DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady If we could count on employers to pay a decent living wage, we wouldn't need a minimum wage. However, we can't count on employers to do that, so we have a minimum wage. I do believe the BLS is wrong, and I also know that many, many minimum wage, just above, or tipped employees are working full time, so I don't really think it adds up to the amount they said. OMG, how many people do you know?!? I mean, we have 134M people working in the US. Just pulling numbers off the top of my head, from memory, it's somewhere around 55% of those are getting paid hourly, rather than salary. So, the 4.7% of hourly paid is roughly 3% of all workers, which is still 10M people? Now, how many people do you know, again? quote:
Statistics are really not much more than a way for someone to spin their opinion to look like it means something. For the data you quoted, I would want to know what the total population they based it on, how many of that population didn't work by choice (stay at home parents), how many were disabled and couldn't work, how many were looking for jobs, and how many were minors, as well as what you say about first and second jobs. I truly believe that would make the data much different. I believe my post mentioned that of all the hourly-paid workers making at or below minimum wage, 24% were 16-19 years old. Go to the BLS website and search for minimum wage. That's where I got it all from.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|