense claimed above...




LafayetteLady -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 11:37:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

yeh thats only associated with the US forces, do you think allies are only the US? Incidently if you look carefully at that sealed document you can see that it says Muller, in german Muller and Miller are most often interchangeable.

if you care to read the memo it was about false complaints of gassing and lies that had been previously investigated and proven false and they were obviously getting sick of them.

Another case of what you dont know can and does hurt you imo.







There seems to be a problem with your "official, sealed document." It's been proven to be a forgery.

Lachout Forgery

Now of course, you will refute everything in the above link, but it doesn't matter. It clearly shows that you are talking out of your ass (as usual) trying to use "proof" from sources who have an agenda.

ETA:

Lachout was TWELVE YEARS OLD when he was supposedly involved in this. He could not have had the rank of "Lieutenant" at that age. Care to explain that away?




Moonhead -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 11:46:26 AM)

Of course he can't: he won't even give us the entertainment of watching him try...




Lucylastic -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 11:46:54 AM)

hitler youth?
Snorts, sorry I leave him alone when hes on his disgusting bullshit fact challenged posts, but this made me snort loud




LafayetteLady -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 11:51:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne



wansee I told you they use the term evacuate and exterminate in the same sentence interchangeably.




What is your evidence of that?

The German word for evacuate is evakuieren
The German word for exterminate is auszurotten

Do they look interchangeable to you? Do you even speak German?




Lucylastic -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 11:52:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Of course he can't: he won't even give us the entertainment of watching him try...

Id rather set fire to my nipples with a cigarette




Moonhead -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 11:53:52 AM)

Whatever turns you on, my dear.
[;)]




Lucylastic -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 11:58:07 AM)

LOL thats the thing...it doesnt...doing it to someone else would, ....
grins




LafayetteLady -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 12:00:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


If the law says you shalt not deny the holocaust it does not matter if there were no war at all, he denied the holocuast then damn it he is guilty.

They dont have religious freedom over there you know, they are told what to believe and its enforced by imprisonment.



Wow, you really know so little about Germany, it's funny.

Germans are guaranteed religious freedom in article 4 of their Constitution. Did they have religious freedom during the reign of the Third Reich? Nope. But before and after, the Constitution article stands.

Also, the law about denying the holocaust has nothing to do with religion. It has to do with Germany not wanting their citizens to deny what actually happened. Ask a German, someone who actually lives in Germany and is a German citizen, not someone in the US with German heritage who hasn't a clue.




LafayetteLady -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 12:02:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

hitler youth?
Snorts, sorry I leave him alone when hes on his disgusting bullshit fact challenged posts, but this made me snort loud


Hitler youth didn't reach the level of officer at twelve. That was the point.




Lucylastic -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 12:04:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

hitler youth?
Snorts, sorry I leave him alone when hes on his disgusting bullshit fact challenged posts, but this made me snort loud


Hitler youth didn't reach the level of officer at twelve. That was the point.

Yes:) I rather gathered it was, hence the snort:)




tazzygirl -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 12:06:33 PM)

This is all a case of someone believing tin foil sites, digging deeply into the topic to find obscure meanings... while totally avoiding the obvious, such as the ages.

While the rest can rage on, I have spoken to people who have the numbers. Others can believe what they read. I will believe what I am told by those who were there.




LafayetteLady -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 1:07:00 PM)

I agree totally. Over the years, I have spoken with people who were there, I have also spoken to Germans (in Germany, not the US) about their views about the laws regarding denial, and I have visited one of the camps.

It is basically the difference between actual reality and the reality in someone's warped, deluded mind who probably suffers from mental illness.




Real0ne -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 1:37:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I stand corrected. Thank you for pointing out the nature of the site. Still does not change the fact the document in question was dismissed by a court of law, but you are correct, courts have dismissed evidence contrary to the prosecutions case in the past. I will give you that.



wrong the document was not dismissed, nor did the case hinge on it.


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Austria does not have religious freedom? Be that is new to them.


Any country that pushes a religion not your own onto you does not have freedom of religion.


quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

yeh thats only associated with the US forces, do you think allies are only the US? Incidently if you look carefully at that sealed document you can see that it says Muller, in german Muller and Miller are most often interchangeable.

if you care to read the memo it was about false complaints of gassing and lies that had been previously investigated and proven false and they were obviously getting sick of them.

Another case of what you dont know can and does hurt you imo.







There seems to be a problem with your "official, sealed document." It's been proven to be a forgery.

Lachout Forgery

Now of course, you will refute everything in the above link, but it doesn't matter. It clearly shows that you are talking out of your ass (as usual) trying to use "proof" from sources who have an agenda.

ETA:

Lachout was TWELVE YEARS OLD when he was supposedly involved in this. He could not have had the rank of "Lieutenant" at that age. Care to explain that away?



wow that is a pro israeli site and foundation thats sole purpose is to promote the holocaust and force semitism upon the rest of the world.

pretty worthless, but then neither can you add, he would have been 20.


Joking right? Like shooting ducks in bondage in a pond.


quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne



wansee I told you they use the term evacuate and exterminate in the same sentence interchangeably.




What is your evidence of that?

The German word for evacuate is evakuieren
The German word for exterminate is auszurotten

Do they look interchangeable to you? Do you even speak German?



yeh you know like holocaust and genocide and massacre and slaughter all mean the same thing. You accept that just fine though doncha LOL



quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Id rather set fire to my nipples with a cigarette


can I watch?



quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


If the law says you shalt not deny the holocaust it does not matter if there were no war at all, he denied the holocuast then damn it he is guilty.

They dont have religious freedom over there you know, they are told what to believe and its enforced by imprisonment.



Wow, you really know so little about Germany, it's funny.

Germans are guaranteed religious freedom in article 4 of their Constitution. Did they have religious freedom during the reign of the Third Reich? Nope. But before and after, the Constitution article stands.

Also, the law about denying the holocaust has nothing to do with religion. It has to do with Germany not wanting their citizens to deny what actually happened. Ask a German, someone who actually lives in Germany and is a German citizen, not someone in the US with German heritage who hasn't a clue.




you just made it perfectly clear that you dont know much about religion and the freedom of religion or what it means or what it entails.


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

This is all a case of someone believing tin foil sites, digging deeply into the topic to find obscure meanings... while totally avoiding the obvious, such as the ages.

While the rest can rage on, I have spoken to people who have the numbers. Others can believe what they read. I will believe what I am told by those who were there.



yeh I am telling you the more I look at it the more these people prove they are pretty out there on tinfoil island.





jlf1961 -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 2:17:02 PM)

quote:

Houston, TX - September 1, 2010 - Family Tree DNA, the largest Y-chromosome testing organization for genealogy and ancestry purposes, announced today that the interpretation given by certain media outlets that Adolf Hitler's ancestry included possible Jewish relatives is highly questionable. These reports were based on information released by Jean-Paul Mulders and historian Marc Vermeeren. With a Y-chromosome database containing close to 200,000 samples from different populations, Family Tree DNA's Chief Y-DNA Scientist, Professor Michael Hammer said that "scientific studies as well as records from our own database make it clear that one cannot reach the kind of conclusion featured in the published articles.

Based on Family Tree DNA records, no more than 9% of the populations of Germany and Austria belong to the haplogroup E1b1b, and among those, the vast majority - about 80% -are not associated with Jewish ancestry. "This data clearly show that just because one person belongs to the branch of the Y-chromosome referred to as haplogroup E1b1b, that does not mean the person is likely to be of Jewish ancestry," said Professor Hammer.

Mulders confirmed the misinterpretation of his account with the following statement to Family Tree DNA: "I never wrote that Hitler was a Jew, or that he had a Jewish grandfather. I only wrote that Hitler's haplogroup is E1b1b, being more common among Berbers, Somalian people and Jews than among overall Germans. This, in order to convey that he was not exactly what during the Third Reich would have been called 'Aryan.' All the rest are speculations of journalists who didn't even take the trouble to read my article, although I had it translated into English especially for this purpose."

Founded in April 2000, Family Tree DNA was the first company to develop the commercial application of DNA testing for genealogical purposes that had previously been available only for academic and scientific research. Today - with over 300,000 individual records in its Y-DNA and mtDNA databases - and a state-of-the-art Genomics Research Center in Houston, Texas, Family Tree is the prime source for anyone researching recent and distant family ties.
Family Tree DNA Questions Reporting about Hitler's Possible Jewish Origins


Gee the lab that did the DNA tests on the Hitler family says it is not definitive that Hitler was of Jewish ancestry.




Real0ne -> RE: is holacaust denial antisemitic? (2/7/2013 2:49:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
Gee the lab that did the DNA tests on the Hitler family says it is not definitive that Hitler was of Jewish ancestry.


but we know grandmama was knocked up while working for and staying with a jew.

how about those 6 million death records, how are you coming along with those?

1122 is a really good start but you are falling just a wee bit short doncha think?


email taz she knows people who have all the numbers.

she will save the day!




Page: <<   < prev  19 20 [21] 22 23   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875