Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 3:43:16 AM   
Staleek


Posts: 361
Joined: 6/1/2010
Status: offline
Ahhh... you're from Singapore, fair enough, my apologies for mistaking that.

Although while Singapore is better than a lot of Mid East nations it still has issues of its own, including supporting the US military.

https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2014/country-chapters/singapore

However, the point remains - ordinary Islamic citizens can not fight back against their rulers. They tried, many died, even more fled, and at the end of the day groups like ISIS emerged from the wreckage. You have to try to understand these are places where life can be brutally short, hard, and unforgiving. In those circumstances governments have fewer qualms about launching brutal genocides against their own people because they themselves risk their own lives by simply being in their position.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 4:11:40 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

I'm all for Muslims killing each other and not interfering.


Lovely.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 4:29:58 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

I'm all for Muslims killing each other and not interfering.


Lovely.

Definitely. Their Religion of Peace don't even teach them anything about bothering to step in to help their own kind. And it takes a Christian country to come in and assist instead. I think that's speaks volumes about the kind of religion they are.

The more I think about it, damn middle east is richer than the US at the moment! Talking about the middle eastern countries where everything is under control. Dubai, Saudi, Qatar etc. How about they splurge some of their money, get involve, on actually fixing the problems in their region! They should pay US and Europe for aid.

And all those countries should take in all the Syrian Refugees, do their part!

And another thing! Certain African Nations have been torn by brutal civil wars as well. There are crazy Muslims over there too, and they are killing each other. I don't see any western nation interfering in their internal strife. It's okay to let Muslims in Africa kill each other but not okay to leave middle east alone.
Why the bias care and concern for middle eastern countries?


< Message edited by Greta75 -- 12/9/2015 4:40:31 AM >

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 4:30:46 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

Nobody knows more about ANYthing than Thompson the keyboard bully.

Stop whining when you get your ass spanked purple for posting up nonsense...grow a pair.

Even when he knows fuck all about fuck all,

Of course posting cites to back up my statements does seem to make your asshole pucker, doesn't it mate.



(in reply to Dvr22999874)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 4:32:53 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
Still sticking with your "cool teen sites" link huh. Why am I not surprised?

Perhaps because you failed to notice the criminal code reference?


(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 4:42:43 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Greta75

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

e) with or without consent, when she is under fourteen (14) years of age. "


I hope you were never a lawyer, your poor 14 yr old victim may end up having her rapist go free, because you were ignorant at the laws and how it works to prosecute under 16 illegal sex. Imagine you simply insisting to the judge that no crime has been commited because of your own oversight.

The law is quite clear. You wish to conflate it to mean something different. For those who choose willful ignorance let me explane it to you. A married 14 year old female can have sex with her husband . A 13 year old married female may not...but...a 14 year old female may not engage in promiscuous sex. Why is that so difficult for someone who claims to live in singapore, to grasp? The law has been posted but you wish only to read the part that agrees with your position and not the whole law.


(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 4:47:41 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD


ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

Time for KKK and Nazis to call themselves a Religion too to be branded peaceful.

The KKK promotes themselves as a Protestant Christian organization.

Falsey promotes themselves as a Protestant Christian organization.

Wouldn't that caviat also apply to isis?

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 5:18:22 AM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/hundreds-muslims-marching-against-terrorism-6977099


_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 5:22:48 AM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
And another one....

http://usuncut.com/politics/while-trump-spewed-hate-this-muslim-group-raised-100000-for-san-bernardino-victims/

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 5:35:37 AM   
Staleek


Posts: 361
Joined: 6/1/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

Definitely. Their Religion of Peace don't even teach them anything about bothering to step in to help their own kind. And it takes a Christian country to come in and assist instead. I think that's speaks volumes about the kind of religion they are.


That actually speaks volumes about the kind of person you are and where all this is coming from.

Newsflash: Most Muslims are peaceful people. I don't mean most Muslims living in the Middle East and North Africa (which accounts for a whole 22% of Muslims on earth), I mean most Muslim nations. The most populus Islamic nation, Indonesia, has a better human rights record than Singapore.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Singapore

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Indonesia

Taking what is going on in the Middle East as being representative of all of Islam is at best misguided and at worst just bigoted.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
The more I think about it, damn middle east is richer than the US at the moment! Talking about the middle eastern countries where everything is under control. Dubai, Saudi, Qatar etc. How about they splurge some of their money, get involve, on actually fixing the problems in their region! They should pay US and Europe for aid.

And all those countries should take in all the Syrian Refugees, do their part!


The population of Jordan is currently 10% refugees, and that's not all....

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2015/09/syrias-refugee-crisis-in-numbers/


Lebanon hosts approximately 1.2 million refugees from Syria which amounts to around one in five people in the country
Jordan hosts about 650,000 refugees from Syria, which amounts to about 10% of the population
Turkey hosts 1.9 million refugees from Syria, more than any other country worldwide
Iraq where 3 million people have been internally displaced in the last 18 months hosts 249,463 refugees from Syria
Egypt hosts 132,375 refugees from Syria

And you really think Saudi is under control?

http://www.ibtimes.com/saudi-arabia-unrest-2015-2-police-killed-eastern-shiite-region-qatif-2189873

The regime is hanging on, thanks to shipments of weapons and personel from the US/UK, but for that, and the situation going in Yemen, the Saudi Royal family would be in quite some trouble.

You are very very poorly informed about the entire religion politically.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
And another thing! Certain African Nations have been torn by brutal civil wars as well. There are crazy Muslims over there too, and they are killing each other. I don't see any western nation interfering in their internal strife. It's okay to let Muslims in Africa kill each other but not okay to leave middle east alone.
Why the bias care and concern for middle eastern countries?



It's ok to leave the Middle East alone. It is not Ok to supply it with deadly weapons, tanks, tear gas, ammunition, prison equipment etc, prop up it's dicators, fly drones over their nations, kill them indescriminately, then complain when the citizens decide to hate the West for it.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 5:57:54 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


The law is quite clear. You wish to conflate it to mean something different. For those who choose willful ignorance let me explane it to you. A married 14 year old female can have sex with her husband . A 13 year old married female may not...but...a 14 year old female may not engage in promiscuous sex. Why is that so difficult for someone who claims to live in singapore, to grasp? The law has been posted but you wish only to read the part that agrees with your position and not the whole law.

I realise there is a loop hole that you are bringing up, that 13 and above, there is no such thing as marital rape in Singapore unless there is protection order filed already, only way to tell if it's rape or not.

But for a 14 yr old to get married requires government approval. It's a whole process, they will thoroughly interview both parents, and both parties who want to get married involve, to ascertify if they are of the right maturity to handle a marriage together. And you know what? A damn 50 yr old is sure hell never gonna get his marriage to a 14 yr old approved. And nobody is gonna get married at 14 unless it's a shotgun. And if it's a shotgun, the man is dead before he can even marry her. Probably be thrown in jail for quite a few years.
We have only like 23 of underage marriages last year and 10 of them were rejected. This means below 16 yr old marriages. I believe the ones approved are shot gun teenagers of the same age.

This is interesting: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/home-office-powerless-legal-loophole-4846514
I wonder if it's the same in the US as well. After all, legal age for marriage in Islamic nations is after puberty is reach. In my country Muslims do not get married under civil law but under their own sharia courts. So their permissible marriage age is also at puberty.

One of the ugly side of Islam isn't it. We got to respect their culture of pedophilia or we would restricting their religious freedom.




< Message edited by Greta75 -- 12/9/2015 6:20:49 AM >

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 7:29:16 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/hundreds-muslims-marching-against-terrorism-6977099


The problem with this sort of report LC is that it won't really reach mainstream media because so few Muslims attended.
If the Muslim community as a whole are rejecting what Daesh stands for, you'd think there would be a lot more attending and more than just a token rally.

Given that there are nearly 3 million Muslims in England alone (2.7m as of 2011 census), a few thousand on a rally is hardly big news.

I think the problem with half-hearted protests from the Muslims is that many, secretly, actually support most of the extremist views to do with Islam with the exception of the obvious open displays of violence posted on social media sites.

There are about two dozen Muslim families around here (mainly Iranian or Pakistani) and while we were out at the local shop last night, I asked a few of them about the current Islam confusion that is being disseminated.
Just about all of them support the idea of arranged marriages.
Most of them support the notion of honour killings and think it is the right thing to do for family values.
Most prefer (and take notice of) the rulings of an illegal Sharia court over our established judiciary.
Most support the Islamic views of the marrying of girls at a very young age.
Almost all support the idea that the man rules the woman in all aspects of life - including punishment beatings.
All of them would prefer an Islamic madrassa-style school rather than our state-run schools.
All of them, without exception, think that other religions are just plain wrong.

And by 'most', I am referring to where there were more than 80% affirmative and only the odd one or two that disagreed or wouldn't answer.

Not exactly a scientific study and a small sample size with people I know well enough to actually ask those sort of questions.
But it does show (at least for those around here) the way they feel and think about our western society.
They like all the freebies - the free healthcare and social housing, free schooling and our benefits system.
Beyond that, they would prefer an Islamic-style rule with Sharia law and Sharia courts.

Just goes to show that not all Muslims support what is being reported by the 'moderate' Muslims.
I got the distinct feeling that there is an underlying current of western resentment where things conflict with Islamic teachings or because they see them as 'Christian' views.



_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 7:50:25 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

The problem with this sort of report LC is that it won't really reach mainstream media because so few Muslims attended.
If the Muslim community as a whole are rejecting what Daesh stands for, you'd think there would be a lot more attending and more than just a token rally.

Given that there are nearly 3 million Muslims in England alone (2.7m as of 2011 census), a few thousand on a rally is hardly big news.

I think the problem with half-hearted protests from the Muslims is that many, secretly, actually support most of the extremist views to do with Islam with the exception of the obvious open displays of violence posted on social media sites.

There are about two dozen Muslim families around here (mainly Iranian or Pakistani) and while we were out at the local shop last night, I asked a few of them about the current Islam confusion that is being disseminated.
Just about all of them support the idea of arranged marriages.
Most of them support the notion of honour killings and think it is the right thing to do for family values.
Most prefer (and take notice of) the rulings of an illegal Sharia court over our established judiciary.
Most support the Islamic views of the marrying of girls at a very young age.
Almost all support the idea that the man rules the woman in all aspects of life - including punishment beatings.
All of them would prefer an Islamic madrassa-style school rather than our state-run schools.
All of them, without exception, think that other religions are just plain wrong.

And by 'most', I am referring to where there were more than 80% affirmative and only the odd one or two that disagreed or wouldn't answer.

Not exactly a scientific study and a small sample size with people I know well enough to actually ask those sort of questions.
But it does show (at least for those around here) the way they feel and think about our western society.
They like all the freebies - the free healthcare and social housing, free schooling and our benefits system.
Beyond that, they would prefer an Islamic-style rule with Sharia law and Sharia courts.

Just goes to show that not all Muslims support what is being reported by the 'moderate' Muslims.
I got the distinct feeling that there is an underlying current of western resentment where things conflict with Islamic teachings or because they see them as 'Christian' views.





I need to chime in, here. fd, you and I agree on immigration, for the most part and I think we agree on the threat posed by radical islam extremism.

I grew up in New York City in a borough where there was a large Jewish community. For example, while divorce was rare, when it happened, the ruling of the state court meant nothing to the Hasidim. There was a rabbinical court that handed down a ruling (and sometimes, they refused the divorce). The rabbinical court made it clear that the state court was to be obeyed (child support, etc.), but that they were a "higher" authority when it came to being divorced in the Jewish faith.

I have no issue with that. They obeyed civil law and God's law (as they understood it). To my knowledge, all of the people that participated in that religion and the rabbinical council were willing participants. They didn't try to convert any of us. They certainly didn't adhere to a "convert or die", scorched earth policy.

Honestly, I don't particularly care if Muslims don't want to allow their young girls to go to school in their own country , but if they want to live here, they have to be made to assimilate to some degree . Most devout Muslims reject this idea.

I first noticed it amongst the Latino community where they would come here; either legally or illegally and have the unmitigated gall to insist that we speak their language and add expense to our government proceedings by insisting that our government print all official paperwork in their language, as well.

My grandparents were immigrants and they never did that. They learned the language because they wanted to live here.

It seems that most of the Muslim immigrants don't really want to live here; they want to come here, make a (comparative) ton of money than they could make in their native land, live to a higher standard and then turn our neighborhoods into the same kind of third-world shit hole they left.



Michael


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 7:55:07 AM   
Staleek


Posts: 361
Joined: 6/1/2010
Status: offline
Really? Well I asked some Muslims and they all said the exact opposite.

One even told me that Muslims were working on a cure for cancer, that all Muslims (even terrorists) are opposed to violence, and that Muslim priests are vodka drinking party animals.

It's amazing what anecdotal evidence will do for your case isn't it!

So ok. Let's take your... uhm... "questionaire" at face value. From the look of the thing there is an inherent patriarchy in the Islamic faith and women are oppressed. If true, how do you explain the existence of this person?



That's Megawati Sukarnoputri, perhaps talking about her husband. Look her up.

In 2008 there was an election another major Muslim nation, Bangladesh. Three candidates. Much like the UK and US political ground it consisted of two major candidates and one minor. The two major candidates, polling over 20 million votes each, have something in common. Can you spot what it is?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladeshi_general_election,_2008

Be informed by more than just asking some locals reading the Daily Mail.

quote:


I got the distinct feeling that there is an underlying current of western resentment where things conflict with Islamic teachings or because they see them as 'Christian' views.


I got the feeling there was western resentment because of crap like this - people trying their best to smear and discredit them and everything they do.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 8:25:12 AM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
OK, this shit goes on at the moment, how many of you wanting Muslims to make a stand (and I see absolutely no reason why they should)

are YOU going to make a stand against this:

https://www.colorlines.com/articles/muslim-girl-reportedly-attacked-called-isis-bronx-public-school

Seriously, I don't feel responsible for every evil deed another atheist does, most Catholics don't want to carry the guilt of all the atrocities that have been committed in the name of their religion, so why expect the Muslims to walk around with "mea culpa" and express that they are not "like them" - those idiots who target funerals with signs, Westboro Baptist church I think, they call themselves Christians, do all Christians here feel the need to tell the world they are not like them? Does every gun owner stand up if there is a mass shooting or another tragic accident of a toddler shooting somebody and goes "We're not like them?"

I love dogs, my dogs are big and super friendly (ask Peon) but I don't feel responsible for every idiot who's dog bites somebody because the owner was too stupid or lazy to train the dogs.

The majority of Muslims are people like you, they were born into a religion and that's it, would they have been born into a Catholic or Protestant family they'd be that, just like you'd be a Muslim if you'd be born into a Muslim family. They don't want a holy war and all that bullshit, but by treating them like freaking lepers and claiming they are all evil and should wear badges, they get pushed and pushed, and you gotta wonder how far you can push a group before they snap, do we really want to make the moderate ones so frustrated that they see no other way than joining the radicals?

As for the brainiac who claimed that IRA members were excommunicated but couldn't back it up, I called the Catholic priest here (no biggie, nice guy and we work together on some charities) guess what: NEVER HAPPENED, explanation, excommunication is a religious punishment that is not fitting for secular crimes... So funny how the person (btw not familiar with the 10 commandments, in this case it's number 9 that was violated) wants another religion to do what her own religion isn't willing to do.

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to Staleek)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 8:34:17 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr
I need to chime in, here. fd, you and I agree on immigration, for the most part and I think we agree on the threat posed by radical islam extremism.

...Honestly, I don't particularly care if Muslims don't want to allow their young girls to go to school in their own country , but if they want to live here, they have to be made to assimilate to some degree . Most devout Muslims reject this idea.

...It seems that most of the Muslim immigrants don't really want to live here; they want to come here, make a (comparative) ton of money than they could make in their native land, live to a higher standard and then turn our neighborhoods into the same kind of third-world shit hole they left.

Michael


This is my findings here too.
It does seem that if it wasn't for them being forced to send their girls to school (as per our laws), many would have them sat at home and being treated as nothing short of uneducated slaves.

I looked at Staleek's response and while you can always find an exception to the general rule (like the one he quoted), I am definitely not finding my local Muslims behaving in the way that he is describing.

Sure, they are pleasant enough and they send their kids to school as the law says they should and on outward appearances they look very 'westernised' and fully integrated.
But there are some tell-tale signs that they aren't.
And it's not just the obvious religious stuff either.
They insist that they wear their headgear - even in classes where other students are told to remove it.
They wear their jewelry when other kids are told it's not allowed in school.
Male kids are able (and do) order their own mother and grandmother about like slaves where in western families they are told to behave and to respect their parents/elders.
I have been a visitor to Muslim friends houses - the women/girls are treated appallingly by the males of the house.
Even when we go to the corner shop to top-up our credit on phones/meters, the women are ushered away and when I've asked why, I am told 'it is beyond their intellect to operate the machinery' but are good enough to serve the customers and refill the shelves. WTF???
Honour killings are on the rise and many of them don't even get reported.

Greta brought up a loophole in our current laws about underage brides being let into our country and there is apparently (as of right now) no way to stop it.
But... what's the betting that if *I* decided to go to Pakistan and select a 12yo bride, marry her (legally) in Pakistan, and try to bring her home to the UK, they almost certainly wouldn't allow it.
That's how far the western governments are bending over backwards to accommodate the Islamics.
And like in the US, we have to produce documents and leaflets in various languages because many refuse to learn sufficient English to understand them.

I think the whole situation is ridiculous.
In many ways, Trump's comments about blocking any more Islamics coming into the country would get my vote even if the rest of his rhetoric is rubbish - and I'm not even American!


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 8:43:45 AM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
Seriously, my experience with Muslims is vastly different than yours FD, they send their girls to the same expensive schools as the boys, true a lot of the women don't work but a lot of the women in this area are more "ornamental", most of them just give a nod to the religion by not eating pork (I don't and I'm not a Muslim) and in general they don't indulge in binge drinking, which makes a rather pleasant break from the noble British weekend tradition.

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 9:08:19 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
Most of the Muslims down here are quite religious.
They only eat Halal meat and they don't touch alcohol of any sort.
One of the checkout girls was put into the tobacco/lottery kiosk because she refuses to handle alcohol at the tills.
My daughter had a good friend when she was at school. Once they left the school premises, her friend couldn't be seen with non-Muslim friends because she'd get beaten at home for becoming too familiar.

And yes, they send their kids to school but only because our laws say they must do that or face a fine.
I'm not saying they are discourteous or rude but they certainly are only paying lip-service to what they must do by law.
And generally, they don't mingle with other parents waiting at the school gates for their kids to come out.
They really are a very segregated group in our society and don't appear to socialise outside of their group unless they have to.
Even to the extent that when they have advertised for shop workers they will only employ other Islamics.
I noticed that in Maidstone and Peterborough where I've lived in recent years too; so it's not just here.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 10:06:01 AM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14441
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

The KKK promotes themselves as a Protestant Christian organization.

So when I really think about this, KKK has interesting targets. They don't attack non-christians, they simply dislike people of colour.


You're wrong again.

quote:

After a period of decline, white Protestant nativist groups revived the Klan in the early 20th century, burning crosses and staging rallies, parades and marches denouncing immigrants, Catholics, Jews, blacks and organized labor. The civil rights movement of the 1960s also saw a surge of Ku Klux Klan activity, including bombings of black schools and churches and violence against black and white activists in the South.


_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims - 12/9/2015 12:02:58 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Most of the Muslims down here are quite religious.


That would be appear to be a reassuring sign rather than a worrying one. As the MI5 report says,

" ... there is little connection between religious piety and terrorism among Muslims A "restricted" report of hundreds of case studies by the domestic counter-intelligence agency MI5 found that •

[f]ar from being religious zealots, a large number of those involved in terrorism do not practise their faith regularly. Many lack religious literacy and could actually be regarded as religious novices. Very few have been brought up in strongly religious households, and there is a higher than average proportion of converts. Some are involved in drug-taking, drinking alcohol and visiting prostitutes. MI5 says there is evidence that a well-established religious identity actually protects against violent radicalisation.[29]•"

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2008/aug/20/uksecurity.terrorism1


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Duty of "Peaceful" Muslims Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094