MariaB -> RE: Financial Domination / What are your thoughts & Why ? (7/29/2013 1:55:23 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kalikshama quote:
ORIGINAL: Agent99 quote:
My man gets sexual satisfaction when I wear stockings, garters, and very high heels. Because he pays for these, am I a prostitute? How can you totally repeatedly miss the point that he has to pay for the sex, not for the stockings? How can you repeatedly miss the point that THERE IS NO SEX between fin dommes and clients? But the point was void because she's in a relationships with her man. Although some people compare a wife or lover to a prostitute, its a ridiculous comparison. What I accept but clearly many here can't is, if a woman touts/entices/encourages a person on the internet or otherwise, for money by portraying herself to be a dominant and if that dominant woman shows provocative pictures, or speaks in a way that she knows will excite him, then she is deemed by a good margin of people as offering a sexual service. She doesn't need to feel turned on, she doesn't need to touch his genitals, she doesn't need to meet him in the flesh even. She is offering wank fodder that in most cases would not exist if money or gifts were not involved. Some people will see any sort of sexual service as prostitution and some won't. These people, mainly male subs that are using the word 'prostitute' are well aware there is no sex. Regardless of that they still believe its prostitution.
|
|
|
|