RE: home birth in chains (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive



Message


LadyPact -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 2:56:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Well I think that chaining a woman up to have a baby will relieve the father of some of that 'You did this to me, MOTHERFUCKER!!!!'  clawing and scratching and hitting child birth pains they have to deal with in sympathy with the mother.

So I am for this with both feet!!!
Geez, I wasn't even the one who "did it to her" when My daughter was in the delivery room having My first grandchild.

I don't know. I wore those claw marks with pride. They lasted about six weeks.





UllrsIshtar -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 2:57:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: breagha


honestly... i didn't have any of those " you did this to me" moments. nor did i scratch, hit, or claw anyone.


I'm reasonably sure that if we hadn't managed to pull my step sister's husband out of her grasp, she would have succeeded in strangling him.


Mid-contraction, I took a bite out of my boyfriend's hand that left a scar.




Arturas -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 2:57:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: breagha


quote:

ORIGINAL: CarolBC

. God forbid we allow them to have even a glimpse of a woman being submissive...their classmates will ridicule them, the teachers will report them and the authorities will be knockin' on the door shortly.



i know that in the community i live in, if my daughter casually mentioned to a teacher that mom spends the day in chains, there would be an investigation. i don't know that it would end with me losing my child or anything like that. there would be people looking into what is going on and why she would say something like that. Mandated reporters are required by law to report anything they think might be harmful or inappropriate to a child. Most teachers in NY state are mandated reporters, as are most day care providers.


Makes sense. But consider the same thing might happen if the children walked in on you and yours having sex and then casually mentioned to their teacher that "I like watching mom having sex". There would be an investigation but no child would be removed. The point is your children would not casually mention either the vanilla sex or the BDSM acts to their teacher and if they did the result would be the same because neither is worse than the other, it is the initial interpretation by the outside observer that something is remiss when in truth nothing is wrong or illegal in either situation.




Arturas -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 3:06:06 PM)

quote:

. the chains are just a tangible symbol


Yes. Tangible. Women wear Christian crosses as a tangible symbol. She wears chains as a tangible symbol, as you say. They both comfort their wearers and/or mean something important to the wearer especially during stressfull moments. Like childbirth?




SacredDepravity -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 4:06:23 PM)

Jeff and Carol:

I just wanted to pop back in on this thread to kind of address your posts a bit. Two things are for sure. Many in this modern world definitely overshelter their children. Dirt and germs and the occasional boo boo are good for kids. And for sure, the US is WAAAAAY uptight about sexual stuff. Poor Janet Jackson was villified for how long for accidently displaying a *gasp* nipple on national tv and this was such a big, fat, hairy deal because, "What if a child saw that! They'd be scarred for life!" I wanted to freaking puke.

Sadly, none of that actually has anything to do with this conversation. We have government agencies with carte blanc power in very personal parts of our lives here. The matter of should a child be witness to such things is pretty much moot since such powers that be have determined they shouldn't. CPS, the courts, and the police have great latitude to investigate and disrupt families. Anybody and everybody that's supposed to be a bound by confidentiality helping professional (teachers, doctors, coaches, counselors, ministers, etc.) are actually also duty bound to report anything they find suspect to CPS and other appropriate agencies and often are also subject to blanket reporting policies that treat all kinds of not even remotely similar situations in the same way. Under this condition, I simply would not risk any avenue for someone to claim they have grounds to come in and take my kids. I don't care if it should be my right to live as I please or if I think there's nothing wrong with what I am doing. My kids don't have to pay the price for my social, moral, or political outrage. People posting are simply looking at the situation and trying to warn the OP what the police, CPS, and the courts are going to do should something happen that or word get out that they are engaging in these things the way they are. I can tell you now, if something goes wrong with that delivery and the first responders discover chains or that they had been used by marks on her body, there WILL be an investigation at least into the midwife and her practices if not also whether or not this woman was held against her will and whether or not it lead to any negative outcomes. In the course of this investigation, the children may be interviewed (without their parents anywhere around) and say something that then spawns a CPS investigation. It's just the way of things at this time.

As far as showing her submissiveness, I think that happens in many ways all the time. Would agree that accepting his decision to not allow her the chains would be equally submissive as wearing the chains had he agreed to it? Who will be watching over her and making many, if not all, of the decisions for her through labor, the delivery, and after when it is not a strictly a medical call the midwife can and should make? There are so many other ways. I just can't see doing something that has so many potentially negative consequences.
Things may go great. Wonderful! And all this was for naught. I had a friend who had his wife die in labor (in a hospital) and dealt with a lot of guilt over some of the decisions they made together and he made on her behalf when she was incompacitated. I don't want this to be one of those things for the OP if complications should arise.

This post was strictly to your points. I have stated my concerns in other posts and didn't really have much to do with displaying submissiveness or bdsm-y stuff around the kids beyond watching what little eyes see since little mouths have no filter. I choose to keep it all under wraps around here. That's the choice I made for me and mine. That doesn't mean others can't successfully raise well adjusted kids another way. Safety concerns me about the chaining both in labor and when home alone with the children. That's fairly legitimate. I am sure that people do this and nothing bad ever happens. It's just too damn late when the unexpected happens. And, boy, I sure wouldn't want to look back and know that I was warned and ignored it just to do life my way. That would be a fate worse than death as far as I'm concerned.

SD





SacredDepravity -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 4:16:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

quote:

. the chains are just a tangible symbol


Yes. Tangible. Women wear Christian crosses as a tangible symbol. She wears chains as a tangible symbol, as you say. They both comfort their wearers and/or mean something important to the wearer especially during stressfull moments. Like childbirth?


Actually, I was required to remove all make up and jewlery upon arriving at labor and delivery. It makes it quicker than having to do all that prep in a crisis situation. I still held my cross necklace and my wedding band in my hands as I labored and delivered, but I didn't put myself and my child at risk had I needed emergency care.

SD




breagha -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 4:20:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

quote:

. the chains are just a tangible symbol


Yes. Tangible. Women wear Christian crosses as a tangible symbol. She wears chains as a tangible symbol, as you say. They both comfort their wearers and/or mean something important to the wearer especially during stressfull moments. Like childbirth?


i wasn't negating the importance of the symbol. Just stating that, like a Christian cross, not wearing it doesn't mean she's denying that part of herself.




Baroana -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 4:20:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

quote:

ORIGINAL: breagha


quote:

ORIGINAL: CarolBC

. God forbid we allow them to have even a glimpse of a woman being submissive...their classmates will ridicule them, the teachers will report them and the authorities will be knockin' on the door shortly.



i know that in the community i live in, if my daughter casually mentioned to a teacher that mom spends the day in chains, there would be an investigation. i don't know that it would end with me losing my child or anything like that. there would be people looking into what is going on and why she would say something like that. Mandated reporters are required by law to report anything they think might be harmful or inappropriate to a child. Most teachers in NY state are mandated reporters, as are most day care providers.


Makes sense. But consider the same thing might happen if the children walked in on you and yours having sex and then casually mentioned to their teacher that "I like watching mom having sex". There would be an investigation but no child would be removed. The point is your children would not casually mention either the vanilla sex or the BDSM acts to their teacher and if they did the result would be the same because neither is worse than the other, it is the initial interpretation by the outside observer that something is remiss when in truth nothing is wrong or illegal in either situation.



Yes, Arturas, one is much worse than the other. A child should never witness anyone, let alone his or her own parent, engaging in BDSM.

I so hope that I don't have to explain why, but I have the sinking feeling that I do.




breagha -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 4:31:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

quote:

ORIGINAL: breagha


quote:

ORIGINAL: CarolBC

. God forbid we allow them to have even a glimpse of a woman being submissive...their classmates will ridicule them, the teachers will report them and the authorities will be knockin' on the door shortly.



i know that in the community i live in, if my daughter casually mentioned to a teacher that mom spends the day in chains, there would be an investigation. i don't know that it would end with me losing my child or anything like that. there would be people looking into what is going on and why she would say something like that. Mandated reporters are required by law to report anything they think might be harmful or inappropriate to a child. Most teachers in NY state are mandated reporters, as are most day care providers.


Makes sense. But consider the same thing might happen if the children walked in on you and yours having sex and then casually mentioned to their teacher that "I like watching mom having sex". There would be an investigation but no child would be removed. The point is your children would not casually mention either the vanilla sex or the BDSM acts to their teacher and if they did the result would be the same because neither is worse than the other, it is the initial interpretation by the outside observer that something is remiss when in truth nothing is wrong or illegal in either situation.



i didn't say that one would be worse than the other. I actually didn't state that i had issue with chains in front of their children. The only issue i addressed about the chains ws the safety and health issues that might arise from wearing them during delivery. Personally i lock the door so that walk ins don't happen. That is my option though to keep my child from seeing things she shouldn't. In my experience, children do tend to talk about things they see and hear. Sometimes within ear shot of people who might feel the need to report it. I'm not attempting to show negativity to anyone, especially the OP. If that is how my replies are being taken then i aplogise to anyone who might be offended.




littlewonder -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 5:40:19 PM)

Seriously? Imo, you're both crazy.

ETA: When I went into labor, I was screaming so loudly that the doctor walked out and told the nurses he was not coming back in until someone calmed me down. When my husband finally arrived....he was stuck on base and almost was not allowed to leave the base....he said I was squeezing his hands and arms to tightly that he thought he was going to pass out from loss of blood to his brain.

The last thing I was thinking about was him at all...in any way whatsoever...except that if he didn't get that fucking thing out of me right now I'm going to rip someone's balls off. Yeah, I was in that much pain. Anyone who is thinking about their submission or even their partner at all during childbirth are either on drugs or they've had so many children that they're able to plop them out with no problems. <cringes to even think about that thought>.

And the chains? If I would have been chained, all the noise coming from them would have driven me insane and would have made the pain worse due to the sheer sound of them. During childbirth every single noise, every movement, everything bothered me. It just added to the tension.

As for the everyday chains, how does she not trip in them? I mean, even if they're loose, they would still drag on the ground and you could stumble over them. I know I would. Maybe it's just the klutz in me. I dunno.

Being a single mom, I couldn't have imagined being chained all day. Half the time I was running after her to keep her from running out into the street in traffic or falling from a chair that she climbed on when I turned my back for just a second or running to keep her from sticking her fork in a power outlet when she was 4. How does she run with chains? Or do the children just sit and do nothing....ever? How does one change diapers in chains? Wouldn't they get in the way and what if they accidently fall in the eeerr.....bodily waste while you're changing it? EEEWwwwww.

These are just things I remember when my daughter was a toddler and hell...even when she was 15. heh.

All I can say is yeah....crazy.




LafayetteLady -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 7:16:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

quote:

I'm actually undecided on the nudity thing in front of children, but leaning more towards it not being a big deal. However, adding BDSM into the nudity....ok for the kids to see mom or dad locked in a chastity device while walking around naked? How about nipple clamps? What about a butt plug? These items, when clothed would have no affect on the children, however, when everyone is running around naked? Yea, huge difference.


You know, nipple clamps can be quite lovely on a woman. A butt plug? Yes. Pony tail? You bet.

Well what about when your children walk in on you and yours? Seeing their mother bent over the bed bound and being sodomized with her hair held tightly by their father might affect them negatively if they were not their mother's children, raised by her and very used to her and her ways. To them this is normal just as your children walking in on you having vanilla sex makes them laugh and giggle for quite a few days when they are by themselves. This is because this is all relative, not black and white, It's all relative and if you always tend to walk around the house in nothing but heels and chastity belt and even a butt plug I suspect this would not impact the children's normal developement one iota unless you pretended you did not from the beginning and they suddenly found out you did.


You really shouldn't be permitted around children. Teenagers catching their parents having sex will giggle. Small children become concerned.

Wearing any of those things visibly around a child is inappropriate and the parties who do deserve to have their children taken away.




littlewonder -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 7:19:11 PM)

This reinforces my belief there should be a test you must pass to get married or have children.




DesFIP -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 7:49:17 PM)

Hear, hear!

I'm a new grandmother. The DIL had a baby ten days ago. 24 hours of exhausting and painful labor. They began this swearing no pain relief, totally natural all the way. When it came down to it, she was begging for the epidural and grateful to get it.

Right now this is just another pregnant woman craving. And that doesn't automatically make it healthy. My cousin had aversions to all protein during her first pregnancy. It wasn't healthy and nobody said "she's pregnant so it's fine if she only eats peaches for the next nine months." Because that wouldn't have been the smart thing to do.




tazzygirl -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 9:02:40 PM)

quote:

I didn't see velcro releases and quick release hardware have not been discussed at any point in this tread, prior to my post. Instead, some vague comments where made about how he should make sure that "they can be taken off quickly" and are soft.
Most of the users chose to focus instead on the presumption that he'd use cuffs and locks that couldn't be taken off quickly, to the point that you posted:


Hmmm... soft restraints....

http://www.allmed.net/catalog/item/1,707,801,802

Velcro with ties instead of chains. [;)]

quote:

Really, if you want to go this route, soft restraints would be so much better.


http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4407361

quote:

When the OP at no point in time even suggested they where going to use a lock, and there therefore was no reason to believe that there would be any key to even get stuck in any lock.


With the use of chains, its natural to believe a lock will also be used.


quote:

Velcro restraints can be taken off in the time it takes -if not way faster- to get out and charge a defibrillator so that's not a consideration.


Really? Gee... wonder why I didnt think of that myself.. wait.. [;)]

quote:

Instead of making recommendations on what the OP may safely use, most of this tread has focussed on the horror of what may go wrong if he choses the exactly wrong restraints for this sort of thing.


As a nurse I would be remiss if I didnt point out the dangers of what COULD go wrong. And I did provide an alternative.

But thank you for reinforcing my position. [;)]




tazzygirl -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 9:06:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: breagha


honestly... i didn't have any of those " you did this to me" moments. nor did i scratch, hit, or claw anyone.


I'm reasonably sure that if we hadn't managed to pull my step sister's husband out of her grasp, she would have succeeded in strangling him.


lol... I used to tell the father's in delivery... "There is a pillow in the corner, if you feel faint, go there and lay down. I have two patients, you may lay where you land for a bit if you become my third"




tazzygirl -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 9:08:47 PM)

quote:

As far as showing her submissiveness, I think that happens in many ways all the time.


In my opinion, the best way to show it is simply... Yes Master.




littlewonder -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 9:10:59 PM)

If you need chains and leather and toys to show and feel your submissiveness.....are you?

I know my answer....what's yours op?





LafayetteLady -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 9:46:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

Hear, hear!

I'm a new grandmother. The DIL had a baby ten days ago. 24 hours of exhausting and painful labor. They began this swearing no pain relief, totally natural all the way. When it came down to it, she was begging for the epidural and grateful to get it.

Right now this is just another pregnant woman craving. And that doesn't automatically make it healthy. My cousin had aversions to all protein during her first pregnancy. It wasn't healthy and nobody said "she's pregnant so it's fine if she only eats peaches for the next nine months." Because that wouldn't have been the smart thing to do.


[sm=offtopic.gif]

Congratulations on being a new grandmother!

Back to our regular programming....




UllrsIshtar -> RE: home birth in chains (3/22/2013 10:31:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Hmmm... soft restraints....

http://www.allmed.net/catalog/item/1,707,801,802

Velcro with ties instead of chains. [;)]



Soft restraints...

http://www.amazon.com/NV-Wrist-Restraint-Purple-Fur/dp/B001D4Z8CW

The soft restraints where recommended against chafing, velcro wasn't mentioned to ensure quick release. For all we know the guy had never thought about velcro. I wouldn't want him going into something like this with claps on the cuffs, so I found it worth while to make sure he was aware of the option.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

When the OP at no point in time even suggested they where going to use a lock, and there therefore was no reason to believe that there would be any key to even get stuck in any lock.


With the use of chains, its natural to believe a lock will also be used.



I disagree.
I've many many times see kinksters use chains with carabiners and eye hook clasps.

Even if you were worried he might use locks, it is more productive to point other options out to him, than to chastise him about how dangerous the lock you don't even know if he was planning to use might be.


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
quote:

Instead of making recommendations on what the OP may safely use, most of this tread has focussed on the horror of what may go wrong if he choses the exactly wrong restraints for this sort of thing.


As a nurse I would be remiss if I didnt point out the dangers of what COULD go wrong. And I did provide an alternative.



And as a nurse I wouldn't expect you to do anything less than point out potential dangers... but I consider it more productive to point out various alternatives he may use to make the situation safer, instead of chastising the all the possible options he may choose to use when possibly unaware of other options. [;)]

Honestly, I wasn't trying to argue with anything you had said, I think you've made some of the more productive posts on this tread. But I still felt there generally was a heavier focus on telling the guy what not to do, and very little practical suggestions for how to increase safety should he ignore warnings and choose to proceed anyways.

As far as I can tell, everybody on this tread is mainly concerned about the baby's safety, so trying to guide him in a positive way will probably make the dad more receptive to suggestion where as chastising him may cause him to disregard good advice out of feeling attacked... and that won't help the baby's safety any, now would it?




FrostedFlake -> RE: home birth in chains (3/23/2013 2:59:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

Hear, hear!

I'm a new grandmother. The DIL had a baby ten days ago. 24 hours of exhausting and painful labor. They began this swearing no pain relief, totally natural all the way. When it came down to it, she was begging for the epidural and grateful to get it.

Right now this is just another pregnant woman craving. And that doesn't automatically make it healthy. My cousin had aversions to all protein during her first pregnancy. It wasn't healthy and nobody said "she's pregnant so it's fine if she only eats peaches for the next nine months." Because that wouldn't have been the smart thing to do.


[sm=offtopic.gif]

Congratulations on being a new grandmother!

Back to our regular programming....


The part I bolded is off topic, until you read the rest and note it would not make much sense without the bolded part.

Congrats to the extremely tired new Mom. And to the family.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875