Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: No worries about the shutdown


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: No worries about the shutdown Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 3:44:20 AM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

the House holds the power of the purse

Not unilaterally.

The Constitution (I.7) says simply, "All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills." Bills passed by the House still require passage in the Senate and presidential approval.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 4:01:17 AM   
KYsissy


Posts: 781
Joined: 5/12/2005
Status: offline
All of this could yave been avoided if Congress had passed a budget like they are supposed to every year, and have not done for the past several years. I think the pola like this drama.

_____________________________

"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went."
Will Rogers, 1897-1935

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 4:09:35 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
On Meet The Press, Sen. Ted Cruz stated that his alternative to the ACA is that uninsured people should get a job,

http://www.politicususa.com/2013/09/29/ted-cruz-tells-people-health-insurance-job.html

but 60% of the uninsured already have jobs.
According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, Ted Cruz is completely wrong about who the uninsured are, “Over six in ten of the uninsured have at least one full-time worker in their family, and 16% have a part-time worker in the family. Individuals below poverty are at the highest risk of being uninsured, and this group accounts for 38% of all the uninsured (the poverty level for a family of four was $23,050 in 2012). In total, nine in ten of the uninsured are in low- or moderate-income families, meaning they are below 400% of poverty. The problem for employees whose employers offer health insurance is that they can’t afford it, “Workers usually enroll in employer-sponsored health insurance if they are eligible.4 However, it has become increasingly difficult for many workers to afford coverage. In 2013, the average annual total cost of employer-sponsored family coverage was $16,351, and the share of the premium paid by workers was 29%. Between 2003 and 2013, premiums have increased by 80%.5.”


As an aside...why did they pass the bill sunday that not only delays a key part of Obamacare, it allows bosses to deny women any health care, including birth control, on "moral or religious grounds."
What makes them think THAT would get passed by the senate????
Yeah its al the dems fault:)


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 4:37:10 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Exactly. I did not think they would go this route, but they represent citizens who want them to do this so they are.


Odd. When I read things, I got a sense of inevitability.

The citizens do not want a shutdown. Period. The only people who favor it, do not do so because it's a shutdown, but as a means to stop/slow Obamacare and/or government spending. It won't slow Obamacare, and the idea of stopping spending not when it occurs, bit when it's time to pay for what's already been bought, is insane.
quote:



They are the House of Representatives. They are not simply a right side of the left side, they do hold the purse strings and they are using that power legally.


Absolutely. There is no question that this is in their power. The question is, will it benefit them politically or not? Or, to use an outdated, archaic concept, what benefits the country as a whole?
quote:



I myself find this very interesting. Still, the Dems have shutdown the Government in the past and we seem to be OK so I suspect we are going to be better off for this action in the long run or at least come out of this stronger. Of course, the fat lady has not sung yet.


It is neither the Dems nor the GOP that can shut down the government. Rather, it is their refusal to work things out, although I will say that here, the GOP has deliberately provoked this by adding conditions which everyone knows the Dems will not accept.

There are two questions.

1. Will the "shutdown" (actually, a cutting back of services) even be noticed?
2. Who will take the blame/credit for it?

Right now, the Dems are the more reality-driven, pragmatic party and the GOP have been driven by a sense that if they're ideologically pure, reality will follow their wishes. (e.g., the 2012 election where the GOP was predicting a GOP landslide based on Rasmussen and Gallup while the Dems were using every other polling source that showed an Obama win, and the Iraq war, where Bush 43 threw out all the analysis prepared for his father which showed that occupation of Iraq would be a stupid course of action. Meanwhile, Pelosi correctly foresaw that the Bush initiatives would be disasters and, rather than fight them quixotically like Teddy and the Cruzers are doing here, positioned her party to be the party of We're-not-Bush.)

We've seen this movie before and we know how it ends. Gingrich, the architect of the major shutdown we've seen before, has tried to tell his fellow Republicans not to follow this path but they're convinced that their ideological purity will make things different from when Newt was responsible for discrediting a previously very virile GOP House.

Note: In the above, I've referred to the GOP as thought it's a monolith. It's not. The old guard GOP is terrified of what they're in for, and the Tea Party wing, led here by Cruz, is driving this. It bothers me a LOT that Cruz is smart enough to know that he is appealing to the TP wing, not the party as a whole, and his gambit here will serve to further fragment the GOP. He doesn't care. He puts his personal ambition over not only the country, but his party as well.


_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 5:39:05 AM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

The Obamacare exchanges will be open right on time.



Yes, and the young people will be standing in line to sign up. I'll be there handing out doughnuts. I should have enough for all. I bought a dozen.



Enjoy them.

_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 6:02:53 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
LOL Daily News Front cover...


Love it

Had a ditz moment


< Message edited by Lucylastic -- 10/1/2013 6:05:42 AM >


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 6:10:51 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
government shutdown
whats affected and what isnt
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2013/09/politics/government-shutdown-impact/index.html?iid=article_sidebar

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 6:28:04 AM   
DsBound


Posts: 268
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline
[image][/image]]

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 6:31:01 AM   
DsBound


Posts: 268
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

LOL Daily News Front cover...


Love it



Fitting... he is for sure.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 6:42:07 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
And we got more comin'.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DsBound)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 7:54:10 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
That's it right there.

The US leader who started the borrowing binge of the USA was Reagan.

In 1980 budget problems were related to the expensive legacy of Vietnam, today the legacy is Iraq,, Afghanistan, and the fiscal crisis.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 9:45:18 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Exactly. I did not think they would go this route, but they represent citizens who want them to do this so they are.


Odd. When I read things, I got a sense of inevitability.

The citizens do not want a shutdown. Period. The only people who favor it, do not do so because it's a shutdown, but as a means to stop/slow Obamacare and/or government spending. It won't slow Obamacare, and the idea of stopping spending not when it occurs, bit when it's time to pay for what's already been bought, is insane.
quote:



They are the House of Representatives. They are not simply a right side of the left side, they do hold the purse strings and they are using that power legally.


Absolutely. There is no question that this is in their power. The question is, will it benefit them politically or not? Or, to use an outdated, archaic concept, what benefits the country as a whole?
quote:



I myself find this very interesting. Still, the Dems have shutdown the Government in the past and we seem to be OK so I suspect we are going to be better off for this action in the long run or at least come out of this stronger. Of course, the fat lady has not sung yet.


It is neither the Dems nor the GOP that can shut down the government. Rather, it is their refusal to work things out, although I will say that here, the GOP has deliberately provoked this by adding conditions which everyone knows the Dems will not accept.

There are two questions.

1. Will the "shutdown" (actually, a cutting back of services) even be noticed?
2. Who will take the blame/credit for it?

Right now, the Dems are the more reality-driven, pragmatic party and the GOP have been driven by a sense that if they're ideologically pure, reality will follow their wishes. (e.g., the 2012 election where the GOP was predicting a GOP landslide based on Rasmussen and Gallup while the Dems were using every other polling source that showed an Obama win, and the Iraq war, where Bush 43 threw out all the analysis prepared for his father which showed that occupation of Iraq would be a stupid course of action. Meanwhile, Pelosi correctly foresaw that the Bush initiatives would be disasters and, rather than fight them quixotically like Teddy and the Cruzers are doing here, positioned her party to be the party of We're-not-Bush.)

We've seen this movie before and we know how it ends. Gingrich, the architect of the major shutdown we've seen before, has tried to tell his fellow Republicans not to follow this path but they're convinced that their ideological purity will make things different from when Newt was responsible for discrediting a previously very virile GOP House.

Note: In the above, I've referred to the GOP as thought it's a monolith. It's not. The old guard GOP is terrified of what they're in for, and the Tea Party wing, led here by Cruz, is driving this. It bothers me a LOT that Cruz is smart enough to know that he is appealing to the TP wing, not the party as a whole, and his gambit here will serve to further fragment the GOP. He doesn't care. He puts his personal ambition over not only the country, but his party as well.



Interesting analysis. How you can logically blame the republicans for "including things the democrats won't accept" without having exactly the same analysis for the democrats is... amazing.


(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 9:47:29 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

That's it right there.

The US leader who started the borrowing binge of the USA was Reagan.

In 1980 budget problems were related to the expensive legacy of Vietnam, today the legacy is Iraq,, Afghanistan, and the fiscal crisis.


The budget problems of 1980 just like the budget problem of today has nothing to do with iraq, afghanistan, or iran.

It has to do with entitltement spending being (now) over 50% of the budget, and climbing. Tack on interest and you're around 2/3 of the budget.

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 9:51:42 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NoBimbosAllowed


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: NoBimbosAllowed

'the Dems have shutdown the Government in the past'

meaning the republicans and the neo cons themselves never have, themselves?



Actually, I'm not fully up on democrat epithets - so depending on what you think neocons means - yes its entirely possible that the neocons have never shut the govt down.


you'll need to review some of the earlier Clinton attempts at reform that echoed this whole fracas most eerily.


You misunderstand. I remember the fracas very well. I am contesting the attribution to the neocons. Neocons are not a euphemism for republicans. Moynihan was a democrat, for example. So I don't think you can significantly attribute the shutdown to neocons.

(in reply to NoBimbosAllowed)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 9:56:08 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Servicepeople will not get paid on the 15th. They will get IOU's. I wonder how it will feel taking fire in Afghanistan for free?

This one isn't correct.

quote:

President Barack Obama signed a bill Monday that will protect military pay in the case of any government shutdown.

The bill passed the Senate unanimously earlier on Monday after passing the House on Sunday morning.

The Pay Our Military Act was signed just two hours before a midnight government shutdown. After a government funding bill was vollied between the House and the Senate Monday evening, the House decided not to pass a "clean" funding bill in time to stave off a shutdown.

The new bill will protect pay and allowances for members of the Armed Forces when the government shuts down at midnight.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/30/obama-military-pay-government-shutdown_n_4020224.html



Cool. I missed that some how.

Cool. now the repulicans just need to keep that same formulla
pass whatever bills are hurting people at the moment - and let the democrats veto them.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 10:17:07 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

That's it right there.

The US leader who started the borrowing binge of the USA was Reagan.

In 1980 budget problems were related to the expensive legacy of Vietnam, today the legacy is Iraq,, Afghanistan, and the fiscal crisis.


The budget problems of 1980 just like the budget problem of today has nothing to do with iraq, afghanistan, or iran.

It has to do with entitltement spending being (now) over 50% of the budget, and climbing. Tack on interest and you're around 2/3 of the budget.


Nope. Most of the federal entitlements programs are self funded and presently in the black. The overwhelming part of the government that is funded in the budget is defense and it is the cause of the deficits and the vast bulk of the debt.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 10:17:40 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I am lost regarding how D. Moynihan is involved in this. The fight was actually the republicans trying to kill Medicare/Medicaid much like Obamacare, although not as adamantly.

Moynihan was not on that side ideologically, or politically. That was all them whatever you want to call them, cuz not conservatives, nor republicans in the old sense of the world, and haven't been for aeons.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 10:18:19 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Servicepeople will not get paid on the 15th. They will get IOU's. I wonder how it will feel taking fire in Afghanistan for free?

This one isn't correct.

quote:

President Barack Obama signed a bill Monday that will protect military pay in the case of any government shutdown.

The bill passed the Senate unanimously earlier on Monday after passing the House on Sunday morning.

The Pay Our Military Act was signed just two hours before a midnight government shutdown. After a government funding bill was vollied between the House and the Senate Monday evening, the House decided not to pass a "clean" funding bill in time to stave off a shutdown.

The new bill will protect pay and allowances for members of the Armed Forces when the government shuts down at midnight.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/30/obama-military-pay-government-shutdown_n_4020224.html



Cool. I missed that some how.

Cool. now the repulicans just need to keep that same formulla
pass whatever bills are hurting people at the moment - and let the democrats veto them.


Yeah pretty soon it will all be funded and they can stop this perpetual whining about something so popular the American people have crushed the various websites offering sign ups.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 10:19:28 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: NoBimbosAllowed


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: NoBimbosAllowed

'the Dems have shutdown the Government in the past'

meaning the republicans and the neo cons themselves never have, themselves?



Actually, I'm not fully up on democrat epithets - so depending on what you think neocons means - yes its entirely possible that the neocons have never shut the govt down.


you'll need to review some of the earlier Clinton attempts at reform that echoed this whole fracas most eerily.


You misunderstand. I remember the fracas very well. I am contesting the attribution to the neocons. Neocons are not a euphemism for republicans. Moynihan was a democrat, for example. So I don't think you can significantly attribute the shutdown to neocons.

How the fuck do you Moynihan was involved in these shutdowns? In detail.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: No worries about the shutdown - 10/1/2013 10:24:32 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: NoBimbosAllowed


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: NoBimbosAllowed

'the Dems have shutdown the Government in the past'

meaning the republicans and the neo cons themselves never have, themselves?



Actually, I'm not fully up on democrat epithets - so depending on what you think neocons means - yes its entirely possible that the neocons have never shut the govt down.


you'll need to review some of the earlier Clinton attempts at reform that echoed this whole fracas most eerily.


You misunderstand. I remember the fracas very well. I am contesting the attribution to the neocons. Neocons are not a euphemism for republicans. Moynihan was a democrat, for example. So I don't think you can significantly attribute the shutdown to neocons.

How the fuck do you Moynihan was involved in these shutdowns? In detail.

Since you're not paying attention:

You said the neocons shut down the government in '95 and '96.

I said I don't think you can blame the neocons. Neocon is not a euphemism for republican. Moynihan was a neocon, for example.

So while there were perhaps a couple of dozen "neocons" in office - again I don't think you can accurately abscribe the shut down to an ideology; specifically to that ideology.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: No worries about the shutdown Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078