Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 3/31/2013 12:46:13 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

A knife in kitchen is used to make food


If someone in your home is too dangerous to be allowed around firearms they can kill YOU with the buther knife only a strawman argument to those who actually believe that was a reference to the school shooting.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 3/31/2013 1:04:24 PM >

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 3/31/2013 12:49:55 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
Again Ted Bundy is not a strawman he killed more than all the mass killings in the last decade and NEVER used a firearm. The point, for those too myopic to see it is that it is the evil intent that causes heinous crimes, not the tools they use.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 3/31/2013 1:04:58 PM >

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 3/31/2013 1:09:08 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

If you sell a car to someone and they use it to commit a crime, and you can't prove you sold it and surrendered the plates, you will have a lot of explaining to do.


You do not state, but imply that the same cop who will give you a hard time abiut the car will just shrug his shoulders and go away if it is your gun.

You also ignore the obviou that they don't know it is your car or firearm untill they have recoved them.

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 3/31/2013 5:12:49 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro
It was reported in a few newpaper, however I myself have found no referrence to it. It is possible that Nancy could simply as many reported felt she could no longer contorl Adam and was preparing to have him declared a ward of the state. As reported and my own research seems to indicate that Connecticut has no age limitation on the purchase of rifles in fact it does appear Adam did attempt to purchase on prior to the incident but was turned down, the reason is not clear. So Adam did not need to turn 21 to purchase of rifle. It depends on what measure one takes to secure a safe key or combination. My own Mother had a small safe, and I could never find the combination. On her death, I has conservator had to have the safe opened by a licensed person.
A lot of things have been reported. Not all of them are necessarily based in fact. Keep in mind that this whole story has been incorrectly reported from a number of angles since the beginning.

I'm sorry to hear of your difficulty with the safe at your Mother's passing. My kid cracked our safe at the age of fourteen. MP was deployed, so I was the only parent at home and I worked twelve hour shifts. I had never given a thought to the official papers, spare keys, and other items that were in there in the event of a fire or other emergency. Well, I was wrong.

I kind of get the possibility that Nancy Lanza never thought her kid couldn't be trusted. That he'd never do something so heinous. Nobody thinks of their own kid like that, even when they've done some stuff that shocks the shit out of you.



_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 3/31/2013 6:09:14 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

Now you are simply lying. You very clearly posted that any TG person who looked at what they were doing as playing around with gender roles, was a moron. Your denial that you posted that isn't going to change the fact that you said it.

And now you are advocating more intolerance for 'loonies' and others who aren't 'normal', while trying to derail any attempt to discuss the importance of mental health issues.

Knock yourself out with the hatemongering, I won't be bothering to read any more of it.



quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren


quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

You also consider transgender people who don't do it your way to be "morons"... your words.

Whether you get off on being intolerant or not, the epidemic of suicide and its overlap with the profile of the school shooters is undeniable, and far too strong a positive correlation to be hand waved away.


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

I am going to have to back track myself a little, I found out that Nancy did have a gun safe, it was in her bed room where she was killed, opened, now that is really and I mean really stupid. You have a person in your house, you claim they are out of control, violent, you leave guns out and not lock them up when you have the means to? I am not trying to fix blame on Nancy, but you have to admit she was irresponsible.

You may not, I am, I am a parent and I know how hard it is to be one, but quite frankly, the woman was either off the rails herself or was completely stupid, I suspect the latter. She wasn't alone in this, the father could be involved and if they wanted to get him committed, the guy had the firepower to do that. The guy is a senior executive at GE Capital in their tax office, I work with someone whose wife works in that division, the father is way, way up the food chain, he is making 7 figures, easily, and had the kind of legal help at his disposal that could get the kid into treatment, but apparently the wife didn't bother to ask him,

Every piece of evidence we have is that she was a stupid sack of shit, and if Oprah wants to claim she is a victim and the rest of the people saying she was a victim, I'll barf. I have heard advocates for the mental health community claiming Adam was a victim, that memorials should mention 28 victims, but that is crap. The kid went there to kill little kids, didn't give a crap, he knew it was wrong, he was wearing body armor, and he killed himself when he realized the cops were coming because he knew the consequences....I don't consider him a victim at all, to be honest.

As far as the mother, I don't want to hear how she was struggling to deal with him, it sounds to me like her answer was to let the kid around guns, shoot with him, and allow the kid to have a mess of weapons around that you wonder about them to to start with. She bought the kid the body armor (he didn't have money of his own), and she sat there while the kid spent most of the day playing violent video games in the basement of the house, and didn't wonder why the kid was doing nothing, doing that for years. My personal opinion she was a nut herself, the survivalist stuff alone, the reveling in gun ownership, smacks of that, but the key thing is she has a kid that a 6 year old child could tell was off, not normal, and she fed that, didn't get him help, sat there while he basically moldered for several years, and allowed him access to all kinds of weapons. She wasn't a victim, she was the poster child for someone with shit for brains, to say the least. I would be concerned if my son was into shoot em up games (he has had a couple, played them briefly, and thought they were hysterical), and all he did was play them day after day and he is normal (though after playing them like that, I wonder if a normal kid would come out straight, it can't be good for you), but she was oblivious to what he was doing. Yes, he was 20, but it was her house, and she could set the rules, but she didn't. And leaving the gun safe open, the weapons lying around the house? That is like leaving matches around a 5 year old and then sitting back and saying "I can't understand how the house burned down".

I don't have problems with gun ownership even though I choose not to, but I also think it is about time we had accountability for gun owners, too, for their stupidity. We have a lot more accountability with cars and boats then we do with guns, and that is idiotic.



I don't know where that came from, but it isn't true, that is typical of what passes for debate these days, can't come up with an answer, claim something stupid (I have met transgender people I think who were morons, but wasn't over doing things differently then myself, I have called them morons for judging other people). This isn't about a matter of style, Nancy Lanza had a kid who was off the rails, and it wasn't just being autistic, and if I put a case in front of a jury, few people would assume via the rational man logic that what she did was anything but moronic. She had a kid who had severe problems, couldn't function, and her answer was to let him sit there day after day playing violent video games, she gave him body armor, took the kid shooting, apparently gave him money to buy his own gun, let him have access to the guns (explain to me the opened gun safe), and you consider that responsible parenting? Not to mention a house full of knives, swords, etc? This isn't s disagreement over parenting styles, this is plain old fashioned stupidity.



If you want to claim I am a liar, I want to see the full quote of what i supposedly said about TG's playing around with gender roles being morons, it isn't something I would say, unless it was in context of something else, I suspect you are taking something out of context and trying to use it because you don't like what I posted..

As far as ducking mental health issues,Adam Lanza was a messed up person, he had mental health issues that weren't addressed, and it wasn't because she couldn't get him treatment, as the mental health advocates claimed, it was because she wouldn't. She had an emotionally disturbed son (whom we will never know the truth about, thanks to the mental health care advocates who claim a right to privacy, even though he is dead along with 26 other people) and her answer was to buy him violent video games and sit there while he played them all day every day, and take him shooting with high powered weapons, I am sure that is in every treatment recommendation for disturbed people. Nancy Lanza was a loon, what she did was moronic and anyone but true gun nuts would see it as so, I am sure the local gun club will probably have a Nancy Lanza award or something. Not getting him treatment when she had the means to, and letting him play all these violent fantasies out and teaching him to shoot is like giving a two year old a live wire to play with.

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 3/31/2013 6:21:09 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

I've mentioned on several threads in the past that My girl child (now grown) was pretty tough to raise. As much as I was concerned about being the only adult in the house while MP was deployed for safety reasons, and a gun in the house would have leveled the playing field if we ever had a break in, I was actually more worried about the kid getting the gun. She got in My fireproof document safe more than once. All it took was her finding where I had the combination written down.

The gun safe wasn't going to stop Adam Lanza. Even if Nancy Lanza had made the same choice about not owning guns until Adam moved out, all that would mean would be that he would postpone whatever plan he had until after his twenty-first birthday. In a small classroom at close range, he didn't even need what he had to get off twenty-two shots at mostly young children. The only difference would have been the actual number of holes that he was able to get into each of the victims.

I honestly don't know if tougher gun laws would have prevented Sandy Hook. Have a good look at illegal gun sales.






There are a lot of issues here. If we didn't allow people to own weapons that can pump out hundreds of rounds a minute with large capacity magazines, it is likely that Newtown if Lanza had used a handgun would have been a lot better. He killed 26 people in a short period of time, he only had about 10 minutes before the cops showed up, and given the slower shooting rates of a handgun and the need to reload, plus also that a handgun, because of its slower reload capability, might have given adults more of a chance to protect the kids; an AR15 firing free fire gives no one a chance to try and stop the perp, with a handgun, they might have been able to, plus like I said, it takes something like an AR15 to kill 26 people in <10 minutes,he pumped out 150 shots I seem to recall.

As far as Adam Lanza goes, he might have done something assuming he actually could figure out how to support himself (keep in mind the kid was unemployable, he had no skills, no real education), it is not likely he would, he was already 20 and had moldered for how many years? It would have been a lot more difficult to do on his own, he would have needed money to live someplace, and he would have needed pretty good bucks to buy the kind of weapons his mom provided for him. A gun safe could have secured them, but it looks like it was either open or Adam knew the combination (the profile on the mom I have read indicates she saw things as her and Adam against the world). I know what they say about illegal weapons, but Adam Lanza wasn't exactly streetwise, the kid didn't seem to have any kind of survival skills, and despite popular myth you have to know where to buy illegal weapons, and it isn't that cheap, either. One note on illegal gun sales, if we hypothetically had a ban on things like the AR15, it is likely he wouldn't easly find them in the black market, if he could find one. A large percentage of weapons in the black market were bought legally, a lot of them by straw man buyers in states with lax gun laws, or by people abusing federal weapons permits, others are lost or stolen or 'given away' by gun owners.......

I would argue that left to his own devices, Adam couldn't have pulled this off, that the easy access his mother gave him to guns is what caused it to happen, and it was foolish and stupid to do so. A gun safe might have kept it out of his hands, but it looks to me like he probably had the combo to the safe, or mom left it open...but as you point out, he probably could have broken in, which raises questions about having them there in the first place.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 3/31/2013 6:29:37 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

A knife in kitchen is used to make food


If someone in your home is too dangerous to be allowed around firearms they can kill YOU with the buther knife only a strawman argument to those who actually believe that was a reference to the school shooting.

They might kill me, but they wouldn't be able to easily kill 26 people. It is a lot harder to kill someone with a knife, and with a knife, someone at the school could have disarmed him, used a fire extinguisher, because a knife is a short range weapon, unlike an AR15 or a handgun. Gun rights people love to point out that knives kill and cars kill, but the answer is that few people use cars to kill deliberately, too unwieldy, and with knives the numbers killed is a lot less then handguns, I don't have exact numbers, but 30,000 people a year die from guns, I don't think that many people die from knives, in part, because knives aren't that effective a weapon.

And I did say that if I had someone mentally ill living in my house, I would secure anything I could, though if I thought they were a danger of being violent to myself or others, I would probably be looking to get them help or placed somewhere. What is being left out of this is the scope of destruction, if he had access to kitchen knives, Lanza might have been able to kill a couple of people; with an AR15, he was able to kill 26 in <10 minutes,until the cops got there. If he had slower guns or a knife, it is also likely the kids would have been locked down by the time he could get near them.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 3/31/2013 6:36:27 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Again Ted Bundy is not a strawman he killed more than all the mass killings in the last decade and NEVER used a firearm. The point, for those too myopic to see it is that it is the evil intent that causes heinous crimes, not the tools they use.


A serial killer is a rare thing compared to gun violence, in the last several years we have seen roughly 20 shootings where it was mass killing. A Ted Bundy is a menace, but it is exceedingly rare, plus in many cases they get caught before they do much damage. A psycho like Lanza with an AR15 is a lot more common event, we see guys going in and shooting up their old job, we see the craphole in Colorado, and they commit mass murder in a matter of minutes, and it is getting more and more common. Can we do more to find psychotic people, people likely to do things like this, and find ways to neutralize them in some way? Yes, but we also have to realize that given the size of our population that the likelyhood of people slipping through the cracks is quite high, and having a culture that provides easy access to rapid fire weapons, that has so many guns out there, is likely to generate more and more of what we are seeing. Someone postulated that one of the reasons for the who mania for weapons is that those who most use them, people who live in rural, less densely populated areas, see it as another place of them losing their influence, as more and more people live in relatively densely populated areas. The problem is that weapons like AR15's in Montana isn't going to cause much problems, or Alaska, because they are relatively rural, but in built up areas, they are a problem, because it is a lot easier to kill a lot of people in a densely populated area, plus there are likely to be a lot more mentally ill people waiting to do it there.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 3/31/2013 8:04:51 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

A knife in kitchen is used to make food


If someone in your home is too dangerous to be allowed around firearms they can kill YOU with the buther knife only a strawman argument to those who actually believe that was a reference to the school shooting.

They might kill me, but they wouldn't be able to easily kill 26 people. It is a lot harder to kill someone with a knife, and with a knife, someone at the school could have disarmed him, used a fire extinguisher, because a knife is a short range weapon, unlike an AR15 or a handgun. Gun rights people love to point out that knives kill and cars kill, but the answer is that few people use cars to kill deliberately, too unwieldy, and with knives the numbers killed is a lot less then handguns, I don't have exact numbers, but 30,000 people a year die from guns, I don't think that many people die from knives, in part, because knives aren't that effective a weapon.

And I did say that if I had someone mentally ill living in my house, I would secure anything I could, though if I thought they were a danger of being violent to myself or others, I would probably be looking to get them help or placed somewhere. What is being left out of this is the scope of destruction, if he had access to kitchen knives, Lanza might have been able to kill a couple of people; with an AR15, he was able to kill 26 in <10 minutes,until the cops got there. If he had slower guns or a knife, it is also likely the kids would have been locked down by the time he could get near them.

Apparently you did not read far enough back to see the begining of this thread within a thread.
It bagan with a question about getting rid of your guns because someone in the house is too unstable to be around them, not if getting rid of them would have prevented Sandy Hook. At that point it becomes a question of personal safty. You cannot secure enough items in your house tokeep them from killing you in your sleep you have to deal with the unstable person.

People uneducated with firearms do not realize that he could have done the same with a 12 ga pump.
1 it is far more lethal than a .223
2 it would not reqiure second shots
3 it would fire 9 .32 prejectiles every time you pull the trigger so there would be no missses.

Next as much time as he spent online had he been deprived of firearms he could have learned to make bombs that would have killed far more.

Are you aware of the fact that in this country there are 2 times as many murders committed by blut instruments,
and 5 times as many with knifes as with rifles of all kinds.

Before you say but 26 at one time are you saying that 26 at one time is somehow worse than 130 one at at time.?

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 3/31/2013 8:08:23 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
So you want to restrict them where there is no problem in the hopes of slowing down bad guys in areas whwere they are misused.

I have an idea since it is the guns that are a problem send them to jail instead of the innocent people they lured into crime.

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 3/31/2013 8:12:38 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
Everyword you said about Ted Bundy and his ilk is true about mass shooters.
The difference for every serial killer who gets caught early there is one,like Bundy who kill for years.
Desalvo 13 in Boston
Williams at least 44 in Atlanta
Bundy over one hundred all over the country
Romirez 20 something in LA
They always catch the mass shooters.

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 4/1/2013 8:59:45 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Again Ted Bundy is not a strawman he killed more than all the mass killings in the last decade and NEVER used a firearm. The point, for those too myopic to see it is that it is the evil intent that causes heinous crimes, not the tools they use.

source please.... because ...over 70 people died in mass shootings in 2012 alone.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/12/mass-shootings-victims-2012

Bundys total was officially 30 over four years, rumoured to be higher, but never proven
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Bundy#Victims

I guess you will ignore this lil bit too

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/04/gun-free-zones-mass-shootings
Among the 62 mass shootings over the last 30 years that we studied, not a single case includes evidence that the killer chose to target a place because it banned guns. To the contrary, in many of the cases there was clearly another motive for the choice of location. For example, 20 were workplace shootings, most of which involved perpetrators who felt wronged by employers and colleagues. Last September, when a troubled man working at a sign manufacturer in Minneapolis was told he would be let go, he pulled out a 9mm Glock and killed six people and injured another before putting a bullet in his own head. Similar tragedies unfolded at a beer distributor in Connecticut in 2010 and at a plastics factory in Kentucky in 2008.

Or consider the 12 school shootings we documented, in which all but one of the killers had personal ties to the school they struck. FBI investigators learned from one witness, for example, that the mass shooter in Newtown had long been fixated on Sandy Hook Elementary School, which he'd once attended.

Or take the man who opened fire in suburban Milwaukee last August: Are we to believe that a white supremacist targeted the Sikh temple there not because it was filled with members of a religious minority he despised, but because it was a place that allegedly* banned firearms?

Thirty-six of the killers committed suicide at or near the crime scene. These were not people whose priority was identifying the safest place to attack.
Proponents of this argument also ignore that the majority of mass shootings are murder-suicides. Thirty-six of the killers we studied took their own lives at or near the crime scene, while seven others died in police shootouts they had no hope of surviving (a.k.a. "suicide by cop"). These were not people whose priority was identifying the safest place to attack.

No less a fantasy is the idea that gun-free zones prevent armed civilians from saving the day. Not one of the 62 mass shootings we documented was stopped this way. Veteran FBI, ATF, and police officials say that an armed citizen opening fire against an attacker in a panic-stricken movie theater or shopping mall is very likely to make matters worse. Law enforcement agents train rigorously for stopping active shooters, they say, a task that requires extraordinary skills honed under acute duress. In cases in Washington and Texas in 2005, would-be heroes who tried to take action with licensed firearms were gravely wounded and killed. In the Tucson mass shooting in 2011, an armed citizen admitted to coming within a split second of gunning down the wrong person—one of the bystanders who'd helped tackle and subdue the actual killer.


Not to mention the nearly three thousand gun deaths JUST since sandy hook....

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 4/1/2013 9:08:17 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

They always catch the mass shooters.

thats cuz mass shooters (like Lanza) want the infamy of being the bad ass that killed XX number of people, they want people to know who they are, they want their name on the front page headlines and be remembered for years or decades afterwards.. serial killers dont want to be found out (even if some do take pleasure in taunting the police), cuz that would mean an end to what they like to do.. Imo, they are two very different types of killers with very different motives, tools and actions..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 4/1/2013 9:28:37 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren
There are a lot of issues here. If we didn't allow people to own weapons that can pump out hundreds of rounds a minute with large capacity magazines, it is likely that Newtown if Lanza had used a handgun would have been a lot better. He killed 26 people in a short period of time, he only had about 10 minutes before the cops showed up, and given the slower shooting rates of a handgun and the need to reload, plus also that a handgun, because of its slower reload capability, might have given adults more of a chance to protect the kids; an AR15 firing free fire gives no one a chance to try and stop the perp, with a handgun, they might have been able to, plus like I said, it takes something like an AR15 to kill 26 people in <10 minutes,he pumped out 150 shots I seem to recall.

As far as Adam Lanza goes, he might have done something assuming he actually could figure out how to support himself (keep in mind the kid was unemployable, he had no skills, no real education), it is not likely he would, he was already 20 and had moldered for how many years? It would have been a lot more difficult to do on his own, he would have needed money to live someplace, and he would have needed pretty good bucks to buy the kind of weapons his mom provided for him. A gun safe could have secured them, but it looks like it was either open or Adam knew the combination (the profile on the mom I have read indicates she saw things as her and Adam against the world). I know what they say about illegal weapons, but Adam Lanza wasn't exactly streetwise, the kid didn't seem to have any kind of survival skills, and despite popular myth you have to know where to buy illegal weapons, and it isn't that cheap, either. One note on illegal gun sales, if we hypothetically had a ban on things like the AR15, it is likely he wouldn't easly find them in the black market, if he could find one. A large percentage of weapons in the black market were bought legally, a lot of them by straw man buyers in states with lax gun laws, or by people abusing federal weapons permits, others are lost or stolen or 'given away' by gun owners.......

I would argue that left to his own devices, Adam couldn't have pulled this off, that the easy access his mother gave him to guns is what caused it to happen, and it was foolish and stupid to do so. A gun safe might have kept it out of his hands, but it looks to me like he probably had the combo to the safe, or mom left it open...but as you point out, he probably could have broken in, which raises questions about having them there in the first place.
Oh, I'm not arguing against that he had easiER access. He obviously did.

I do think too many folks are reading into things that haven't been proven as facts about this guy. There's lots of rumor and very little evidence. There have been "reports" (I hope My sarcasm is showing) that he supposedly tried to purchase weapons and was denied. Ok, where's the guy who the attempted purchase was supposedly made from and where's the reason for Adam Lanza to have failed a background check?

There is none. Do you know why? Because it's all a bunch of hype and it makes for good fodder when people want to use fear as a basis for a stance on the issue.



_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 4/1/2013 9:32:45 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

It's like pouring water on a rock.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 4/1/2013 9:45:15 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
I have much less contempt for rocks, they dont try to make bullshit into facts

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 4/1/2013 10:15:57 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Everyword you said about Ted Bundy and his ilk is true about mass shooters.
The difference for every serial killer who gets caught early there is one,like Bundy who kill for years.
Desalvo 13 in Boston
Williams at least 44 in Atlanta
Bundy over one hundred all over the country
Romirez 20 something in LA
They always catch the mass shooters.

Serial killers like that are rare, mass shootings are not

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 4/1/2013 10:23:26 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

So you want to restrict them where there is no problem in the hopes of slowing down bad guys in areas whwere they are misused.

I have an idea since it is the guns that are a problem send them to jail instead of the innocent people they lured into crime.

I want accountability, I am tired of the bullshit that joe billy bob doesn't need to be accountable for the guns they buy. Because of the nut jobs who equate registration to confiscation, and who dream of the day when they fight the government, we have a situation where there are tighter controls over cars and boats then guns (both of them by federal law have to be registered). If you own a car and it is stolen and used in a crime, and you don't report it, you are in deep shit, if you sell the car to friend and he uses it in commission of a crime using your plates, you could be held accountable. Joe Billy Bob has an arsenal of high powered assault weapons and handguns, and needs money for beer, can sell them into the black market, and if they get traced back to him, can say "I lost em, boss" or "they was stolen"..... Legal gun ownership is fine, within limits, but I also want accountability, and the proof is in the pudding of the need for that. A lot of guns are getting into the black market via strawman purchases and also from so called legitimate gun owners who decide they need money for Christmas gifts and sell it into the black market..if you have to account for your weapons, and report them if lost or stolen, that gets cut off. If Joe Billy Bob is constantly reporting guns stolen or lost, it will kind of stand out. This idea that guns should be like selling a baseball card collection or a piece of furniture is ludicrous.

BTW, there are 30,000 gun related killings a year in the US, I doubt very much there are 150,000 knife related murders.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 4/1/2013 10:27:17 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

A knife in kitchen is used to make food


If someone in your home is too dangerous to be allowed around firearms they can kill YOU with the buther knife only a strawman argument to those who actually believe that was a reference to the school shooting.

They might kill me, but they wouldn't be able to easily kill 26 people. It is a lot harder to kill someone with a knife, and with a knife, someone at the school could have disarmed him, used a fire extinguisher, because a knife is a short range weapon, unlike an AR15 or a handgun. Gun rights people love to point out that knives kill and cars kill, but the answer is that few people use cars to kill deliberately, too unwieldy, and with knives the numbers killed is a lot less then handguns, I don't have exact numbers, but 30,000 people a year die from guns, I don't think that many people die from knives, in part, because knives aren't that effective a weapon.

And I did say that if I had someone mentally ill living in my house, I would secure anything I could, though if I thought they were a danger of being violent to myself or others, I would probably be looking to get them help or placed somewhere. What is being left out of this is the scope of destruction, if he had access to kitchen knives, Lanza might have been able to kill a couple of people; with an AR15, he was able to kill 26 in <10 minutes,until the cops got there. If he had slower guns or a knife, it is also likely the kids would have been locked down by the time he could get near them.

Apparently you did not read far enough back to see the begining of this thread within a thread.
It bagan with a question about getting rid of your guns because someone in the house is too unstable to be around them, not if getting rid of them would have prevented Sandy Hook. At that point it becomes a question of personal safty. You cannot secure enough items in your house tokeep them from killing you in your sleep you have to deal with the unstable person.

People uneducated with firearms do not realize that he could have done the same with a 12 ga pump.
1 it is far more lethal than a .223
2 it would not reqiure second shots
3 it would fire 9 .32 prejectiles every time you pull the trigger so there would be no missses.

Next as much time as he spent online had he been deprived of firearms he could have learned to make bombs that would have killed far more.

Are you aware of the fact that in this country there are 2 times as many murders committed by blut instruments,
and 5 times as many with knifes as with rifles of all kinds.

Before you say but 26 at one time are you saying that 26 at one time is somehow worse than 130 one at at time.?


I doubt it, he killed 26 people in less then 10 minutes. A 12 gauge holds two shells in it, after firing the primary and the choke you need to reload, which means breaking the gun, pulling out the cartridges and putting the new ones in, closing it and then firing....as opposed to 30 shots from a clip in rapid fire from a distance. With a 12 gauge, he could kill some, but someone would have gotten him when he is reloading..to change the clip on an AR15 is a lot faster than a 12 gauge shotgun, so there would be no time to try and disarm him. Relatively killing power is the same, but the rapidity is not; remember, he had roughly 10 minutes before the cops showed up and he,like the piece of twisted shit coward he was, killed himself.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza - 4/1/2013 10:30:32 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Everyword you said about Ted Bundy and his ilk is true about mass shooters.
The difference for every serial killer who gets caught early there is one,like Bundy who kill for years.
Desalvo 13 in Boston
Williams at least 44 in Atlanta
Bundy over one hundred all over the country
Romirez 20 something in LA
They always catch the mass shooters.

Serial killers like that are rare, mass shootings are not

Yes they are they just get lots of publicity.
Unless there is something spectacular like Desalvo or huge numbers like Bundy we don't hear about the serial killers as much.
However getting bogged down in exact numbers misses the point.
Serial killers, other than Zodiac who was never caught ( thanks in part to Diane Fienstien) do not use firearms.
They want to kill just like mass killers but they tend to be smarter, more clever.
One is as evil as the other, and they will never be stopped till we go after the people, not the tools.
You say AR15s are not a problem in Montana but they are in New Jersey. Since Montana Firearms don't make people commit crimes maybe Jersyites should get thier guns there.
Or maybe the problem is the difference in New Jersy society and Montana society.

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: It's Just so Scary -- Adam Lanza Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109