Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 7:26:38 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

I refuse to think that either fed or state or local govt are "efficient".


That about sums you up. From this fixed idea, all of your other ideas flow -- and contrary facts get discarded.

You fail to see the inefficiencies of the free market at all: allocation of capital in too few hands, externalizing pollution costs, relying on business models for health care services -- just to name the big three.

The greatest inefficiency I've seen in our Federal Government is military spending -- at the opportunity cost of maintaining our own infrastructure here at home. The nation building in Afghanistan and IRAQ has been a huge waste as have the payments to "allegedly more efficient" private contractors operating in those regions.

< Message edited by cloudboy -- 4/14/2014 7:27:38 AM >

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 8:16:21 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

While I completely agree that things could change, after the 2012 election the right wing just didn't seem to understand WHY they failed to take the white house. They got a slap in the face, then continued on doing what they've constantly been doing. Insulting the current president, coming up with fake scandals, continuing on their rampage of removing women reproductive rights, hard stances on small crimes like pot possession, preventing gay marriage, blatantly denying science, failing to appeal to minorities, trying to restrict voting in primarily democratic ridings, trying to put christianity above other religions, etc. Until they realize that these policies and these actions are turning people away from their party, they won't win another election, whether it be the midterm elections or presidential. The average people are much more sensible and moderate than the right wing thinks, and by going to the extreme will just alienate themselves and make things worse for their party.



Yeah, you get paid a lot of money to prognosticate on US elections, OH canadian citizen.

The republicans couldn't settle on a candidate. Do you recall that they have 5 front runner candidates. In the end, their last man standing was Romney. Who alienated a significant portion of the republican base. Ie., evangelicals and tea partiers.

He was elitist, and he fell down on the third debate. He should have gone for the jugular, instead he gambled on cruising on the strength of his 2nd debate performance.

Now, there is no question that long term, that the democrats have successfully created a problem by creating a self identifying hispanic minority.
However unrecognized is the fact that balkanization of minorities will probably put asians in the gop camp.

But none of the issues you raised really are the germane GOP problems. Its demographics, not issues.

(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 8:19:42 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
The GOP really is off the map on issues, they have no prescriptive solutions for real problems, they can name post offices after St. Wrinklemeat, borrow and spend, and pork up defense, but those have proven over and over again to be nothing but destructive.

Don't matter who runs, at present they are unelectable.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 8:23:13 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

quote:

I refuse to think that either fed or state or local govt are "efficient".


That about sums you up. From this fixed idea, all of your other ideas flow -- and contrary facts get discarded.

You fail to see the inefficiencies of the free market at all: allocation of capital in too few hands, externalizing pollution costs, relying on business models for health care services -- just to name the big three.

The greatest inefficiency I've seen in our Federal Government is military spending -- at the opportunity cost of maintaining our own infrastructure here at home. The nation building in Afghanistan and IRAQ has been a huge waste as have the payments to "allegedly more efficient" private contractors operating in those regions.


First of all. You obviously don't know what I think.
Since I agree that corporations, and unions (and government) are too big, and have too much money. I just don't agree with the democratic prescriptions.

Second. I don't agree with "externalizing pollution costs" at ALL. So don't blow that noise at me. People and companies should not be allowed to pollute. And if it isn't possible to clean they should pay an appropriate cost. For example, hexavalent chrome is carcinogenic, deadly and probably borderline illegal.

But I don't agree that CO2 is a pollutant.

Finally, government directed (and oversighted) contractor spending in afghan. and iraq is hardly an example of free markets, is it?

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 8:28:25 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I am amused constantly by the mythical asswipe that is passed off as a reality and an ideal.


Where, on the face of this earth; EVER; has there existed a free market? If such a thing ever existed, it was before recorded history, and there was not any form of government extant.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 11:57:09 AM   
Tkman117


Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline
It's called Somalia

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 12:17:10 PM   
Tkman117


Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

quote:

I refuse to think that either fed or state or local govt are "efficient".


That about sums you up. From this fixed idea, all of your other ideas flow -- and contrary facts get discarded.

You fail to see the inefficiencies of the free market at all: allocation of capital in too few hands, externalizing pollution costs, relying on business models for health care services -- just to name the big three.

The greatest inefficiency I've seen in our Federal Government is military spending -- at the opportunity cost of maintaining our own infrastructure here at home. The nation building in Afghanistan and IRAQ has been a huge waste as have the payments to "allegedly more efficient" private contractors operating in those regions.


But I don't agree that CO2 is a pollutant.



Of course you don't, because after all too much of anything natural is totally not a bad thing

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 12:26:33 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

quote:

I refuse to think that either fed or state or local govt are "efficient".


That about sums you up. From this fixed idea, all of your other ideas flow -- and contrary facts get discarded.

You fail to see the inefficiencies of the free market at all: allocation of capital in too few hands, externalizing pollution costs, relying on business models for health care services -- just to name the big three.

The greatest inefficiency I've seen in our Federal Government is military spending -- at the opportunity cost of maintaining our own infrastructure here at home. The nation building in Afghanistan and IRAQ has been a huge waste as have the payments to "allegedly more efficient" private contractors operating in those regions.


But I don't agree that CO2 is a pollutant.



Of course you don't, because after all too much of anything natural is totally not a bad thing


And you're idea of "too much" is a few piddling parts per MILLION

(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 12:37:49 PM   
Tkman117


Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline
And you fail to realize understand that a few parts per million can have a bigger impact than you're willing to admit, all because your ego wouldn't be able to handle being wrong. CO2 concentrations have risen to 380 ppm by the early 2000s, well over the range of 180-300 ppm of natural variation. CO2 helps to keep the planet warm, as does methane in the parts per billion (which has risen from the natural variation range of 350 -700 ppb over the last 400,000 years to 1750 ppb since the 1800s). If these ranges of greenhouse gases has kept the planet warm enough to sustain life, then to assume an extra 80 ppm of CO2 and an extra 1000 or so ppb of methane will do nothing is not only bad science, but it's also extremely presumptuous and idiotic. Not to mention Humans release about 6 billion metric tons of CO2 yearly world wide, so to say that its a few parts per million fails to take into consideration just how much we produce and continue to produce.

< Message edited by Tkman117 -- 4/14/2014 12:40:22 PM >

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 2:36:46 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117
While I completely agree that things could change, after the 2012 election the right wing just didn't seem to understand WHY they failed to take the white house. They got a slap in the face, then continued on doing what they've constantly been doing. Insulting the current president, coming up with fake scandals, continuing on their rampage of removing women reproductive rights, hard stances on small crimes like pot possession, preventing gay marriage, blatantly denying science, failing to appeal to minorities, trying to restrict voting in primarily democratic ridings, trying to put christianity above other religions, etc. Until they realize that these policies and these actions are turning people away from their party, they won't win another election, whether it be the midterm elections or presidential. The average people are much more sensible and moderate than the right wing thinks, and by going to the extreme will just alienate themselves and make things worse for their party.


Almost everything you just put out is Liberal rhetoric for what the GOP is doing. Nothing more.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 2:45:47 PM   
Tkman117


Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline
Hey, if you wana deny reasons why people won't vote for the right, be my guest. People don't like it when they're discriminated against, and the GOP has been doing plenty of that over the last few years

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 4:20:07 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117
While I completely agree that things could change, after the 2012 election the right wing just didn't seem to understand WHY they failed to take the white house. They got a slap in the face, then continued on doing what they've constantly been doing. Insulting the current president, coming up with fake scandals, continuing on their rampage of removing women reproductive rights, hard stances on small crimes like pot possession, preventing gay marriage, blatantly denying science, failing to appeal to minorities, trying to restrict voting in primarily democratic ridings, trying to put christianity above other religions, etc. Until they realize that these policies and these actions are turning people away from their party, they won't win another election, whether it be the midterm elections or presidential. The average people are much more sensible and moderate than the right wing thinks, and by going to the extreme will just alienate themselves and make things worse for their party.


Almost everything you just put out is Liberal rhetoric for what the GOP is doing. Nothing more.


Nothing more? What more would it need? It's a list of actual GOP positions.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 6:54:05 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117
While I completely agree that things could change, after the 2012 election the right wing just didn't seem to understand WHY they failed to take the white house. They got a slap in the face, then continued on doing what they've constantly been doing. Insulting the current president, coming up with fake scandals, continuing on their rampage of removing women reproductive rights, hard stances on small crimes like pot possession, preventing gay marriage, blatantly denying science, failing to appeal to minorities, trying to restrict voting in primarily democratic ridings, trying to put christianity above other religions, etc. Until they realize that these policies and these actions are turning people away from their party, they won't win another election, whether it be the midterm elections or presidential. The average people are much more sensible and moderate than the right wing thinks, and by going to the extreme will just alienate themselves and make things worse for their party.

Almost everything you just put out is Liberal rhetoric for what the GOP is doing. Nothing more.

Nothing more? What more would it need? It's a list of actual GOP positions.


You are correct. It is a list of GOP positions, according to the rhetoric of the Left.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 7:03:30 PM   
Tkman117


Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline
So...the GOP isn't doing all those things...

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 9:02:11 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

And you fail to realize understand that a few parts per million can have a bigger impact than you're willing to admit, all because your ego wouldn't be able to handle being wrong. CO2 concentrations have risen to 380 ppm by the early 2000s, well over the range of 180-300 ppm of natural variation. CO2 helps to keep the planet warm, as does methane in the parts per billion (which has risen from the natural variation range of 350 -700 ppb over the last 400,000 years to 1750 ppb since the 1800s). If these ranges of greenhouse gases has kept the planet warm enough to sustain life, then to assume an extra 80 ppm of CO2 and an extra 1000 or so ppb of methane will do nothing is not only bad science, but it's also extremely presumptuous and idiotic. Not to mention Humans release about 6 billion metric tons of CO2 yearly world wide, so to say that its a few parts per million fails to take into consideration just how much we produce and continue to produce.


Natural range of 180-300 according to whom?

Are you really so ignorant of the historical record?
http://www.biocab.org/carbon_dioxide_geological_timescale.html

Ie., historically, our co2 levels are damn near at LOWS.

(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 9:17:04 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117
While I completely agree that things could change, after the 2012 election the right wing just didn't seem to understand WHY they failed to take the white house. They got a slap in the face, then continued on doing what they've constantly been doing. Insulting the current president, coming up with fake scandals, continuing on their rampage of removing women reproductive rights, hard stances on small crimes like pot possession, preventing gay marriage, blatantly denying science, failing to appeal to minorities, trying to restrict voting in primarily democratic ridings, trying to put christianity above other religions, etc. Until they realize that these policies and these actions are turning people away from their party, they won't win another election, whether it be the midterm elections or presidential. The average people are much more sensible and moderate than the right wing thinks, and by going to the extreme will just alienate themselves and make things worse for their party.

Almost everything you just put out is Liberal rhetoric for what the GOP is doing. Nothing more.

Nothing more? What more would it need? It's a list of actual GOP positions.


You are correct. It is a list of GOP positions, according to the rhetoric of the Left.


DS, I mean this in all sincerity...

The GOP and their Tea Party lackeys have serious breaches of reality on most of the subject matters in the country. Pick a topic, and their viewpoint is so well off the road of 'sanity', 'sensibility', or 'rational' as to render the idea silly. For example, to pay down the US Debt, they want to cut spending in only that areas that they don't care about. The problem here, is to actually cut that spending down will require raising taxes. It could be done in the present, and the rate will be small; or held off for several years and be a REAL burden on the average American. Or on gun control, when most people say that those with mental or emotional problems should NEVER be allowed a firearm for obvious reasons; the GOP/TP defends it relentless. Immigration is another problem in the nation. The GOP/TP's solution is to walk in their directly of the Nazis in the 1930s; its not helpful by any stretch of the imagination. An that there is enough evidence on the table that the nation's infrastructure should be improved. Yet, the GOP/TP is against this since it would: A ) increase job availability, B ) improve local economies that feed into the national economy, C ) update things with 1950's technology for 2014, and D ) Protect this nation from domestic terrorism. Heck, the GOP/TP is against the stuff that has NEVER been a problem in Congress before: voting on whether so and so can have one new intern because the last one graduated.

This is also the organization that spearheaded completely shutting down the US Government back in November of 2013. In the time frame of the partial shutdown, the GOP/TP cost the American public $18 billion in damages. Those came in the form for many, as their livelihoods were directly threaten. The most noted are those in the tourism business that provided a way to see national parks to visitors in a state. Do you really think those Americans will vote Republican/Tea Party after their businesses were almost destroyed?

There are no good ideas coming out of the Republican/Tea Party for over a decade now. And Americans are starting to show their distaste by not voting them into office. Why do you think the GOP/TP crusades against voter fraud, when the reality is, it is not happening? Less people that vote, the more likely Republican/Tea Party wins.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 9:17:24 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

The March Gallup poll found 59 percent personally worry about “the economy” a great deal; 58 percent said they worry about “federal spending and the deficit,” 57 percent “the availability and affordability of health care,” 49 percent “unemployment,” and 48 percent “the size and power of the federal government.”

Rarely will you find a political environment as golden for a Republican policy agenda as this one.


Bottom three issues:

Quality of the Environment.
Climate change.
Race relations.

This is why dimocrats have desperately been manufacturing issues, as an attempt to avoid a conversation on the big 5 issues.
Minimum wage.
Immigration.
Gender Gap.
blah blah blah blah.

All are attempts by the administration and a lap dog media to avoid do anything possible to avoid having discussions on the big issues.
Because they know they are on the wrong side of those issues.



Thank GAWD I know everything.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 9:25:11 PM   
Tkman117


Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline
Those are ranges I'm citing from a textbook (Earth's Climate Past and Future, William F. Ruddiman), but here's a link to more recent info as the textbook I have isn't the most recent edition (2nd as opposed to 3rd). Also these ranges cover the last 21,000 years since the Last Glacial Maximum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide_in_Earth's_atmosphere#Past_concentration

"The most widely accepted of such studies come from a variety of Antarctic cores and indicate that atmospheric CO2 concentrations were about 260–280 ppmv immediately before industrial emissions began and did not vary much from this level during the preceding 10,000 years. In 1832 Antarctic ice core levels were 284 ppmv.[29]

The longest ice core record comes from East Antarctica, where ice has been sampled to an age of 800,000 years.[9] During this time, the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration has varied between 180–210 ppm during ice ages, increasing to 280–300 ppm during warmer interglacials.[30][31] The beginning of human agriculture during the current Holocene epoch may have been strongly connected to the atmospheric CO2 increase after the last ice age ended, a fertilization effect raising plant biomass growth and reducing stomatal conductance requirements for CO2 intake, consequently reducing transpiration water losses and increasing water usage efficiency.[32]"

And historically levels are near lows? Ya, I agree. In the past CO2 concentrations were as high as 3000 ppm in order 200 to 150 million years ago to compensate for a weaker sun/lower insolation. Over time insolation increased due to the sun's aging and the climate reacted through a variety of processes, you'd know this if you ever heard of the faint young sun paradox and the various ways earth's thermostat is managed, such as chemical weathering, biological factors (Gaia hypothesis), etc. Comparing the CO2 concentrations of present day to back then is like comparing a cup of water to an ocean, it's juvenile to think that just because one condition was higher in the past doesn't mean any other variables were different too.

I don't think your problem is the science Phydeaux, I think you just have an inability to picture how fragile the climate is to human influence. The world isn't massive anymore, humans cause more of an impact than you're willing to admit. Already we have seen a global warming average of 0.7 degrees Celsius, with much more heat trapped in the oceans due to thermal inertia. Eventually that heat will be released back into the climate system, it's only a matter of time.

< Message edited by Tkman117 -- 4/14/2014 9:28:07 PM >

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 9:33:56 PM   
Tkman117


Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline
Also from your own link:

"From the early Triassic to the middle Cretaceous, the concentration of atmospheric Carbon Dioxide was similar to its current density. From the late cretaceous to the early Miocene, the concentration climbed above 210 ppmV. During the Holocene period, the concentration has oscillated from 210 ppmV to 385 ppmV."

These ranges, while not exactly 180-300 as I stated earlier, are fairly close. Or are they? Because after all it is just a few measly ppm as you've said. I'll let you decide

(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics - 4/14/2014 10:52:26 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117
While I completely agree that things could change, after the 2012 election the right wing just didn't seem to understand WHY they failed to take the white house. They got a slap in the face, then continued on doing what they've constantly been doing. Insulting the current president, coming up with fake scandals, continuing on their rampage of removing women reproductive rights, hard stances on small crimes like pot possession, preventing gay marriage, blatantly denying science, failing to appeal to minorities, trying to restrict voting in primarily democratic ridings, trying to put christianity above other religions, etc. Until they realize that these policies and these actions are turning people away from their party, they won't win another election, whether it be the midterm elections or presidential. The average people are much more sensible and moderate than the right wing thinks, and by going to the extreme will just alienate themselves and make things worse for their party.

Almost everything you just put out is Liberal rhetoric for what the GOP is doing. Nothing more.

Nothing more? What more would it need? It's a list of actual GOP positions.

You are correct. It is a list of GOP positions, according to the rhetoric of the Left.

DS, I mean this in all sincerity...
The GOP and their Tea Party lackeys have serious breaches of reality on most of the subject matters in the country. Pick a topic, and their viewpoint is so well off the road of 'sanity', 'sensibility', or 'rational' as to render the idea silly. For example, to pay down the US Debt, they want to cut spending in only that areas that they don't care about. The problem here, is to actually cut that spending down will require raising taxes. It could be done in the present, and the rate will be small; or held off for several years and be a REAL burden on the average American. Or on gun control, when most people say that those with mental or emotional problems should NEVER be allowed a firearm for obvious reasons; the GOP/TP defends it relentless. Immigration is another problem in the nation. The GOP/TP's solution is to walk in their directly of the Nazis in the 1930s; its not helpful by any stretch of the imagination. An that there is enough evidence on the table that the nation's infrastructure should be improved. Yet, the GOP/TP is against this since it would: A ) increase job availability, B ) improve local economies that feed into the national economy, C ) update things with 1950's technology for 2014, and D ) Protect this nation from domestic terrorism. Heck, the GOP/TP is against the stuff that has NEVER been a problem in Congress before: voting on whether so and so can have one new intern because the last one graduated.
This is also the organization that spearheaded completely shutting down the US Government back in November of 2013. In the time frame of the partial shutdown, the GOP/TP cost the American public $18 billion in damages. Those came in the form for many, as their livelihoods were directly threaten. The most noted are those in the tourism business that provided a way to see national parks to visitors in a state. Do you really think those Americans will vote Republican/Tea Party after their businesses were almost destroyed?
There are no good ideas coming out of the Republican/Tea Party for over a decade now. And Americans are starting to show their distaste by not voting them into office. Why do you think the GOP/TP crusades against voter fraud, when the reality is, it is not happening? Less people that vote, the more likely Republican/Tea Party wins.


You mean that in all sincerity, Joether, and so do the rest of the Liberal shills.




_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Upcoming elections - America's hot button topics Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109