Yachtie
Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dcnovice quote:
Would you think most criminals would prefer what we have or a private court? I don't know. It's impossible to answer without knowing how private criminal courts would operate. quote:
The advantage is that the parties contesting pay for the court. The cost could be but a stipend, like the fee one gets paid for being a juror. Nominal. No need for the trappings of what we have today. Could be held in the town square, in public. Get a trained counselor, do it yourself, or ask your friend. Your choice. If the stipend's nominal, why would anyone want to serve as a judge? Would the trials be rooted in law or be more of a cross between Judge Judy and Springer? Would this system lead to more just results? The criminal aspect could be handled, even in today's environment, by either type court. Odds are, the weed would choose to go to private whereas the true injury would choose to go to equity. why would anyone want to serve as a judge? Civic service? I mean, it's not a job one would do day in, day out. No black robes.
_____________________________
“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC “Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell
|