Numb3rlocked -> RE: Financial Domination / What are your thoughts & Why ? (11/23/2013 11:09:59 AM)
|
I'm sure in certain circles, financial domination as an element of a complex power relationship is legitimate. But financial domination itself is not subtle nor nuanced, and skirts the definition of kink. Take the list of BDSM interests you can list on your profile for instance. Every interest is contentious; that is, there are significant contingents of society that finds crossdressing, blindfolds, what have you, to be deviant, asexual, alternative, etc. My point is that you have to go out of your way to find others interested in this, which makes a site like this purposeful. But financial domination centers itself around accepting money from someone simply because they want to give it. There is nothing unconventional about this. You would have trouble finding anyone, dom, sub, or random vanilla person on the street, who would turn down an invitation to participate in the receiving end of this "dynamic." In any other kink, the sub and the domme are turned on by a mutually beneficial experience. That is, when a sub gives up power through bondage, or receiving pain, there is a feedback of enjoyment that stems from both parties enjoying purely the exchange of power and who is forfeiting what. In financial domination however, the pleasure she experiences comes in whole or in part from the use of that money for material goods and services, which is a pleasure we all enjoy in our normal lives outside the D/s dynamic. You don't have to be kinky to enjoy spending someone else's money, just selfish. This is the skepticism us subs sometimes feel when a woman says she wants money. We don't need an alt lifestyle website to find people like that. [sm=rolleyes.gif]
|
|
|
|