Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/27/2016 7:08:10 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
You want pussy? You dance to the pussy tune. Period.
That's pretty much the philosophy of weak men whose lack of mastery with women means they have no idea what they're fucking talking about.

One of the ironic commonalities between women is their desire to believe they're unique and special. The truth of course is that they're not. Women respond to the same things and most share the same biological fundamentals which cause them to do so. There are exceptions but they're not statistically significant enough to care about.

Healthy sane women with self-esteem are drawn to strong men with options. Period. Men who lead, men who don't need them, men who don't give a fuck what they think. All other men are toys to them. And if you think that dancing to their tune will get you laid, then you're very much a toy.

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 141
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/27/2016 10:21:18 AM   
cindyluvNY


Posts: 26
Joined: 9/29/2015
Status: offline
@respectmen

If you believe that ALL women "date up" then wouldn't ALL homely looking women be with handsome men? Wouldn't ALL heavy set women be with athletic men? Wouldn't ALL poor women be with wealthy men?

Just look around you. I rarely see this. It seems to me most people connect with other people on their same level.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 142
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/27/2016 7:32:27 PM   
crumpets


Posts: 1614
Joined: 11/5/2014
From: South Bay (SF & Silicon Valley)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cindyluvNY

@respectmen

If you believe that ALL women "date up" then wouldn't ALL homely looking women be with handsome men? Wouldn't ALL heavy set women be with athletic men? Wouldn't ALL poor women be with wealthy men?

Just look around you. I rarely see this. It seems to me most people connect with other people on their same level.


It seems you are assuming a certain criteria for UP whereas the poster who proposed that theory expressly stated that UP is different for each person.

For example, Afton Elaine "Star" Burton, who is in her twenties, is just dying to marry the octogenarian Charles Manson, where, I'm sure, she considers that feat a move "up" in some way, shape, or form (not the least of which are book and other royalties).

(in reply to cindyluvNY)
Profile   Post #: 143
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/27/2016 10:02:54 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

I'm sorry, but this is just sticking in my craw.

quote:

ORIGINAL: dreamlady

DS posted he's had more than his lifetime quota (fair share) of pussy getting thrown his way in so many words, not uncommon with musicians and groupies. Turns out, a carousel of easily obtained casual sex wasn't enough for him, he wanted more out of life and from his intimate partnerships.

DreamLady



I didn't say that "in so many words". I know it seems unimportant, but with the amount of people that like to twist my words, around here, I'd rather clear this up.

What I said was:

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Many times I have said that because of my past, if I never get laid again, I've had my fair share and that's true. It's also what keeps me from "dancing to the pussy tune" as you so eloquently put it. Have I spent a lot of time in my life without a romantic partner? Sure, but the partnerships I have had since I adopted this stance have been much more satisfying.




The reason I feel it's important to clear up is that I used the term "getting laid" which trivializes an act . "having pussy thrown at me" (not my words) trivializes a part of the female body and thereby, a female.

I know it's kind of "distinction-without-difference" territory, but again, there are people that would love to believe a mis-quote.

Thank you, in advance, for your understanding.



Michael



_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to dreamlady)
Profile   Post #: 144
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/27/2016 11:15:52 PM   
dreamlady


Posts: 737
Joined: 9/13/2007
From: Western MD
Status: offline
My bad, for not quoting you verbatim. I was also thinking of musicians I've known and it isn't always getting laid (i.e. pussy) that they get offered in term of sexual acts. Usually it's the lead singer who gets the lion's share. Correct me if I'm mistaken, but isn't it the drummer who typically has to scramble for crumbs (the leftovers -- speaking of trivializations ).

DreamLady

_____________________________

Love is born with the pleasure of looking at each other, it is fed with the necessity of seeing each other, it is concluded with the impossibility of separation. ~José Marti

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 145
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/27/2016 11:39:47 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dreamlady

My bad, for not quoting you verbatim. I was also thinking of musicians I've known and it isn't always getting laid (i.e. pussy) that they get offered in term of sexual acts. Usually it's the lead singer who gets the lion's share. Correct me if I'm mistaken, but isn't it the drummer who typically has to scramble for crumbs (the leftovers -- speaking of trivializations ).

DreamLady



What an interesting side-track!

Your question deserves its own thread (although I'm not sure where would be appropriate). The short answer is that I can only speak for myself (and maybe my band mates) and I "crossed some lines". Due to certain circumstances, in the band in which I spent the most time (and had the most success), I was a lead singing bass player.

That said, I want to be VERY CLEAR, here: I am NOT proud about what I am about to type. Nor am I "boasting": When I say "I've had more than my fair share", I am willing to bet a dollar to a doughnut (and I'm also not a gambler) that I have had more partners than 80% of the men on the planet.

I can say this (briefly): there seemed (to me) to be different kinds of ladies that were attracted to the different kinds of members of the band. It seemed (to me) that personality sync-up even applied to casual sex/attraction situations.

With my background/interest in Psychology, there's a whole plethora of sub-subjects there. Where's a good place for such a thread (if there is any, here)?



Michael


< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 2/27/2016 11:44:10 PM >


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to dreamlady)
Profile   Post #: 146
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/27/2016 11:59:44 PM   
pleasnpetrichor


Posts: 72
Joined: 1/13/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
I have looked at the topic at quite an in-depth level.
I honestly and sincerely don't believe that men get a hard time with what very few disadvantages we suffer compared to the majority of women in the world.


In that case, I think saying so would have made a far better post than "dance to the pussy tune".

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
Nick was a well-known troll long before I joined the forums and has always bleated ad-nauseum about a tiny handful of things that he believes men suffer as an injustice.
He never considers things from a woman's PoV.


There are plenty of posters here who consistently fail to consider things from a man's point of view. Does that make them trolls? And who decides? Did you conclude he was a troll from independent observation, or did you simply and unthinkingly adopt the view of the majority of other posters?

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
And he's been consistently beating this particular drum ever since I've been here.

It's always the same old tired broken record every time.
Nothing new; always the same old shit every time.
After a few years you really get miffed at seeing it at every turn of the scroller.
He doesn't let up.
He never speaks on other subjects - always this one and only topic.


If you're all indeed so tired of hearing, it's pretty amazing that so many continue to respond to him.

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
A sniveling, whining, piss-poor excuse of a man that has this brow-beaten myopic attitude that makes a really bad impression of men in general.


I've been gone a while. Tell me, has the TOS around here changed dramatically with regard to "personal attacks"?

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
Life isn't perfect. We all know that.
But really?? This incessant bleating on one minuscule subject is tiring.


No offense, but some people's incessant complaining about him is far from fascinating.

_____________________________

aka gungadin09
aka metamorfosis

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 147
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/28/2016 12:09:03 AM   
pleasnpetrichor


Posts: 72
Joined: 1/13/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

"Why is the left obsessed by the Daily Mail?"



Because it's crap.


Peon, I keep hearing you tell others which sources are legit and which aren't. I'm not sure you're the arbiter of that.


_____________________________

aka gungadin09
aka metamorfosis

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 148
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/28/2016 12:46:38 AM   
Dvr22999874


Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline
I think you are being very kind to the Daily Mail peon. It surprises me the it is still in existence and it is my opinion that it has to be one of the lowest papers in existence in the U.K........................worse than the N.O.T.W. ever aspired to be

(in reply to pleasnpetrichor)
Profile   Post #: 149
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/28/2016 1:10:35 AM   
angelikaJ


Posts: 8641
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline
Hi there, did I miss something?
You said that women are complaining and inferred that it was related to not meeting local guys.

I have not read many women complaining about how hard it is to meet people.
You see, women here ofter have the opposite issue especially when they are new.
They can get hundreds of messages in a day; over a thousand in a week.

So the issue really isn't about women.
The issue is why don't women want to meet you.

And given the very negative angle in the majority of your posts that continually complain about women, I do not find it puzzling as to why you are not appealing to some of them.

If you want to click with women, then you have to work on being more than just one dimensional.

Put aside the fact that you identify as a D-type and the hard-earned body for a minute and think about the rest of you.
What do you bring to a relationship (apart from the whole personal trainer gig)?

For a woman to want to meet with you for 20 minutes, you have to be appealing to that woman.
If all we have to go on is your posts here, I would guess that you won't appeal to the majority of women here.



_____________________________

The original home of the caffeinated psychotic hair pixies.
(as deemed by He who owns me)

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3234821/tm.htm

30 fluffy points!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQjuCQd01sg

(in reply to MuscleBoundDom)
Profile   Post #: 150
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/28/2016 4:59:16 AM   
pleasnpetrichor


Posts: 72
Joined: 1/13/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

We could debate all night about who gets the shorter end of that stick.

Nope. People do


I know I said so, but what I really think is this: folks judge because we are not all created equal. Not in looks, intelligence, character, social power, aptitude, or a hundred other things that matter. Being discriminating is an evolutionary strategy. And people who are superior have good reason to want to preserve the distinction.

_____________________________

aka gungadin09
aka metamorfosis

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 151
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/28/2016 7:49:24 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

I've been gone a while. Tell me, has the TOS around here changed dramatically with regard to "personal attacks"?


Pam..welcome back
Yes youve been gone for a while, and while the TOS hasnt changed, enforcing the rules has.
We have been without effective moderation and rules for some time.
Just been thru a month or so (longer) of millions of socks appearing, a tiny group making multiple accounts and idiotic threads.
The board has been up and down and the mood is dark.
Personal attacks are mostly ignored, unless multiple reports hit.
I know they are trying...but theres a lot to fix.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to pleasnpetrichor)
Profile   Post #: 152
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/28/2016 8:16:21 AM   
pleasnpetrichor


Posts: 72
Joined: 1/13/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

I've been gone a while. Tell me, has the TOS around here changed dramatically with regard to "personal attacks"?


Pam..welcome back
Yes youve been gone for a while, and while the TOS hasnt changed, enforcing the rules has.
We have been without effective moderation and rules for some time.
Just been thru a month or so (longer) of millions of socks appearing, a tiny group making multiple accounts and idiotic threads.
The board has been up and down and the mood is dark.
Personal attacks are mostly ignored, unless multiple reports hit.
I know they are trying...but theres a lot to fix.


Thanks!

That's cool. I was on Twitter for a while, and I've gotten used to lax moderation.

_____________________________

aka gungadin09
aka metamorfosis

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 153
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/29/2016 8:58:17 AM   
crumpets


Posts: 1614
Joined: 11/5/2014
From: South Bay (SF & Silicon Valley)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ
So the issue really isn't about women.
The issue is why don't women want to meet you.


I don't normally do the +1 thing, but I must agree wholeheartedly with angelikaJ that women aren't complaining what the OP infers.

Women do complain aplenty about men; but it's never what the OP infers.
In fact, they have the polar opposite problem from what the OP infers.

On the other hand, the OP has the same problem that most men (yours truly included) have, which is that we think like men do.
And it turns out, because of that, we think women think like men think.

Nothing is further from the truth.

At the risk of opening up a huge can of worms, the OP might actually be better off being gay, by the way, since the OP, with a moniker of "muscle bound anything" (apparently) thinks his body counts for something with women in the first assessment.

While a woman's body counts for men in the first, second, third, fifth, tenth, and infinite assessment (with the odd openings in that series reserved for other merits), a man's body counts for nothing in the first assessment, and only well after the tenth assessment does the man's body even begin to play a role in a woman's decision-making process of whether or not to meet up with him for that apocryphal 20-minute meeting.

Having said all that, and knowing it will most likely fall on deaf ears, my suggestion to the OP gym rat is to find another gym unicorn who is into kink.


(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 154
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/29/2016 4:15:45 PM   
Wayward5oul


Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: crumpets
While a woman's body counts for men in the first, second, third, fifth, tenth, and infinite assessment (with the odd openings in that series reserved for other merits), a man's body counts for nothing in the first assessment, and only well after the tenth assessment does the man's body even begin to play a role in a woman's decision-making process of whether or not to meet up with him for that apocryphal 20-minute meeting.


That is far from true.

While women, in general, do place less importance on physical shape than men, I think its fair to say that women who don't take it into account at all in the first assessment would still be the exception rather than the norm.

And as far as saying that women don't factor it in until well after the tenth assessment? Where did you get that craptoid? From your "research" conducted under your numerous fake profiles on this site?

Oh wait, those are profiles where you pose as a woman to talk to men...

(in reply to crumpets)
Profile   Post #: 155
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/29/2016 6:15:08 PM   
BlueRoses1111


Posts: 48
Joined: 5/3/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

I am not talking about "all women". No, not ALL women only want the top 1 percent but surely on every personals website, there isn't a shortage of women who do fall in that category. There are also plenty of women who fall close to it. 100s of men aren't good enough for them while they are just the woman next door.



Women date 'up'. Though what a woman considers 'up' depends on what she personally values.

'Up' has a different definition for a bohemian-communist-artist type, than for a lawyer-career-woman, than for a Biblical-literalist-Bible-belt woman, than for an outdoor-sporty-survivalist-training woman, than for a geeky-gamer-tech-obsessed woman, than for a model-money-and-status-obsessed-trophy-wife-type woman, because they all value different things.
For some women 'up' means dating the biggest, baddest, most heinous, serial killer they can find, even while he's serving out a life sentence. However, if that's what attracts her, she's not going to settle for some petty thief, she's going to want the top 1% of 'bad boys'.
If you're not that, she's never going to be interested, even if you're objectively (sanely) a much better catch than a serial killer serving out multiple life sentences.

All women look for a man who has higher social standing than they do, in the things they value the most. What they value the most will differ from woman to woman, but all women will want the top 1% of men, in the category of things they value the most.

If you're consistently hitting the issue of finding women who deem you 'not good enough' and who seem to be aiming for the 1% of men in a category you cannot attain, you're looking for women who value precisely those things you are not.
You'll never be able to convince them that you're 'good enough' because you are not who they are looking for.

Once you accept that, and start dating/looking for women who are looking for the things you are good at, you'll find women easily, because you will be in that top 1% of men those women are looking for.

If you're not good at anything, and there isn't a single category in which you excel, you ought to ask yourself why you're going through life not valuing anything enough to be more than mediocre in it.

Why are you being so shallow as to expect women to be interested in you for things you are not, instead of finding a woman who is interested in the things that you are?

Men also like to date 'up' btw. It's just that with men 'up' usually has little to do with social class, economic class, or esoteric value systems (which are the things women fall for) and more to do with looks, and how caring/appreciative/nurturing/loving/sexual she is.



quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

Look at it this way, one would think that the people who demand most out of the opposite gender, should be the ones under more judgement on what they have to offer compared to the ones that are expecting less. I think that is perfectly reasonable and logical.



Apparently your logic doesn't hold up in the real world. Because most women have no problem finding partners, and apparently you do.

Women are being judged by men, just as much as men are being judged by women. If that wasn't the case, men would settle for marrying/dating any woman at all, instead of having preferences for some women, and not for others.

Apparently a lot of men are judging the women you are attracted to to be acceptable, and fitting of their definition of 'up', and so those women have a lot of choices. Apparently you're a small fish, in a big pond, with a lot of competition that's better than you. Maybe you should change ponds...
Maybe the women you aim for just have more to offer in the category of things men are interested in, than you have to offer in the category of things those women are interested in.
Maybe you should actually evaluate what you have to offer to a woman, and find women who value those things.
Maybe you should actually evaluate what the women you are attracted to want in a man, and figure out why you're not those things, or why you consistently fall for women who value things you are not interested in excelling in.



quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

But what I see, its usually men who are expecting less out of the opposite gender and yet being under the most scrutiny with who they are and what they have to offer compared to a woman who claims she has rejected 100s of men.



A woman who has rejected 100s of men has 100s of men interested in her to begin with. As such, she can afford to be selective, because she has a lot of options available to her, and can afford to pick the one that suits her the best.
If she only has very very few men interested in her, she couldn't afford to reject 100s, because doing so would leave her lonely.

If you had 100s of women interested in you, you would be equally selective, because you could afford all those who you didn't like as much, to find the one who suited you most.

Apparently you have a lot of sour grapes about the fact that the women you are attracted to are in high demand, and have 100s of suitors already, with you being at the bottom on the scale of things those women are attracted to.

Maybe you should look for different women, with different values, who are looking for the things you are, instead of women who are looking for the things you are not.





And the award for best and honest post goes to....

There was just so much win in your post, I had to quote the entire thing!

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 156
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 2/29/2016 11:28:54 PM   
Andalusite


Posts: 2492
Joined: 1/25/2009
Status: offline
Crumpets, I generally agree that the OP is really mistaken about what women complain about, and that we aren't trying. I disagree that the physical stuff doesn't matter at all - as Wayward said, looks are generally less important to women than men, but there are definitely some men who I wouldn't be willing to consider dating based on looks.

CindyLuv, I agree with Crumpets that respectmen and Ishtar did say that women generally want to date up, but I agree with Crumpets that Ishtar said that what "up" means is very individual. There's not a set population that is "up" for everyone, and people have different priorities.

Ishtar, while I do agree with you generally on the priority issue, I disagree that women always want men in the top 1% or who are more of x trait than they have themselves. A lot of women have their priorities change over time, with more experience and different circumstances. Personally, I want to date a man who is able to be friendly and sociable without a lot of handholding, who my friends like, and who is an interesting conversationalist. My new sweetie is more introverted than I am, I'm more of a social butterfly, but all of my friends who've met him think he's great, he can talk with them and with me, etc. Likewise, I love that he is so protective and possessive toward me, but I wouldn't want that exaggerated to the point of being jealous or stalkerish or something, which seems to go hand in hand with extreme levels in that area. I don't even really know which of us would "win" in some areas, we both feel we win!

(in reply to BlueRoses1111)
Profile   Post #: 157
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 3/1/2016 12:18:43 AM   
crumpets


Posts: 1614
Joined: 11/5/2014
From: South Bay (SF & Silicon Valley)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Andalusite
Crumpets, I generally agree that the OP is really mistaken about what women complain about, and that we aren't trying. I disagree that the physical stuff doesn't matter at all - as Wayward said, looks are generally less important to women than men, but there are definitely some men who I wouldn't be willing to consider dating based on looks.


Fair enough.

(in reply to Andalusite)
Profile   Post #: 158
RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining - 3/1/2016 3:05:11 AM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MuscleBoundDom

I don't understand why a woman won't meet a local man, say at a coffee shop, just to see if they "click." It just takes 20 minutes out of her schedule. She could probably meet 10 men in one week. Surely, out of the 10 men, there would be one she would "click" with. Yet, most women don't meet any men and then they complain that they can't find anyone. That's just crazy.

Now if a woman said, "I met 10 different men last week at a coffee shop and I didn't "click" with any of them" then that would be a different story.

However, most women meet ZERO men and complain that they can't meet anyone.

Don't you agree?




Nope I don't, because most women look at what a man writes, when it's obvious that they wouldn't be well matched for various reason (him complaining in epic detail about dating fails could be one of them, hint hint) why meet up?



_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to MuscleBoundDom)
Profile   Post #: 159
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Women Aren't Trying So They Are Complaining Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109