RE: 19 yr old tagger, tazed, died, do you care? - 8/10/2013 11:36:46 AM
|
|
|
freedomdwarf1
Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012 Status: offline
|
I still say that in this case, a tazer was the best option given the circumstances. A tackle could easily have resulted in serious injury (and maybe death through injuries) just as a by-product of a tackle. A normal hand gun would probably have been just as lethal, if not more so. The fact that this youngster died as a (relative) fluke of a tazer deployment doesn't sit well with me for people to make tazers out as a WMD or dangerous and purposefully blown out of all proportion for the sake of discussion. People die falling off a horse. Do we ban the riding of horses because of it? No, we don't. People die in car accidents. Do we ban the use of cars? No, we don't. People get electrocuted and die in their homes. Do we ban electricity and go back to gas lights? No, we don't. People have been known to die from over-eating. Do we now ban all food on the planet? No, we don't. Everything in proportion. I think the overtly and deliberate use of provocative words and statements about the deadliness of tazers is just completely out of proportion. Sure, accidents happen. They happen all the time. But to make a song-and-dance about it doesn't make the point any better or clearer or more justified. The death, however tragic, was an accident. Pure and simple. ETA: to answer some of apple's comments above... It matters not a jot whether his art was good or bad or if he was famous or not. The point is, he was vandalising someone else's property. That is a criminal offence, it's as simple as that. When confronted by police, he didn't give up peacefully either. He made them chase him. And it wouldn't matter how many police surrounded him, he can only charge in one direction. That means that a very limited number of police would have been able to tackle him with any sensibility - probably only one or two at best. They didn't know if he had any other weapon with him when he charged them. The officer at most risk of being injured, or possibly killed, had at best, maybe half a second to evaluate the situation and make a decision as to how to deal with a charging and determined criminal trying to escape. I don't know if it is also true of the US, but most taggers caught here have been known to use their spray paint like CS gas and many are also caught with knives as well. I would surmise that with guns being fairly common in the US, that would also have to be taken into consideration by the officer having to make that determination. As it happens, the tagger didn't appear to have a gun or other weapons. But the officer didn't know that at the time. It's a calculated risk at any time.
< Message edited by freedomdwarf1 -- 8/10/2013 11:54:07 AM >
|
|
|