pleasnpetrichor
Posts: 72
Joined: 1/13/2016 Status: offline
|
Sorry. I fucked up the coloring, and lack the patience to go back and fix it. quote:
ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr So ... here's the thing with the thing: In the world, but, especially here; If I call you a bitch, would there be a ton of women (and a few hangers-on men) who would ride to the rescue and flambé me? What if you called me a "bastard" or a "son of a bitch" (which is actually a slight to my mother)? I have been called worse names than that by entitled females on this site. So, who would get the worst of it? True 'dat, and not just for this site or just kink sites. That reminds me of a story, but I suppose I'll save it for later, as I'm not sure it's really on topic for this thread. What if I didn't have a job/means of support? What about if you didn't? Can't go against you on that one, either. Now, you made a point about women being judged differently than men. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that you're talking about aesthetics? Do you seriously think women don't judge men that way, also? No, of course not. I do think it's fair to say women are judged more than men on their appearance. Just as it's fair to say that men are judged more than women on their earning power. Saying so doesn't imply that men aren't judged at all on their looks or that women aren't judged at all on their earning power. Or, borrowing from your example, if I didn't have a job I'm sure I would still be judged for it, although I believe that you would be judged more harshly because of your gender. It's the same with looks. I know some of my female friends have been talking to me and said: "That guy looks like he hasn't seen a gym in a decade, but that's okay. he's sweet!" It happens all the time (actually, most of my female friends are a little less shallow than most or they wouldn't be my friends). However, just like the other side of the gender aisle, there are certain amounts of trade-offs. Then I'm not sure we're even in disagreement. A "trade off" was also what I was talking about. I have never dated an ugly lady (but back in my old band days, there were a few ... err ... guests backstage that were borderline), but I have dated ladies that weren't as aesthetically pleasing as models in the best magazine advertisements. Why? Because models, by-and-large, are self-absorbed airheads with whom I can't be bothered. See? Trade-off. By the same token, a woman might refuse to date a millionaire she found him arrogant. I never said that because I think appearance is one of the predominate factors women are judged by, or because earning power is one of the predominate factors men are judged by, that they aren't both also judged according to other standards as well. In other words, of course you don't want the beautiful girl who's also a self absorbed airhead. I can tell you this: in direct dichotomy to my aforementioned lady friends, I've never heard a guy say: "Wow! Look at that ugly gal in purple, at the bar! I'm not leaving until I get her number!" I have, however, seen my friends (male and female) say: "I'm looking for something a bit more solid and a bit less superficial." Women and men, judged by different criteria? Hardly. men just tend to be a bit more uncouth about how they go about making their decision-making process known. I guess I disagree. Individuals can be rather more superficial or less, but that doesn't change the fact that men and women are (on average at least) judged differently. Michael
< Message edited by pleasnpetrichor -- 2/23/2016 2:32:23 PM >
_____________________________
aka gungadin09 aka metamorfosis
|