RE: Gun control in the U.K. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


lovmuffin -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/21/2014 11:25:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
You added text to my post as if I wrote it. That is expressly forbidden.


OOPs, I sure as shit did. When I review the text before posting it I don't always look at what I'm quoting. I'm using a phone at the moment and I remember hitting something and lost what I was writing so I rewrote it. So thats where it went. My sincere apologies for that. Can it be fixed ? I hope you don't think I did it deliberately. When you responded to it I wasn't exactly sure what you were talking about. I thought you might have meant my opinion took your argument out of context.

As long as you didn't do it intentionally.


Honest I didn't but I stand by what I wrote in response to your original post, not including the part I accidently added. I suppose ya got something to say about that[8D]




DomKen -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/22/2014 6:36:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
You added text to my post as if I wrote it. That is expressly forbidden.


OOPs, I sure as shit did. When I review the text before posting it I don't always look at what I'm quoting. I'm using a phone at the moment and I remember hitting something and lost what I was writing so I rewrote it. So thats where it went. My sincere apologies for that. Can it be fixed ? I hope you don't think I did it deliberately. When you responded to it I wasn't exactly sure what you were talking about. I thought you might have meant my opinion took your argument out of context.

As long as you didn't do it intentionally.


Honest I didn't but I stand by what I wrote in response to your original post, not including the part I accidently added. I suppose ya got something to say about that[8D]

I already did, you were full of it.




jlf1961 -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/22/2014 7:39:52 AM)

Look, the UK has a damn good reason for limiting access to firearms, have you ever seen footage of the soccer riots? Could you imagine throwing semi auto pistols into the mess?

Seriously, I do not agree to the system they use, but I do feel that the US needs to improve registration and who can actually buy guns.




Yachtie -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/22/2014 8:04:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
I do feel that the US needs to improve registration and who can actually buy guns.


Oh hell!!! ATF should be a convenience store, not a government agency. [:D]




Politesub53 -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/22/2014 10:44:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

I posted the original link as just what I said, a dissenting opinion from the U.K. on U.K. gun control laws.

If you follow the link you see a pattern of criminalization of persons for doing what was formerly perfectly legal behavior. And the criminalization continuing to excess to the point a man was arrested for purchasing a book on home gunsmithing.

To me, it is an example of excessive use of force against law abiding citizens similar to that high school senior charged with a felony for having legal items in his car on school grounds.

Rules don't come on stone tablets from burning bushes any more. They are decisions made by fallible people. And when they are ridiculous; we, as citizens, should speak up for change. If you don't push back on ridiculous rules, soon everything that is not mandatory will be forbidden and George Orwell will have been a prophet.



I said it before, the link is bullshit. Try reading the history of UK gun laws. I have posted the facts before but cant be arsed to keep on doing it.




Lucylastic -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/22/2014 11:50:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Well, since there are numerous brits that feel free to opine that we should have gun control in the US, I think its only about fair that we should have a thread where we Yanks get to come and be rude and obnoxious and insist the brits should immediately institute a policy of mandatory gun ownership.


Yes yes, when our murder rates hit the level of yours, you have my permission to start posting like a prick.



Far too late for that




jlf1961 -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/22/2014 2:09:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I said it before, the link is bullshit. Try reading the history of UK gun laws. I have posted the facts before but cant be arsed to keep on doing it.


The link is bullshit.

I made it clear, the UK gun laws were put in place in anticipation of the Soccer riots.

Considering the number of Soccer riots in the UK and rest of Europe, if they had legal private ownership of guns, they would exceed American gun deaths 30 fold.

Besides the UK has a tradition of swords, not guns. And they have not made private ownership of a hand and a half or claymore illegal. The Brits pride themselves on getting up close and personal in their interpersonal debates.

Did Guy Fawkes use a gun?

Other than Cromwell, show me a point where the citizens of the UK were so pissed off at the government they staged a revolution.




lovmuffin -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/22/2014 4:38:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
You added text to my post as if I wrote it. That is expressly forbidden.


OOPs, I sure as shit did. When I review the text before posting it I don't always look at what I'm quoting. I'm using a phone at the moment and I remember hitting something and lost what I was writing so I rewrote it. So thats where it went. My sincere apologies for that. Can it be fixed ? I hope you don't think I did it deliberately. When you responded to it I wasn't exactly sure what you were talking about. I thought you might have meant my opinion took your argument out of context.

As long as you didn't do it intentionally.


Honest I didn't but I stand by what I wrote in response to your original post, not including the part I accidently added. I suppose ya got something to say about that[8D]

I already did, you were full of it.


Upon further reflection, I think my apology was a bit too mushy. Yes, I'm sorry I fucked up and added to your text. But, "as if you wrote it" ????? Seein what got added to your post was almost word for word in part of my response to you, one would have to be pretty dense to really think that is was intentional and especially written "as if you wrote it". As if[8D].....So I'm taking back a little more than half of that apology.

As for sayin I'm full of shit, I think even you can do better than that.




lovmuffin -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/22/2014 5:16:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

I posted the original link as just what I said, a dissenting opinion from the U.K. on U.K. gun control laws.

If you follow the link you see a pattern of criminalization of persons for doing what was formerly perfectly legal behavior. And the criminalization continuing to excess to the point a man was arrested for purchasing a book on home gunsmithing.

To me, it is an example of excessive use of force against law abiding citizens similar to that high school senior charged with a felony for having legal items in his car on school grounds.

Rules don't come on stone tablets from burning bushes any more. They are decisions made by fallible people. And when they are ridiculous; we, as citizens, should speak up for change. If you don't push back on ridiculous rules, soon everything that is not mandatory will be forbidden and George Orwell will have been a prophet.



I said it before, the link is bullshit. Try reading the history of UK gun laws. I have posted the facts before but cant be arsed to keep on doing it.


The parts of the article concerning the British requesting donations of firearms from Americans for the civilian population as the Germans were piling up across the channel because of having been previously disarmed and then disarming them once again after the war, was spot on. I posted an article on a thread some time ago about it sourced from a crap load of footnotes. Dumping those perfectly good firearms in the ocean was a pompous ass, ignorant typical beaurocratic stupid as shit fucking thing to do and something I didn't know. I tend to believe it.

However, if there are parts of the article linked in the OP that are not accurate, I would be sincerely interested to know (no snark intended). I won't even ask you for a link. If you can point something out, I'll take your word for it.




Politesub53 -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/22/2014 5:38:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

I posted the original link as just what I said, a dissenting opinion from the U.K. on U.K. gun control laws.

If you follow the link you see a pattern of criminalization of persons for doing what was formerly perfectly legal behavior. And the criminalization continuing to excess to the point a man was arrested for purchasing a book on home gunsmithing.

To me, it is an example of excessive use of force against law abiding citizens similar to that high school senior charged with a felony for having legal items in his car on school grounds.

Rules don't come on stone tablets from burning bushes any more. They are decisions made by fallible people. And when they are ridiculous; we, as citizens, should speak up for change. If you don't push back on ridiculous rules, soon everything that is not mandatory will be forbidden and George Orwell will have been a prophet.



I said it before, the link is bullshit. Try reading the history of UK gun laws. I have posted the facts before but cant be arsed to keep on doing it.


The parts of the article concerning the British requesting donations of firearms from Americans for the civilian population as the Germans were piling up across the channel because of having been previously disarmed and then disarming them once again after the war, was spot on. I posted an article on a thread some time ago about it sourced from a crap load of footnotes. Dumping those perfectly good firearms in the ocean was a pompous ass, ignorant typical beaurocratic stupid as shit fucking thing to do and something I didn't know. I tend to believe it.

However, if there are parts of the link in the OP that are not accurate, I would be sincerely interested to know (no snark intended). I won't even ask you for a link. If you can point something out, I'll take your word for it.


I have posted on it before and wont do so again. Try using search ro even Google. (no snark intended)




lovmuffin -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/22/2014 6:15:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

I posted the original link as just what I said, a dissenting opinion from the U.K. on U.K. gun control laws.

If you follow the link you see a pattern of criminalization of persons for doing what was formerly perfectly legal behavior. And the criminalization continuing to excess to the point a man was arrested for purchasing a book on home gunsmithing.

To me, it is an example of excessive use of force against law abiding citizens similar to that high school senior charged with a felony for having legal items in his car on school grounds.

Rules don't come on stone tablets from burning bushes any more. They are decisions made by fallible people. And when they are ridiculous; we, as citizens, should speak up for change. If you don't push back on ridiculous rules, soon everything that is not mandatory will be forbidden and George Orwell will have been a prophet.



I said it before, the link is bullshit. Try reading the history of UK gun laws. I have posted the facts before but cant be arsed to keep on doing it.


The parts of the article concerning the British requesting donations of firearms from Americans for the civilian population as the Germans were piling up across the channel because of having been previously disarmed and then disarming them once again after the war, was spot on. I posted an article on a thread some time ago about it sourced from a crap load of footnotes. Dumping those perfectly good firearms in the ocean was a pompous ass, ignorant typical beaurocratic stupid as shit fucking thing to do and something I didn't know. I tend to believe it.

However, if there are parts of the link in the OP that are not accurate, I would be sincerely interested to know (no snark intended). I won't even ask you for a link. If you can point something out, I'll take your word for it.


I have posted on it before and wont do so again. Try using search ro even Google. (no snark intended)



Thought so[8D] (snark intended)




lovmuffin -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/22/2014 6:47:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I said it before, the link is bullshit. Try reading the history of UK gun laws. I have posted the facts before but cant be arsed to keep on doing it.


The link is bullshit.

I made it clear, the UK gun laws were put in place in anticipation of the Soccer riots.

Considering the number of Soccer riots in the UK and rest of Europe, if they had legal private ownership of guns, they would exceed American gun deaths 30 fold.

Besides the UK has a tradition of swords, not guns. And they have not made private ownership of a hand and a half or claymore illegal. The Brits pride themselves on getting up close and personal in their interpersonal debates.

Did Guy Fawkes use a gun?

Other than Cromwell, show me a point where the citizens of the UK were so pissed off at the government they staged a revolution.


As much as I took your post as sarcasm, after thinking about it there may be some truth to it.


BTW, post # 63, "improve registration" ??? Say you don't mean it jlf, I'm crushed.




jlf1961 -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/22/2014 7:34:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I said it before, the link is bullshit. Try reading the history of UK gun laws. I have posted the facts before but cant be arsed to keep on doing it.


The link is bullshit.

I made it clear, the UK gun laws were put in place in anticipation of the Soccer riots.

Considering the number of Soccer riots in the UK and rest of Europe, if they had legal private ownership of guns, they would exceed American gun deaths 30 fold.

Besides the UK has a tradition of swords, not guns. And they have not made private ownership of a hand and a half or claymore illegal. The Brits pride themselves on getting up close and personal in their interpersonal debates.

Did Guy Fawkes use a gun?

Other than Cromwell, show me a point where the citizens of the UK were so pissed off at the government they staged a revolution.


As much as I took your post as sarcasm, after thinking about it there may be some truth to it.


BTW, post # 63, "improve registration" ??? Say you don't mean it jlf, I'm crushed.



Technically we already 'register' a fire arm at purchase. That information is available to the ATF whenever they want it. My problem is like the Virginia Tech shooter who had a history of violent mental illness who, hours before he started shooting on campus, he bought another gun.





BamaD -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/22/2014 7:36:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I said it before, the link is bullshit. Try reading the history of UK gun laws. I have posted the facts before but cant be arsed to keep on doing it.


The link is bullshit.

I made it clear, the UK gun laws were put in place in anticipation of the Soccer riots.

Considering the number of Soccer riots in the UK and rest of Europe, if they had legal private ownership of guns, they would exceed American gun deaths 30 fold.

Besides the UK has a tradition of swords, not guns. And they have not made private ownership of a hand and a half or claymore illegal. The Brits pride themselves on getting up close and personal in their interpersonal debates.

Did Guy Fawkes use a gun?

Other than Cromwell, show me a point where the citizens of the UK were so pissed off at the government they staged a revolution.


As much as I took your post as sarcasm, after thinking about it there may be some truth to it.


BTW, post # 63, "improve registration" ??? Say you don't mean it jlf, I'm crushed.



Technically we already 'register' a fire arm at purchase. That information is available to the ATF whenever they want it. My problem is like the Virginia Tech shooter who had a history of violent mental illness who, hours before he started shooting on campus, he bought another gun.



And the evaluation said he was a danger "to himself and others"
I considerate criminal that this information wasn't in the data base.




Phydeaux -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/23/2014 12:36:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Well, since there are numerous brits that feel free to opine that we should have gun control in the US, I think its only about fair that we should have a thread where we Yanks get to come and be rude and obnoxious and insist the brits should immediately institute a policy of mandatory gun ownership.


Yes yes, when our murder rates hit the level of yours, you have my permission to start posting like a prick.



Far too late for that


Coming from a person who's consistent content is mere snark, I should think the irony would be overpowering.




crazyml -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/23/2014 1:07:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I made it clear, the UK gun laws were put in place in anticipation of the Soccer riots.


This isn't true at all. The most recent and draconian laws were put in place in the wake of the Hungerford massacre.

quote:




Considering the number of Soccer riots in the UK and rest of Europe, if they had legal private ownership of guns, they would exceed American gun deaths 30 fold.


Two problems with this. First, the number of soccer riots in the UK and the rest of Europe has declined dramatically over the past decade. Secondly other European countries have much more relaxed gun laws.

quote:



Besides the UK has a tradition of swords, not guns. And they have not made private ownership of a hand and a half or claymore illegal. The Brits pride themselves on getting up close and personal in their interpersonal debates.


I'm not sure this is true, we have a history of using swords because, well ... our history goes back that far (no snark intended).

One thing, in terms of history, that I think might be important is that we don't have a recent (relatively so) history of subsistence by hunting, largely because of the length of time that big chunks of the uk have been settled and farmed (not to mention "enclosed" by landlords). Whereas 200 years ago big chunks of the USA were wilderness.

quote:


Did Guy Fawkes use a gun?


No, I'm pretty sure that he didn't spend much time pondering over whether he thought he should use a gun to blow up the houses of parliament vs many barrels of gunpowder.

We're talking about 1605... firearm technology was still pretty rudimentary.

quote:



Other than Cromwell, show me a point where the citizens of the UK were so pissed off at the government they staged a revolution.


Well... as a functioning democracy, we've not had any particular cause since then?






crazyml -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/23/2014 2:20:07 AM)

To the OP...

We have strict gun control in the UK because our elected representatives in Parliament voted to implement those controls.

If there were a significant number of people in the UK who advocated the freedom to own guns it would become a political topic, and something that political parties would have to take a stand on one way or another. If a majority of British MP's were elected with a mandate to relax gun controls, they'd be relaxed.

Right... I appreciate that that's a somewhat simplistic take, but I'd say it was pretty close - The reason we have tighter gun controls in the UK is simply that the vast majority of the people in the UK are opposed to more relaxed gun regulation.

If something terrible happened, and the number of illegal guns in the UK rose to such a level that ordinary people felt it necessary to carry a gun, we'd have a change in the law.

As an example, when the Labour government banned hunting with dogs (largely targeted at fox hunting) close to 100,000 people held demonstrations outside Parliament to protest. When the 1988 Firearms (Amendment) Act was passed (In the wake of the Hungerford massacre) , there was no protest (or if there was, none that I was aware of), the same was true of the 1997 act to ban all hand guns (in the wake of the Dunblane massacre).

It's also really important to point out that, I can own some pretty awesome rifles if I want to... I just need to demonstrate that I have a good reason (something I can legally shoot at, and land I have permission to shoot on). Sure, autos and semis are banned... but a chunky bolt-action rifle is eminently ownable.

As many people have pointed out - there are massive historical and cultural differences between the UK and the US that make comparisons really difficult.

Firstly, gun ownership has never been that widespread. For starters, we don't have a culture of hunting (lacking anywhere you can meaningfully hunt). We also don't have the same history of discovery and expansion as the US has, it's been a long time since settlers had to forge out into wilderness and establish themselves in the face of a hostile environment and sometimes hostile natives.

Our "revolution" happened in the 1640's, since then we've had a pretty stable and more or less functional democracy. One of the side effects of this is that Brits, and I'd say Europeans generally, are more trusting of Government than Americans. (In fact I think this is by far the biggest difference between the US and Europe).

None of this, of course, is because Brits/Euros are better or smarter (which is nonsense) it's just a question of history.

So simplistic comparisons between the UK and the USA aren't worth shit. But that isn't to say that lessons cannot be learnt.

One of the key reasons that we have a lower rate of gun crime in the UK is definitely the fact that we have fewer guns. Note that I don't claim a lower rate of violent crime here, but if guns were freely available, I'm pretty fucking sure we'd have more gun crime.

Equally, if there were a magic wand that could immediately make every gun in the USA disappear, I don't think that anyone can rationally deny that this would have an immediate impact on gun related crime. That is to say, in order for there to be a gun related crime there's no getting around the fact that there has to be a gun.

I appreciate that this idea is absurd.... there is no magic wand. But it's not necessarily a pointless exercise. Thinking it through... would there be an impact on violent crime? Well, it certainly wouldn't eradicate violent crime, but there's not much doubt that it is harder to kill someone with a knife than a Colt 45.

But... the magic wand solution ain't going to happen - on account of "magic" not actually being a "thing".

And there are so many guns in circulation, and so many unregistered guns, that "passing a law" wouldn't actually work. So a blind belief in "more gun regulation" isn't going to solve the problem. But I would also say that a blind belief in "no gun regulation" isn't going to solve it either.

So yeah, I can understand the frustration that many of my American friends feel at the default stand by some Brits/Euros that the gun situation we have somehow makes us "better " or "smarter" - Because we know that is bullshit.

But equally, setting aside the gun control poseurs... I'm pretty sure that there are some lessons that can be drawn from the British/European experience.





Politesub53 -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/23/2014 3:26:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

Thought so[8D] (snark intended)


Yes, your "No snark intended " comment didnt fool anyone.

Try posting anything from the OP, and backing it up with facts (Not distortions). (Even the myth that guns from the US public were delivered to UK citizens, let alone collected after the war.

If you manage that, try and find some "facts" from the Op that tell the whole truth and dont include lies or spin.

I will give you one or two of the points hold some half truths, no more and no less.






Politesub53 -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/23/2014 3:31:12 AM)

JLF....... "Other than Cromwell, show me a point where the citizens of the UK were so pissed off at the government they staged a revolution."

Plenty of examples in the history books, as Crazy says they were mostly prior to Cromwell.




jlf1961 -> RE: Gun control in the U.K. (3/23/2014 4:47:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

JLF....... "Other than Cromwell, show me a point where the citizens of the UK were so pissed off at the government they staged a revolution."

Plenty of examples in the history books, as Crazy says they were mostly prior to Cromwell.



Look, I may not agree with restricting ownership and access to guns as they do in the UK, but as that I am not a citizen of the UK, I fail to see where I have the right to criticize.

Granted, should the UK get hit with a Zombie outbreak, you guys are totally screwed, but the odds of that are kinda slim.

Yes the US has some pretty liberal gun laws, and it is made worse by the fact that nobody shares information. The background checks do not flag mental health issues that could indicate a violent person who should not own a pen knife let alone a gun.

My reasons for owning guns are simple, I hunt various game and some of the guns are for specific animals (and if these feral hogs get any bigger I am going to want a damn cannon) and the fact that I personally believe that civilization is going to collapse, probably because some rich guy is going to go on a vacation into some remote jungle, pick up a virus that the makes ebola look like a common cold, and bring it back to the rest of the world.

I have had the opportunity to see just how fast a situation can get so far out of hand that no one is in control. I am referring to the riots in LA after the Rodney King verdict. The few businesses that didn't get burned out had the owner protecting them with a legally owned gun.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625