evesgrden -> RE: Financial Domination / What are your thoughts & Why ? (11/25/2013 10:04:21 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ThePrincessKali quote:
ORIGINAL: evesgrden I don't have a problem with you using the word raping in the context you did. I think it was an appropriate metaphor for the way you feel. :::haha fuck you,:: LLLgiving it back to the male population:::: This is about callously taking, and wanting the other to feel taken and not in a good way I'm certainly not trying to compare what you do to a rapist, nor is the result comparable in any respect. But sadly the thought process, the vindictiveness, the sense of being justified in taking and that they deserve it, unfortunately that's from a very dark place.On one hand what you're doing could be considered a pseudo coping skill, it's cathartic for you and the participants are willing and can come and go as they please. On the other hand Audrey II comes to mind and I have to wonder if this isn't insatiable ultimately. The more you feed it the more you need it. But I can't see how this could possibly leave you open to finding a partner for whom you will really care and who will feel likewise about you... who will want you for who you are, and the delectable package is a perk. Rather presumptuous of me because you didn't say anything of wanting that in your life. I not only find it presumptuous but I find it offensive to assume that I won't be able to find a partner. I never said that I have romantic or sexual relationships with my subs, I don't. My dating life is completely separate. I have healthy relationships. Would you tell a guy who boxes who might have some anger issues that he can't function normally if that's his outlet? It never occurred to me that you would have a romantic relationship with your clients and I didn't say you couldn't function normally. You said you became a bitch to compensate, you get a rush from getting back at men.. and please re-read what I said.. it's in bold this time. To answer your question about whether I would say something similar to a boxer; to Sugar Ray Leonard, no. To Mike Tyson, yes. Sugar Ray was in it because he was good at boxing and liked it. Tyson ultimately found that while it was a release for him, the anger was always there. Boxing was an outlet, but it wasn't enough because he didn't come to terms with the cause of the problem. Aggression was a fix for his anger and until he treated the anger it spilled over into other relationships. Supposedly he's taken care of that. I started treating aggression and anger over 30 years ago. Context is everything and the context you provided raised my antennae big time. You say you have a healthy relationship... congrats. I'm surprised given the things you've said, but that's why I say things like "on one hand". I've been surprised plenty of times over the years and I'm sure this time won't be the last.
|
|
|
|