Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Cruise ships in Kansas?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 9:40:00 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
I really do not know the particulars other than the link but to me the bottom line would be will these rules make a difference to someone truly in need and receiving assistance to get back on their feet. If they do not then why the big argument about trying to limit abuse even if they sound ridiculous?

Butch

< Message edited by kdsub -- 4/6/2015 9:43:50 AM >


_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 9:49:52 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
Good question, Bitch. If perpetrators of fraud are to be ferreted out, if you want to do your best to assure the public that their hard-earned money is not being used to do things the worker himself doesn't feel he can afford to do, then you go after these folks.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 10:02:38 AM   
Tkman117


Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Good question, Bitch.


Best spelling mistake I've ever seen on here

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 10:07:43 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Good question, Bitch.


Best spelling mistake I've ever seen on here


Freudian slip

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 10:14:04 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
Don't be jealous... he loves me

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 10:18:02 AM   
Moderator3


Posts: 3289
Status: offline
I love this place.

_____________________________

FAST REPLY




(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 10:44:35 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Don't be jealous... he loves me

Butch

Shhhh...don't tell Bear!

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 1:48:55 PM   
MercTech


Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

Amusing that Republicans in Kansas think the poor is a bigger drain on their resources than wealthy corporations that demand everything from reduction in taxes, to prime real estate to build upon. If a wealth person shows up, Republicans will kneel down to suck their cock, but if anyone else has a problem, 'fuck 'em'.

I saw this story last night and thought it just sounded absolutely silly. The ATM cards are limited to $25/day in charges. Most people shop by the week rather than the day. Poor people working 40 hours/week at minimal wage now have to trudge off to the market on their way home to handle the food purchases. Its like Republicans wish to give the wealthy every convenience but be an absolute dick to the poor. Because we all know that being financially poor is such an easy thing to handle....

Yet per many sources, each of these ATM cards charge a fee of $0.85 after the first transaction. So that is six days financial institutions are gaining $0.85 of the poor. In Kansas (per most sources) place the poor at over 15,500 in the last few moments. That's $0.85 per card holder each day. That Republicans want to keep the poor from gaming the system is silly compared to how easily the wealthy do it already.

The Republicans at state and federal levels have been going out of their way to earn bad press. In a time they should be trying to minimize the damages, they are showing they still dont understand the concept of 'running good government'.


Placing limitations on where and for what government subsidies may be used for is a reasonable stipulation and is routinely found in State regulations all around the country. And limiting how much CASH a person can withdraw from a government debit card while placing few limits on PURCHASES made with the debit card is not unusual at all. It isn't a Republican thing, it is a governmental micro management thing.

I'd say $25 a day is low but the limitation concept is valid. The last time I was forced to use an EBT card (drawing unemployment compensation from Illinois) the cash out limit was $100 a day. But no limit on making purchases. And, the Illinois EBT cad was blocked from being used at those third party ATMs you find in casinos and convenience stores. But you could still do debit card purchases at convenience stores.

Move along, these aren't the Republican droids you are looking for.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 2:30:05 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Amusing that Republicans in Kansas think the poor is a bigger drain on their resources than wealthy corporations that demand everything from reduction in taxes, to prime real estate to build upon. If a wealth person shows up, Republicans will kneel down to suck their cock, but if anyone else has a problem, 'fuck 'em'.
I saw this story last night and thought it just sounded absolutely silly. The ATM cards are limited to $25/day in charges. Most people shop by the week rather than the day. Poor people working 40 hours/week at minimal wage now have to trudge off to the market on their way home to handle the food purchases. Its like Republicans wish to give the wealthy every convenience but be an absolute dick to the poor. Because we all know that being financially poor is such an easy thing to handle....
Yet per many sources, each of these ATM cards charge a fee of $0.85 after the first transaction. So that is six days financial institutions are gaining $0.85 of the poor. In Kansas (per most sources) place the poor at over 15,500 in the last few moments. That's $0.85 per card holder each day. That Republicans want to keep the poor from gaming the system is silly compared to how easily the wealthy do it already.
The Republicans at state and federal levels have been going out of their way to earn bad press. In a time they should be trying to minimize the damages, they are showing they still dont understand the concept of 'running good government'.

Placing limitations on where and for what government subsidies may be used for is a reasonable stipulation and is routinely found in State regulations all around the country. And limiting how much CASH a person can withdraw from a government debit card while placing few limits on PURCHASES made with the debit card is not unusual at all. It isn't a Republican thing, it is a governmental micro management thing.
I'd say $25 a day is low but the limitation concept is valid. The last time I was forced to use an EBT card (drawing unemployment compensation from Illinois) the cash out limit was $100 a day. But no limit on making purchases. And, the Illinois EBT cad was blocked from being used at those third party ATMs you find in casinos and convenience stores. But you could still do debit card purchases at convenience stores.
Move along, these aren't the Republican droids you are looking for.


It doesn't matter that KS will be in the majority in passing a limitation on the usage of EBT cards. It doesn't matter that the limitations are, pretty much, the same as the Federal requirements (+cruise ships). It only matters that it was a Republicans passing it, and something could be written mocking them. That's it.




_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 6:41:04 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Amusing that Republicans in Kansas think the poor is a bigger drain on their resources than wealthy corporations that demand everything from reduction in taxes, to prime real estate to build upon. If a wealth person shows up, Republicans will kneel down to suck their cock, but if anyone else has a problem, 'fuck 'em'.
I saw this story last night and thought it just sounded absolutely silly. The ATM cards are limited to $25/day in charges. Most people shop by the week rather than the day. Poor people working 40 hours/week at minimal wage now have to trudge off to the market on their way home to handle the food purchases. Its like Republicans wish to give the wealthy every convenience but be an absolute dick to the poor. Because we all know that being financially poor is such an easy thing to handle....
Yet per many sources, each of these ATM cards charge a fee of $0.85 after the first transaction. So that is six days financial institutions are gaining $0.85 of the poor. In Kansas (per most sources) place the poor at over 15,500 in the last few moments. That's $0.85 per card holder each day. That Republicans want to keep the poor from gaming the system is silly compared to how easily the wealthy do it already.
The Republicans at state and federal levels have been going out of their way to earn bad press. In a time they should be trying to minimize the damages, they are showing they still dont understand the concept of 'running good government'.

Placing limitations on where and for what government subsidies may be used for is a reasonable stipulation and is routinely found in State regulations all around the country. And limiting how much CASH a person can withdraw from a government debit card while placing few limits on PURCHASES made with the debit card is not unusual at all. It isn't a Republican thing, it is a governmental micro management thing.
I'd say $25 a day is low but the limitation concept is valid. The last time I was forced to use an EBT card (drawing unemployment compensation from Illinois) the cash out limit was $100 a day. But no limit on making purchases. And, the Illinois EBT cad was blocked from being used at those third party ATMs you find in casinos and convenience stores. But you could still do debit card purchases at convenience stores.
Move along, these aren't the Republican droids you are looking for.


It doesn't matter that KS will be in the majority in passing a limitation on the usage of EBT cards. It doesn't matter that the limitations are, pretty much, the same as the Federal requirements (+cruise ships). It only matters that it was a Republicans passing it, and something could be written mocking them. That's it.




Let's ignore the rest of it....let's ignore the tax cutting, the deficit shortfall,the cuts to education and other services.
It's a republican gov.and a republican led statehouse,so let's ignore all of that,
LOL

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 7:06:21 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Amusing that Republicans in Kansas think the poor is a bigger drain on their resources than wealthy corporations that demand everything from reduction in taxes, to prime real estate to build upon. If a wealth person shows up, Republicans will kneel down to suck their cock, but if anyone else has a problem, 'fuck 'em'.
I saw this story last night and thought it just sounded absolutely silly. The ATM cards are limited to $25/day in charges. Most people shop by the week rather than the day. Poor people working 40 hours/week at minimal wage now have to trudge off to the market on their way home to handle the food purchases. Its like Republicans wish to give the wealthy every convenience but be an absolute dick to the poor. Because we all know that being financially poor is such an easy thing to handle....
Yet per many sources, each of these ATM cards charge a fee of $0.85 after the first transaction. So that is six days financial institutions are gaining $0.85 of the poor. In Kansas (per most sources) place the poor at over 15,500 in the last few moments. That's $0.85 per card holder each day. That Republicans want to keep the poor from gaming the system is silly compared to how easily the wealthy do it already.
The Republicans at state and federal levels have been going out of their way to earn bad press. In a time they should be trying to minimize the damages, they are showing they still dont understand the concept of 'running good government'.

Placing limitations on where and for what government subsidies may be used for is a reasonable stipulation and is routinely found in State regulations all around the country. And limiting how much CASH a person can withdraw from a government debit card while placing few limits on PURCHASES made with the debit card is not unusual at all. It isn't a Republican thing, it is a governmental micro management thing.
I'd say $25 a day is low but the limitation concept is valid. The last time I was forced to use an EBT card (drawing unemployment compensation from Illinois) the cash out limit was $100 a day. But no limit on making purchases. And, the Illinois EBT cad was blocked from being used at those third party ATMs you find in casinos and convenience stores. But you could still do debit card purchases at convenience stores.
Move along, these aren't the Republican droids you are looking for.

It doesn't matter that KS will be in the majority in passing a limitation on the usage of EBT cards. It doesn't matter that the limitations are, pretty much, the same as the Federal requirements (+cruise ships). It only matters that it was a Republicans passing it, and something could be written mocking them. That's it.

Let's ignore the rest of it....let's ignore the tax cutting, the deficit shortfall,the cuts to education and other services.
It's a republican gov.and a republican led statehouse,so let's ignore all of that,
LOL


Start a thread about it, Mike. This thread was about the legislation that is being passed, regarding limitations to the use of EBT cards. That has nothing to do with tax cutting, deficit shortfalls, or cuts to anything else.

Apparently, you forgot about that.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 7:22:45 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

Amusing that Republicans in Kansas think the poor is a bigger drain on their resources than wealthy corporations that demand everything from reduction in taxes, to prime real estate to build upon. If a wealth person shows up, Republicans will kneel down to suck their cock, but if anyone else has a problem, 'fuck 'em'.

I saw this story last night and thought it just sounded absolutely silly. The ATM cards are limited to $25/day in charges. Most people shop by the week rather than the day. Poor people working 40 hours/week at minimal wage now have to trudge off to the market on their way home to handle the food purchases. Its like Republicans wish to give the wealthy every convenience but be an absolute dick to the poor. Because we all know that being financially poor is such an easy thing to handle....

Yet per many sources, each of these ATM cards charge a fee of $0.85 after the first transaction. So that is six days financial institutions are gaining $0.85 of the poor. In Kansas (per most sources) place the poor at over 15,500 in the last few moments. That's $0.85 per card holder each day. That Republicans want to keep the poor from gaming the system is silly compared to how easily the wealthy do it already.

The Republicans at state and federal levels have been going out of their way to earn bad press. In a time they should be trying to minimize the damages, they are showing they still dont understand the concept of 'running good government'.


Placing limitations on where and for what government subsidies may be used for is a reasonable stipulation and is routinely found in State regulations all around the country. And limiting how much CASH a person can withdraw from a government debit card while placing few limits on PURCHASES made with the debit card is not unusual at all. It isn't a Republican thing, it is a governmental micro management thing.

I'd say $25 a day is low but the limitation concept is valid. The last time I was forced to use an EBT card (drawing unemployment compensation from Illinois) the cash out limit was $100 a day. But no limit on making purchases. And, the Illinois EBT cad was blocked from being used at those third party ATMs you find in casinos and convenience stores. But you could still do debit card purchases at convenience stores.

Move along, these aren't the Republican droids you are looking for.

He who has the gold makes the rules. It's the governments money, they can tell you how to spend it.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 7:28:13 PM   
Marini


Posts: 3629
Joined: 2/14/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Don't be jealous... he loves me

Butch


I am now jealous Butch, I thought you were my "bitch".



_____________________________

As always, To EACH their Own.
"And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. "
Nelson Mandela
Life-long Democrat, not happy at all with Democratic Party.
NOT a Republican/Moderate and free agent

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 7:33:02 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Amusing that Republicans in Kansas think the poor is a bigger drain on their resources than wealthy corporations that demand everything from reduction in taxes, to prime real estate to build upon. If a wealth person shows up, Republicans will kneel down to suck their cock, but if anyone else has a problem, 'fuck 'em'.
I saw this story last night and thought it just sounded absolutely silly. The ATM cards are limited to $25/day in charges. Most people shop by the week rather than the day. Poor people working 40 hours/week at minimal wage now have to trudge off to the market on their way home to handle the food purchases. Its like Republicans wish to give the wealthy every convenience but be an absolute dick to the poor. Because we all know that being financially poor is such an easy thing to handle....
Yet per many sources, each of these ATM cards charge a fee of $0.85 after the first transaction. So that is six days financial institutions are gaining $0.85 of the poor. In Kansas (per most sources) place the poor at over 15,500 in the last few moments. That's $0.85 per card holder each day. That Republicans want to keep the poor from gaming the system is silly compared to how easily the wealthy do it already.
The Republicans at state and federal levels have been going out of their way to earn bad press. In a time they should be trying to minimize the damages, they are showing they still dont understand the concept of 'running good government'.

Placing limitations on where and for what government subsidies may be used for is a reasonable stipulation and is routinely found in State regulations all around the country. And limiting how much CASH a person can withdraw from a government debit card while placing few limits on PURCHASES made with the debit card is not unusual at all. It isn't a Republican thing, it is a governmental micro management thing.
I'd say $25 a day is low but the limitation concept is valid. The last time I was forced to use an EBT card (drawing unemployment compensation from Illinois) the cash out limit was $100 a day. But no limit on making purchases. And, the Illinois EBT cad was blocked from being used at those third party ATMs you find in casinos and convenience stores. But you could still do debit card purchases at convenience stores.
Move along, these aren't the Republican droids you are looking for.

It doesn't matter that KS will be in the majority in passing a limitation on the usage of EBT cards. It doesn't matter that the limitations are, pretty much, the same as the Federal requirements (+cruise ships). It only matters that it was a Republicans passing it, and something could be written mocking them. That's it.

Let's ignore the rest of it....let's ignore the tax cutting, the deficit shortfall,the cuts to education and other services.
It's a republican gov.and a republican led statehouse,so let's ignore all of that,
LOL


Start a thread about it, Mike. This thread was about the legislation that is being passed, regarding limitations to the use of EBT cards. That has nothing to do with tax cutting, deficit shortfalls, or cuts to anything else.

Apparently, you forgot about that.


Bullshit DS,it's called thread drift
No need to start a new thread,it's all patches of the same quilt.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 7:40:48 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Amusing that Republicans in Kansas think the poor is a bigger drain on their resources than wealthy corporations that demand everything from reduction in taxes, to prime real estate to build upon. If a wealth person shows up, Republicans will kneel down to suck their cock, but if anyone else has a problem, 'fuck 'em'.
I saw this story last night and thought it just sounded absolutely silly. The ATM cards are limited to $25/day in charges. Most people shop by the week rather than the day. Poor people working 40 hours/week at minimal wage now have to trudge off to the market on their way home to handle the food purchases. Its like Republicans wish to give the wealthy every convenience but be an absolute dick to the poor. Because we all know that being financially poor is such an easy thing to handle....
Yet per many sources, each of these ATM cards charge a fee of $0.85 after the first transaction. So that is six days financial institutions are gaining $0.85 of the poor. In Kansas (per most sources) place the poor at over 15,500 in the last few moments. That's $0.85 per card holder each day. That Republicans want to keep the poor from gaming the system is silly compared to how easily the wealthy do it already.
The Republicans at state and federal levels have been going out of their way to earn bad press. In a time they should be trying to minimize the damages, they are showing they still dont understand the concept of 'running good government'.

Placing limitations on where and for what government subsidies may be used for is a reasonable stipulation and is routinely found in State regulations all around the country. And limiting how much CASH a person can withdraw from a government debit card while placing few limits on PURCHASES made with the debit card is not unusual at all. It isn't a Republican thing, it is a governmental micro management thing.
I'd say $25 a day is low but the limitation concept is valid. The last time I was forced to use an EBT card (drawing unemployment compensation from Illinois) the cash out limit was $100 a day. But no limit on making purchases. And, the Illinois EBT cad was blocked from being used at those third party ATMs you find in casinos and convenience stores. But you could still do debit card purchases at convenience stores.
Move along, these aren't the Republican droids you are looking for.

It doesn't matter that KS will be in the majority in passing a limitation on the usage of EBT cards. It doesn't matter that the limitations are, pretty much, the same as the Federal requirements (+cruise ships). It only matters that it was a Republicans passing it, and something could be written mocking them. That's it.

Let's ignore the rest of it....let's ignore the tax cutting, the deficit shortfall,the cuts to education and other services.
It's a republican gov.and a republican led statehouse,so let's ignore all of that,
LOL


Start a thread about it, Mike. This thread was about the legislation that is being passed, regarding limitations to the use of EBT cards. That has nothing to do with tax cutting, deficit shortfalls, or cuts to anything else.

Apparently, you forgot about that.


Bullshit DS,it's called thread drift
No need to start a new thread,it's all patches of the same quilt.

Of course...using SNAP Benefits for anything other than what they were intended is fraud.

Tax cutting, deficit shortfalls, etc. are not.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 8:09:43 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
Oh but I am Marini... CD just does not understand me

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Marini)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 8:16:22 PM   
Marini


Posts: 3629
Joined: 2/14/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Oh but I am Marini... CD just does not understand me


Okay, I am relieved.
Let CD find his own stable.

_____________________________

As always, To EACH their Own.
"And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. "
Nelson Mandela
Life-long Democrat, not happy at all with Democratic Party.
NOT a Republican/Moderate and free agent

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/6/2015 10:07:50 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Oh but I am Marini... CD just does not understand me


Okay, I am relieved.
Let CD find his own stable.

Stable?...I have no horses. But DONT tell Bear about Butch, o.k.?

(in reply to Marini)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/7/2015 12:25:38 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
Placing limitations on where and for what government subsidies may be used for is a reasonable stipulation and is routinely found in State regulations all around the country. And limiting how much CASH a person can withdraw from a government debit card while placing few limits on PURCHASES made with the debit card is not unusual at all. It isn't a Republican thing, it is a governmental micro management thing.


Which has more stipulations? The poor whom really have a rough go on things due to their circumstances? Wealthy corporations whom can dictate terms to Kansas for preferred treatment. Using blackmail of 'We can always move else where if you don't give us this...

When it comes to welfare the knee-jerk reaction is the poor are just all gaming the system. That only a tiny minority actually do need the help and the rest are free loaders. If being poor is such a piece of cake; try it out for five years. Let us all know what its like, ok?

Study after study, across this nation, shows that fraud on the part of the poor as it concerns government programs (local, state, and federal) are often below the national average. The poor are more honest of their situation then the rich whom have may different ways of hiding their wealth from the tax man! As it stands, the poor already jump through a number of hoops just to survive, without bring in government action into their lives. So according to the 'noble' and 'generous' GOP, the poor should jump through an even broader range of hoops. All for the amusement of the rich....

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
I'd say $25 a day is low but the limitation concept is valid. The last time I was forced to use an EBT card (drawing unemployment compensation from Illinois) the cash out limit was $100 a day. But no limit on making purchases. And, the Illinois EBT cad was blocked from being used at those third party ATMs you find in casinos and convenience stores. But you could still do debit card purchases at convenience stores.


$25/day is silly. Its also impractical and hard to manage logistics. I question the Republicans viewpoints that the poor are using these resources in correctly; using legitimate studies showing citizens from their state, on these programs, were using them on cruise ships or in ways not consistent with the nature of the program.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
Move along, these aren't the Republican droids you are looking for.


Yeah, the Republicans are usually the ones with a restraining bolt attached after a mindwipe is complete. We dont want them thinking for themselves! Just doing what they were designed to obey.

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? - 4/7/2015 12:29:34 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Amusing that Republicans in Kansas think the poor is a bigger drain on their resources than wealthy corporations that demand everything from reduction in taxes, to prime real estate to build upon. If a wealth person shows up, Republicans will kneel down to suck their cock, but if anyone else has a problem, 'fuck 'em'.

I saw this story last night and thought it just sounded absolutely silly. The ATM cards are limited to $25/day in charges. Most people shop by the week rather than the day. Poor people working 40 hours/week at minimal wage now have to trudge off to the market on their way home to handle the food purchases. Its like Republicans wish to give the wealthy every convenience but be an absolute dick to the poor. Because we all know that being financially poor is such an easy thing to handle....

Yet per many sources, each of these ATM cards charge a fee of $0.85 after the first transaction. So that is six days financial institutions are gaining $0.85 of the poor. In Kansas (per most sources) place the poor at over 15,500 in the last few moments. That's $0.85 per card holder each day. That Republicans want to keep the poor from gaming the system is silly compared to how easily the wealthy do it already.

The Republicans at state and federal levels have been going out of their way to earn bad press. In a time they should be trying to minimize the damages, they are showing they still dont understand the concept of 'running good government'.


Placing limitations on where and for what government subsidies may be used for is a reasonable stipulation and is routinely found in State regulations all around the country. And limiting how much CASH a person can withdraw from a government debit card while placing few limits on PURCHASES made with the debit card is not unusual at all. It isn't a Republican thing, it is a governmental micro management thing.

I'd say $25 a day is low but the limitation concept is valid. The last time I was forced to use an EBT card (drawing unemployment compensation from Illinois) the cash out limit was $100 a day. But no limit on making purchases. And, the Illinois EBT cad was blocked from being used at those third party ATMs you find in casinos and convenience stores. But you could still do debit card purchases at convenience stores.

Move along, these aren't the Republican droids you are looking for.

He who has the gold makes the rules. It's the governments money, they can tell you how to spend it.


Least not forget, that the poor can and do vote as well. If they decide they want better government without Republicans, that is their right.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Cruise ships in Kansas? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109