Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The French Learn Their Lesson


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The French Learn Their Lesson Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 8 [9]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The French Learn Their Lesson - 2/2/2015 10:55:50 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
IT's on the list--look again.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 161
RE: The French Learn Their Lesson - 2/2/2015 10:57:15 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Well then, in this case, they have 400,000 support personnel to every radical group member.

The US has 1,373,183 active personnel. So by your "shadow" theory, the US would need additional "support" of 549 billion people.

Since the US population is 316 million, and the world population is 7 billion, we're about 548.7 billion people short.




I am pretty sure that we do NOT have over a million military members specifically assigned to blow shit up and kill people.

Who said that you have to have equal support to violence ratios?

Why are you making up your own little arguments?

The question was about why not every person in a group was part of the sub-group that blew shit up and killed people.

The answer has to do with logistics.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 162
RE: The French Learn Their Lesson - 2/2/2015 10:57:16 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
But you guys are derailing the convo. North Korea does not speak French.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 163
RE: The French Learn Their Lesson - 2/2/2015 10:58:38 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

IT's on the list--look again.

admitedly I scrolled and didnt look:) MY bad:)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 164
RE: The French Learn Their Lesson - 2/2/2015 11:00:20 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

You wanted to know why not every Muslim blows shit up and kills people. Because they do not have to. You only need a percent of the group doing so to be effective. The rest fill support roles.


"The rest just fill support roles"?

I'm sorry, but that's just senseless, Aylee.


What is the most important consideration in war/battles? Logistics. Yes, you have the folks that actually fight. Then you have everyone else. Those that grow food, make cloth, pay taxes, pump fuel, maintain roads, train soldiers, teach reading and math, comfort the grieving. . . and the list goes on.

How many people does it take to keep one soldier in the field? In the feudal days wasn't it something like 50 peasants to one mounted knight? And that did not count women and children, I believe.

Logistics is only senseless if you have never cracked a book with Clausevitz, Sun Tzu, Alexander, and so forth or have studiously avoided any mention of them.

"The line between disorder and order lies in logistics…"
- Sun Tzu

"There is nothing more common than to find considerations of supply affecting the strategic lines of a campaign and a war."
- Carl von Clausevitz

"My logisticians are a humorless lot ... they know if my campaign fails, they are the first ones I will slay."
- Alexander

Amateurs talk tactics, professionals talk logistics.


Of course with terrorists being....terrorists none of your logistics bullshit means diddly.
The logistical support needed for a suicide bomber I daresay is quite different than that needed to field a standing army....which is pretty much what is being referred to in all of your quotes.
Reducing the above post to nothing more than another "lets ban the pools" posting
You really do have an affinity for apples and oranges,don't you ?


Are you actually suggesting that Sam the Suicide Bomber has no support group?

Where did he get his money? How did he pick his target? Bomb making materials? Indoctrination on why strapping on a vest and blowing yourself up is a fine idea?

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 165
RE: The French Learn Their Lesson - 2/2/2015 11:06:03 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Well then, in this case, they have 400,000 support personnel to every radical group member.

The US has 1,373,183 active personnel. So by your "shadow" theory, the US would need additional "support" of 549 billion people.

Since the US population is 316 million, and the world population is 7 billion, we're about 548.7 billion people short.




I am pretty sure that we do NOT have over a million military members specifically assigned to blow shit up and kill people.

Who said that you have to have equal support to violence ratios?

Why are you making up your own little arguments?

The question was about why not every person in a group was part of the sub-group that blew shit up and killed people.

The answer has to do with logistics.

Yup, that's your argument -- that the vast majority of peaceful Muslims are actually support staff for the fighters. That's a ratio of 400,000 to 1. If the US military used that ratio, it would have, at its current size, 3 soldiers.

Thank god actual logisticians are good at math.

You, however, are just making up a ridiculous and unsupported argument, and when shown how ridiculous it is, doubling down on ridiculousness.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 166
RE: The French Learn Their Lesson - 2/2/2015 11:11:26 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
WHAT ME...carried away!!!! and I thought you knew me.

Butcvh

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 167
RE: The French Learn Their Lesson - 2/2/2015 11:12:19 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
LOL

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 168
RE: The French Learn Their Lesson - 2/2/2015 11:29:07 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

You wanted to know why not every Muslim blows shit up and kills people. Because they do not have to. You only need a percent of the group doing so to be effective. The rest fill support roles.


"The rest just fill support roles"?

I'm sorry, but that's just senseless, Aylee.


What is the most important consideration in war/battles? Logistics. Yes, you have the folks that actually fight. Then you have everyone else. Those that grow food, make cloth, pay taxes, pump fuel, maintain roads, train soldiers, teach reading and math, comfort the grieving. . . and the list goes on.

How many people does it take to keep one soldier in the field? In the feudal days wasn't it something like 50 peasants to one mounted knight? And that did not count women and children, I believe.

Logistics is only senseless if you have never cracked a book with Clausevitz, Sun Tzu, Alexander, and so forth or have studiously avoided any mention of them.

"The line between disorder and order lies in logistics…"
- Sun Tzu

"There is nothing more common than to find considerations of supply affecting the strategic lines of a campaign and a war."
- Carl von Clausevitz

"My logisticians are a humorless lot ... they know if my campaign fails, they are the first ones I will slay."
- Alexander

Amateurs talk tactics, professionals talk logistics.


Of course with terrorists being....terrorists none of your logistics bullshit means diddly.
The logistical support needed for a suicide bomber I daresay is quite different than that needed to field a standing army....which is pretty much what is being referred to in all of your quotes.
Reducing the above post to nothing more than another "lets ban the pools" posting
You really do have an affinity for apples and oranges,don't you ?


Are you actually suggesting that Sam the Suicide Bomber has no support group?

Where did he get his money? How did he pick his target? Bomb making materials? Indoctrination on why strapping on a vest and blowing yourself up is a fine idea?

No what I'm suggesting is crystal clear (reading comprehension always trip you guys up) the logistical needs of a modern standing army are vastly different than those needed by hucklebuck the suicide bomber.
If you seek to sound knowledgeable about a given topic,plucking quotes and all of that,make sure the quotes are applicable to the topic you are discussing.
Clausewitz has very little to do with a terrorist organization.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 169
RE: The French Learn Their Lesson - 2/2/2015 11:33:00 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
I don't think she can come up with all this silliness on her own.

She must have an extensive support staff. Simple logistics.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 170
RE: The French Learn Their Lesson - 2/2/2015 12:51:53 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
ROFLMAO

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 171
RE: The French Learn Their Lesson - 2/2/2015 6:26:43 PM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

You wanted to know why not every Muslim blows shit up and kills people. Because they do not have to. You only need a percent of the group doing so to be effective. The rest fill support roles.


"The rest just fill support roles"?

I'm sorry, but that's just senseless, Aylee.


What is the most important consideration in war/battles? Logistics. Yes, you have the folks that actually fight. Then you have everyone else. Those that grow food, make cloth, pay taxes, pump fuel, maintain roads, train soldiers, teach reading and math, comfort the grieving. . . and the list goes on.

How many people does it take to keep one soldier in the field? In the feudal days wasn't it something like 50 peasants to one mounted knight? And that did not count women and children, I believe.

Logistics is only senseless if you have never cracked a book with Clausevitz, Sun Tzu, Alexander, and so forth or have studiously avoided any mention of them.

"The line between disorder and order lies in logistics…"
- Sun Tzu

"There is nothing more common than to find considerations of supply affecting the strategic lines of a campaign and a war."
- Carl von Clausevitz

"My logisticians are a humorless lot ... they know if my campaign fails, they are the first ones I will slay."
- Alexander

Amateurs talk tactics, professionals talk logistics.


Of course with terrorists being....terrorists none of your logistics bullshit means diddly.
The logistical support needed for a suicide bomber I daresay is quite different than that needed to field a standing army....which is pretty much what is being referred to in all of your quotes.
Reducing the above post to nothing more than another "lets ban the pools" posting
You really do have an affinity for apples and oranges,don't you ?


Are you actually suggesting that Sam the Suicide Bomber has no support group?

Where did he get his money? How did he pick his target? Bomb making materials? Indoctrination on why strapping on a vest and blowing yourself up is a fine idea?


How much money would they actually need? The 9/11 bombers carried out their task with only the cost of box cutters and plane tickets. If I recall correctly, they were in the US for a few years and had jobs (one of them was even a soccer coach) and could have earned for themselves whatever money was needed to operate.

A couple years after 9/11, I think they caught one guy from Afghanistan who apparently traded opium with the Mexican cartels in return for being guided across the border, so they could also conceivably barter for what they need.

As for bomb making materials, I think McVeigh used materials which he purchased at the hardware store and rented a Ryder truck (which was the same truck rental company used by the 1993 WTC bombers). How much would that cost?

I can see the point you're trying to make, but it's really all just speculation to consider how much actual support the terrorists have from the Muslim population as a whole. Considering that most of the actual fighting taking place has been Muslim against Muslim, it would be quite a stretch to suggest that they could have that much widespread support from the overall population. No doubt that they have some support, but as to how much and which ones, that's all speculation.

I also don't think that it's entirely an either/or question. I can imagine that there are those who might support the same cause, yet would still be against violence. It was similar with 1960s era radicals, who pretty much supported similar causes, yet only a few actually advocated violence and even fewer actually did anything violent - compared to the millions who protested peacefully and were very much against using violence. Likewise, there are a lot of people who peacefully protest against abortion, but it would be wrong to lump them all in with the few who carry out bombings and assassinations.

< Message edited by Zonie63 -- 2/2/2015 6:31:59 PM >

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 172
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 7 8 [9]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The French Learn Their Lesson Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 8 [9]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078