RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 8:01:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

The problem is tweak, within most christian religions, all those nasty bits are generally skipped over when kids are being taught about the religion.
So while they are indeed present, most just skim over them even if they are avid bible readers.

For those that follow Islam, these behavioural absurdities (to us) are focused upon as being a fundamental point of the religion.


So if one were to look at the statistics of e.g. wife-battering in Britain, say, one could expect to see that as rife amongst Muslims?

Probably not Peon because an awful lot of Islamic women don't report it because it is expected of them to accept such behaviour as 'normal'.
Western women, on the other hand, have accepted that it is not acceptable and are increasingly reporting such incidents.




Lucylastic -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 8:02:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Arent you lucky you have never seen any other kind of male beat up on a female in public.

Are all the shitty people in your life only muslims?

There are many incidents where men beat women for no real apparent or justifiable reason.
However, only in Islam is it actually encouraged and sanctioned as not only permissible, but expected.
There are many references in This Website where sections of the Qur'an are quoted as being the definitive permission for wife-beating.

DO you honestly think I dont know that, if you believe I dont know what various religions have done and continue to do in the name of god against women...you simply arent worth reading simply to hear more about your islamaphobic bullcrap.
You join hide with Greta, and Thompson.
happy christmas!




Staleek -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 8:06:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

Probably not Peon because an awful lot of Islamic women don't report it because it is expected of them to accept such behaviour as 'normal'.
Western women, on the other hand, have accepted that it is not acceptable and are increasingly reporting such incidents.



So, like any other conspiracy theorist, you'll actually manufacture theories to fit with your warped world-view when the actual data doesn't support it.

Just like Greta, this is an extremely religious mindset.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 8:06:57 AM)

If you want to deny the truth about what we see happening every day - that's your choice.

I'm quite happy to speak out against it and see it for what it is.




tj444 -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 8:08:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Sorry freedomdwarf, when you start asserting that wife beating is a "a fundamental point of the religion", drummed into kids from an early age, universally across Islam, surely even you can recognise that you have gone over the top.

Most Muslims ignore those passages you highlight just as most Christians ignore the Biblical injunctions of murder rape genocide etc.

This is something about religious people I dont get.. people have to "ignore" certain (horrific) parts of the Bible (Quran, etc) but yet they blindly believe the rest??? does that actually make any sense to anyone? cuz it doesnt to me..

It doesn't make sense to me either but this is what they must do. The mechanism employed is called cognitive dissonance - an ability to reconcile irreconcilable data. It is used in all kinds of spheres - it is far from the truth to assert that religion and the religious have a monopoly on it.

lol.. no, religious people arent the only ones that do that.. people that vote (for either party) employ that mechanism too.. [:D]




Lucylastic -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 8:10:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

If you want to deny the truth about what we see happening every day - that's your choice.

I'm quite happy to speak out against it and see it for what it is.


Ive worked with THOUSAnds of battered women, english AND canadian.... you are so damn blatantly wilfully ignorant it hurts.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 8:37:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Staleek


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

Probably not Peon because an awful lot of Islamic women don't report it because it is expected of them to accept such behaviour as 'normal'.
Western women, on the other hand, have accepted that it is not acceptable and are increasingly reporting such incidents.



So, like any other conspiracy theorist, you'll actually manufacture theories to fit with your warped world-view when the actual data doesn't support it.

Just like Greta, this is an extremely religious mindset.

Not exactly, because I'm not religious or even spiritual.

We see it reported increasingly among Islamic support groups where some women are managing to find a voice.

Wikislam has some figures about Islamic violence against women.
About half-way down the page it says -
In summation, we find in the Hadiths:

Muhammad provided tacit approval of wife beating by not scolding Muslims for beating their wives
Muhammad referred to women who spoke-out against abuse as "not the best among you"
Muhammad forbid Muslims from questioning men who beat their wives
Muhammad allowed others to hit his wives (the very women whom all Muslims adore and refer to as "the Mother of believers")
Three of the four Rightly-Guided Caliphs beat women
Muhammad reaffirms the command of wife-beating in his parting sermon
Muhammad himself struck his wife in the chest

It is clear from all of the above that wife-beating has been an accepted part of Islam since its inception. Muhammad was not against domestic violence and indeed permitted wife-beating in Islam.


It goes on to give figures from various Islamic countries and the majority of reported violence to the women are way up there in percentage terms.
Headlines such as -
Nearly 90 percent of Afghan women suffer from domestic abuse.
Statistics in Iran show that 66% of Iranian women, at the beginning of the marriage have been at least physically abused once
91% of university students polled by the Jordanian Human Right Center approve of wife beating. An earlier study by another organization found out that a majority of WOMEN also supports the right of a husband to beat the wife
A study published in June 2006 in the Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, based on interviews with 300 women admitted to hospital for childbirth, said 80 percent reported being subjected to some kind of abuse within marriage.
One in three wives in Qatar suffer physical or psychological violence from the side of their husband.
London-based Refugee Workers Association Woman’s Group (GIK-DER) revealed disturbing news last week [in November, 2006] that up to 80% Turkish and Kurdish women are victims of domestic violence and sexual harassment. At the same time 70% of Turkish and Kurdish husbands cheat on their wives.
41.9 percent of Turkish women are subjected to physical and sexual violence.
Violence against women in the home is the main emergency needed to be tackled by the Mediterranean's southern shores. The phenomenon affects between 40% and 75% of married women, who suffer mainly at the hands of their husbands.


The figures, compared to non-Islamic countries is horrendous.
Yes, we have violence against women in the west, we all know that it happens.
But I don't see the levels as we are slowly discovering within the Islamic communities.

And to answer Lucy's post#26, I recently had to go to a women's shelter to collect my step-daughter who was there visiting a friend. Most of the women in there (much more than half) looked to be of Afghan/Pakistani type appearance and I make the sweeping assumption that most of them are Islamic.
And yes, there are thousands of battered women of ALL races and religions.
It just seems that now we are managing to get some Islamic figures from brave Muslim women willing to put their head above the parapet, the levels of violence within Islam is much higher than those of other beliefs.

It's not Islamophobia, it's Islamic facts - at least those we are getting reported in recent times.




Staleek -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 8:41:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Staleek


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

Probably not Peon because an awful lot of Islamic women don't report it because it is expected of them to accept such behaviour as 'normal'.
Western women, on the other hand, have accepted that it is not acceptable and are increasingly reporting such incidents.



So, like any other conspiracy theorist, you'll actually manufacture theories to fit with your warped world-view when the actual data doesn't support it.

Just like Greta, this is an extremely religious mindset.

Not exactly, because I'm not religious or even spiritual.

We see it reported increasingly among Islamic support groups where some women are managing to find a voice.

Wikislam has some figures about Islamic violence against women.
About half-way down the page it says -
In summation, we find in the Hadiths:

Muhammad provided tacit approval of wife beating by not scolding Muslims for beating their wives
Muhammad referred to women who spoke-out against abuse as "not the best among you"
Muhammad forbid Muslims from questioning men who beat their wives
Muhammad allowed others to hit his wives (the very women whom all Muslims adore and refer to as "the Mother of believers")
Three of the four Rightly-Guided Caliphs beat women
Muhammad reaffirms the command of wife-beating in his parting sermon
Muhammad himself struck his wife in the chest

It is clear from all of the above that wife-beating has been an accepted part of Islam since its inception. Muhammad was not against domestic violence and indeed permitted wife-beating in Islam.


It goes on to give figures from various Islamic countries and the majority of reported violence to the women are way up there in percentage terms.
Headlines such as -
Nearly 90 percent of Afghan women suffer from domestic abuse.
Statistics in Iran show that 66% of Iranian women, at the beginning of the marriage have been at least physically abused once
91% of university students polled by the Jordanian Human Right Center approve of wife beating. An earlier study by another organization found out that a majority of WOMEN also supports the right of a husband to beat the wife
A study published in June 2006 in the Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, based on interviews with 300 women admitted to hospital for childbirth, said 80 percent reported being subjected to some kind of abuse within marriage.
One in three wives in Qatar suffer physical or psychological violence from the side of their husband.
London-based Refugee Workers Association Woman’s Group (GIK-DER) revealed disturbing news last week [in November, 2006] that up to 80% Turkish and Kurdish women are victims of domestic violence and sexual harassment. At the same time 70% of Turkish and Kurdish husbands cheat on their wives.
41.9 percent of Turkish women are subjected to physical and sexual violence.
Violence against women in the home is the main emergency needed to be tackled by the Mediterranean's southern shores. The phenomenon affects between 40% and 75% of married women, who suffer mainly at the hands of their husbands.




You quoted "Wikiislam"

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/WikiIslam

You quoted a site which is specifically intended to keep you misinformed and foolish.

And you keep on avoiding the point about women in Islamic nations being leaders, politicians, lawyers, scientists, doctors, engineers, etc. You can keep avoiding the facts, but you can't claim credibility by doing so.




Aylee -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 8:50:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Sorry freedomdwarf, when you start asserting that wife beating is a "a fundamental point of the religion", drummed into kids from an early age, universally across Islam, surely even you can recognise that you have gone over the top.

Most Muslims ignore those passages you highlight just as most Christians ignore the Biblical injunctions of murder rape genocide etc.

This is something about religious people I dont get.. people have to "ignore" certain (horrific) parts of the Bible (Quran, etc) but yet they blindly believe the rest??? does that actually make any sense to anyone? cuz it doesnt to me..


Ignore as in we don't follow those rules anymore. G*d doesn't say to go kill all the men and take the women as wives kind of thing.

The Western world had the Reformation and the Enlightenment. The Islamic world has not had this.

So yes, atrocities are there in the Bible. But they happened a longtime ago. Nobody gets to claim they heard the voice of G*d and so going out and committing them is okay-dokey.




tj444 -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 9:08:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Sorry freedomdwarf, when you start asserting that wife beating is a "a fundamental point of the religion", drummed into kids from an early age, universally across Islam, surely even you can recognise that you have gone over the top.

Most Muslims ignore those passages you highlight just as most Christians ignore the Biblical injunctions of murder rape genocide etc.

This is something about religious people I dont get.. people have to "ignore" certain (horrific) parts of the Bible (Quran, etc) but yet they blindly believe the rest??? does that actually make any sense to anyone? cuz it doesnt to me..


Ignore as in we don't follow those rules anymore. G*d doesn't say to go kill all the men and take the women as wives kind of thing.

The Western world had the Reformation and the Enlightenment. The Islamic world has not had this.

So yes, atrocities are there in the Bible. But they happened a longtime ago. Nobody gets to claim they heard the voice of G*d and so going out and committing them is okay-dokey.

yeah, I know all that.. but why believe in a book (& it's God) that said that shite in the first place? I dont care if your religion has "reformed" and "enlightened".. I dont give a crap if God exists or not, he is not a God I would ever follow (assuming he actually exists).. According to what I was taught as a child, you have to believe in God to go to Heaven.. its not about being a good person which imo is what it should be about, its about worshipping some egotistical narcissist God.. Thanks but no thanks! Even as a 10 year old kid I knew that to believe that crap was wrong and stupid.. oh and never mind all the crimes and pain those pedo priests caused.. even today they are still protecting their own..




BamaD -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 9:12:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: Staleek

That says more about the people watching than it does about anything else.

It says that Islam defenders like you teach us to respect Islamic religion, so we cannot interfere when they are simply practicing their teachings. Why would we? That would be disrespectful to their religion. Right? You mean you want to walk up and tell them what they are doing is wrong, despite it being permissible in their religion? It would be like criticizing them for not eating pork.
Make up your mind whether you are pro-Islam or anti-Islam.

I'm anti-Islam, so I have no problem telling a muslim man who is beating his woman that his religion is shit and tell the woman to leave Islam! I'd tell her that her Allah approve of this, so she needs to leave.

I bet you all the people who did nothing, are pro-Islam. Defenders of Islam. That's why none of them did anything.

End of the day, as political correct as some of you want to be. I wonder how many deep in your hearts would think an Islamic runned country is utopia and it's a country you'd love to live in because it's such a beautiful religion of peace.

I just find it totally ridiculous. At least I am honest about it. I don't support anything that I will fear living under the rule of.




I would not take religion into consideration I would simply explain to him that he should stop. I am certain that if you explained it to him properly he would quit.




BamaD -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 9:15:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

The problem is tweak, within most christian religions, all those nasty bits are generally skipped over when kids are being taught about the religion.
So while they are indeed present, most just skim over them even if they are avid bible readers.

For those that follow Islam, these behavioural absurdities (to us) are focused upon as being a fundamental point of the religion.


So if one were to look at the statistics of e.g. wife-battering in Britain, say, one could expect to see that as rife amongst Muslims?

No because Islamic women are taught that it is the husbands right and would be unlikely to report it.




Aylee -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 9:18:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Sorry freedomdwarf, when you start asserting that wife beating is a "a fundamental point of the religion", drummed into kids from an early age, universally across Islam, surely even you can recognise that you have gone over the top.

Most Muslims ignore those passages you highlight just as most Christians ignore the Biblical injunctions of murder rape genocide etc.

This is something about religious people I dont get.. people have to "ignore" certain (horrific) parts of the Bible (Quran, etc) but yet they blindly believe the rest??? does that actually make any sense to anyone? cuz it doesnt to me..


Ignore as in we don't follow those rules anymore. G*d doesn't say to go kill all the men and take the women as wives kind of thing.

The Western world had the Reformation and the Enlightenment. The Islamic world has not had this.

So yes, atrocities are there in the Bible. But they happened a longtime ago. Nobody gets to claim they heard the voice of G*d and so going out and committing them is okay-dokey.

yeah, I know all that.. but why believe in a book (& it's God) that said that shite in the first place? I dont care if your religion has "reformed" and "enlightened".. I dont give a crap if God exists or not, he is not a God I would ever follow (assuming he actually exists).. According to what I was taught as a child, you have to believe in God to go to Heaven.. its not about being a good person which imo is what it should be about, its about worshipping some egotistical narcissist God.. Thanks but no thanks! Even as a 10 year old kid I knew that to believe that crap was wrong and stupid.. oh and never mind all the crimes and pain those pedo priests caused.. even today they are still protecting their own..



The short answer is that it is about believing and having faith in something greater than yourself.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 9:19:35 AM)

I do agree, it does tend to be an Anti-Islam styled site.
Unfortunately, as much as you feel it misinforms, I am finding it fits what I see and witness right here where I live.

From Wiki: Domestic violence is considered by many to be a problem in Muslim-majority cultures, but because women hide their bruises and don't report domestic abuse to authorities, the incidence in many Muslim-majority countries is uncertain, but believed to be great by Muslim feminists. According to Pamela K. Taylor, co-founder of Muslims for Progressive Values, such violence is not part of the religion, but rather more of a cultural aspect.
For Islamic followers, and particularly those living in Islamic run countries, Islam is the law.
If it was commonly thought that violence against women was wrong, their laws would reflect that; but it doesn't.

If you didn't like the figures from wikislam, Wiki itself states: Afghanistan has one of the highest incidence rates of domestic violence in the world. Domestic violence is so common that 85 per cent of women admit to experiencing it. 60% of all women report being victims of multiple forms of serial violence.
It also states: A 2011 report claims 80% of women in Pakistan suffer from domestic abuse.
Wikislam said 90%. Wiki says 85%. Not a significant difference of opinion.




LadyConstanze -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 9:23:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
I'm anti-Islam, so I have no problem telling a muslim man who is beating his woman that his religion is shit and tell the woman to leave Islam! I'd tell her that her Allah approve of this, so she needs to leave.

You might want to read this Greta.

Allah does not approve of anyone leaving Islam except on pain of death.
The Qur'an commands your death for leaving Islam (4:89 calls for the murder of renegades from the faith), and Muhammad is explicit in a hadith: "If anyone changes his religion, kill him" (Bukhari).



Seriously, I found the Qur'an no more blood thirsty than the bible, OT and NT, there are some quotes from Jesus that are just as bad. Why the hell have this damned stupid Islamophobia and feed into it, when Christianity has done pretty much the same? I'm actually just as worried about extremist Christians as I am about extremist Muslims. In fact I find them so alike that they scare the shit out of me, both tend to try to take away women's rights, both are fucked up about same sex relations and all that crap.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 9:55:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze
Seriously, I found the Qur'an no more blood thirsty than the bible, OT and NT, there are some quotes from Jesus that are just as bad. Why the hell have this damned stupid Islamophobia and feed into it, when Christianity has done pretty much the same? I'm actually just as worried about extremist Christians as I am about extremist Muslims. In fact I find them so alike that they scare the shit out of me, both tend to try to take away women's rights, both are fucked up about same sex relations and all that crap.

Because, the essential difference is in the way the religious text is taught to our youngsters.

From the Sunday Schools of my youth, to the RE being taught in mainstream schools today, most christian teachings skip over the bad bits that our modern society has deemed as unacceptable behaviour.

Madrassas and other Islamic schools teach the Qur'an and most certainly do focus on the men's responsibility in controlling womenfolk.
Even as recent as 4 days ago, there are a number of UK schools either being closed or about to be closed because of restrictive Islamic teachings.
From the BBC: Inspectors also found books described as inappropriate, with texts including "misogynistic, homophobic and anti-Semitic material". While most of the places visited by Ofsted so far have been in Muslim communities, inspectors may also turn their attention to similar unregistered tuition centres operated by other groups.
There are also some 'unregistered' schools that Ofsted says it found "a narrow Islam-focused curriculum in the latest schools it investigated."

ETA: It's not the content of the holy books so much as what aspects are taught from them.




Staleek -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 9:58:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

I do agree, it does tend to be an Anti-Islam styled site.
Unfortunately, as much as you feel it misinforms, I am finding it fits what I see and witness right here where I live.

From Wiki: Domestic violence is considered by many to be a problem in Muslim-majority cultures, but because women hide their bruises and don't report domestic abuse to authorities, the incidence in many Muslim-majority countries is uncertain, but believed to be great by Muslim feminists. According to Pamela K. Taylor, co-founder of Muslims for Progressive Values, such violence is not part of the religion, but rather more of a cultural aspect.
For Islamic followers, and particularly those living in Islamic run countries, Islam is the law.
If it was commonly thought that violence against women was wrong, their laws would reflect that; but it doesn't.

If you didn't like the figures from wikislam, Wiki itself states: Afghanistan has one of the highest incidence rates of domestic violence in the world. Domestic violence is so common that 85 per cent of women admit to experiencing it. 60% of all women report being victims of multiple forms of serial violence.
It also states: A 2011 report claims 80% of women in Pakistan suffer from domestic abuse.
Wikislam said 90%. Wiki says 85%. Not a significant difference of opinion.



Wikiislam implies that all of Islam has this level of domestic violence against women. Wikipedia mentions two nations, both of which have culturally oppressed women whether they've been influenced by Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, or Soviet control. The difference between the two sources is staggering. Wikiislam is speaking of 1.8 billion people, Wikipedia is talking about maybe 200 million.

Why do you hate Islam so much you have to actually manufacture bullshit to hurl at it? If the silent majority of Islamic people have no quarrel with you why do you still have to fight with them? This is how ideological then military conflicts start.




tj444 -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 10:12:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

The short answer is that it is about believing and having faith in something greater than yourself.

Yes, I know that is what people tell themselves.. but what if God doesnt exist? then there is no "something greater than yourself".. I think religion (all of them) were created before laws really existed so religion was a way to keep people in line, and too, to give them, especially the poor with no prospects for a better life, a (false) sense of hope and the mirage of a light at the end of the tunnel.. Imo, people should rely on themselves instead.. God aint gonna help you or save you.. he has let multi-millions suffer and die for no reason.. its all BS.. the biggest con job in history..




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 10:23:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Staleek
Why do you hate Islam so much you have to actually manufacture bullshit to hurl at it? If the silent majority of Islamic people have no quarrel with you why do you still have to fight with them? This is how ideological then military conflicts start.

I don't manufacture it.

I can say that of all the Islamic folk that I have come into contact with (and bearing in mind I have, and still do, live among them), most of them I am finding their behaviour towards women as deplorable and completely unacceptable.
I am not finding that among those who are not Islamic.
Almost a quarter of the noble city of Peterborough (north-west quadrant) where I used to live is predominantly (almost exclusively) Islamic.
Even among those that I befriended, I hated the way the women were treated in most aspects of their lives.
The menfolk thought the christian ways and our law were utterly wrong in regard to affording women equal rights and having a say.
Sure, there are some Islamic women who have made great strides; but these are minuscule by comparison.
To my mind, Islam (in general) is homophobic, mysoginistic, and anti-women.

If that makes me an Islamophobe, then so be it.
I strongly believe in equal rights and decent treatment for all women.
Islam doesn't treat it's women favourably and to me, that is horribly wrong and inexcusable.





LadyConstanze -> RE: Would people defend Hijab wearing women being beaten in public? (12/15/2015 11:22:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

If you want to deny the truth about what we see happening every day - that's your choice.

I'm quite happy to speak out against it and see it for what it is.




I never see it happening, so my truth might differ a lot from your truth. However when I walk the dogs in the evening along the canals, I tend to stop for a quick warm up in a pub on the way, well, I never see drunk Muslims in there but I see a lot of guys getting absolutely plastered at rather early hours and if the gf or wife comes in to fetch them, some of them are quite rowdy, disrespectful and tell them to eff off or else they get it when they're at home. So should I conclude from this is the truth and it is happening every day, and English guys are all wife beaters? There is a segment of people everywhere that will be abusive towards women, to claim that Muslims do it regularly and the women put up with it and it doesn't happen with Brits is BS.

Seriously, we stopped the car TWICE in the last year when we saw a guy getting a bit rowdy with a woman and interfered and brought her home, offered the women to bring them to the police, they wouldn't, they made excuses for their drunk spouses, again, never a Muslim, all fine upstanding Englishmen.... I don't go around and claim all English are wife beaters and abusers and the women just take it...




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625