|
ResidentSadist -> RE: m f comparisions (3/12/2015 9:20:09 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GotSteel
quote:
Also people need to stop comparing male subs to female subs, it is a totally, totally different ballgame here. I wouldn't know where to begin.
I thought this was a rather strange claim, thoughts?
The only difference I have ever seen that stands between the genders is their numbers. There has always been a horny hetro male sub stereotype with a larger presence on the scene than their horny female counterparts. Hence the presence of more pro pay for play Femdommes than pro male Doms. On the gay scene, not so much difference. So a young hetro horny toad seeking no strings encounters for free will have a harder time finding a partner than a young horny hetro female.
But I fail to see how that would be grounds for comparison between the "ballgame" for submissives of any gender or sexual preference... unless the "ballgame" means the act of getting in the game by the dating pool availability. But even then, a good s-type of either gender with a sincere passion for leather never goes for too long without a partner if they make themselves available to the community.
If the "ballgame" isn't just about who has a harder time getting laid, but it's about BDSM, leather and the s-type's role . . . their interactions, protocols, duties, responsibilities, scope and depth of service in the wide variety of encounter and relationship options, well then there is no difference. I been doin' this shit since 1971 . . . and when I was younger I had both male and female slaves. In fact, the crowd I hung with felt that if you couldn't accept service from a slave of either gender, it was because you weren't really into leather, you were into sex. They felt if your sexual preferences outweighed your ability to accept service in your role as Master, you were sex-centric not leather-centric. To them a good slave was a good slave, gender irrelevant.
Whether it's the horny male stereotype seeking a cruel Mistress or Gay Master for purely physical kink-centric BDSM encounters or a male sub seeking a romantic and protocol rich D/s relationship partner, there is an identical female stereotype like the horny housewife looking for a cruel sadistic Master, the dungeon bunny seeking a wicked Top or the subby looking for The One to share a leather love life.
It's always been exactly the same "ballgame", male, female, gay or straight once you're in the game . . . just different genitalia. Whomever said otherwise seems to have a self inflated chauvinistic gender bias.
|
|
|
|
