Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 4:21:09 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:


Thomas Paine once said something I think was profound, that intolerance and tolerance both were equally bad. He said with intolerance, a person took on the right to judge what others were doing, find it lacking, and then decide the right to make their lives a living hell, restrict them and so forth. He said that the tolerant person reserved the right to judge what others were doing, perhaps find it lacking, but decided they didn't have the right to interfere. He said the problem wasn't the action, that it was in the person deciding they had the right to judge where the problem came in, and both were equally guilty. Obviously, it is preferable if you are the one being judged that people be tolerant, but it would be better if people simply respected your right to live as you wish and not judge it.......among other things, tolerant people are not that likely to stand up for the rights of those trampled by those who are intolerant...lots of people claim to be tolerant towards gay people, but a lot of them won't lift a finger to help gays by, for example, voting against a same sex marriage ban, or worse, voting for it while claiming tolerance but saying 'it is wrong'.....


'Tolerant' is not such a positive word as it may sound, it does not mean you are in solidarity with them or are in their corner. It only means you are not an enemy, your are not against. As I use the word, anyway.

I think few people can really be on the side of people they do not identify with. And those who can are usually ridiculed.

Although, in cases where things kind of blow up in a way to make everything very clear, people will generally react with outrage on the side of the victims, but - the day after it might be forgotten.

Not evil, just the way it is. Took me a long long time to accept.

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 4:36:50 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

On this particular night, there were two males who happened to be "new". Roughly the same age, etc. One guy did really well in that social setting, met and chatted with people, and had a great time. The other was just the opposite. Even after the evening, when posts were being made thanking the host the next day and so forth, the comments from these two guys were like night and day. They had completely different perceptions of how it turned out for them, even though they were in the same room with the same people.

So, I'm not so quick to say that 'people who fall in group X' aren't treated well. Sometimes, there can be people in group X that do just fine when another member of group X doesn't. More often than not, I find it was the individual who happened to belong to group X that doesn't have the same strengths as the others in that category. Of course, it isn't all that often that you'll hear the individual say that they need to work on being interesting to talk to or how they can improve their socialization skills. It's just plain easier to blame the other people in the room.



I guess attitudes vary with different places and countries. US, as I understand it, is what we would see as fiercely individualistic and what happens to you is your own responsibility.

Scandinavia is somewhat different. I my organization, it was the duty of the club to make new people welcome and make them feel safe, not least women, but basically everybody. A special person was always assigned that duty, but in general people were aware that there were new members present and acted accordingly. At some point we had a specific 'new-member evening', and it worked just fine.

After such an intro evening, people would be on their own.

As I see the world, it is a matter of about 50-50 - how you yourself behave, and how other people behave. I have been in places where you'd need a wedge and a big hammer to get into any of the close-knit cliques, and I am an outgoing person.

The ratio femdoms/subs and maledoms/femsubs might also play a role.

Leonine informs me that in his fet group in UK, they have a met-and-greet system for new people, and that this is fairly typical for UK meetings.

So in my view the many mails about that he does not really have a problem or if he does, it is probably his own fault, means that people are not listening or given anyone the benefit of any doubt, which, I think, strengthens his case.


(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 4:54:02 AM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
Observations from the armpit of the Midwest (Indiana):

The local munch here is very inclusive, there are as many male dom/fem sub couples as there are fem dom/male sub couples. We also get a good sprinkling of singles. There are many younger members from the university, which impacts the group's all around 'tone.'

The local MAST (in Indy) is 99% long term couples of the male dom/fem sub variety. I've *never* seen a single person there -- but I don't go often and I've never attended a play party. However, a demonstration about sissies was very well received and I saw no discrimination.

A femdomme group also located in Indy meant for fem doms and male subs where cd and tgs are extremely well received.

A local group about 50 miles north of me that has play parties and a weekly discussion group. Almost exclusively male dom/fem sub with a few fem sub singles. All the fem doms are switches (myself included), and male subs are looked upon as an 'oddity.' I think there would be more acceptance of male subs in this group if it wasn't so insular. But in backwater, Bible belt Indiana, most couples *are* male dom/fem sub.

YMMV





_____________________________



(in reply to egern)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 5:21:27 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
Regarding transfolks, I'm happy to say that Colorado is not trans-friendly as much as trans-agnostic, as in nobody cares if you're trans or not. Occasionally, we get someone that uses the wrong pronoun,and they're quietly asked to not do that. That's it.

With one unfortunate exception. There's a local swingers' club that has occasional BDSM nights, and it states on their website that they're open to everyone over 18. However, they charge five times as much for men as women, and they go by drivers' licenses instead of presentation to determine gender for admission purposes. The local transfolks are generally broke (hormones, electrolysis, and new clothes don't come cheap), so this has the effect of banning them. Plus they're pretty pissed at the club, and refuse to attend.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to egern)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 5:58:18 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682

I was thinking to myself how fortunate I am to be living in 2013 and not 1813.I can't even imagine what a "sub" would have to go through back then.Now,in modern time,alot has changed since then.With the invention of the internet,like minded people can literally talk to each other from around the world in a matter of seconds.Thats amazing.Plus,society(here in the USA)has slowly started to accept BDSM as a way of life.

While I do believe there is alot of room for improvement,I am certainly glad I am living in modern times.


At the very least both being gay and being into bdsm is no longer an illness in either UK or many other countries, and that is a big step forward.

(in reply to Charles6682)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 6:13:05 AM   
Jayden2U


Posts: 2
Joined: 2/29/2012
Status: offline
Time has not helped this lifestyle it has diminished it. What happened to protocols, respect, and discipline?


< Message edited by Jayden2U -- 3/11/2013 6:17:38 AM >

(in reply to IamMuffin)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 6:20:07 AM   
Jayden2U


Posts: 2
Joined: 2/29/2012
Status: offline
oops

< Message edited by Jayden2U -- 3/11/2013 6:21:07 AM >

(in reply to Charles6682)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 6:25:20 AM   
Mastersergeant67


Posts: 1
Joined: 2/4/2012
Status: offline
I will just make this short and simple and let a professional explain my thoughts and opinion for me.

http://voices.yahoo.com/a-closer-look-bdsm-collars-they-really-587209.html?cat=69



(in reply to Jayden2U)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 6:40:44 AM   
Charles6682


Posts: 1820
Joined: 10/1/2007
From: Saint Pete,FL
Status: offline
There are anti-discrimination laws where I live here in Pinellas County,Florida.In the local Pinellas County "Office of Human Rights",there are many laws to protect many people from legal discrimination,including laws protecting people of "Sexual Orientation".That particular law only applies to Pinellas County as Florida does not have laws protecting people of "Sexual Orientation" on a state wide level.Some other cities and counties may have simliar protections.Pinellas County just also recently legalized "Domestic Partnership" for any couple,gay or straight.That is a big deal for this part of Florida.

The question I have is this.Would "Sexual Orientation" also cover aspects of BDSM?For example,can a "Dom" or "Sub" be protected under these type of laws too,such as laws to protect people due to "Sexual Orientation"?

< Message edited by Charles6682 -- 3/11/2013 6:47:50 AM >


_____________________________

Charley aka Sub Guy

http://www.Facebook.com/SubGuy

https://Twitter.com/SubGuy6682

(in reply to Mastersergeant67)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 9:49:40 AM   
Charles6682


Posts: 1820
Joined: 10/1/2007
From: Saint Pete,FL
Status: offline
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominance_and_submission This seems to give a good definition of Dominance and submission.I know Wikipedia is open to debate,as it should be,but I think its gives at least a better general understanding to people who may not fully understand Dominance and submission.

_____________________________

Charley aka Sub Guy

http://www.Facebook.com/SubGuy

https://Twitter.com/SubGuy6682

(in reply to Charles6682)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 10:39:05 AM   
Charles6682


Posts: 1820
Joined: 10/1/2007
From: Saint Pete,FL
Status: offline
http://maybemaimed.com/2008/01/07/because-submissive-is-an-orientation/ This is a website that debates whether Dominance and submission should be considered a "sexual orientation',simliar to how gay,bi-sexual and lesbians can identify themselves as its their "sexual orientation".I agree with alot of what is said there.Its all mainly opinions from Doms and subs.Maybe some people could actually get a better idea of how people think and feel when they see it in plain writing.

I think the term "orientation" is important because that term seems to give some people certain rights.With anti discrimination laws to help gay people because of their "sexual orientation",why can't the same be said for D/s?If it can provide important legal help,why not?

Furthermore,I simply just agree that this an "orientation".I would not deny myself who I am,just like I would assume a gay person wouldn't deny themselves for who they are either.

< Message edited by Charles6682 -- 3/11/2013 10:43:27 AM >


_____________________________

Charley aka Sub Guy

http://www.Facebook.com/SubGuy

https://Twitter.com/SubGuy6682

(in reply to Charles6682)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 7:39:53 PM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline
The male subs who somehow feel that bdsm lessens male subs somehow, my suggestion is to move to Allentown, PA. There is a HUGE scene for malesubs and FemDommes. They have their own club there. I used to live there and almost all the munches and parties were mainly malesubs and femdommes. I actually found I never had anything in common with the "scene" there because of that reason so I never really attended many events there.


_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to Charles6682)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 8:00:43 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: egern


quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682

I was thinking to myself how fortunate I am to be living in 2013 and not 1813.I can't even imagine what a "sub" would have to go through back then.Now,in modern time,alot has changed since then.With the invention of the internet,like minded people can literally talk to each other from around the world in a matter of seconds.Thats amazing.Plus,society(here in the USA)has slowly started to accept BDSM as a way of life.

While I do believe there is alot of room for improvement,I am certainly glad I am living in modern times.


At the very least both being gay and being into bdsm is no longer an illness in either UK or many other countries, and that is a big step forward.


Actually, that raises a good question, a number of years ago there was a case in the UK, I think it was called the "spanner's case", where members of gay bd/sm group were arrested for assault for what went on in a play party. Did the UK ever decriminalize consensual BD/SM, or can people still be charged with it?

(in reply to egern)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 8:08:43 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682

There are anti-discrimination laws where I live here in Pinellas County,Florida.In the local Pinellas County "Office of Human Rights",there are many laws to protect many people from legal discrimination,including laws protecting people of "Sexual Orientation".That particular law only applies to Pinellas County as Florida does not have laws protecting people of "Sexual Orientation" on a state wide level.Some other cities and counties may have simliar protections.Pinellas County just also recently legalized "Domestic Partnership" for any couple,gay or straight.That is a big deal for this part of Florida.

The question I have is this.Would "Sexual Orientation" also cover aspects of BDSM?For example,can a "Dom" or "Sub" be protected under these type of laws too,such as laws to protect people due to "Sexual Orientation"?

No, sexual orientation only covers that, which means gay, bi, or straight (for example, gay owned business that refused to hire straights), I don't know of any place that has protection for BD/SM folk, though there have been court rulings that firing someone for private behavior is illegal. It gets complicated, because many states are employment at will, which means technically an employer can fire you for anything. In reality, employers can be sued for illegal termination, if the cause for termination is found to be irrelevant to the job. There have been cases where BD/SM folks were found out and lost their jobs, and advocacy groups have stepped in and sued the employer. There is a hot area of law around this, about the right to privacy of employers, that what people do in their spare time has nothing to do with their employment, but it all depends on how the laws are written. If you live in NYC and an employer openly fired you for being into BD/SM they would be in deep shit, juries would find most of the time for the plaintiff, in the bible belt, not so likely. There was a case where a guy who had been a truck driver for Winn Dixie supermarkets for something like 25 years, was fired because it was discovered at work that he was a closet cross dresser (did it only at home, 10 to 1, a disgruntled friend), and that firing was upheld (btw, if you can avoid it, don't shop at Winn Dixie, it is owned by evangelical Christian nutjobs, who are totally anti gay, anti trans, anti anything).

In any event, with something like BD/SM, that is considered a lifestyle choice, the only real argument in employment law would be unjust termination that violated the right to privacy of employees. Problem is proving you were fired for being outed, companies can find myriad excuses to fire you.

< Message edited by njlauren -- 3/11/2013 8:33:50 PM >

(in reply to Charles6682)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 8:14:43 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jayden2U

Time has not helped this lifestyle it has diminished it. What happened to protocols, respect, and discipline?



Still exists, for those who care about such things (re Lady Pacts explanation to me). It hasn't diminished, it has grown, to where those into all the traditions, titles, protocols, etc, don't have the right to tell others the 'proper' way to live their lives. The whole Old Guard stuff was such a crock of shit IMO, not because it wasn't good for some people, or valid things didn't come out of it, but rather that it was the only way to do things, that in training a sub there were certain protocols that had to be followed, or if you were sub you automatically had to show deference to Lady This or this one because of their pedigree...please. I have a lot of respect for the people who in effect pioneered the BD/SM community, I don't have it for those who try to turn it into a religion everyone has to follow. I don't believe in nobility, I don't believe in titles and if I wanted rigid dogma, I would become an orthodox Catholic...:). I think the community has become diverse, rather then being controlled by a group of people who got off on controlling others.

(in reply to Jayden2U)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/11/2013 9:57:35 PM   
Charles6682


Posts: 1820
Joined: 10/1/2007
From: Saint Pete,FL
Status: offline
I did not know that about Winn-Dixie.There are a few of those stores here but they have had alot of stores close business because Winn Dixie just can't compete with the Wal-Marts and Publix stores around here.Sounds like the less,the better.

_____________________________

Charley aka Sub Guy

http://www.Facebook.com/SubGuy

https://Twitter.com/SubGuy6682

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/12/2013 1:21:00 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: egern
I guess attitudes vary with different places and countries. US, as I understand it, is what we would see as fiercely individualistic and what happens to you is your own responsibility.

Scandinavia is somewhat different. I my organization, it was the duty of the club to make new people welcome and make them feel safe, not least women, but basically everybody. A special person was always assigned that duty, but in general people were aware that there were new members present and acted accordingly. At some point we had a specific 'new-member evening', and it worked just fine.

After such an intro evening, people would be on their own.

As I see the world, it is a matter of about 50-50 - how you yourself behave, and how other people behave. I have been in places where you'd need a wedge and a big hammer to get into any of the close-knit cliques, and I am an outgoing person.

The ratio femdoms/subs and maledoms/femsubs might also play a role.

Leonine informs me that in his fet group in UK, they have a met-and-greet system for new people, and that this is fairly typical for UK meetings.

So in my view the many mails about that he does not really have a problem or if he does, it is probably his own fault, means that people are not listening or given anyone the benefit of any doubt, which, I think, strengthens his case.
I very much enjoy cross-cultural discussions. Hopefully, you will indulge Me for a moment.

Many BDSM groups have a person delegated as "greeters". The job of the greeter for the evening is to introduce folks around. Make the person welcome, ensure that they know the rules of the group, give them a head's up about how things work. In some groups that do not designate a greeter, this responsibility goes to the elected members of the board or to the organizer. Of course, DM's at public clubs understand their role as ambassador. Many of us who teach this course include this element.

My view on this is that it still varies. If you have five new folks attending on any particular night, the greeter has to split their time accordingly. The other members of the group are going to their own preferences. Some people get on with others when other individuals do not. For example, an outgoing person who can engage Me with interesting conversation and wit will absolutely inspire Me to *want* to talk with them. If not, they will get the casual "hello" and I will go back to discussing matters with those who will. When I am not in an elected position or a DM, who I spend time with is completely up to My personal *preference*.

No, the fact that someone walks into the door doesn't mean that I have to like them. If they have interesting aspects, I'm more than happy to be friendly to them. I would be put off by a group that mandates My reactions.




_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to egern)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? - 3/12/2013 5:05:35 AM   
Charles6682


Posts: 1820
Joined: 10/1/2007
From: Saint Pete,FL
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: egern
I guess attitudes vary with different places and countries. US, as I understand it, is what we would see as fiercely individualistic and what happens to you is your own responsibility.


I do think there is some truth to this claim.The problem with that method is it makes changing additudes in general society at large difficult.People have a better chance of changing hearts and minds in numbers.Gay Pride parades would have had little impact if it was only 1 person.But when a town sees like minded people coming together as a community,thats when things get down.Going solo has its problems.But hey,if someone wants to keep to themselves,they do have that right a well.

< Message edited by Charles6682 -- 3/12/2013 5:07:58 AM >


_____________________________

Charley aka Sub Guy

http://www.Facebook.com/SubGuy

https://Twitter.com/SubGuy6682

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 98
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Have times changed for the better for BDSM? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094