LookieNoNookie
Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: joether quote:
ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic Well, Lucy, HuffnPoo isn't likely to mention it, and with you not being from around here we could hardly expect you to know, but let me educate you just a bit. Someone in this situation once would have had pretty easy access to MediCaid (which is a lot better than what an American is going to get on a Bronze Plan), but that access and eligibility was cut off by... wait for it... the earliest provisions of Obamacare to go into effect. Pretty drastic cuts to the already existing program which provided full service medical insurance to the neediest Americans went into place well ahead of the other changes of this law you find so cool. This created a stockpile of funding that could be used to hide the real cost of the new law for a while. It meant people would die, of course, but they are just blaming Republicans for that. After all. It's fine for Americans to die horribly, if the left can blame the right. YAY TEAM! Yep. Yachtie, Desi, myself and others all told everyone two years ago...."just wait...the cost is going to rise substantially, the deductible's will rise....they have to...it's just simple math...if you extend coverage to every kid until 26, remove the lifetime caps, it's just math. If car dealers are now required to provide free oil changes, tune ups and tires until you let the car go...a car ain't gonna cost 35 grand....it's gonna cost 100 grand or more". All the democrat types all said "Noooooooo....this is a beautiful thing....it's gonna cost less...Obama said so" Uh huh. Math doesn't lie. Politicians do. If the ACA is 'shit' as you state it, then perhaps each of you can supply me with your complete and detailed plan for a better healthcare system in America. When someone tells me that the President's plan sucks, I interpret that they have a much better idea that is well supported with documentation on hand. Only an idiot would attack the ACA and not have a better, well developed and strongly defendable under scrutiny of an idea, right? First you would need to give a detailed analysis of what was going on in the marketplace prior to the ACA being put into law. How the industry was doing. How individual Americans were handling things. And American businesses. After that, a very studied report on what improvements should be made to make the system viable for long term economic growth while helping Americans regardless of their financial status. This document of yours will need to be constitutional, since we'll present it to Congress. I know, you guys will do a great job in showing Americans that conservatives can use creative and innovating ideas that reduce costs from the individual on up to the federal government, while allowing the industry to make a good profit. Part of this plan will need to show how to reduce the number of bankruptcies due to medical bills. An you can not make it a cut/paste job. All work is yours originally. After all, don't you want the honor and thanks of the nation coming to you rather than some other person? Oh, and you'll have to be able to defend your work from us. Since you have been ripping apart the ACA for three years, its only fair to return the 'favor', right? Joether, do you seriously really need to see what a freshly baked, right out of the oven cherry pie looks, smells and tastes like to realize that a big steaming pile of shit that has an unusual and unsavory odor to it is absolutely not, of the two now clearly available choices....the correct one to stick a fork into and enjoy after a long evening of good steak and wine? Indeed, having been given only one option (the big steaming pile of shit), do you still need assistance as to what should not be served for desert? (Man...I thought you were smarter than that). (You won't be insulted then, if I and others may decline your offer of dinner).
|